Barack Obama, our next President

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ... Full Story

“Stop Child Soliders”

Since: Apr 14

Location hidden

#1108913 Apr 2, 2014
Homer wrote:
<quoted text>
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
No mention about buying elections.
Our founding fathers would be appalled by their decision.
Every time we have on of theses Freedom of Speech issues-the Dems come out swinging about it.

Why do you think people should be limited to giving money to 17 candidates only. That sounds silly to me

“Stop Child Soliders”

Since: Apr 14

Location hidden

#1108914 Apr 2, 2014
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
In the House just 16 of 203 Democratic members voted yes. In the Senate, however, 11 of 48 Democrats voted for the new Bush entitlement. First, let’s just stop right there. Could you imagine 16 and 11 Republicans ever voting for an Obama legislative priority, something that was clearly Obama’s “baby” in the same way that the Part D bill was Bush’s? There’d be no end to the slobbering over Republicans for being so reasonable. As I recall, the Democrats were attacked at the time for not supporting the bill enough.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/10...
more unpopular....
Obama says Medicare Part D was less popular than Obamacare when it first passed
Polling data shows that a lower percentage of people favored Part D in 2004 than favor Obamacare in 2013.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/state...
The bill passed with wide support of BOTH Dems and Reps

Obamacare was passed by Dems only

Since: Mar 14

Orlando, FL

#1108915 Apr 2, 2014
When interviewed on "60 Minutes" on September 12, 2012, and asked about how a protest could have involved the kinds of weapons used in the attack, Obama said these words, "This is not a situation that was exactly the same as what happened in Egypt...and....my suspicion is there are folks involved in this who were looking to target Americans from the start."

Two days later, Jay Carney told the press, "This was not in response to United States policy, not to obviously the administration, not to the American people...it was in response to a video."

"Looking to target Americans from the start" is NOT a spontaneous protest.

Wake up people. You're missing the entire movie.

Since: Aug 13

Location hidden

#1108916 Apr 2, 2014
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
In the House just 16 of 203 Democratic members voted yes. In the Senate, however, 11 of 48 Democrats voted for the new Bush entitlement. First, let’s just stop right there. Could you imagine 16 and 11 Republicans ever voting for an Obama legislative priority, something that was clearly Obama’s “baby” in the same way that the Part D bill was Bush’s? There’d be no end to the slobbering over Republicans for being so reasonable. As I recall, the Democrats were attacked at the time for not supporting the bill enough.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/10...
more unpopular....
Obama says Medicare Part D was less popular than Obamacare when it first passed
Polling data shows that a lower percentage of people favored Part D in 2004 than favor Obamacare in 2013.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/state...
Part D is not a Mandate.

If you didn't like it, don't sign up for it

Why don't you Democrats do the same for Obamacare?

“Stop Child Soliders”

Since: Apr 14

Location hidden

#1108917 Apr 2, 2014
The Dems don’t object to wealthy donors or even unlimited contributions from wealthy donors. They object to GOP donors and GOP dissent.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#1108918 Apr 2, 2014
Homer wrote:
<quoted text>
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
No mention about buying elections.
Our founding fathers would be appalled by their decision.
you can't buy an elelction unless the people who vote are selling their votes to whomever puts out the most TV commercials...

it is not that elections are being bought, it is that they are being sold by a complacent, uneducated electorate. solve the problem, don't treat the symptom.

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#1108919 Apr 2, 2014
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>I looked at the Constitution. Your part seems to be missing.
What Constitution are you looking at?
You're a moran, Ghostie!!!

Since: Mar 14

Orlando, FL

#1108920 Apr 2, 2014
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
are you still whining about Mitt losing the election?
Either the president was telling the truth when he admitted the day after the attack that there were "folks involved in this who were looking to target Americans from the start" or Carney was perpetrating the lie that had just begun about a spontaneous protest because of a video which Obama continued for two weeks afterwards.

Can't be both.

Like I told dem, snap out of it.

“Stop Child Soliders”

Since: Apr 14

Location hidden

#1108921 Apr 2, 2014
Listening to the silliness from the Dems on Twitter, you would think Soros and other big money Dem donors run small Mom and Pop stores
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#1108922 Apr 2, 2014
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
all well and good when you consider there are no death panels and the government isn't trying to take over our healthcare.
substandard mandatory insurance like ObamaKKKare that denies access to the better doctors and hospitals in a death panel, Bangladesh-style.....

“It's always darkest 'fore dawn”

Since: Jul 08

When's dawn?

#1108923 Apr 2, 2014
RoxLo wrote:
<quoted text>
Every time we have on of theses Freedom of Speech issues-the Dems come out swinging about it.
Why do you think people should be limited to giving money to 17 candidates only. That sounds silly to me
"theses"??? Really? Come on now, rockslow, you really out to get to bed before you get to arguing about seventeen candidates. How about how much your can give? How about Adelson getting a private audience and deciding he wanted to buy none of them.
Grey Ghost

Berryville, VA

#1108924 Apr 2, 2014
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
if a college student wants to preach in an open, outdoor area of a campus, what is the problem????.....
would you have banned protests against the Vietnam War???....
or protests against anti-abortion laws???...
Y
You are an Idiot Galt. You prove it daily.

“It's always darkest 'fore dawn”

Since: Jul 08

When's dawn?

#1108925 Apr 2, 2014
flack wrote:
<quoted text> You're a moran, Ghostie!!!
That's not Ghost...now who's the moran?
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#1108926 Apr 2, 2014
Lily Boca Raton FL wrote:
<quoted text>
She changed her name again. Was gone for awhile; maybe she was in the hospital.
Didn't she used to be jasonjay?
who killed Jean from Queens, your fellow NYC Bocajew????....

Jean is either dead or masquerading as USAsince, given that a nasty old biddy like Jean would never go away voluntarily.....
Grey Ghost

Berryville, VA

#1108927 Apr 2, 2014
flack wrote:
<quoted text> You're a moran, Ghostie!!!
WRONG, Ghost wants all to know who he is..Oh well, What's one more paranoid chimp. You have to be one of the most twofaced hypocrites on here, and you prove that daily.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#1108928 Apr 2, 2014
RoxLo wrote:
Listening to the silliness from the Dems on Twitter, you would think Soros and other big money Dem donors run small Mom and Pop stores
the fact taht you ae getting your information from twitter shows what a fool you are, and explains a lot about why you are so misinformed about so much in this world.
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#1108929 Apr 2, 2014
RoxLo wrote:
<quoted text>
The bill passed with wide support of BOTH Dems and Reps
Obamacare was passed by Dems only
16 of 203 is wide support?

what you must be thinking of is how dems reacted after it was passed. they did all they could to help Part D survive seeing as how it was going to help people.

though as we can see, republicans care not about helping people unless it's buying them votes.

Recall the situation in 2003. The Bush administration was already projecting the largest deficit in American history–$475 billion in fiscal year 2004, according to the July 2003 mid-session budget review. But a big election was coming up that Bush and his party were desperately fearful of losing. So they decided to win it by buying the votes of America’s seniors by giving them an expensive new program to pay for their prescription drugs.

http://www.forbes.com/2009/11/19/republican-b...
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#1108930 Apr 2, 2014
flack wrote:
<quoted text> She changed her name because demwit started posting under her name. Why do you support these juvenile delinquent lowlife posters? Oh never mind, I forgot, you're a libtard. That is the make up of your party base!!!!
lol! Funny. Never bothered you people when you did it!
Eleanor Beaver

East Hartford, CT

#1108931 Apr 2, 2014
leosnana wrote:
<quoted text>"theses"??? Really? Come on now, rockslow, you really out to get to bed before you get to arguing about seventeen candidates. How about how much your can give? How about Adelson getting a private audience and deciding he wanted to buy none of them.
Uh...¨you really out to get to bed¨???

Um...¨How about how much your can give?¨

Really, lame ninny?
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#1108932 Apr 2, 2014
Incognito4Ever wrote:
<quoted text>
Either the president was telling the truth when he admitted the day after the attack that there were "folks involved in this who were looking to target Americans from the start" or Carney was perpetrating the lie that had just begun about a spontaneous protest because of a video which Obama continued for two weeks afterwards.
Can't be both.
Like I told dem, snap out of it.
me snap out of it?

so what will change if the FOX wish is fulfilled?

nothing.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Wethersfield Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 29 min James 68,492
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 44 min Patriot AKA Bozo 46,679
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 1 hr Eric 69,387
The 25 Most Dangerous Cities in the U.S. Are Mo... (Nov '10) 2 hr Jimbo 19,213
Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision (Jan '08) 4 hr cpeter1313 305,647
State child agency pulling wards from Durham sc... (May '07) Wed Jaslin Martinez 41
CT Who do you support for Governor in Connecticut ... (Oct '10) Tue Tippy Faulker 792
•••
•••
•••

Wethersfield Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Wethersfield People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Wethersfield News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Wethersfield
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••