Barack Obama, our next President

Barack Obama, our next President

There are 1523889 comments on the Hampton Roads Daily Press story from Nov 5, 2008, titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

Whatever

Scottsbluff, NE

#996678 Oct 6, 2013
Wouldn't it just be cheaper to use the Park Rangers in their normal capacity than paying for the extra coverage necessary to guard people from seeing open air monuments?

https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/38542...

Since: Aug 13

Bozeman, MT

#996679 Oct 6, 2013
USAsince1680 wrote:
<quoted text>
There is no logic or rational thought behind Galt's posts.
Translation: He doesn't swallow the liberal BS like you do.

Are you going to explain that oath of allegiance you write about?

Since: Aug 13

Bozeman, MT

#996680 Oct 6, 2013
Whatever wrote:
Barack Obama has DOJ shut down the Amber Alert system...So, we can add dead kids to the lengths he's willing to go in his shutdown game.
Didn't this idiot disguised as president give a speech last week telling Americans not to be so “cynical” about government?

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#996681 Oct 6, 2013
Whatever wrote:
We even had five shutdowns when the Democrats ran the White House, House, and the Senate
Oh good, you found google!! You're funny!!

There were 8 under Ronnie Raygun, all with a Repugnant Senate.

So what's yer point, other than the one atop yer haid??

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

“Bill Clinton could have ”

Since: May 10

Prevented this

#996682 Oct 6, 2013
Nuculur option wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you play this stupid act on purpose??
Lithuanian Jews were wiped out by the Nazi's, you moron. You don't even know your own claimed history??
You're either a phony or a fool, perhaps both.
""The Holocaust in Nazi-occupied Lithuania resulted in the near total destruction of Lithuanian Jews living in the Nazi-controlled Lithuanian territories (Generalbezirk Litauen of Reichskommissariat Ostland). Out of approximately 208,000 to 210,000 Jews, an estimated 195,000–196,000 were murdered before the end of World War II (wider estimates are sometimes published); most between June and December 1941. The Holocaust resulted in the largest ever loss of life in so short a space of time in the History of Lithuania.""
----------
You come here posting bullshit. Give it a rest. You know nothing about what happened to European Jews, just as you know nothing about the true nature of Zionism.
The British Mandate in Palestine labelled Zionists like David Ben Gurion 'terrorists', in a time when the word still meant something.
Want to talk about the Zionists blowing up the King David Hotel in 1946, a terrorist act resulting in 91 deaths??
I'm wagering you know nothing about modern Israel, or the terrorists who created it.
Let's find out.
who controlled Lithuania starting in 1940? the communists of Russia.

The King David Hotel was the site of the British military command and the British Criminal Investigation Division. The Irgun chose it as a target after British troops invaded the Jewish Agency June 29, 1946, and confiscated large quantities of documents. At about the same time, more than 2,500 Jews from all over Palestine were placed under arrest. The information about Jewish Agency operations, including intelligence activities in Arab countries, was taken to the King David Hotel.

A week later, news of a massacre of 40 Jews in a pogrom in Poland reminded the Jews of Palestine how Britain's restrictive immigration policy had condemned thousands to death.

Irgun leader Menachem Begin stressed his desire to avoid civilian casualties and said three telephone calls were placed, one to the hotel, another to the French Consulate, and a third to the Palestine Post, warning that explosives in the King David Hotel would soon be detonated.

On July 22, 1946, the calls were made. The call into the hotel was apparently received and ignored. Begin quotes one British official who supposedly refused to evacuate the building, saying: "We don't take orders from the Jews."1 As a result, when the bombs exploded, the casualty toll was high: a total of 91 killed and 45 injured. Among the casualties were 15 Jews. Few people in the hotel proper were injured by the blast.

In contrast to Arab attacks against Jews, which were widely hailed as heroic actions, the Jewish National Council denounced the bombing of the King David.

For decades the British denied they had been warned. In 1979, however, a member of the British Parliament introduced evidence that the Irgun had indeed issued the warning. He offered the testimony of a British officer who heard other officers in the King David Hotel bar joking about a Zionist threat to the headquarters. The officer who overheard the conversation immediately left the hotel and survived.

BTW Israel would have never been created without the Irgun. Begin in later years said it best: When asked to give up Jerusalem (the capital of Israel) in the same manner that the French gave up Algeria, Beign replied that the French would not give up Paris and the British would not give up London.

They are no more terrorists than you are--ok maybe less so.

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#996683 Oct 6, 2013
Whatever wrote:
Wouldn't it just be cheaper to use the Park Rangers in their normal capacity than paying for the extra coverage necessary to guard people from seeing open air monuments?
https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/38542...
You're so lame.

They are operating with minimal staff, not able to deal with crowds, promote safety and security. It would be dangerous to operate under these conditions. What if something bad happened and there were no Rangers to respond??

The Repugnants knew this would happen, but they went ahead and screwed America again, as they always do.

Repugnants are disgusting.

End your House led shutdown, and quit trying to pass the blame, you nitwit. It didn't work, even in this echo chamber of Teabag fools.
Whatever

Scottsbluff, NE

#996684 Oct 6, 2013
War World II Memorial is paid for by PRIVATE CONTRIBUTIONS. Including maintenance fee to the National Parks paid in advance

“Peace on Earth”

Since: Sep 08

Santa Barbara, CA

#996685 Oct 6, 2013
LoisLane59 wrote:
<quoted text>
The shutdown could have ended on Monday if the Senate had agreed to removing the subsidies Congress will receive.
But in your mind Congress not having to live under the same rules they laid down for the rest of us is fair, right? And expecting them to abide by the same law as the rest of us is unfair, correct?
Members of congress do not qualify for "subsidies". However, they are entitled to continue receiving the employee contribution to their healthcare like any other Federal employee. Even the Republican who attached the amendment to the ACA said he never intended for them to lose that benefit. What isn't fair is that, unlike everyone else, they are being FORCED to buy from the exchange. Besides, the House was never going to pass a bill based on that alone. Where do you get such bull?
Whatever

Scottsbluff, NE

#996686 Oct 6, 2013
Nuculur option wrote:
<quoted text>
You're so lame.
They are operating with minimal staff, not able to deal with crowds, promote safety and security. It would be dangerous to operate under these conditions. What if something bad happened and there were no Rangers to respond??
The Repugnants knew this would happen, but they went ahead and screwed America again, as they always do.
Repugnants are disgusting.
End your House led shutdown, and quit trying to pass the blame, you nitwit. It didn't work, even in this echo chamber of Teabag fools.
You and your stompy foot POTUS are repulsive.

NEVER has the Lincoln Memorial been closed before! The very FIRST time this open air memorial has been closed by a vengeful OMB that operates under the WH directives.

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#996687 Oct 6, 2013
Whatever wrote:
New Poll Shows More Ohioans Blame President and Senate Democrats for “Shutdown” than Republicans
http://www.ohiolibertycoalition.org/new-poll-...
From a Teabag Party site no less. It'd be funny if it weren't so stupid!!

Can you say 'grasping at straws'??

You must think everyone is as easily led, bred, and bled as you are.

Not likely!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

“Bill Clinton could have ”

Since: May 10

Prevented this

#996688 Oct 6, 2013
Nuculur option wrote:
<quoted text>
You post unsupported bullshit.
I post links to facts and you whine about it.
It figures.
Unless you can get around the definition of Zionism, you lose.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
you haven't posted a link all day have you?

“Bill Clinton could have ”

Since: May 10

Prevented this

#996689 Oct 6, 2013
USAsince1680 wrote:
<quoted text>
Members of congress do not qualify for "subsidies". However, they are entitled to continue receiving the employee contribution to their healthcare like any other Federal employee. Even the Republican who attached the amendment to the ACA said he never intended for them to lose that benefit. What isn't fair is that, unlike everyone else, they are being FORCED to buy from the exchange. Besides, the House was never going to pass a bill based on that alone. Where do you get such bull?
OMG OMG Americans being FORCED to buy something they don't want? really...what kind of democrats FORCE Americans? I thought they were the party of equality for all. Guess not.
Whatever

Scottsbluff, NE

#996690 Oct 6, 2013
USAsince1680 wrote:
<quoted text>
Members of congress do not qualify for "subsidies". However, they are entitled to continue receiving the employee contribution to their healthcare like any other Federal employee. Even the Republican who attached the amendment to the ACA said he never intended for them to lose that benefit. What isn't fair is that, unlike everyone else, they are being FORCED to buy from the exchange. Besides, the House was never going to pass a bill based on that alone. Where do you get such bull?
The 28th Amendment would be cheered by all those non-SEI and non-congressional staffers who loss their health insurance and MUST use the exchanges....

"Congress shall make no law that applies to the citizens of the United States that does not apply equally to the Senators and/or Representatives."

“Bill Clinton could have ”

Since: May 10

Prevented this

#996691 Oct 6, 2013
Ray Donovan wrote:
<quoted text>
Translation: He doesn't swallow the liberal BS like you do.
Are you going to explain that oath of allegiance you write about?
You mean the oath of allegiance that she thinks All Americans should take because she considers them all illegals to begin with? that Oath? That Oath of Naturalizion? the one she states all Americans should take or be thrown out? that Oath?

http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuit...
Whatever

Scottsbluff, NE

#996692 Oct 6, 2013
Mean spirited Obama states he will veto a bill that will continue to support NIH and cancer treatment to kids.

But, all the press staff is essential according to WH ran OMB

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#996693 Oct 6, 2013
fetch almighty wrote:
<quoted text>who controlled Lithuania starting in 1940? the communists of Russia.
You avoid the truth like it's poison.

The occupation of Lithuania by Nazi Germany lasted from the German invasion of Soviet Union to the end of the Battle of Memel (June 22, 1941 to January 28, 1945). At first the Germans were welcomed as "liberators" from the repressive Soviet regime which occupied Lithuania prior to the German arrival. In hopes of re-establishing independence or regaining some autonomy, Lithuanians organized their Provisional Government. Soon the Lithuanian attitudes towards the Germans changed into passive resistance."

"Before the Holocaust, Lithuania was home to about 210,000 or 250,000 Jews and was one of the greatest centers of Jewish theology, philosophy, and learning which preceded even the times of the Gaon of Vilna. The Holocaust in Lithuania can be divided into three stages: mass executions (June–December 1941), ghetto period (1942 – March 1943), and final liquidation (April 1943 – July 1944).
Unlike in other Nazi-occupied countries where the Holocaust was introduced gradually (first limiting Jewish civil rights, then concentrating Jews in ghettos, and only then executing them in death camps), executions in Lithuania started on the first days of war. According to German documents, on June 25–26, 1941, "about 1,500 Jews were eliminated by Lithuanian partisans. Many Jewish synagogues were set on fire; on the following nights another 2,300 were killed." The executions were carried out by three main groups: in Kaunas (Ninth Fort), in Vilnius (Ponary massacre), and in countryside (Rollkommando Hamann). It is estimated that 80% of the Lithuanian Jews were killed before 1942.""

----------

Your bullshit doesn't line up with history. The Nazi's wiped out Lithuania's Jews, with the help of Lithuanian Christian Partisans. The local Christians in Europe, like Poland and the rest, were eager helpers in killing the Jews.
Whatever

Scottsbluff, NE

#996694 Oct 6, 2013
Nuculur option wrote:
<quoted text>
From a Teabag Party site no less. It'd be funny if it weren't so stupid!!
Can you say 'grasping at straws'??
You must think everyone is as easily led, bred, and bled as you are.
Not likely!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
The public is becoming aware and you are panicking.

The House has passed bills that will finance NIH, WIC, Border Guards and Park Rangers.

Obama states he would veto them.

Let everyone know who is being hateful-Obama
Whatever

Scottsbluff, NE

#996695 Oct 6, 2013
Hey everyone,

Are you aware of the latest mean spirited action of our stompy foot POTUS?

The OMB, who operates under the direction of the WH, has ordered the DOJ to close down the Amber Alert system as they claim it is non-essential.

Add dead kids with kicking grandma out of her home to Obama's resume.
Whatever

Scottsbluff, NE

#996696 Oct 6, 2013
Why does Senator Reid and the Senate Dems want children with cancer to die? Vote to pass the House NIH bill.

Since: Jun 13

Orlando, FL

#996697 Oct 6, 2013
Can anyone point to a previous "law of the land" that was passed on a strict party line without compromises made on the part of the opposing party?

Tried to find one. Couldn't.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Wethersfield Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision (Jan '08) 1 hr silly rabbit 313,995
News Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 8 hr TRD 71,285
News The 25 Most Dangerous Cities in the U.S. Are Mo... (Nov '10) 9 hr honest assessment 20,982
News Scientists say they have proved climate change ... (Dec '08) Apr 22 Patty Myers 8,138
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) Apr 20 Patriot AKA Bozo 63,620
News Five Key Points From Hartford's Budget Proposal Apr 19 IdiotCamp 1
News State child agency pulling wards from Durham sc... (May '07) Apr 18 Chastity Veasley 48

Wethersfield Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Wethersfield Mortgages