no he's not. you don't even know what my question was, do you? if you did then you'd never say he was answering it.<quoted text>
He's answering your question.
bitner said that post birth abortions and post birth terminations were the same, and that both were non existent. since i agreed that post birth abortions were indeed non existent, i asked her to similarly explain how post birth terminations were non existent.
grumpy was saying that they were not non existent. he was saying they happen.
so how is that possibly answering my question?
why so stupid?The last line of your posts asked and he answered. All that crap above is just crap, a distraction. Why so quarrelsome?