Your "logic" says that Drew Barrymore is correct in considering her baby girl a baby girl & naming her at 3 months gestation. Yet, you say I am "immature" for considering her preborn baby girl a baby.<quoted text>
You know what's missing from your argument here? Logic.
It's Drew Barrymore's pregnancy, her baby, her civil right to do as she chooses. I support that, even though you lie about it.
Besides, Kurt Cobain and what's her face gave their daughter the middle name of Bean for the same reason.
So how does any of your post refute anything I said? It doesn't. Simple as that.
Further, you say it's also correct for a mother who doesn't want to be "inconvenienced" with her baby girl to call her a "useless wad of cells" - and kill her.
Where your "logic" is flawed is that a preborn baby girl is no different biologically from being perceived a baby girl or "useless wad of cells." DNA analysis results are no different, 4-D ultrasound is no different, beating heart is no different, etc. In either case - Preborn Baby Olive is a unique, distinct human being.
Yes, your argument fails => "The baby is a baby if mom thinks so...or is a useless wad of cells if mom thinks so." Interestingly enough, you preach "science" as the supposed support for backing your arguments in favor of killing preborn babies.
Mom's "perception" or "sentiments" towards her preborn baby do not change her baby's biology in any way. Nada. None. Zilch. Zippo. You can't even call your view junk science. It's nothing but gobbledygook. It's just another one of your assinine "excuses" to kill.
To be fair, you are no different than the other proaborts in here. bHitner, too, pretends to preach science.....until she doesn't. Heck, she will go as far as to use Wronglish to claim "a human" (noun) and "human being" are not synonyms.
You're both frauds.