Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 310174 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

No Relativism

West Lafayette, IN

#308988 Aug 22, 2013
Junket wrote:
<quoted text>
Boggles the mind, does it not? If raped victims know they'll be tied for years to their "monster" ... makes a strong case for terminating a pregnancy. Do they not see this? It must be hard enough to carry to term knowing that the child was conceived in an act of violence, but to have to "share" custody? Geez.
Junket always overlooks the baby's right to life.

Insensitive cow.
worships reality

AOL

#308989 Aug 22, 2013
cpeter1313 wrote:
Gestating wasn't the issue.
of course it was. it wasn't about anything "but" gestation.

308537 -
"if the fetus is 'gestating' at the woman's will then it is a wanted pregnancy"

308539 -
"no woman has to 'gestate' that fetus against her will"

308586 -
"why is it a problem that there is no right to 'gestate'?

not about gestation? mutt.
f course, I also celebrate your complete and utter impotence on the issue.
I take "mutt" as a compliment; my ancestors were french, german, irish, and polish, with a little native american in there somewhere.
<quoted text>
that's just fabulous.

mutt.
worships reality

AOL

#308990 Aug 22, 2013
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
Embryo/fetus = potential life, a developing life not yet lived, a life possibly unable to live outside the womb. If gender is known, maybe a name can be decided.
is it potential life or is it developing life ? it can't be both. if it is potential life that means it is not yet life. if it is developing life then it is just that...a life that is developing.

do you keep a log of all the outrageously stupid things you say ?

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#308991 Aug 23, 2013
worships reality wrote:
<quoted text>
you'd know firsthand. bigot.
Matthew 23

Then Jesus said to the crowds and to his disciples: 2 “The teachers of the law and the Pharisees sit in Moses’ seat. 3 So you must be careful to do everything they tell you. But do not do what they do, for they do not practice what they preach.

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#308992 Aug 23, 2013
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>

Insensitive cow.
You call HER "insensitive", and then you call her a "cow" in the very same sentence?

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#308993 Aug 23, 2013
not a playa1965 wrote:
<quoted text>I've read the Bible cover to cover, at least 6 times. It lacked any other mention of "killing unborn babies" than within the context of God's command.
You say abortion is killing unborn babies. Given my understanding of YOUR use of the words 'killing unborn babies', the use of this concept within the verse provided indicates to me, that this is the only context in which abortion is discussed in the Bible. I'm going to stand by my assertion.
Since you're so knowledgeable about its contents, please point out ANY chapter, or verse, or line of scripture, which mentions the word 'abortion' specifically - in any context whatsoever.
I'll wait.
While I'm waiting, and you're growing ever more aware of the futility of your digging, perhaps you'll consider the absence of that word as an indication of the importance with which your 'God' imbued it. In his inerrant judgment. With his omnipotence, and his all-seeing self.
Well said :)

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#308994 Aug 23, 2013
Junket wrote:
Just caught up reading. No force. Regardless, she wants nothing more to do with loverboy and shouldn't her wants trump his, at least in this situation?
She was under the age of consent for her state. And, IMO, he's only doing it to get out of jail time. It's the judge who should be questioned here. Why they allowed his original decision to stand, I have no idea.
No Relativism

Belleville, IL

#308995 Aug 23, 2013
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
You call HER "insensitive", and then you call her a "cow" in the very same sentence?
"Insensitive" is an adjective & described what kind of cow (noun) she is.

“Truly Pro-Life”

Since: Nov 11

Proudly Pro-choice

#308996 Aug 23, 2013
cpeter1313 wrote:
She should play his game--demand that he be given full custody and she will waive her parental rights. That would be the last thing he wants.
I see new legislation in MA stemming from this.
<quoted text>
What happens to the child if the judge takes her seriously, and grants full custody to the rapist who fathered it?

I can't get behind your idea, simply because that possibility even exists.

“Truly Pro-Life”

Since: Nov 11

Proudly Pro-choice

#308997 Aug 23, 2013
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
Junket always overlooks the baby's right to life.
Insensitive cow.
No relevance always overlooks the facts:

Women have the right to life.
Fetuses do not.

Obtuse control freak.

“Truly Pro-Life”

Since: Nov 11

Proudly Pro-choice

#308998 Aug 23, 2013
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
"Insensitive" is an adjective & described what kind of cow (noun) she is.
"Obtuse" is an adjective, describing what sort of freak (noun) you are.

Next...
No Relativism

Belleville, IL

#308999 Aug 23, 2013
not a playa1965 wrote:
<quoted text>No relevance always overlooks the facts:
Women have the right to life.
Fetuses do not.
Obtuse control freak.
Playa: "Women have the right to life."

So do baby women.

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#309001 Aug 23, 2013
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
"Insensitive" is an adjective & described what kind of cow (noun) she is.
Really? Cows can be insensitive? This thing you wrote makes no sense at all. If you were trying to come off as intelligent you failed miserably.

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#309002 Aug 23, 2013
When a christer brings their god into the argument, I will point out that their sourcebook contradicts them--especially when they claim the bible condemns abortion, which it does not.
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Then it shouldn't be used as your justification for anything especially abortion.

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#309003 Aug 23, 2013
You can't overlook what doesn't exist.
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
Junket always overlooks the baby's right to life.
Insensitive cow.
el cid 777

Scranton, PA

#309004 Aug 23, 2013
Hi! Today I just want to speak about the space
alien web sites. The space aliens are all over the
internet. One of their web addresses is
alaje777 Put this address in all small letters
in the you tube search box and you can click on his
videos. Note...We are NOT alone in the universe and
there are more than one universe! The flying saucers are real! I must go for now...
Love, el cid 777
Note...I am NOT a space alien!

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#309005 Aug 23, 2013
The subject is the woman's right to choose whether or not to gestate--not gestation itself.

Cur.
worships reality wrote:
<quoted text>
of course it was. it wasn't about anything "but" gestation.
308537 -
"if the fetus is 'gestating' at the woman's will then it is a wanted pregnancy"
308539 -
"no woman has to 'gestate' that fetus against her will"
308586 -
"why is it a problem that there is no right to 'gestate'?
not about gestation? mutt.
<quoted text>
that's just fabulous.
mutt.

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#309006 Aug 23, 2013
He won't get the kid; he's a felon on parole and I would presume also now a registered sex offender. But she can keep him in court for a very long time and at tremendous cost.

The question in my mind is, why the hell did they allow a 14yo rape victim to have a kid to begin with?
not a playa1965 wrote:
<quoted text>What happens to the child if the judge takes her seriously, and grants full custody to the rapist who fathered it?
I can't get behind your idea, simply because that possibility even exists.
No Relativism

Belleville, IL

#309007 Aug 23, 2013
Huh wrote:
<quoted text>
Lucky for FREEDOMS sake abortion is legal and always will be. Now tell me how a women controlling her own body hurts you.
Duh Huh posted: "tell me how a women controlling her own body hurts you"

1. The baby's body is not mom's body. DNA analysis is definitive regarding this fact.

2. How did Casey Anthony killing her daughter Caylee during her 12th trimester of life hurt you?
No Relativism

Belleville, IL

#309008 Aug 23, 2013
cpeter1313 wrote:
The subject is the woman's right to choose whether or not to gestate--not gestation itself.
Cur.
<quoted text>
Actually, the subject is the woman's right to intentionally kill her baby or not.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Wethersfield Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 5 min USAsince1680 1,251,359
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 39 min Brian_G 53,954
News Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 58 min Ratloder 70,144
Electric heat Cromwell hills (Jul '14) 5 hr Mslmike 2
News The 25 Most Dangerous Cities in the U.S. Are Mo... (Nov '10) 7 hr Gomer 20,056
Review: Nirenstein Horowitz And Associates (Sep '12) Thu AnthonyI15 44
News Boy, 11, drowns in Brentwood pool (Jun '08) Jun 29 tom wingo 48
More from around the web

Wethersfield People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Wethersfield Mortgages