Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 311625 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

Since: Dec 09

Location hidden

#291719 Apr 3, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't believe you care one wit whether those babies were killed just before birth or just after. That't why no one did anything to stop him. Not the mothers whose abbies were murdered, not the state, not the NAF or the stall. Nobody cared. Only the DEA who were after drugs.
What did Pro Life groups do to stop him? Nothing. Didn't even protest his clinic when the police had to be called in. Why is it Pro Life gets all these reports about women dying from botched abortions done at PP but doesn't know anything about a butcher with numerous complaints and police involvement? The area is too "Fresh Prince" for them is my guess.
Ink

Philadelphia, PA

#291720 Apr 3, 2013
AyakaNeo wrote:
<quoted text>What did Pro Life groups do to stop him? Nothing. Didn't even protest his clinic when the police had to be called in. Why is it Pro Life gets all these reports about women dying from botched abortions done at PP but doesn't know anything about a butcher with numerous complaints and police involvement? The area is too "Fresh Prince" for them is my guess.
Now you think there should be protesting against abortion. LOL. It seems to me that proabortion types should police their own. You guys don't care what goes on in these places as long as the kid is dead.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#291721 Apr 3, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't believe you care one wit whether those babies were killed just before birth or just after. That't why no one did anything to stop him. Not the mothers whose abbies were murdered, not the state, not the NAF or the stall. Nobody cared. Only the DEA who were after drugs.
You believe a lot of things that aren't true. No skin off my nose. You wanting to believe this says more about you than it does anyone else.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#291722 Apr 3, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
What we do know is that you don't give a rat's ass about whether those babies were aborted alive or dead. Nobody else did either, not the mothers, not the state, not the staff or the NAF. Only the DEA looking for drugs brought it to light. It is so important to keep open clinics that will make sure mom goes home childless that they will overlook anything.
Dont forget yourself in that list Inkstain. You dont give a rats ass either. All you seem to care about is posting here from morning to night making an ass of yourself.
grumpy

Garnerville, NY

#291723 Apr 3, 2013
The Prince wrote:
<quoted text>
She is a stonecold hearted proabortion pagan. You won't get an ounce of comapssion out of the pagan. She is one damaged soul.
They're the best kind!
The Prince

Allentown, PA

#291724 Apr 3, 2013
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
Dont forget yourself in that list Inkstain. You dont give a rats ass either. All you seem to care about is posting here from morning to night making an ass of yourself.
Since you do the same, what does that make you, pagan?

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#291725 Apr 3, 2013
Susanm wrote:
<quoted text>
Your implication is that I only address the unsafe conditions at abortion "clinics" is for shock value. Your words:
"If I'm wrong, good. In that case, you know that it's far more likely that an unsafe family clinic will have an effect on your community, than an abortion provider. Of course, it doesn't have the shock value of Gosnell, does it?"
That wasn't an implication. It was an explicit statement. It was a smart ass remark and unfair. Sorry. However, you accused me of a completely different "implication," on my first post to you. Different post. It's hardly important, now, is it?

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#291726 Apr 3, 2013
Susanm wrote:
<quoted text>
If I did, then plese reword it so that I can better understand what you meant.
Just read the words and don't try to read anything into them. There's no need to reword the comment. You're very suspicious.

Since: Feb 07

Location hidden

#291727 Apr 3, 2013
elise in burque wrote:
<quoted text> Just read the words and don't try to read anything into them. There's no need to reword the comment. You're very suspicious.
I apologize as well. If you will reword your post, I will try to understand what you are saying.

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#291728 Apr 3, 2013
Your ignorance, while unsurprising, is still appalling.

HIV evolved from SIV due to consumption of raw/undecooked meat, not sexual transmission. You bestiality fantasies don't interest me. As for "my tribe", what would that mean?

Patient zero is a myth; HIV was already in several large cities before he ever touched down.

Heteros spread HIV through unprotected sex, not just anal sex. And why would straight people want or need our encouragement to have sex at all?

Face it, you haven't a clue about anything, and don't want to know anything. In the latter, you are a stunning success.
The Prince wrote:
<quoted text>
"HIV began among heteros in africa, who irresponsibly spread it to gays"
How convenient, pagan. But that is bullshat. Your tribe had man/monkey sex and your gay flight attendent brought it to the US. It spread by hetros in Africa because you pagans encourage man on woamn anal sex like you boys and pagan women enjoy.
Time to fess up to the reality of life.

Since: Dec 09

Location hidden

#291729 Apr 3, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Now you think there should be protesting against abortion. LOL. It seems to me that proabortion types should police their own. You guys don't care what goes on in these places as long as the kid is dead.
Good grief, are you not a grown woman? Act like it. You're ridiculous.
Katie

Auburn, WA

#291730 Apr 3, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
How can you possibly see a self-defense argument here?
Pregnancy is a medical condition that uses every resource the woman has, takes these resources from her to give to the embryo/fetus. If the embryo/fetus is unwanted/unhealthy, the woman has every right to use self-defense and get it out of her.
Ink

Philadelphia, PA

#291731 Apr 3, 2013
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
Pregnancy is a medical condition that uses every resource the woman has, takes these resources from her to give to the embryo/fetus. If the embryo/fetus is unwanted/unhealthy, the woman has every right to use self-defense and get it out of her.
Nice try, doesn't hold water. That is not the meaning of self-defense.
Katie

Auburn, WA

#291732 Apr 3, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Nice try, doesn't hold water. That is not the meaning of self-defense.


Why do you say this? Do you have objective reasoning why that doesn't quote hold water? Use back up if necessary.
feces for jesus

Brooklyn, NY

#291733 Apr 3, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Nice try, doesn't hold water. That is not the meaning of self-defense.
You and your religion love to try and redefine our language constantly. You don't get to define what constitutes as self defense.
worships reality

United States

#291734 Apr 3, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Nice try, doesn't hold water. That is not the meaning of self-defense.
you give her way more credit than she deserves. it wasn't even a nice try. it wasn't even close to being a valid self defense argument.

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#291735 Apr 3, 2013
Susanm wrote:
<quoted text>
I apologize as well. If you will reword your post, I will try to understand what you are saying.
It's cool. No big deal.

Since: Dec 09

Location hidden

#291736 Apr 3, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Nice try, doesn't hold water. That is not the meaning of self-defense.
She's not defining self-defense. Cancer is medical condition too, if you don't want to have cancer, it's your body and you can get do whatever you want to not have cancer.
Ink

Philadelphia, PA

#291737 Apr 3, 2013
AyakaNeo wrote:
<quoted text>She's not defining self-defense. Cancer is medical condition too, if you don't want to have cancer, it's your body and you can get do whatever you want to not have cancer.
That's just as dumb as what she said.
Katie

Auburn, WA

#291738 Apr 3, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
That's just as dumb as what she said.
Your words mean nothing. You cannot refute the fact abortion is self-defense against an unwanted/unhealthy pregnancy. Nothing but a blowhard. All bark, no bite.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Wethersfield Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 2 min New Yorker 61,050
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 3 min RoxLo 1,419,277
News Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 43 min TRD 70,953
News The 25 Most Dangerous Cities in the U.S. Are Mo... (Nov '10) 7 hr Hipocrit 20,505
Chris Powell Editor of the JI investigated for ... Aug 22 HCourantsub 1
News SEA CLIFF: Paramedic arrested on child harm cha... (Jun '08) Aug 21 Greg 55
CAR Accident on Friday April 22, 2016 Apr '16 MarcusT20073 1

Wethersfield Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Wethersfield Mortgages