Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 309843 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

No Relativism

Belleville, IL

#309095 Aug 23, 2013
not a playa1965 wrote:
<quoted text>Did you ever read biology texts that describe why a fetus cannot survive outside the womb before a specific point in development?
We don't recognize 'rights' for humans who are dependent on the organs and systems of another human. Your BORN child doesn't have the right to one of your kidneys. Your parents do not have a right to one of your lungs.
Let me know when laws compel you to divest yourself of a body part, or hook yourself up to another person, for the purpose of keeping that person alive,'k?
Next
Mankind was created to procreate via pregnancy. It's not a disease. It's a natural part of who we are as human beings.

You look like a moron when all you have to explain your proabort view is to dehumanize humans.
Ink

Warminster, PA

#309096 Aug 23, 2013
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
Yet God killed off everyone with a mammoth flood? Yet God killed off everyone in Sodom & Gomorrah?
I can see where you fundies learned to be such hypocrites.
Since everyone dies, I guess that is part of His plan.
Ink

Warminster, PA

#309097 Aug 23, 2013
not a playa1965 wrote:
<quoted text>Well thank goodness for that, since I had no intention of doing so. It's up to individual women whether they consider their fetus a 'baby' or not.
I'm not in the business of 'convincing' them it is or isn't. I just know what the word 'fetus' means.
Yes it means offspring.
No Relativism

Belleville, IL

#309098 Aug 23, 2013
not a playa1965 wrote:
<quoted text>So what?
Playa: "So what?"

You're proven wrong and all you have to say is "so what?"

Such a tool..........
Katie

Seattle, WA

#309099 Aug 23, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
God did not command anyone to destroy any nation.
Nowhere in Numbers does it say that the woman drinking bitter waters was pregnant.
Oh? Samaria was not a nation? What was it, with its own King? A neighborhood?

You didn't say, "According to the Jewish Bible, God ordered the entire distruction of Samaria. Killed were men, women, children and unborn babies, everything alive. Nothing here represents an abortion.

"Probably you shouldn't repeat things that you 'think' are in the bible without reading it yourself for context."

Hypocrisy is not a good thing. Y'know

http://www.topix.com/forum/news/abortion/T833...

PS You can find what Numbers says on your own time. If you interpret it differently, it's probably because someone has told you to do so.
Ink

Warminster, PA

#309100 Aug 23, 2013
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
Why should he/she stay out of it? Because you don't like his opinion?
Because he said he has no interest in the subject.

“Truly Pro-Life”

Since: Nov 11

Proudly Pro-choice

#309101 Aug 23, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
What body part are you giving up when pregnant.
The fetus is conscripting the calcium of my teeth and bones, the nutrition from my stomach and intestines, and the blood and placenta from my uterus.

You can let me know when laws compel you to hook yourself up to another human for the purpose of that human's survival, right along with that other SCPL idiot.

Next...
Ink

Warminster, PA

#309102 Aug 23, 2013
Huh wrote:
<quoted text>
And that is your cult and I don't have to follow it...WHAT PART OF CONSTITUTION ALLOWING EACH OUR OWN RELIGION OR NONE AT ALL DONT YOU GET???
You Christians seem to think somehow you have the right to force your religion on me...YOU DONT AND IF YOU TRY GONNA SNAP YOUR NECK..
The conversation was about non believers trying to claim that the Bible promotes abortion, which it doesn't.

I am not forcing religion on you and likewise I will not allow you to force your corrupted version of the Bible on me.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#309103 Aug 23, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
I am tired of the old one. Let's talk about gender selection.
Why? It's nothing to me, and a non-issue in this country, despite the far right's attempt to scare people with it.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#309104 Aug 23, 2013
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
Dear bHitler,
Your namby-pamby style is duly noted. Again.
Your arguments have a childishly neurotic flavor.
LOL, you're projecting again.
Ink

Warminster, PA

#309105 Aug 23, 2013
not a playa1965 wrote:
<quoted text> The fetus is conscripting the calcium of my teeth and bones, the nutrition from my stomach and intestines, and the blood and placenta from my uterus.
You can let me know when laws compel you to hook yourself up to another human for the purpose of that human's survival, right along with that other SCPL idiot.
Next...
What body part did you give up?
Ink

Warminster, PA

#309106 Aug 23, 2013
feces for jesus wrote:
<quoted text>
You arent going to convince anyone that your omniscient god has nothing to do with spontaneous abortions.
Do you believe He does?

“Truly Pro-Life”

Since: Nov 11

Proudly Pro-choice

#309107 Aug 23, 2013
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
Mankind was created to procreate via pregnancy. It's not a disease. It's a natural part of who we are as human beings.
You look like a moron when all you have to explain your proabort view is to dehumanize humans.
Mankind evolved with the ability to procreate during pregnancy. It is a medical condition. Abortion is also a 'natural' part of who we are as human beings.

You are a moron - denying that the fetus has rights does not dehumanize it. It merely puts the fetus in a category of human without certain rights.

Born children do not have all the rights which are recognized as belonging to adults - does that 'dehumanize' them, due to their stage of development?

And there STILL aren't any laws compelling you to give your born child a lung, a kidney, or even blood. Does that fact 'dehumanize' your kids?

Next....

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#309108 Aug 23, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Since everyone dies, I guess that is part of His plan.
How could anything NOT be a part of the plan of an omniscient being that created the everything? Including abortion.
Ink

Warminster, PA

#309110 Aug 23, 2013
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
Dear bHitler,
Your namby-pamby style is duly noted. Again.
Your arguments have a childishly neurotic flavor.
She whines.

“Truly Pro-Life”

Since: Nov 11

Proudly Pro-choice

#309111 Aug 23, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
I am tired of the old one. Let's talk about gender selection.
Do you plan to apply gender selection to your next pregnancy?

I don't.

There. I've talked about it.
I'm done now.

Next...
Huh Duh

United States

#309112 Aug 23, 2013
not a playa1965 wrote:
<quoted text>Did you ever read biology texts that describe why a fetus cannot survive outside the womb before a specific point in development?
We don't recognize 'rights' for humans who are dependent on the organs and systems of another human. Your BORN child doesn't have the right to one of your kidneys. Your parents do not have a right to one of your lungs.
Let me know when laws compel you to divest yourself of a body part, or hook yourself up to another person, for the purpose of keeping that person alive,'k?
Next
Laws don't compel you .....because they apply to born humans. You said it yourself - you're not compelled to hook yourself up to another "person". You're not comparing fetuses to born humans are you ? PL aren't allowed to do that. Neither are you.
Katie

Seattle, WA

#309113 Aug 23, 2013
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
Katie V.: "The majority of induced abortions occur during the first 8-12 weeks of pregnancy when gender is not known."
As early as 5-7 weeks gestation mom can find out from home"
"It's A Girl!"
"It's A Boy!"
www.TellMePinkOrBlue.com
__________
Dumb (continued....)
Azz.
DA, why would you repeat yourself? Didn't you think I saw this the first time you posted it today? How about the first day you posted/spammed it? How about all those days in between?

You're not a good reader or you'd've known this bolsters MY point. Doubt you even remember it. Or what it was originally.

<plays world's smallest violin for DA NR>

“GOD SO LOVED US”

Since: Aug 08

He Gave His SON to Save us

#309114 Aug 23, 2013
not a playa1965 wrote:
<quoted text>"He won't get the kid," eh? I wouldn't have thought he would get paroled....or get a court ruling in his favor, regarding parental rights, for that matter...but apparently those both happened. Accordingly, I can see some asshat of a judge granting him full custody, as well. If 'best interests of the child' were the operating principle here, the judge(s) failed miserably all the way around...what's to stop them from sticking to that pattern?
To answer your question, the mother had no intention of 'allowing' her 14 year old to gestate this baby...but the daughter must have agreed to the abortion, or she wouldn't have been given one. Their motives / reasons for the abortion might have differed. From what I understand, dude was mom's boyfriend first. Circumstantial evidence supports the idea that mom wanted kid to abort, to keep from giving evidence of paternity...to keep the rape charge against him from materializing, due to the lack of same.
Nonetheless, the decision to abort the fetus is well within the legal purview of the daughter, and the legal procedure, for collecting DNA evidence of paternity from the products of conception, was not followed. Mom should be absolved of criminal charges, if there are any. JMO
She,didn't have an abortion though .

And it looks,like some kind of error on the part of the moms attorney
Is part of the problem

See bottom ..may be there are other cases but it says,it is before a family court
http://law.justia.com/cases/massachusetts/sup...

“Truly Pro-Life”

Since: Nov 11

Proudly Pro-choice

#309115 Aug 23, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Miscarraiges happen for many reasons including sperm or egg quality, mal formation, improper implantation, viruses, bacteria etc.
God supposedly has a 'vast eternal plan'. Obviously the gestation and survival of every conceived embryo, wasn't part of it.

I know that sounds may sound 'inconvenient'. Take it up with Him.

Next...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Wethersfield Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 2 min Patriot 1,231,563
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 30 min Patriot AKA Bozo 53,436
News Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 43 min Faith 70,008
News The 25 Most Dangerous Cities in the U.S. Are Mo... (Nov '10) 9 hr ICP_2015K 19,911
News Strangers Come To Hartford Student's Aid (Mar '09) 18 hr didusayhome 120
News Conn. Gay Couple Accused of Molesting Adopted Sons (Dec '11) 19 hr Smg 591
News Glastonbury Parents Cited For Allowing Underage... (Mar '09) 19 hr tom wingo 275
More from around the web

Wethersfield People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]