Barack Obama, our next President

Full story: Hampton Roads Daily Press

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...
Comments
947,061 - 947,080 of 1,096,422 Comments Last updated 7 min ago
Realtime

Deltona, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1030315
Nov 25, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

2

LCNLin wrote:
<quoted text>
photoshop ?
It's not even Obama's mother__someone else completely__the entire thing is a smear created by some right wing loon.

Lonely mofo's of lower IQ easily fall for that sort of nonsense!

Secrets__no one like secrets more than the morons do.
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1030316
Nov 25, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

Whatever wrote:
<quoted text>
So true it takes several administrations to build up trust and one vain administration to destroy it all.
trust is not a 22% popularity rating at the end of your term.

but if bagger logic says that it somehow is.....what does Obama have to worry about?

“My Life Is A Shell Game”

Since: May 07

Lapeer, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1030317
Nov 25, 2013
 

Judged:

5

4

4

Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>lol! So THAT'S how you catch your jollies!
no....that's how your wife gets you to stand at attention; a Taser to the crotch.

BTW, keeping a car battery in the bedroom is against National Fire Safety Regulations.
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1030318
Nov 25, 2013
 

Judged:

5

4

4

Naah wrote:
<quoted text>lol! The whole nation (except for Obamadolts like you) are crying rivers over the insanity of Obama's Unaffordable ObamaSCARE Act, daughter. lol!
lol! As usual, another reich winger who claims to speak for the majority of Americans.

I love this comedy channel!

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1030319
Nov 25, 2013
 

Judged:

4

4

4

ByREBECCA KAPLAN CBS NEWS November 25, 2013, 6: 00 AM
As issues loom in D.C., Obama heads west to raise cash

With Congress home for the Thanksgiving recess, President Obama has the political spotlight largely to himself for the next three days.

He's spending the next two on the West Coast with Democratic Party fundraisers and a few policy remarks. Behind the agenda, though, lurk major issues back in Washington, including the looming end-of-November deadline the president gave his team for fixing HealthCare.gov , and a nuclear deal with Iran that has angered allies including Israel and many members of Congress.

Mr. Obama raised money for the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) in Seattle Sunday night at two separate events. The first event for the DNC raised $20,000 per person attending and $32,000 per couple and be held at the home of Sonya and Tom Campion, co-founder of the clothing chain Zumiez. The second event, for the DCCC, was at the home of former Microsoft Executive Jon Shirley. Attendees had to pay $16,200 per person or $32,400 per couple to attend.

Some of the money that Mr. Obama helps raise over the next several days will likely go to incumbents who have struggled to defend the Affordable Care Act in the wake of its rocky rollout.
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1030320
Nov 25, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

shinningelectr0n wrote:
<quoted text>
so when are they going to fix their problems?
After the Democrats get voted out with a vengeance this coming Fall.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHA....
Keep up the good work Mr. Morris.
Whatever

Gering, NE

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1030321
Nov 25, 2013
 

Judged:

4

4

4

Realtime wrote:
<quoted text>Nawaf Obaid is an underling and in no way speaks for the Saudi royals. For their part the royals don't like this deal either__strangely the Wahabbist Kuwait and Qatar love the deal as does Dubai/UAE.
Surprising you'd waste you time quoting Obaid, who's a fellow at Harvard and a regular on the various political "shows."
Do you think Kerry spoke for Obama during the deal making? Why would an ambassador counter his government?

Please provide sources as my search failed to link to any news articles confirming this.

Dubai/UAE counts on Iran for oil is an article that I found
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1030322
Nov 25, 2013
 

Judged:

5

4

4

Realtime wrote:
<quoted text>It's not even Obama's mother__someone else completely__the entire thing is a smear created by some right wing loon.
Lonely mofo's of lower IQ easily fall for that sort of nonsense!
Secrets__no one like secrets more than the morons do.
lol! I'm still waiting for those idiots to provide their source.

Obviously based on their assertions, they HAD to have seen and confirm it!

And yet, they're so quiet now... as if they LIED!
Naah

Palm Coast, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1030323
Nov 25, 2013
 

Judged:

4

4

4

Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>lol! As usual, another reich winger who claims to speak for the majority of Americans.
I love this comedy channel!
lol! You are another sickobama left winger who speaks for the now minority of Americans, daughter. lol!
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1030324
Nov 25, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

How Should Republicans Respond to the Iran Deal?

Jim Antle considers the effect that the deal with Iran will have on the foreign policy debate inside the GOP. He sees a political opportunity for hawks in the party:

The hawks’ op-eds and 2014 attack ads write themselves. Obama, John Kerry, and the mullahs are on one side, Israel and the GOP on the other.

It’s true that the op-eds and attack ads will write themselves, but is the public going to be particularly receptive to this message? Public opinion is on the side of a negotiated deal with Iran, and it seems unlikely that this is going to change if the interim deal leads to a more lasting agreement. Since Iran has made most of the concessions in the interim deal, and the deal includes all the restrictions that could realistically have been achieved, there is not much for hawks to criticize. There may not be much incentive for elected Republicans to endorse the deal right away, but there is also very little advantage in defining themselves as knee-jerk opponents of diplomacy. Republican hawks may seize on the Iran deal as a chance to lock the party into its dead-end attachment to confrontational and aggressive foreign policy, but if the party follows them it will be putting itself once again on the wrong side of public opinion and casting itself once again as a party in search of new wars to fight. Republicans should view the deal with Iran as an opportunity to change their party’s reputation. They can do this by giving diplomacy the chance to succeed, and by opposing when necessary those measures that could undermine future negotiations.

Conservatives should reject what Republican hawks are telling them on Iran, and they should do this mainly because their arguments make no sense. First, the goal of “zero enrichment” is a fantasy, so conservatives should ignore declarations that this is the only acceptable outcome. Iran is never going to agree to those terms. Iran isn’t going to be forced into accepting them, so additional sanctions serve no purpose except to inflict more pain on Iranian civilians. Increased pressure with the goal of toppling the government isn’t going to work. The regime perversely benefits from sanctions, because sanctions deflect blame from the government for the country’s economic problems and sabotage the opposition by impoverishing the middle class. Foreign governments are naturally blamed for the damage that the sanctions do, so giving Iranians more reasons to resent foreign powers certainly isn’t going to turn them against their own government. Finally,“preventive” war is nothing of the kind, since it will almost certainly increase Iran’s interest in acquiring nuclear weapons rather than discourage them.

http://www.theamericanconservative.com/lariso...
Whatever

Gering, NE

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1030325
Nov 25, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

3

Liberals want to ensure your Thanksgiving ends in fistfights: Obama urges folks to talk health care, Bloomberg wants you to talk gun control.
Whatever

Gering, NE

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1030326
Nov 25, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

2

sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
Poll: Most Americans Oppose Obamacare Repeal Despite Rollout Troubles
Despite sharp divisions over the long-term impact of President Obama's health-reform law, fewer than two in five Americans say it should be repealed, virtually unchanged since last summer, the latest United Technologies/National Journal Congressional Connection Poll has found.
Amid all the tumult over the law's troubled implementation, the survey found that public opinion about it largely follows familiar political tracks and has changed remarkably little since the summer on the critical question of what Congress should do next. On that measure, support for repeal has not significantly increased among any major group except Republicans and working-class whites since the Congressional Connection Poll last tested opinion on the question in July.
http://www.nationaljournal.com/congressional-...
Yeah, they want a re-write which would destroy large sections of it and

Only 7% wants it to stay as it is.
Buroc Millhouse Obama

Newington, CT

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1030327
Nov 25, 2013
 

Judged:

3

2

2

Whatever wrote:
Liberals want to ensure your Thanksgiving ends in fistfights: Obama urges folks to talk health care, Bloomberg wants you to talk gun control.
Liberals are complete idiots. Mental cases.
Buroc Millhouse Obama

Newington, CT

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1030328
Nov 25, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

2

sonicfilter wrote:
How Should Republicans Respond to the Iran Deal?
Jim Antle considers the effect that the deal with Iran will have on the foreign policy debate inside the GOP. He sees a political opportunity for hawks in the party:
The hawks’ op-eds and 2014 attack ads write themselves. Obama, John Kerry, and the mullahs are on one side, Israel and the GOP on the other.
It’s true that the op-eds and attack ads will write themselves, but is the public going to be particularly receptive to this message? Public opinion is on the side of a negotiated deal with Iran, and it seems unlikely that this is going to change if the interim deal leads to a more lasting agreement. Since Iran has made most of the concessions in the interim deal, and the deal includes all the restrictions that could realistically have been achieved, there is not much for hawks to criticize. There may not be much incentive for elected Republicans to endorse the deal right away, but there is also very little advantage in defining themselves as knee-jerk opponents of diplomacy. Republican hawks may seize on the Iran deal as a chance to lock the party into its dead-end attachment to confrontational and aggressive foreign policy, but if the party follows them it will be putting itself once again on the wrong side of public opinion and casting itself once again as a party in search of new wars to fight. Republicans should view the deal with Iran as an opportunity to change their party’s reputation. They can do this by giving diplomacy the chance to succeed, and by opposing when necessary those measures that could undermine future negotiations.
Conservatives should reject what Republican hawks are telling them on Iran, and they should do this mainly because their arguments make no sense. First, the goal of “zero enrichment” is a fantasy, so conservatives should ignore declarations that this is the only acceptable outcome. Iran is never going to agree to those terms. Iran isn’t going to be forced into accepting them, so additional sanctions serve no purpose except to inflict more pain on Iranian civilians. Increased pressure with the goal of toppling the government isn’t going to work. The regime perversely benefits from sanctions, because sanctions deflect blame from the government for the country’s economic problems and sabotage the opposition by impoverishing the middle class. Foreign governments are naturally blamed for the damage that the sanctions do, so giving Iranians more reasons to resent foreign powers certainly isn’t going to turn them against their own government. Finally,“preventive” war is nothing of the kind, since it will almost certainly increase Iran’s interest in acquiring nuclear weapons rather than discourage them.
http://www.theamericanconservative.com/lariso...
Hey Propaganda phag! You need to worry about the split in your Socialist Party on this.

Since: May 11

Chambersburg, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1030329
Nov 25, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

2

Buroc Millhouse Obama wrote:
<quoted text>
You are dumber that sh*t, DumbDave.
Show us the video of these thousands of people gasping for air, as if they were in the Night of the Living Dead.
You are such a lying weasel. A hyperbolic moron.
You Moonbats are frikkin unreal!
"Particle pollution from power plants is estimated to kill approximately 13,000 people a year.” American Lung Association.
Whatever

Gering, NE

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1030330
Nov 25, 2013
 

Judged:

3

2

2

More discussing news

Ohio AG: 4 people indicted on misdemeanor or felony charges related to impeding Steubenville rape investigation

Ohio indictments include Steubenville schools superintendent; an elementary school principal; coach; volunteer.

Coming over the wires, no article to link to yet
Realtime

Deltona, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1030331
Nov 25, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

Whatever wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you think Kerry spoke for Obama during the deal making? Why would an ambassador counter his government?
Please provide sources as my search failed to link to any news articles confirming this.
Dubai/UAE counts on Iran for oil is an article that I found
Learn how to search, I've no time to do your ilk's work.

Obaid is a counselor not an ambassador__at least not in the official sense.

And FYI P5+1=U.S.__Russia__China__U.K. __France plus Germany.

The agreement was hardly Obama's deal.
Whatever

Gering, NE

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1030332
Nov 25, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

2

Liberals celebrate ending sanctions on a nation that lynches gays, stones women and wants to exterminate Jews, but they boycott Chick-fil-A.

“My Life Is A Shell Game”

Since: May 07

Lapeer, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1030333
Nov 25, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

LCNLin wrote:
<quoted text>
" Oh...and get a life while you're at it, racist honey "-shinningelectr0n
Keep shooting blanks. You're out of ammunition so maybe making some noise will have to suffice..
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1030334
Nov 25, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Buroc Millhouse Obama wrote:
<quoted text>
Liberals are complete idiots. Mental cases.
lol! And yet, still superior to radical reich wingers!

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
•••

Wethersfield Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Wethersfield People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Wethersfield News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Wethersfield
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••