What information do you speak of? That video of Bush saying he was not concerned about Bin Laden? I've seen that a hundred times already. All you liberals are programmed to post that as if it really meant anything. In the meantime, I posted a video of Leon Panetta dancing around the question of torture. As we know, DumBama never used torture, so apparently he was saying information about Bin laden was gathered by our agents while Bush was President.<quoted text>
If what you say is even close to being true, then Bush had a magic crystal ball. Too bad he didn't look at it when it came to the 800,000 jobs that were being lost a month when he was in.
Also, you are a liar. Here's how much Bush went after Bin Laden...
At least Clinton shot missiles at him. Bush did nothing.
Wonder how long it's going to take you guys to figure out that this is the age of easily accessed information? Your documented history is all over the internet and only the bleary eyed Lawrence Welk fans that make up your base are going to fall for the cheap lies that got the GOP by for decades before.
Okay, so did all the terrorists attacks stop with the death of Bin Laden? What about this Arab Sprung going on now? Can all our solders come home and we can continue with our life before 911? That's what Bush was talking about. The death of Bin Laden is meaningless looking at the entire picture. Bush was more concerned about the thousands of Jihad clowns than he was focusing all his energy on one person. Bin Laden is dead, and somebody else will just take his place. His death only gave Americans some satisfaction. I don't discredit Obama, but lets face it, this hunt for Bin Laden didn't start with him.