Barack Obama, our next President

There are 20 comments on the Nov 5, 2008, Hampton Roads Daily Press story titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#1020394 Nov 8, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Would you be talking about the John McCain that co-authored the obviously unconstitutional Line Item Veto legislation in 1996, and went to Syria for a photo op with Al Qaeda about a week after they slaughtered a Christian village, and said US Armed Forces should be fighting shoulder to shoulder alongside Al Qaeda?
Is that the same John McCain you're talking about?
Panama, on United States territory, both parents being born in the United States. John McCain didn't have to create an obviously fraudulent birth certificate, moron. John McCain didn't need a foreign passport to enter the United States, and then use it to travel to a country on the US State Department's No Travel List. And, it's very easy to find a whole slew of people who met John McCain at the Naval Academy.
Would you like to compare John McCain to anyone?
John McCain obviously is not a constitutionalist, moron. I've known that since he co-authored the Line Item Veto bill. You'd know that, too, if you knew anything at all about what happens here.
It didn't surprise me one bit when he exposed himself as a RINO. I've known that since 1996. YOu would, too, if you weren't the most ignorant dupe here.
lol! Technically son, he wouldn't have been able to run for president if he was born 18 months earlier.

But I'm sure the law really doesn't bother you unless you see a benefit for yourself!
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#1020395 Nov 8, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Like I say to the television when one of those ghosts-are-real shows is on, show me the ghost.
Show me the subsidies to oil companies. You still haven't been able to show anything but politicians using the words "oil subsidies". It's easy to find proof of subsidies to, say, farmers. For some reason, you can't find one shred of evidence those mythical subsidies to oil companies exist.
That's because there is no evidence for something that doesn't exist. Subsidies to oil companies is an urban legend. There is no such thing as a subsidy to oil companies in the United States.
Show me the subsidies to oil companies.
lol! So! You talk to your television!

Ok.... that explains a lot about your psychological condition!

Since: May 11

Chambersburg, PA

#1020396 Nov 8, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Prove it. Answer the question. Who's paying that subsidy so crackwhores can get free health insurance and be equal to everyone who works their whole life to have it?
Who's paying that subsidy, clown?


I thought your wife would be on your policy?

Since obviously you are too stupid to look it up online, here is a link:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/...

Now, who is paying your subsidy???? Every tax payer.

Since: Jun 13

Orlando, FL

#1020397 Nov 8, 2013
PDUPONT wrote:
<quoted text>
"Coconut head" Carol? Just because he(or she) accurately pointed out that insurance companies have always cancelled policies for various reasons like when someone has the audacity to actually get sick. Pardon me if I'm not really sympathetic to those who decided to throw the dice and gamble with their family's health and financial stability with a junk policy that would actually cost them more than they saved with their cheap ass premiums. I'm more concerned about the 49 million who now qualify for insurance coverage under the affordable Care Act. The ones I really feel sorry for are the 30 million who will remain without coverage because GOP governors decided against Medicaid expansion in their states in a partisan snit.
Here's how the American people benefit from the ACA;
&#61607; Health insurance companies now have to spend at least 80 cents of each premium dollar on health care costs instead of profits, or give consumers a refund. In 2012, 8.5 million Americans received about $500 million in rebates.
&#61607; All insurance companies must now publicly justify any rate increase of 10 percent or more. So far, the rate review program has helped save Americans about $1 billion.
&#61607; Insurance companies can no longer drop coverage because a plan Some 129 million nonelderly Americans have preexisting conditions. Under the ACA, insurers can no longer deny coverage to children because they have a preexisting condition, including diabetes or asthma. Starting in 2014, health insurers will no longer be able to charge more or deny coverage to anyone because of a preexisting condition.
&#61607; Obamacare has allowed 3.1 million young adults who would otherwise have been uninsured to remain on their parents' health insurance plans until age 26.
&#61607; The ACA helps close the Medicare prescription drug "doughnut hole," the dollar limit on the drug costs the plan will cover each year.(The limit now is $2,970). Since 2010, over 6.6 million Americans with Medicare have saved over $7 billion on prescription drugs, or an average of $1,061 per person.
&#61607; Most insurance plans now have to cover preventive care for free. Beginning in 2014, Obamacare will require most health plans in the individual and small group markets to cover 10 essential health benefits, including hospitalization, prescription drugs, maternity and newborn care, and mental health and rehab services.
Who's the coconut head Carol? That would be you.
If this president and his two cronies, Pelosi and Reid, had just left pre-existing as the only additional coverage mandated by the elite inner circle instead of a long list of forced government requirements that many people didn't want and insurance companies and policy holders couldn't afford, the cancellations would have been minimal compared to what we're seeing now.

Almost everyone was on board with the pre-existing conditions part.

And it's only just beginning.

So the distinct title of coconut head still belongs to you.
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#1020398 Nov 8, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
It helped the Democrats in Philadelphis, didn't it? You do remember seeing that on the news, don't you?
From your source, it would appear the conservative observer was in the booth with voters son!

And he supports himself by quoting himself.

Oh, such an incestuous relationship you people use!
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#1020399 Nov 8, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Since when did you become a big fan of Ashcroft? I get confused. Which side of your mouth are you speaking from now?
Now, back to the locations where not one person pressed the wrong button by mistake.
Humans are fallible... except in 69 precincts around Cleveland and another 26 precincts around Philadelphia where not one person in about a million voters pressed the wrong button by mistake.
Thanks for pointing that out.
For extra credit, how about you do some research and tell all of us here where those voting machines were that were programmed to steal 100 percent of the vote. They are easy to find. Those are the machines that registered zero votes for Romney.
Or, are you going to change your idea about humans being fallible?
lol! I find it so funny that you idiots demand others prove your point for you!

And here I thought you idiots claimed to be 'independent' and 'hardworking'!!!

“Bill Clinton could have ”

Since: May 10

Prevented this

#1020400 Nov 8, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
I posted this already.
It not not job to post the same information over & over because you are too f*cking stupid to get it the first time.
Did you get a job yet where you can carry your own weight, or are the tax payers still subsidizing your lazy ass.
I am with you davie--we need to stop subsidizing the poor with oil--let's let them all freeze to death this winter.
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#1020401 Nov 8, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
I get confused about which side of your mouth you're speaking from. You endorse abnormal sexual unions, then you endorse putting people who stone those people to death in policy making positions in the Department of Homeland Security.
Please make up your mind.
You seem to be confused a lot lately.

Is reality finally getting the better of you?

Heavens to Betsy! Does that mean you're...... thinking?!?!?!?!

wow!!!

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#1020402 Nov 8, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
So, its a privilege to get married?
Is it OK if Alabama declares blacks can't drive" Driving is a privilege.
Every day you keep proving just how GD dumb you are.
The Constitution doesn't give you the right to drive, dumbass. There is a requirement that priviledges not be distributed with any bias toward or against any normally occurring human characteristic.
The left wants to characterize pedophilia as a sexual orientation. Should we force all states to give pedophiles the same priviledges to own a home right next to an elementary school as given to normal people?
Obviously not.

If you want to know what rights you have, read the Constitution, dumbass. Everything you have not guaranteed in the Constitution is a priviledge. Like health insurance. Health insurance is a priviledge.
You, and Obama, really need an education on the Constitution.
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#1020403 Nov 8, 2013
Buroc Millhouse Obama wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey DumbDave, this is another example of you accusing someone of being racist/bigoted, but in the true hypocrite fashion you on the left portray, you never say anything about your Obama lovin' buddies here that practice bigotry. Your buddies and Democrats in general lately have been attacking Jews & Christians.
Hypocrite.
lol! Funny how you practice what you accuse others of!

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#1020404 Nov 8, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
I thought your wife would be on your policy?
Since obviously you are too stupid to look it up online, here is a link:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/...
Now, who is paying your subsidy???? Every tax payer.
It's like when you couldn't answer the question of where the money will come from to pay for Obama's government. You actually have to identify a source of money to identify who will be paying that subsidy.
So, let's go over this again. You begin by answering this question:

Who's paying that subsidy so crackwhores can get free health insurance and be equal to everyone who works their whole life to have it?
Who's paying that subsidy, clown?
(Here's a hint. Congress doesn't pay for any goddam thing.)
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#1020405 Nov 8, 2013
LoisLane59 wrote:
<quoted text>
Romney and other conservatives proposed perfectly viable and doable solutions - better than what we have now that would sustain the program for future generations.
Your side just doesn't want to listen.
Why is that?
lol!..... whatever they are!

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#1020406 Nov 8, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
I posted this already.
It not not job to post the same information over & over because you are too f*cking stupid to get it the first time.
Did you get a job yet where you can carry your own weight, or are the tax payers still subsidizing your lazy ass.
All you did was post some political hack diatribe spam denying everything that the emails delivered to this committee in Congress proves.
So, try again.

It is a felony for someone in one department or agency to transfer personal information of one American citizen to any other department or agency, moron. That is the written law.
Now, we have this fact:
Top Internal Revenue Service Obamacare official Sarah Hall Ingram discussed confidential taxpayer information with senior Obama White House officials, according to 2012 emails obtained by the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee. Lois Lerner, then head of the IRS Tax Exempt Organizations division, also received an email alongside White House officials that contained confidential information.
What this means is Sarah Hall Ingram committed a felony (and should be sent to prison for violation of that specific law). She included Lois Lerner and the White House in her violation of that law. Lois Lerner and the White House were complicit in that violation of that law. Therefore, Lois Lerner and whomever in the White House participated in this violation of that law should be sent to prison.
If you noticed, I referenced the law without referencing any political orientation, something you are not able to do.
So, since it's very obvious Sarah Hall Ingram and Lois Lerner and whomever was the recipient in the White House committed a felony, why should they not be sent to prison?
nucleoanusbama

Palm Coast, FL

#1020407 Nov 8, 2013
leosnana wrote:
<quoted text>"not 'to' gifted intellectually??? Yep, that would be Waxturds...
fakespellingteacherillegitimat ebabymamabammyworshippingmoron say what? LOL
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#1020409 Nov 8, 2013
fetch almighty wrote:
<quoted text>I am with you davie--we need to stop subsidizing the poor with oil--let's let them all freeze to death this winter.
Oh. I see. SNAFU!
nucleoanusbama

Palm Coast, FL

#1020410 Nov 8, 2013
leosnana wrote:
<quoted text>It didn't stop you, did it? Sitting there in your "wife's" nightgown, you just eat another piece of pie and light up again.
openpieholeillegitimatebabymam anonightgownskankmoron say what? LOL

Since: Jun 13

Orlando, FL

#1020412 Nov 8, 2013
What's ironic is the reason democrats don't want to listen to other ideas from the opposition which would improve the status of SS and Medicare is because they're afraid of losing votes.

But they've lost more credibility and, thus, votes by not listening and digging in their heels and plowing ahead with a single vision of a one-party system than if they had just listened and compromised to find the best solution.

It's fellow Democrats who are turning against them.

According to a Washington Post-ABC News survey: In 2010, 76% of center-right Democrats approved of Obamacare, 20% disapproved.

By last July, only 47% of those Democrats endorsed Obamacare, 46% disapproved.

And that was last July. Can't imagine the numbers now.

Some of the same people who once worked for the Obama campaign are now getting stung by the same law and the same president they worked so hard to keep in place.

So even though the liberals on here want to believe conservatives are the only ones complaining, the facts prove otherwise.

Democrats shot themselves in the foot. No one else.
Realtime

Deltona, FL

#1020413 Nov 8, 2013
CBS admits to error in Benghazi story.

Since: Jun 13

Orlando, FL

#1020414 Nov 8, 2013
Last night I posted that Obama's apology was the first time in his entire presidency he didn't blame Republicans for his and his administration's mistakes.

What I should have said was this is the first he "couldn't" blame Republicans.

Because he certainly would have if he could have.

Since: Nov 11

New York, NY

#1020415 Nov 8, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>I get confused about which side of your mouth you're speaking from. You endorse abnormal sexual unions, then you endorse putting people who stone those people to death in policy making positions in the Department of Homeland Security.

Please make up your mind.
At the end of it all he will be on the side of those "who stone those people to death".

Because after the Democrats destroy the government, our way of life, our economic system, our society and morality the only thing left to cling to is RELIGION!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Wethersfield Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 22 min Ratloder 69,708
News Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision (Jan '08) 2 hr John-K 309,688
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 3 hr Earthling-1 52,866
News The 25 Most Dangerous Cities in the U.S. Are Mo... (Nov '10) 12 hr Chuck 19,852
TS Tiffany Lord HIV POSITIVE.Beware! 18 hr rocky1 1
News Bradley International Airport seen as possible ... Apr 24 Larry 1
News Memorable Nights At The Shaboo -- Courant.com (Aug '07) Apr 22 KM Philcox 148
More from around the web

Wethersfield People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]