Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 316369 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

“Make time ”

Since: Sep 09

for contemplation

#326641 Sep 22, 2014
cpeter1313 wrote:
Private Parts
<quoted text>
Traveling Pants

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#326642 Sep 22, 2014
VoteVets Org wrote:
<quoted text>
Unless they're well hung and willing, eh ?
That could go either way.
VoteVets Org

New York, NY

#326643 Sep 22, 2014
STO wrote:
<quoted text>
Someone's got to make a decision. And it ain't gonna be the zygote, So, who's left?
Even the presence of only one with the ability to make a decision does not mean available legal options should still include killing.
Your post makes no sense.
VoteVets Org

New York, NY

#326644 Sep 22, 2014
cpeter1313 wrote:
The problem was that the "abortion industry" was too far away to help the woman, idiot, thanks to ridiculous local legislation.
Really ? Where was it......Singapore ? The facility was not located where it was impossible for her to arrange transportation. Is there legislation that exists elsewhere that requires abortion clinics to be within walking distance of every woman of child bearing age ?
Buffoon, dickweed, idiot, etc. Werent you the poster that rarely resorted to name calling unless you were responding in kind ?
You were saying?
I believe the poster was saying (accurately) you have no idea what you are talking about.
VoteVets Org

New York, NY

#326645 Sep 22, 2014
cpeter1313 wrote:
The fetus is there without expressed permission, just as if I leave a door unlocked and someone trots in.
Ah but you did a lot more than just leave the door open, hon. You created that "someone" and they are there as a direct result of your action, not theirs. If you want to create an analogy you had better be prepared to take it all the way.
can indeed remove them with whatever force becomes necessary. What happens to them after being removed from the premises isn't my concern.
But you're not just removing them and leaving them to fend for themselves, which may or may not end in their death. Abortion is direct killing.
You seem to have an issue with accepting the full implications of YOUR analogy
VoteVets Org

New York, NY

#326646 Sep 22, 2014
cpeter1313 wrote:
No, nothing that happens within someone else's body is NONE of your business.
<quoted text>
Double negative. So SOMETHING that happens within someone else's body IS her business ?
VoteVets Org

New York, NY

#326647 Sep 22, 2014
Pearl Jam wrote:
<quoted text>That could go either way.
Not really. As the "guest" has no authority to decide if the homeowner should leave or stay.
VoteVets Org

New York, NY

#326648 Sep 22, 2014
Pearl Jam wrote:
<quoted text>That's not an answer. Why would you deny women a safe abortion? It has to be legal to be safe. Why deny women that?

There are plenty of things that would be safer if they were legal yet are not. Purchasing and securing dangerous drugs for recreational use for instance. Should we make selling/purchasing crack cocaine legal so less people would be harmed or killed in attempting to secure them ? Why deny a person that ?

“Proud to be a Wiccan Priest”

Since: Jul 09

Jonesboro AR

#326649 Sep 22, 2014
No, if you are expecting skanky to suddenly be forthcoming. Have any kind of rational answer about her position.. Not going to happen..

Though speaking about her new pope.. So how is that working for you, skanky..Emphasizing feeding the poor, telling catholic business people to quit being greedy, and love one another. That includes people that you do not like, skanky.

Yep, you have a pope that really does understand socialism as well.

BUWHAHAHAHAHAHA The irony of that is just to much. Everything that you are not. The best part you have to listen to the man and do as he says.. LMFAO. The comedy of that alone is gold.

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#326650 Sep 22, 2014
VoteVets Org wrote:
<quoted text>
Even the presence of only one with the ability to make a decision does not mean available legal options should still include killing.
Your post makes no sense.
When there are only two choices, birth or abortion, society doesn't get to decide that the only option for her is birth given the fact she has the ability to make her own decision. Your post makes no sense.

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#326651 Sep 22, 2014
VoteVets Org wrote:
<quoted text>
Not really. As the "guest" has no authority to decide if the homeowner should leave or stay.
Went right over your head.

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#326652 Sep 22, 2014
VoteVets Org wrote:
<quoted text>
There are plenty of things that would be safer if they were legal yet are not. Purchasing and securing dangerous drugs for recreational use for instance. Should we make selling/purchasing crack cocaine legal so less people would be harmed or killed in attempting to secure them ? Why deny a person that ?
My question is still unanswered. I didn't ask for an analogy.

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#326653 Sep 22, 2014
Nope; I consider my home and privacy to be inviolable. If you come in without permission, you're leaving immediately.
VoteVets Org wrote:
<quoted text>
Unless they're well hung and willing, eh ?

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#326654 Sep 22, 2014
Yes, it does. The woman is the fetus's sole legal guardian and makes all health decisions concerning her own body and its.
VoteVets Org wrote:
<quoted text>
Even the presence of only one with the ability to make a decision does not mean available legal options should still include killing.
Your post makes no sense.

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#326655 Sep 22, 2014
Part of abortion law tenets is that a law cannot place an undue burden on the woman seeking an abortion. The nearest clinic was about 300 miles away; that's an undue burden for a woman since closer service would be possible if local legislation weren't preventing it. They don't have to be within walking distance but they don't need to be hours away, either.
VoteVets Org wrote:
<quoted text>
Really ? Where was it......Singapore ? The facility was not located where it was impossible for her to arrange transportation. Is there legislation that exists elsewhere that requires abortion clinics to be within walking distance of every woman of child bearing age ?
Buffoon, dickweed, idiot, etc. Werent you the poster that rarely resorted to name calling unless you were responding in kind ?
<quoted text>
I believe the poster was saying (accurately) you have no idea what you are talking about.

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#326656 Sep 22, 2014
Give me a fu**ing fetus and a fu**ing blender and I'll show you the "full implications".

Pregnancy is an accidental or possible result of sex; it would be a direct result if every sex act created a pregnancy. No woman is obligated to gestate, and terminating a fetus is a part of, not the focus, of the abortion process.
VoteVets Org wrote:
<quoted text>
Ah but you did a lot more than just leave the door open, hon. You created that "someone" and they are there as a direct result of your action, not theirs. If you want to create an analogy you had better be prepared to take it all the way.
<quoted text>
But you're not just removing them and leaving them to fend for themselves, which may or may not end in their death. Abortion is direct killing.
You seem to have an issue with accepting the full implications of YOUR analogy

“CO2 is Gaseous Love”

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#326657 Sep 23, 2014
Stand for life!

Encourage your legislature to enact personhood laws for the unborn.
Life is Love

Allentown, PA

#326660 Sep 23, 2014
Kathwynn wrote:
No, if you are expecting skanky to suddenly be forthcoming. Have any kind of rational answer about her position.. Not going to happen..
Though speaking about her new pope.. So how is that working for you, skanky..Emphasizing feeding the poor, telling catholic business people to quit being greedy, and love one another. That includes people that you do not like, skanky.
Yep, you have a pope that really does understand socialism as well.
BUWHAHAHAHAHAHA The irony of that is just to much. Everything that you are not. The best part you have to listen to the man and do as he says.. LMFAO. The comedy of that alone is gold.
What are you talking about? Why bring religion into this? You are a 'wiccan" and you attack a "Catholic"? You are no different than the them, both man made religions. I am one with nature and as such nature is one with me. The veneer of religion is not necessary.
Abortion on purpose is an act against nature. The unborn child is a new entity of energy from the earth.
So as a woman Kathy, do you support its destruction?

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#326661 Sep 23, 2014
Life is Love wrote:
<quoted text>
What are you talking about? Why bring religion into this? You are a 'wiccan" and you attack a "Catholic"? You are no different than the them, both man made religions. I am one with nature and as such nature is one with me. The veneer of religion is not necessary.
Abortion on purpose is an act against nature. The unborn child is a new entity of energy from the earth.
So as a woman Kathy, do you support its destruction?
Nothing in nature that says it's unnatural for a woman not to be a mother or want to give birth. Stay clear of the mushrooms.

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#326664 Sep 23, 2014
Sorry, nature-boy, but most of human civilization is "against nature"--sanitation, cooked food, housing, clothing, and every aspect of medicine. You know what's natural? Plagues, cancer, infant death, dyin in one's 30's, etc...being "natural" is a death sentence. Abortion is an act whose nature and purpose are solely determined by the woman facing an unwanted pregnancy.
Life is Love wrote:
<quoted text>
What are you talking about? Why bring religion into this? You are a 'wiccan" and you attack a "Catholic"? You are no different than the them, both man made religions. I am one with nature and as such nature is one with me. The veneer of religion is not necessary.
Abortion on purpose is an act against nature. The unborn child is a new entity of energy from the earth.
So as a woman Kathy, do you support its destruction?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Wethersfield Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 2 min Obama Muslim 1,583,534
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 15 hr Agents of Corruption 63,948
News Developer Resubmits Plan In Wethersfield (Jun '08) Aug 20 Warning 44
News While Somers writes, her representatives work Aug 19 Lori Hopkins-Cava... 1
News The 25 Most Dangerous Cities in the U.S. Are Mo... (Nov '10) Aug 19 Leftovers 21,051
News MySpace `Predator' Gets 20-Year Prison Sentence... (Jul '07) Apr '17 Paul Kersey 14
CAR Accident on Friday April 22, 2016 (Apr '16) Apr '16 MarcusT20073 1

Wethersfield Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Wethersfield Mortgages