Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 311215 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

No Relativism

United States

#313334 Oct 15, 2013
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
You know what's missing from your argument here? Logic.
It's Drew Barrymore's pregnancy, her baby, her civil right to do as she chooses. I support that, even though you lie about it.
Besides, Kurt Cobain and what's her face gave their daughter the middle name of Bean for the same reason.
So how does any of your post refute anything I said? It doesn't. Simple as that.
Your "logic" says that Drew Barrymore is correct in considering her baby girl a baby girl & naming her at 3 months gestation. Yet, you say I am "immature" for considering her preborn baby girl a baby.

Further, you say it's also correct for a mother who doesn't want to be "inconvenienced" with her baby girl to call her a "useless wad of cells" - and kill her.

Where your "logic" is flawed is that a preborn baby girl is no different biologically from being perceived a baby girl or "useless wad of cells." DNA analysis results are no different, 4-D ultrasound is no different, beating heart is no different, etc. In either case - Preborn Baby Olive is a unique, distinct human being.

Yes, your argument fails => "The baby is a baby if mom thinks so...or is a useless wad of cells if mom thinks so." Interestingly enough, you preach "science" as the supposed support for backing your arguments in favor of killing preborn babies.

Mom's "perception" or "sentiments" towards her preborn baby do not change her baby's biology in any way. Nada. None. Zilch. Zippo. You can't even call your view junk science. It's nothing but gobbledygook. It's just another one of your assinine "excuses" to kill.

To be fair, you are no different than the other proaborts in here. bHitner, too, pretends to preach science.....until she doesn't. Heck, she will go as far as to use Wronglish to claim "a human" (noun) and "human being" are not synonyms.

You're both frauds.
No Relativism

United States

#313335 Oct 15, 2013
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
You do know the words Human Being have more than one meaning, correct? Just because you focus on the basic meaning doesn't mean you're 100% correct. Because you're not.
You've been shown time and again that the Philosophy of Human Being is much deeper than its general, elementary dictionary definition.
You do realize you did not support bHilter's claim that "a human" (noun) and "human being" are not synonyms.

You're just saying stuff hoping it sticks.

Show me a legitimate site that states "human" (noun) and "human being" are not synonyms. bHitler has failed to provide EVEN ONE site to support her claim. Not one.

Ready..........go..........
Katie

Puyallup, WA

#313336 Oct 15, 2013
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
Katie V.: "A male or female embryo/fetus probably equals a newborn son or daughter in your immature eyes. Tried to help you learn to differentiate."
Pffft.....you said a newborn remains a fetus for 48 hours after born.
You said calling a preborn baby "a useless was of cells" isn't offensive to anyone.
No, you're too lost to be able to teach.
You're a LIHOM (Legend In Your Own Mind).
Nothing more.
A former poster here would call an embryo/fetus a "useless wad of cells [you used the word WAS above haha]" when arguing with others to drive her points home. Somebody asked if I found it [her use of the phrase, not the phrase itself] offensive and I said no. Then I detailed the context around it and told others to grow a thicker skin.

Yet you still outright LIE and try to claim I said it or that it wasn't "offensive to anyone" which is another LIE on your part.

If you have to LIE, you've already lost, and you've lost. Big time. Stop projecting your shortcomings onto me. Scroll on.
No Relativism

United States

#313337 Oct 15, 2013
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
You do know the words Human Being have more than one meaning, correct? Just because you focus on the basic meaning doesn't mean you're 100% correct. Because you're not.
You've been shown time and again that the Philosophy of Human Being is much deeper than its general, elementary dictionary definition.
For someone who preaches science, you sure flop around like a fish out of water. You saw science was going against your argument to kill, so you pulled out philosophy.

You're running out of options, just as science is making advancements countering your illogical arguments.

Desperation much?
Katie

Puyallup, WA

#313338 Oct 15, 2013
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
Your "logic" says that Drew Barrymore is correct in considering her baby girl a baby girl & naming her at 3 months gestation. Yet, you say I am "immature" for considering her preborn baby girl a baby.
Further, you say it's also correct for a mother who doesn't want to be "inconvenienced" with her baby girl to call her a "useless wad of cells" - and kill her.
Where your "logic" is flawed is that a preborn baby girl is no different biologically from being perceived a baby girl or "useless wad of cells." DNA analysis results are no different, 4-D ultrasound is no different, beating heart is no different, etc. In either case - Preborn Baby Olive is a unique, distinct human being.
Yes, your argument fails => "The baby is a baby if mom thinks so...or is a useless wad of cells if mom thinks so." Interestingly enough, you preach "science" as the supposed support for backing your arguments in favor of killing preborn babies.
Mom's "perception" or "sentiments" towards her preborn baby do not change her baby's biology in any way. Nada. None. Zilch. Zippo. You can't even call your view junk science. It's nothing but gobbledygook. It's just another one of your assinine "excuses" to kill.
To be fair, you are no different than the other proaborts in here. bHitner, too, pretends to preach science.....until she doesn't. Heck, she will go as far as to use Wronglish to claim "a human" (noun) and "human being" are not synonyms.
You're both frauds.
YouR arguments are nothing but LIES. Lots of words that have no meaning, no truth, and no sense.

You've already lost. And you know it.
Katie

Puyallup, WA

#313339 Oct 15, 2013
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
You do realize you did not support bHilter's claim that "a human" (noun) and "human being" are not synonyms.
You're just saying stuff hoping it sticks.
Show me a legitimate site that states "human" (noun) and "human being" are not synonyms. bHitler has failed to provide EVEN ONE site to support her claim. Not one.
Ready..........go..........
What Bitner, others, and I have said time and again is that you're arguing about dictionary definitions when we're discussing PHILOSOPHIES. Which is exactly what I spelled out for you earlier.

If you still don't get it, you never will.

You lose. Big time.
Katie

Puyallup, WA

#313340 Oct 15, 2013
cpeter1313 wrote:
What is it about analogies that you PLM zombies can`t understand? Analogies are not direct comparisons.
Scientifically speaking, an entity becomes a member of a species only after birth. BTW--some mammals can abort by choice; why should humans be constrained by genetics?
<quoted text>
Cptr, this quote was in the post to which you responded.

"Oak trees and acorns are not equally valuable," write Robert George and Patrick Lee, "because the basis for their value is not WHAT they are but precisely those accidental [not substantive] characteristics by which oak trees differ from acorns. We value the ugly, decaying oak tree less than the magnificent, still flourishing one; and we value the mature, magnificent oak more than the small, still growing one. But we would never say the same about human beings."

Do you see what I see? Humans "value the ugly, decaying [elderly, poor, black, brown, yellow, deemed different, etc.,] less than the magnificent, still flourishing one[wealthy, good looking, smart, successful, young, nubile, etc.,] one; and we value the mature, magnificent [fill in the blank] more than the small, still growing one. And we do this to other human beings [even if we don't say or admit it] all the fckn time." All anyone needs to do is pick up a newspaper or watch the national news to verify.
Katie

Puyallup, WA

#313341 Oct 15, 2013
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
For someone who preaches science, you sure flop around like a fish out of water. You saw science was going against your argument to kill, so you pulled out philosophy.
You're running out of options, just as science is making advancements countering your illogical arguments.
Desperation much?
What a sad attempt on your part trying to distract.

But you had to make up more LIES to do so.

Look NR, if you can't debate by even loosely following the rules of debate, don't bother wasting anybody's time. All the effort put in to correcting your false claims only confirm our claims that the PLM you follow is based on nothing but false premises, false promises, half-truths, and outright lies. As I said earlier, you are exceptional at it. Yay you.

:-\
Forum

Carlsbad, NM

#313342 Oct 16, 2013
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
Playa is comparing insects to human babies. Her "argument" speaks for itself: she's admitting there is no sound argument for killing human beings in the womb.
There is no sound argument for killing.
We are somehow protected from the
consequences of our actions.
Clueless. We never know what is coming.

Since: Dec 09

Location hidden

#313343 Oct 16, 2013
Gtown71 wrote:
<quoted text>
You are 100% correct!
Being saved is just that saved. My soul is saved, my flesh is not, nor can it be.
I did not cheat on my wife becouse I didn't know God. I cheated on my wife, becouse I yeilded to my flesh.
The flesh is what causes us all most of our troubles.
It isn't subject to God's law, and cannot be.
It's the reason, that though our laws are tougher, and more enforced now than any other time, we still see crime rates going up.
Yes I could have another affair now that I'm saved, and can do everything a lost person can do, but I cannot enjoy it for long, becouse I now belong to God, and He will "whip" me as any loving parent, except He will even take me on home, if I was to continue to rebel.
Thank God He's. Long suffering.
Many blame the devil, when the devil had nothing to do with it.
As long as we are in this flesh we All will sin "small s "
It is Sin "big s " that seperates us from God.
God no longer see the big s in my life, only the small one.
There you go again lol. "Yielded to my flesh"? Seriously?

Since: Dec 09

Location hidden

#313344 Oct 16, 2013
Gtown71 wrote:
<quoted text>
I may be considered more pro choice, then even I've realized.
I to believe ALL people should make whatever choices they wish. I just think decisions that apparently effect so many citizens, should be made by citizens.
Example : any adult is free to drink as much as they choose, but not every town wants a booze shop in it.
People including me, will live and die by the choices they make.
A womans choice to terminate her pregnancy doesn't effect "many citizens".

Since: Dec 09

Location hidden

#313345 Oct 16, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you have a solution? I am assuming that you are talking about third world countries where the is a repressive totalitarian government.
You don't think kids are going hungry in the USA?
Ocean56

AOL

#313346 Oct 16, 2013
No Relativism wrote:
Ocean (aka: Dead Sea): "I decide for MYSELF how to spend all my days, including Sundays."
You're also deciding your eternity by how you spend your days. Your diehard support and promotion of abortion won't fare well when you make an account for your pathetic, life-taking earthly existence. I hear eternity is a long time....
Oh PLEASE. This kind of religionist nonsense got old a long time ago, NoRelevance. You're just pissed because I and others can reject the toxic baggage of Catholicism with NO civil or criminal penalties whatsoever, in the United States anyway. Tough.

I still get to decide for MYSELF in ALL personal matters, rather than allowing a bunch of nosy church clerics to make those choices FOR me. Yeah, I know, that ticks you off too. Good.

Since: Dec 09

Location hidden

#313347 Oct 16, 2013
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
The www.TellMePinkOrBlue.com product informs mom as early as 5-7 weeks gestation whether her baby is a boy or girl.
I guess you missed the scientific study links on the product's website, which corroborate the validity of the sex-determination product.
"95% accuracy" much?
Nice try, though.
Those scientific studies are for diagnosing fetal disorders, not gender.@@

Since: Dec 09

Location hidden

#313348 Oct 16, 2013
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
The point is, the mother is intentionally, knowingly, willingly and brutally killing her baby girl or boy.
The preborn baby does not need permission to be there. He or she has the right to be there by virtue of how mankind was created to procreate.
As is ALWAYS the case for you proaborts, your ONLY 'argument' comes down to this: "Dehumanizing human beings exonerates us for killing baby boys and girls in the womb."
Epic fail.
Every time.
If mankind was created to procreate and you have no children, what is your purpose?

Since: Dec 09

Location hidden

#313349 Oct 16, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
You do promote abortion and try to justify it on this thread.
It is clear that you support abortion for any reason and at any time of fetus development.
You play a very active role in your non commitment of prevention and you justify it by being on this thread.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#313350 Oct 16, 2013
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
DNA analysis of preborn babies prove he/she is a human (noun)/Human being (synonym).
YOU YOURSELF said a human (noun) exists in the womb.
You're a mess.........
DNA analysis does not say human being.

You are lying again.

You are the mess.

But, once again, you've proven me right when I say that lies are all you have to offer.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#313351 Oct 16, 2013
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
You do realize you did not support bHilter's claim that "a human" (noun) and "human being" are not synonyms.
You're just saying stuff hoping it sticks.
Show me a legitimate site that states "human" (noun) and "human being" are not synonyms. bHitler has failed to provide EVEN ONE site to support her claim. Not one.
Ready..........go..........
That was not my claim, Liar.

Let us know when you can address what's actually being said to you, Pretzel.
No Relativism

United States

#313353 Oct 16, 2013
Ocean56 wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh PLEASE. This kind of religionist nonsense got old a long time ago, NoRelevance. You're just pissed because I and others can reject the toxic baggage of Catholicism with NO civil or criminal penalties whatsoever, in the United States anyway. Tough.
I still get to decide for MYSELF in ALL personal matters, rather than allowing a bunch of nosy church clerics to make those choices FOR me. Yeah, I know, that ticks you off too. Good.
I never claimed that you don't have free will. I just poinited out abuse of free will has consequences - in this life, and eternally.

You have a God-given right not to believe in God.

You will be one of those people who lived a life filled with debauchery and exhibit pathetic deathbed behavior. All mouthy and tough until the reality of death gets real.

Have it your way.

Good luck with that....
No Relativism

United States

#313354 Oct 16, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
That was not my claim, Liar.
Let us know when you can address what's actually being said to you, Pretzel.
Are "a human" (noun) and "a human being" synonyms?

Yes or no?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Wethersfield Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 4 min The Donald_ 1,384,071
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 40 min The Donald_ 59,545
News Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 4 hr Ize Found 70,612
News The 25 Most Dangerous Cities in the U.S. Are Mo... (Nov '10) 6 hr Samuel-7g-Jackson 20,316
News Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 12 hr dGo mnaDed lyHo i... 72,026
News Suspect Had Quit Rehab (Mar '08) May 24 Ken Burke 135
CAR Accident on Friday April 22, 2016 Apr '16 MarcusT20073 1
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Wethersfield Mortgages