Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 340847 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#311604 Sep 19, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Wher it is legal it is allowed and where it isn't, it isn't.
As each state allows gay marriage there will be fewer and fewer complaints. Then the other oppressed groups can start there inititive for other types of marriage.
Bitner, you can marry your dog if you want. I wouldn't care.
Thank you, for admitting that same sex marriage being illegal IS a question of the oppression of someone's civil rights.
Ink

Narberth, PA

#311605 Sep 19, 2013
not a playa1965 wrote:
<quoted text>So illegally attempting or procuring an abortion should be the only crime on earth, which has no legal consequences?
While performing or supplying one, should be punished like any other crime...specifically murder?
Really?
Wow.
When has it ever been prosecuted?

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#311606 Sep 19, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
All correct but you are confused that I said something I didn't.
No, I'm not.

Oh, but please, do "enlighten" me on what that was.
Ink

Narberth, PA

#311607 Sep 19, 2013
not a playa1965 wrote:
<quoted text>Ink, you gave one man's interpretation of the history behind the tax exemption, and I took issue with it. I didn't ignore it, I rebutted it.
It's called 'debate'.
If I have an agenda, it's keeping The separation of Church and State: because it is a fundamental precept of our Constitution.
That it keeps churches from being taxed is perfectly okay with me - as long as it works both ways, and also keeps churches from interfering with the laws of the People. Somehow, it seems the people are getting the very short end of the stick.
So you think the exemption given to the churches in 1894 was due to the fear of churches influencing the government rather than because of the charity work they did to care for people who had no one to care for them.

Okay have it your way.
Ink

Narberth, PA

#311608 Sep 19, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
No, I'm not.
Oh, but please, do "enlighten" me on what that was.
I have no idea what you 'thought' I said.
Ink

Narberth, PA

#311609 Sep 19, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
Thank you, for admitting that same sex marriage being illegal IS a question of the oppression of someone's civil rights.


You're welcome but I also consider polygamous groups, incestous groups and those who want to marry a different species to be oppressed. They will all have their day in court.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#311610 Sep 19, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
I have no idea what you 'thought' I said.
You said that same sex marriage was not a question of civil rights. Yes?
Ink

Narberth, PA

#311611 Sep 19, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
Then why make it illegal if you're not going to punish everyone breaking the law?
That is stupid.
I'm not making it illegal. It was a hypothetical question posed to me. Maybe that's why you are confused.
Ink

Narberth, PA

#311612 Sep 19, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
They weren't considered equal. Yep. They had no equal protection under the law, despite the fact that they were citizens of this country and entitled to such. Well guess what? So are LGBT people.
You don't say.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#311613 Sep 19, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
You're welcome but I also consider polygamous groups, incestous groups and those who want to marry a different species to be oppressed. They will all have their day in court.
A different species can't consent to a marriage contract. You should know this.

Incest is only illegal to a certain point (for example, I believe second cousins can marry), and only because it's too small a gene pool. And that's a fairly recent phenomenon, by the way.

There is no reason to make polygamy illegal where all parties are consenting adults.

Your bigotry (as evidenced in this grumpy tone of defeat) is duly noted.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#311614 Sep 19, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm not making it illegal. It was a hypothetical question posed to me. Maybe that's why you are confused.
If you truly didn't understand that I was not saying you, personally, then you're even more stupid than I thought.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#311615 Sep 19, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
You don't say.
Then your original position that same sex marriage does not fall into the same civil rights category as rights for blacks, was wrong.

Here's a reminder...it's time to inhale and exhale again.

Or, perhaps it's already too late. After your posts today, it seems as though your brain is completely oxygen starved, and in a vegetative state already.
Ink

Narberth, PA

#311616 Sep 19, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
You said that same sex marriage was not a question of civil rights. Yes?
No I didn't.
Ink

Narberth, PA

#311617 Sep 19, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
Then your original position that same sex marriage does not fall into the same civil rights category as rights for blacks, was wrong.
Here's a reminder...it's time to inhale and exhale again.
Or, perhaps it's already too late. After your posts today, it seems as though your brain is completely oxygen starved, and in a vegetative state already.
I said I didn't see it as exactly the same thing. And I don't. Basically anything you want to do can be called a civil right.

As I have said before, if you have a 'right' civil or otherwise to kill your own unborn child then everything else is minor.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#311619 Sep 19, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
No I didn't.
Really? This was not you?

http://www.topix.com/forum/news/abortion/T833...
Ink

Narberth, PA

#311620 Sep 19, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
If you truly didn't understand that I was not saying you, personally, then you're even more stupid than I thought.
No I didn't think you meant me.
Ink

Narberth, PA

#311622 Sep 19, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
Really? This was not you?
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/abortion/T833...
I continued to say that I understood the point of view that it is the same. Therefore I didn't see any reason to argue or what your complaint was. What is it?

“lightly burnt,but still smokin”

Since: Dec 06

in the corner of your mind,

#311623 Sep 19, 2013
"No Relativism" brayed like an ass
Hopefully the lesson Foo has learned is "don't share that you have bacterial vaginitis with people on a public forum. You may end up forcing yourself to leave for a while hoping posters forget how skanky you & your partner admittedly are."

could you be anymore of a shit bag? i'll bet you can.
Ink

Narberth, PA

#311624 Sep 19, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
A different species can't consent to a marriage contract. You should know this.
Incest is only illegal to a certain point (for example, I believe second cousins can marry), and only because it's too small a gene pool. And that's a fairly recent phenomenon, by the way.
There is no reason to make polygamy illegal where all parties are consenting adults.
Your bigotry (as evidenced in this grumpy tone of defeat) is duly noted.
They will all make their point in court. "Make polygamy illegal", where is it legal now?

I have a friend who used to say, "everyone has the right to screw themselves"

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#311625 Sep 19, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
No I didn't think you meant me.
Then your response that you're not making it illegal made no sense.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Wethersfield Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News The 25 Most Dangerous Cities in the U.S. Are Mo... (Nov '10) 4 min Trumptanic 21,715
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 11 min OBAMA Muslim 1,761,367
Do pretty Girls Fart??? 15 hr Guy 5
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) Tue BOZO FARTS 64,675
News Democrats back Bysiewicz for lieutenant governor May 21 BPT 4
News Woman accused of stabbing police officer in thr... May 20 Committee For Dec... 1
Gangstalking and Harassment (Jan '13) May 19 Pusses 328

Wethersfield Jobs

Personal Finance

Wethersfield Mortgages