Barack Obama, our next President

Full story: Hampton Roads Daily Press

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...
Comments
937,541 - 937,560 of 1,078,994 Comments Last updated 9 min ago
Grampy

South Windsor, CT

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1020377
Nov 8, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

2

Will this new ban on Transexual Fatties stop Homer from posting on Topix?

“Too Ugly to Win”

Since: May 10

Old Hag Hillary

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1020378
Nov 8, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

PDUPONT wrote:
<quoted text>
"Coconut head" Carol? Just because he(or she) accurately pointed out that insurance companies have always cancelled policies for various reasons like when someone has the audacity to actually get sick. Pardon me if I'm not really sympathetic to those who decided to throw the dice and gamble with their family's health and financial stability with a junk policy that would actually cost them more than they saved with their cheap ass premiums. I'm more concerned about the 49 million who now qualify for insurance coverage under the affordable Care Act. The ones I really feel sorry for are the 30 million who will remain without coverage because GOP governors decided against Medicaid expansion in their states in a partisan snit.
Here's how the American people benefit from the ACA;
&#61607; Health insurance companies now have to spend at least 80 cents of each premium dollar on health care costs instead of profits, or give consumers a refund. In 2012, 8.5 million Americans received about $500 million in rebates.
&#61607; All insurance companies must now publicly justify any rate increase of 10 percent or more. So far, the rate review program has helped save Americans about $1 billion.
&#61607; Insurance companies can no longer drop coverage because a plan Some 129 million nonelderly Americans have preexisting conditions. Under the ACA, insurers can no longer deny coverage to children because they have a preexisting condition, including diabetes or asthma. Starting in 2014, health insurers will no longer be able to charge more or deny coverage to anyone because of a preexisting condition.
&#61607; Obamacare has allowed 3.1 million young adults who would otherwise have been uninsured to remain on their parents' health insurance plans until age 26.
&#61607; The ACA helps close the Medicare prescription drug "doughnut hole," the dollar limit on the drug costs the plan will cover each year.(The limit now is $2,970). Since 2010, over 6.6 million Americans with Medicare have saved over $7 billion on prescription drugs, or an average of $1,061 per person.
&#61607; Most insurance plans now have to cover preventive care for free. Beginning in 2014, Obamacare will require most health plans in the individual and small group markets to cover 10 essential health benefits, including hospitalization, prescription drugs, maternity and newborn care, and mental health and rehab services.
Who's the coconut head Carol? That would be you.
your cut and paste for O'bamaliarcare doesn't even cut and paste correctly.
Obama is a joke

Emmaus, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1020379
Nov 8, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
ObamaKare has nothing to do with health care. There is not one word in the ACA law that mandates specific health care services be provided, such as previous health care laws that mandated things like vaccinations, nor does it invoke any standards in accordance with any health care services must be provided. The ONLY specification defined in ObamaKare is, and I quote, "The Secretary will determine..." everything.
ObamaKare is solely a law applicable to insurance.
Let's see if you can follow this simple logic:
ObamaKare requires young healthy people to buy health insurance. Young healthy people can spend less money paying the Obama tax than it would cost to buy the health insurance. There is a directive to not collect the "tax". Young healthy people will only sign up for ObamaKare when they get sick. The end result will be only people consuming health care will be paying for health insurance. The government will have to subsidize the insurance companies, thus they will have to levy many other taxes to get this money needed to pay for ObamaKare.
It is obvious the government will have to pay the insurance companies to keep them out of bankruptcy because the young healthy "contributors" know they can sign up at any time and get in the system, and who's going to start giving their money away when they don't have to.
When the government pays for everything, the government controls everything.
ObamaKare isn't about health care. It's about health insurance and controlling the entire health care portion of the economy, as well as being the most effective tool known to coerce the population with.
There won't be enough health care assets to cover the mandated insurance. Since the government will control all health care, it will ration health care in accordance with a priority "The Secretary" establishes.
The Democrats have successfully transformed the United States from a limited government constitutional republic to a medieval Machiavellian totalitarian state.
I'm starting to wonder if obamacare was designed to fail so that the dems have something else that they need to "rescue" us from.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1020380
Nov 8, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

PDUPONT wrote:
<quoted text>
....&#61607; Health insurance companies now have to spend at least 80 cents of each premium dollar on health care costs instead of profits, or give consumers a refund. In 2012, 8.5 million Americans received about $500 million in rebates.
&#61607; All insurance companies must now publicly justify any rate increase of 10 percent or more. So far, the rate review program has helped save Americans about $1 billion.
....
Mandated "profit" means companies can't increase their profit margin regardless of how much more educated, informed, efficient and effective they are than any other company participating in the same part of the economy. This means Fred Sanford's insurance company will have the same profit margin as Adam Smith's insurance company.

Now, since it's obvious every insurance company participating in the exchanges will go bankrupt without subsidies from the government, that $0.20 of every "premium" dollar, which will include the subsidies paid by the government, is nothing more than a kickback from the government to the insurance companies to participate in the exchanges.
If an insurance company participates in the exchanges, it is guaranteed to receive subsidies, and it is guaranteed to have $0.20 of every dollar to support the lifestyle of a company living off the government.

Now, that's not too difficult to understand, is it?

Since: May 11

Landisburg, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1020381
Nov 8, 2013
 

Judged:

3

2

2

DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
The Constitution guarantees rights. The Constitution does not guarantee priviledges. You'd know that if you knew the difference between a right and a priviledge... and if you, and Obama for that matter, had ever read the Constitution in your life.
The ignorance of Democrats is continually evident. Here, you demonstrate your ignorance of the Constitution, and also that you are ignorant of the difference between a right and a priviledge.
You should probably shut up and listen for a while. You might become less ignorant if you do that.
So, its a privilege to get married?

Is it OK if Alabama declares blacks can't drive" Driving is a privilege.

Every day you keep proving just how GD dumb you are.

“Too Ugly to Win”

Since: May 10

Old Hag Hillary

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1020382
Nov 8, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
ObamaKare has nothing to do with health care. There is not one word in the ACA law that mandates specific health care services be provided, such as previous health care laws that mandated things like vaccinations, nor does it invoke any standards in accordance with any health care services must be provided. The ONLY specification defined in ObamaKare is, and I quote, "The Secretary will determine..." everything.
ObamaKare is solely a law applicable to insurance.
Let's see if you can follow this simple logic:
ObamaKare requires young healthy people to buy health insurance. Young healthy people can spend less money paying the Obama tax than it would cost to buy the health insurance. There is a directive to not collect the "tax". Young healthy people will only sign up for ObamaKare when they get sick. The end result will be only people consuming health care will be paying for health insurance. The government will have to subsidize the insurance companies, thus they will have to levy many other taxes to get this money needed to pay for ObamaKare.
It is obvious the government will have to pay the insurance companies to keep them out of bankruptcy because the young healthy "contributors" know they can sign up at any time and get in the system, and who's going to start giving their money away when they don't have to.
When the government pays for everything, the government controls everything.
ObamaKare isn't about health care. It's about health insurance and controlling the entire health care portion of the economy, as well as being the most effective tool known to coerce the population with.
There won't be enough health care assets to cover the mandated insurance. Since the government will control all health care, it will ration health care in accordance with a priority "The Secretary" establishes.
The Democrats have successfully transformed the United States from a limited government constitutional republic to a medieval Machiavellian totalitarian state.
these idiots some how think if they have insurance they are going to become healthy--I don't get it. They think the magic (bullet) pill paid for by insurance is going to save them. I am sick and tired of trying to explain to these morons that health does not equate to having a forced insurance policy.

“God bless you, Mr. President”

Since: Jul 08

Peaceful, prosperous second

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1020383
Nov 8, 2013
 

Judged:

4

3

3

Waxman wrote:
<quoted text>
"Tight budgets" was CBS, but it's obvious you have issues that go far beyond those of a normal person.
The mush in between your ears is all over the place.
Obviously, you are poor and made bad decisions in life and/or are not to gifted intellectually.
Do you live alone?
"not 'to' gifted intellectually??? Yep, that would be Waxturds...

Since: May 11

Landisburg, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1020384
Nov 8, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Give it up, idiot. You've been trying for months to find proof that subsidies to oil companies exist, and you haven't come up with squat. Subsidies to oil companies is an urban legend. They don't exist. There is no such thing as a subsidy to oil companies in the United States of America.
By the way, you're running away from this like the plague:
It is a felony for someone in one department or agency to transfer personal information of one American citizen to any other department or agency, moron. That is the written law.
Now, we have this fact:
Top Internal Revenue Service Obamacare official Sarah Hall Ingram discussed confidential taxpayer information with senior Obama White House officials, according to 2012 emails obtained by the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee. Lois Lerner, then head of the IRS Tax Exempt Organizations division, also received an email alongside White House officials that contained confidential information.
What this means is Sarah Hall Ingram committed a felony (and should be sent to prison for violation of that specific law). She included Lois Lerner and the White House in her violation of that law. Lois Lerner and the White House were complicit in that violation of that law. Therefore, Lois Lerner and whomever in the White House participated in this violation of that law should be sent to prison.
If you noticed, I referenced the law without referencing any political orientation, something you are not able to do.
So, since it's very obvious Sarah Hall Ingram and Lois Lerner and whomever was the recipient in the White House committed a felony, why should they not be sent to prison?
I posted this already.

It not not job to post the same information over & over because you are too f*cking stupid to get it the first time.

Did you get a job yet where you can carry your own weight, or are the tax payers still subsidizing your lazy ass.

“Too Ugly to Win”

Since: May 10

Old Hag Hillary

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1020385
Nov 8, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

Laney F wrote:
<quoted text>Libs are hypocrites. They just can't be helped. Another example:
'On Monday, Secretary of State John Kerry met with Saudi King Abdullah to try and warm relations between the two countries.“A true relationship between friends is based on sincerity, candor and frankness,” said Prince Saudi al-Faisal, the Saudi foreign minister, after the meeting.
But Kerry certainly wasn’t frank about Saudi Arabia’s brutal treatment of women; according to The New York Times,“Wary of inflaming Saudi sensitivities, Mr. Kerry sidestepped a reporter’s question about whether Saudi women should be allowed to drive, casting the debate as one ‘best left to Saudi Arabia.’”
The Obama administration has shown no such shyness with regard to ISRAEL:
In 2011, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton launched into a diatribe against segregated buses in religious communities for women and men, despite the fact that those buses exist only in ultra-religious communities.
She also ripped into religious male soldiers leaving concerts at which women sang (there are some interpretations of Jewish law requiring that men not hear women sing).
Clinton compared Israel to Iran and the pre-civil rights movement South.
LECTURING A DEMOCRACY LIKE ISRAEL IS LIBERALISM.
LECTURING A SEXIST MONARCHY LIKE SAUDI ARABIA IS IMPERIALISM,
ACCORDING TO THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION.
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2013/11/05...
Pakistan is selling nuclear weapons to Saudi Arabia because the Saudis do not trust O'bama.
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1020386
Nov 8, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

fetch almighty wrote:
<quoted text>less than 2% of the population is homosexual, and yet they want everyone in their bedrooms. The democrat controlled senate had nothing better to do than vote to pass a law to give homosexuals special treatment today--too bad... once again, the democrats are not worried about J O B S.
So now the jobs report is good.

So.... how are you going to swing your opinion pendulum now son?

I love this comedy channel!
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1020387
Nov 8, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

Ray Donovan wrote:
<quoted text>
And left wingers keep lying.
Doesn't it bother you that Obama had to lie in order to pass the ACA? Signature legislation through deceit?
(Now watch me get the standard "But Bush..." reply)
Why does it bother you only when the president doesn't have an (R) next to his name?
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1020388
Nov 8, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

Jesse wrote:
<quoted text>
Listen shit for brains the congress and president dictate what regulations and policies affect business which DIRECTLY contributes positively or negatively for job growth!
Anyone bring a crayon and coloring book for our friend from the island?
Ok.... so today you're saying the good jobs report can be attributed to the president and his policies?

C'mon son... let's hear you say that so you can prove you don't have shit for brains!

I love this comedy channel.

“God bless you, Mr. President”

Since: Jul 08

Peaceful, prosperous second

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1020389
Nov 8, 2013
 

Judged:

3

2

2

Grampy wrote:
Will this new ban on Transexual Fatties stop Homer from posting on Topix?
It didn't stop you, did it? Sitting there in your "wife's" nightgown, you just eat another piece of pie and light up again.
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1020390
Nov 8, 2013
 

Judged:

3

2

2

LoisLane59 wrote:
And just one more thought...
Does anyone else think Obama now rues the day he won a second term?
I kinda think he thought he'd be outta there when his signature legislation kicked in and did the damage it was intended to do but it would be somebody else's problem.
But maybe not.
Night.
"I miss being pampered" - George Bush
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1020391
Nov 8, 2013
 

Judged:

3

2

2

martinezjosei wrote:
Obama is "sorry"!
Every time a Democrat comes up with new way to control us, they end up being "sorry".
Why?
Because they are CLUELESS on simple basic economics. Their blind desire to control us blinds their common sense.
Yes, he is sorry and we are sorry he is in charge! Yes, they are sorry a.s.s.es!
Yep. bushie boy will never apologize for iraq son.

And he was willing to kill to prove that point!

Since: Jun 13

Orlando, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1020392
Nov 8, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

4

PDUPONT wrote:
<quoted text>
No Carol we're not ignoring the obvious. Your side says that we should raise the retirement age and cut benefits while our side has a simpler solution; raise or eliminate the income cap on which Social Security is paid.
Romney and other conservatives proposed perfectly viable and doable solutions - better than what we have now that would sustain the program for future generations.

Your side just doesn't want to listen.

Why is that?
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1020393
Nov 8, 2013
 

Judged:

3

2

2

Buroc Millhouse Obama wrote:
<quoted text>
None of what all three of you are blabbing about is scientific. At least Carol is stating one example that actually happened, whereas you two spineless needy liberals are just speculating and drinking your Kool-Aid.
Nothing government gets involved in works better or ends up costing less, that much we know.
Why you think Obamacare is going to be so great, just shows hat little zombies you on the left are.
So true.

After all, the military isn't up for a bidding contract, right?
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1020394
Nov 8, 2013
 

Judged:

3

2

2

DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Would you be talking about the John McCain that co-authored the obviously unconstitutional Line Item Veto legislation in 1996, and went to Syria for a photo op with Al Qaeda about a week after they slaughtered a Christian village, and said US Armed Forces should be fighting shoulder to shoulder alongside Al Qaeda?
Is that the same John McCain you're talking about?
Panama, on United States territory, both parents being born in the United States. John McCain didn't have to create an obviously fraudulent birth certificate, moron. John McCain didn't need a foreign passport to enter the United States, and then use it to travel to a country on the US State Department's No Travel List. And, it's very easy to find a whole slew of people who met John McCain at the Naval Academy.
Would you like to compare John McCain to anyone?
John McCain obviously is not a constitutionalist, moron. I've known that since he co-authored the Line Item Veto bill. You'd know that, too, if you knew anything at all about what happens here.
It didn't surprise me one bit when he exposed himself as a RINO. I've known that since 1996. YOu would, too, if you weren't the most ignorant dupe here.
lol! Technically son, he wouldn't have been able to run for president if he was born 18 months earlier.

But I'm sure the law really doesn't bother you unless you see a benefit for yourself!
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1020395
Nov 8, 2013
 

Judged:

3

2

2

DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Like I say to the television when one of those ghosts-are-real shows is on, show me the ghost.
Show me the subsidies to oil companies. You still haven't been able to show anything but politicians using the words "oil subsidies". It's easy to find proof of subsidies to, say, farmers. For some reason, you can't find one shred of evidence those mythical subsidies to oil companies exist.
That's because there is no evidence for something that doesn't exist. Subsidies to oil companies is an urban legend. There is no such thing as a subsidy to oil companies in the United States.
Show me the subsidies to oil companies.
lol! So! You talk to your television!

Ok.... that explains a lot about your psychological condition!

Since: May 11

Landisburg, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1020396
Nov 8, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Prove it. Answer the question. Who's paying that subsidy so crackwhores can get free health insurance and be equal to everyone who works their whole life to have it?
Who's paying that subsidy, clown?


I thought your wife would be on your policy?

Since obviously you are too stupid to look it up online, here is a link:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/...

Now, who is paying your subsidy???? Every tax payer.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
•••
•••

Wethersfield Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Wethersfield People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Wethersfield News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Wethersfield
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••