Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 336709 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

feces for jesus

Thiells, NY

#310518 Sep 8, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>

Because God's supreme law is higher than nine men on the Supreme Court.
"God's supreme law"

Is this on page 1 or 2 of the fundie playbook?
Ink

Drexel Hill, PA

#310519 Sep 8, 2013
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
Imagine that...Ink is allegedly okay with other religions being expressed in schools as long as they fit Christian guidelines for time usage.
And suppose a Muslim said he was fine with Christian prayers as long as they take no longer than Muslim prayers? I'm sure that would go over like a lead balloon.
No I was thinking about the time factor and the school day. I have no problem if children of all religions arrived at school early enough to worship in their own way.
Ink

Drexel Hill, PA

#310520 Sep 8, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
At the flagpole? Yes. In front of the class, forcing the rest of the class to listen to it? No. And that is not "banishment".
Are you really this STUPIDLY unaware of the prayer at the flagpole phenomenon, or that there are Bible clubs at schools? Seriously, Witless?
I think that according to the Constitution, you should be allowed to pray anywhere.
Ink

Drexel Hill, PA

#310521 Sep 8, 2013
Ocean56 wrote:
<quoted text>
MANY other things, Inky, one of which is regularly reminding women that they CAN have sex and still NOT reproduce. Hope that helps.
Whether women decide to be mothers or not, how many children THEY want, ISN'T up to you or the Catholic Church. It's up to each woman to decide that, which I know makes the Catholic hierarchy furious. Tough luck for them. Women who don't ever want kids can use contraception to prevent unwanted pregnancy to the best of their ability and abort an unwanted pregnancy in the event their BC fails.
Motherhood: OPTIONAL, not required.
I believe that it the law. You just seem so preoccupied with sex.

“Truly Pro-Life”

Since: Nov 11

Proudly Pro-choice

#310522 Sep 8, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
As long as it doesn't take longer than a short prayer, go for it.
Start school fifteen minutes earlier for whatever makes each child comfortable to start his day.
Who are you to determine the appropriate length or running time of a prayer??

And if every religion in every school was accommodated with 'prayer time', there wouldn't be any time left for academics.

You're an idiot.
feces for jesus

Thiells, NY

#310523 Sep 8, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
As long as it doesn't take longer than a short prayer, go for it.
Start school fifteen minutes earlier for whatever makes each child comfortable to start his day.
No need. Take care of personal things on your own time. You want your kids to be able to pray in school then send your kids to private schools. Your rights are not being minimalized. Your religion does not MANDATE that one must pray before going to school.
Ink

Drexel Hill, PA

#310524 Sep 8, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
Each child? Really? Idiot, each child MAY pray if they feel comfortable doing so already, just not out loud where others are forced to listen.
Damn, you're stupid. If the teacher had to take the 15 minutes to make "each child comfortable" with the prayer/ritual of their choice, there goes the school day.
Can't Christian kids get up early to pray at home BEFORE school? Mine did.
Well it just took me 25 seconds to say the Lords prayer, not 15 minutes. I think we could afford a short time for each faith.
feces for jesus

Thiells, NY

#310525 Sep 8, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
I believe that it the law. You just seem so preoccupied with sex.
Your belief does not make it law.
Ink

Drexel Hill, PA

#310526 Sep 8, 2013
not a playa1965 wrote:
<quoted text>Guess what....SO DOES MINE.
I refuse to kill a human within me, unless I'm exercising my right to self defense.
Do you get that at all?
How my opinion shapes my behavior?
Here's the deal. "The right thing" and "The wrong thing" ARE SUBJECTIVE. I TRULY believe that I don't have the moral authority to subsume another person's morality into my own.
I'm glad there are laws regulating abortion. I'm crushed that they aren't enforced, in a way that KEEPS abortion safe for women who need it. I refuse to condemn the women for whom I "approve" abortion, to the necessity for seeking it outside the law, by supporting legislation which may prevent them from accessing it. If that makes me a monster, Ink, so be it. I'll not be telling other women not to do what I did. My embryo is just as dead as theirs will be, and they're the ones who are charged with making that decision.
Once you understand that, you may be able to quit smacking others in an attempt to justify your stance. At least, I hope so, for your sake.
Why do you refuse the child within you?
Ink

Drexel Hill, PA

#310527 Sep 8, 2013
not a playa1965 wrote:
<quoted text>What, so you would encourage every child to pray as the spirit moves them, as the leader of a group prayer in every public school, every day? Every class period? Every minute?
Because that's what it would entail, honey. Personally, I think excluding group prayer across the board is more sensible...but maybe you'd LIKE the entire schoolday to be taken up by prayer...
No, just once before they start their studies.

“Truly Pro-Life”

Since: Nov 11

Proudly Pro-choice

#310528 Sep 8, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
No I was thinking about the time factor and the school day. I have no problem if children of all religions arrived at school early enough to worship in their own way.
Pin another cookie on you. I have no problem with kids praying silently all day long, if that's what fries their chicken, but I have a SERIOUS problem with them being required to pray any certain prayer, led by anyone, for any length of time, at a public school. So do most of us, and that's why it's not allowed.

As far as I'm concerned, prayer is personal, not public.
feces for jesus

Thiells, NY

#310529 Sep 8, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
No I was thinking about the time factor and the school day. I have no problem if children of all religions arrived at school early enough to worship in their own way.
Your suggestion only seems to take what you want into consideration. Do you have any clue how many times per day Muslims are MANDATED by their religion to pray? Your religion doesn't even mandate prayer, but here you are thinking that your religious freedom is being suffocated.
Ink

Drexel Hill, PA

#310530 Sep 8, 2013
elise in burque wrote:
<quoted text>Of course, she would, and, because she thinks that it's only Christians that would exercise that privilege, she and her fellow godbots fantasize that it would result in lots of safely uneducated Christians trudging lockstep with her lawd's freaky teachings.
You don't need to speak for me, as you can hardly speak for yourself.

I hardly think it would only be Christians. Do you think only Christians talk to God. I guess you wouldn't really know.
Ink

Drexel Hill, PA

#310531 Sep 8, 2013
not a playa1965 wrote:
<quoted text>Who are you to determine the appropriate length or running time of a prayer??
And if every religion in every school was accommodated with 'prayer time', there wouldn't be any time left for academics.
You're an idiot.
I think each group as a consideration to others should keep it short and sweet.
feces for jesus

Thiells, NY

#310532 Sep 8, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Well it just took me 25 seconds to say the Lords prayer, not 15 minutes. I think we could afford a short time for each faith.
And you can say it under your breath.

No need to alter everyone schedules or separate all the students based on their respective, religious backgrounds or beliefs.

Send your kids to a private, religious institution and stop whining about how your religious rights are being taken away when they are not.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#310533 Sep 8, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
I think that according to the Constitution, you should be allowed to pray anywhere.
And, according to the Constitution, you are, Witless. Already. What you are NOT allowed to do is to infringe on the civil rights of others.

Again, HOW can you claim religion has been "banished" from schools, where the students are allowed to pray in a group around the flagpole at the start of the day, they teach religion classes, and have Bible Clubs?

You are truly an idiot.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#310534 Sep 8, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
I think each group as a consideration to others should keep it short and sweet.
Even if "each group" kept it "short and sweet", how much time would be left for actual SCHOOL WORK? Are you really unaware of just how many religions may be represented in any one classroom, you Moron?
Ink

Drexel Hill, PA

#310535 Sep 8, 2013
not a playa1965 wrote:
<quoted text>Pin another cookie on you. I have no problem with kids praying silently all day long, if that's what fries their chicken, but I have a SERIOUS problem with them being required to pray any certain prayer, led by anyone, for any length of time, at a public school. So do most of us, and that's why it's not allowed.
As far as I'm concerned, prayer is personal, not public.
I didn't say required and you know it.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#310536 Sep 8, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Well it just took me 25 seconds to say the Lords prayer, not 15 minutes. I think we could afford a short time for each faith.
That's because you're too stupid to realize there may be as many as a dozen different religions in any given classroom, and that it takes FAR longer to get a group of kids to settle down to do anything together, especially when you ALSO have to quiet those who AREN'T participating in that activity. And you'd have to repeat the process every single time.

Much simpler to let each child pray silently when they wish.

Why do you believe prayers need to be said out loud? Don't they work if they're not?

Since: Aug 09

Location hidden

#310537 Sep 8, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
I think that according to the Constitution, you should be allowed to pray anywhere.
Good morning "Ink!"

Hope this morning finds you well.

I see we've got a rather "spirited" discussion going on already, and that you're in the thick of it...
I'm rather curious, with regards to your statement above, do you feel that same of freedom ought to be extended to atheists as well?
By that, I mean, do you feel they should have the freedom to not be subjected to others "praying" around them?
This is a question that's solely out of curiosity, and not meant to imply anything whatsoever.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Wethersfield Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 21 min USAsince1680 1,744,862
News Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 4 hr Anonymous 72,073
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 9 hr STEAMY FARTS 64,570
Do pretty Girls Fart??? Fri Jon Neno 4
News House leadership favors statewide gaming strate... Thu Radio Flyer 3016 4
News The 25 Most Dangerous Cities in the U.S. Are Mo... (Nov '10) Apr 18 Radio Flyer 3016 21,530
Why are puerto ricans so lazy & don't work? (Nov '13) Apr 17 Vega 34

Wethersfield Jobs

Personal Finance

Wethersfield Mortgages