Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel

[HughBe]

Eric wrote:

<quoted text>
You are correct. There are over 7 billion better than Hugh.

Indeed, the subtleties of the language have escaped you, dear Eric.

[Eric]

HughBe wrote:

<quoted text>
Indeed, the subtleties of the language have escaped you, dear Eric.

No, just not letting go right now.

[HughBe]

Frijoles wrote:

<quoted text>
Dont make us bail you out, and I doubt Eric has time for pro-bono defense work these days since it is almost tax time.

good morning, dear.

[HughBe]

Eric wrote:

<quoted text>
No, just not letting go right now.

HughBe --Indeed, the subtleties of the language have escaped you, dear Eric.

Eric---No, just not letting go right now.

Hugh--- I knew that you understood. I have observed that you are acquiring wisdom as is demonstrated by your CLEAVING to me and my words.

[Frijoles]

HughBe wrote:

<quoted text>

Joel---Being born homosexual is simply one of the many modes of sexual function.
Hugh--- I suppose being born with an attraction to dogs, goats and other animals are also "many modes of sexual function"

false equivalence

...approx 10-20% of society is gay

...less than 1% is beastial / zoophiliac though...
"The Kinsey reports rated the percentage of people who had sexual interaction with animals at some point in their lives as 8% for men and 3.6% for women, and claimed it was 40–50% in people living near farms,[6] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoophilia

Am I correct that you live near a farm?

[JOEL]

HughBe wrote:

<quoted text>

to?

Your horny boyfriend.

[JOEL]

Humans who're sexually attracted to animals or to inanimate objects are not abnormal but the tendency indicates a lack of evolution in the sexual attraction department that ought to have taken place from the bestial and inanimate level to the human grade (man-woman, man-man, woman-woman). That's all.

[JOEL]

QUESTION:

Is there a gradation in consciousness or in energy or in both? Why?

[JOEL]

HughBe wrote:

<quoted text>

Joel---Technologies like cloning or invitro have made man-woman relationships for procreation redundant.

Hugh--- same for animals.

No.

The animal grade of consciousness is not developed enough to devise technological methods like invitro and cloning.

Animals by themselves are intellectually inferior.

Animals have been fertilized invitro or cloned by human scientists.

[HughBe]

Frijoles wrote:

<quoted text>
false equivalence
...approx 10-20% of society is gay
...less than 1% is beastial / zoophiliac though...
"The Kinsey reports rated the percentage of people who had sexual interaction with animals at some point in their lives as 8% for men and 3.6% for women, and claimed it was 40–50% in people living near farms,[6] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoophilia
Am I correct that you live near a farm?

Joel---Being born homosexual is simply one of the many modes of sexual function.

Hugh--- I suppose being born with an attraction to dogs, goats and other animals are also "many modes of sexual function"

Frijoles---false equivalence

HughBe--- Are you saying that sex with animals is not "ONE of the many modes of sexual function"?

Explain your position against the background that "less than 1% is beastial". Does not the 1% account for the ONE?

Frijoles---...approx 10-20% of society is gay

HughBe--- In the US it could be 99%. Do the survey and you will discover that even two year olds there have GAY desires.

[JOEL]

HughBe wrote:

<quoted text>

Joel---Not that gay instincts are unnatural.

HughBe--- YOU know better. When you were 3 or very young your pencil became HARD in response to a WOMAN.

Yeah, so what?

I'd not have been disturbed had I been sexually attracted to males since it's evident that the genes for sexual proclivity has three or so broad aspects - man to woman, man to man and woman to woman.

Stop judging modes of human behavior using the narrow and ignorant perspectives found in Tanakh and NT.

Oh, these are silly books - Tanakh and NT - were written by stupid men who were instruments of some petty being who they called G-d or God.

Knowledge proceeds from the particular to the general.

The knowledge of the Hebrew patriarchs and Jesus on the particulars or the generals in all departments - material and transcendental - is all wrong and fit for blood thirsty and brain-dead barbarians.

Stop being inspired by scriptural rot.

The true laws of nature and being are very different and are not what is contained in scripture....in fact, science is nearer to the truth of the psycho-material laws than these stupid prophets.

[Jim]

Can someone help answer this question?

http://www.academicroom.com/discussions/how-d...

[HughBe]

JOEL wrote:

<quoted text>
No.
The animal grade of consciousness is not developed enough to devise technological methods like invitro and cloning.
Animals by themselves are intellectually inferior.
Animals have been fertilized invitro or cloned by human scientists.

Joel---Technologies like cloning or invitro have made man-woman relationships for procreation redundant.

Hugh--- same for animals.

Joel--No.

HughBe--- really?

Joel--The animal grade of consciousness is not developed enough to devise technological methods like invitro and cloning.
Animals by themselves are intellectually inferior.

HughBe--- Inferiority does not change the fact that "Technologies like cloning or invitro have made (male-female) relationships for procreation redundant"

[JOEL]

Hugh, get off your high horse. Like Abraham, Moses, Jesus, Rama and Muhammad, you're an idiot and an ignorant creature in all respects.

[HughBe]

JOEL wrote:

<quoted text>
Yeah, so what?
I'd not have been disturbed had I been sexually attracted to males since it's evident that the genes for sexual proclivity has three or so broad aspects - man to woman, man to man and woman to woman.
Stop judging modes of human behavior using the narrow and ignorant perspectives found in Tanakh and NT.
Oh, these are silly books - Tanakh and NT - were written by stupid men who were instruments of some petty being who they called G-d or God.
Knowledge proceeds from the particular to the general.
The knowledge of the Hebrew patriarchs and Jesus on the particulars or the generals in all departments - material and transcendental - is all wrong and fit for blood thirsty and brain-dead barbarians.
Stop being inspired by scriptural rot.
The true laws of nature and being are very different and are not what is contained in scripture....in fact, science is nearer to the truth of the psycho-material laws than these stupid prophets.

Joel---Not that gay instincts are unnatural.

HughBe--- YOU know better. When you were 3 or very young your pencil became HARD in response to a WOMAN.

Joel---Yeah, so what?

HughBe--- YOU were born NORMAL but perversion entered and has corrupted even your mind.

[JOEL]

HughBe wrote:

<quoted text>

Joel---Being born homosexual is simply one of the many modes of sexual function.

Hugh--- I suppose being born with an attraction to dogs, goats and other animals are also "many modes of sexual function"

Humans who're sexually attracted to animals or to inanimate objects are not abnormal but the tendency indicates a lack of evolution in the sexual attraction department that ought to have taken place from the bestial and inanimate level to the human grade (man-woman, man-man, woman-woman). That's all.

[HughBe]

JOEL wrote:

Hugh, get off your high horse. Like Abraham, Moses, Jesus, Rama and Muhammad, you're an idiot and an ignorant creature in all respects.

Joel---Hugh, get off your high horse

Hugh---My suggestion to you dear is, get out of your low ass.

Got to go. see you later. Do not cry.

[JOEL]

HughBe wrote:

<quoted text>

Hugh--- there is nothing like the PUSSYcat so how on earth could I sink so low as you are suggesting. I would have to be suffering from acute mental issues i.e. being F...ing MAD.

Hey, look here, sexual attraction does not depend so much on good looks or on the figure but it invariably depends on vital attraction - if the vital energies of a person can excite your own vital energies then you're sexually attracted to the person who may or may not be of the opposite sex.

During the sexual act, intimate exchange of vital and physical energies takes place and in this way an entanglement of sorts in terms of energies occurs between the partners that is retained even after the act is done with and even when the parteners are away from each other on job, vacation or elsewhere.

Having several sexual partners can add too many such entanglements in one's force fields and in this way one constantly feels a pull towards sex since so many force connections have been forged with the multiple partners and this kind of addiction can be damaging to the brain and nervous system and exacts a toll on the psychological, emotional and physical health of the person. This is the reason why chastity and fidelity have been recommened (not that those stupid prophets of the Tanakh, NT and Quran knew the reasons that I've outlined in this post. For them it was just something moral and had nothing to do with force fields etc).

[JOEL]

HughBe wrote:

<quoted text>

Hugh - My suggestion to you dear is, get out of your low ass.

Shut up, fool.

I am not Frijoles, Eric or MUQ, who'll bypass the main arguments for lack of deep and meaningful insights into the causal mechanisms of the various forces and phenomena. Or, they may agree with you and concur on certain points with the lowly teachings of stupid scriptures like Tanakh, NT or Quran, as the case may be.

If you enter into a serious debate with me, you're up against a very different person who has the capacity to blow all your silly arguments and your inflated ego to bits and in the process your heros from the Tanakh and NT will be shown as dumb fu-cks and their teachings aimed at retards and animals.

Get the hell out of here, assho-le.

[Frijoles]

JOEL wrote:

<quoted text>
Shut up, fool.
I am not Frijoles, Eric or MUQ, who'll bypass the main arguments for lack of deep and meaningful insights into the causal mechanisms of the various forces and phenomena. Or, they may agree with you and concur on certain points with the lowly teachings of stupid scriptures like Tanakh, NT or Quran, as the case may be.
If you enter into a serious debate with me, you're up against a very different person who has the capacity to blow all your silly arguments and your inflated ego to bits and in the process your heros from the Tanakh and NT will be shown as dumb fu-cks and their teachings aimed at retards and animals.
Get the hell out of here, assho-le.

Equanimity