Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 311222 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

Katie

Auburn, WA

#288013 Mar 5, 2013
Susanm wrote:
<quoted text>
How long does a baby have to live to be considered viable?
What? The conversation was about determining fetuses viable. That after baby was born, after baby was attached to ALS, baby didn't survive outside the womb after all. It didn't reach viability. The conversation was about Doc's contention with the phrase, "reaching viability".

I don't know what you, Ink, and JM think this has to do with the baby born from the fatal car accident. That baby, if there'd been no car accident, would most likely still be in utero.

So what's your guys' point? What point do you think you've made? You sound so confused to me trying to combine two separate conversations into one all while pointing your crooked fingers at me.
Ink

Philadelphia, PA

#288014 Mar 5, 2013
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
You pulled something of mine from a separate conversation regarding viability and who determines it; physicians or courts. You've attached to a story from NY about a couple who were killed in a car accident while the wife was 6mos pregnant. Baby was delivered by c-sec, but unfortunately died. He was named, circumcised, and buried. And you asked me an absurd question whether I thought he was a fetus or not. I have answered from the beginning he was a baby because he'd been born.
Yet, even today you are reposting what I said in a conversation regarding viability, "I maintain, a fetus determined to be viable who is delivered and attached to ALS, but dies anyway, was obviously not viable. It was unable to survive outside the womb."
What is your point? Why do you think I'm confused? Baby's no longer an embryo, no longer a fetus. Baby was born. What do you think I'm confused about here? And why are you obsessing on it?
And yet you call the baby a fetus in you r post that I quoted. Why did you call aborn baby a fetus before?
Katie

Auburn, WA

#288015 Mar 5, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
This is what Katie said.
I maintain, a fetus determined to be viable who is delivered and attached to ALS, but dies anyway, was obviously not viable. It was unable to survive outside the womb.
You are calling this case a 'fetus' but now you are calling the baby born after the mother's death a 'baby'.
That's a change of mind.
The sentence you keep quoting does that, too, goofy. Were you unable to comprehend the distinction of fetus and after its born and read it as baby? Or did you miscomprehend and assumed a fetus was born and attached to ALS, but remained a fetus??
grumpy

Stony Point, NY

#288016 Mar 5, 2013
worships reality wrote:
<quoted text>
inkstain(?) Is not wrong. the dead couple's neighbor is not the city medical examiner. the m.e. has already ruled "extreme prematurity" as the cause of death. in this case baby was not viable.
You're anti-choice. Would you say there was a good chance of survival outside the womb under normal circumstances?
worships reality

United States

#288017 Mar 5, 2013
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh bullshit. You got that out of some two-bit newspaper that got it wrong according to every other report out there. Orhodox Jews dont have autopsies - no ME would have been involved beyond a death certificate for a live birth.
At 7 months pregnant, the fetus certainly WOULD have been viable without the trauma incured.
"Isaac Abraham, a community leader in Brooklyn and a neighbor of the dead couple, confirmed the death of the baby this morning. The baby died from injuries overnight at New York's Bellevue Hospital. The baby, who weighed about 3 pounds, sustained brain and other internal injuries, Abraham said."
http://abcnews.go.com/US/suspect-hit-run-acci...
FK off you little coward.
easy sweetheart. ever consider switching to decaff?
the ny daily news is a two bit newspaper?
you mention 'every other report out there' but all you come up with is this neighbors quote.
do you have anything else? because I can come up with numerous other sources if it's the daily news that bothers you, including the associate press:

"ellen borakove, a sppkeswoman for the city's medical examiner's office, said the baby's death was caused by extreme prematurity due to maternal blunt force injuries"
Katie

Auburn, WA

#288019 Mar 5, 2013
worships reality wrote:
<quoted text>
how is it different? did you really just ask that?
for one the medical examiner's cause of death is specifically listed as "extreme prematurity". bit-o-honey statement says non viability was caused by injuries and makes no mention of "prematurity.
two, the medical examiners cause of death makes no mention of injuries to the baby as a factor in its death. bit-o-honey statement says baby was not viable due to injuries "to him". baby was not viable due to its prematurity.
the difference is glaringly stark.
You use a whole of words to say nothing.

You and bit-o-honey said the same thing.

Nobody can claim the fetus didn't suffer injury prior to birth as a result of mother's fatal injuries from the car wreck. What else brought about its premature birth but the car accident and mother's injuries? Her injuries were his injuries. Without them, he'd still be in utero. And she'd still be alive.
Katie

Auburn, WA

#288020 Mar 5, 2013
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>She wasn't talking about a fetus that sustained injuries from blunt force trauma that killed the mother you IDIOT.
Do you practice hard to be this big a jackass?
No practice necessary.
It's a natural talent, Foo.

:|
Ink

Philadelphia, PA

#288021 Mar 5, 2013
grumpy wrote:
<quoted text>You're anti-choice. Would you say there was a good chance of survival outside the womb under normal circumstances?
What is a normal circumstance? This child was 6-7 mon gestated and delivered from a deceased mother. Hardly normal circumstances.
Ink

Philadelphia, PA

#288022 Mar 5, 2013
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
The sentence you keep quoting does that, too, goofy. Were you unable to comprehend the distinction of fetus and after its born and read it as baby? Or did you miscomprehend and assumed a fetus was born and attached to ALS, but remained a fetus??
Ok this should be easy and I did ask before. In your opinion, is any fetus outside the womb a baby including full term stillborns?

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#288023 Mar 5, 2013
She signed a contract, reneged on it, and then tried to hit them up for 5K more to abort. What is admirable about that?
Susanm wrote:
STO

Vallejo, CA

#288024 Mar 5, 2013
Gtown71 wrote:
<quoted text>
I would comment, but your post was barely worth this :)
Another cop out.

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#288025 Mar 5, 2013
It would be quite inconvenient to be promiscuous without genitals.

Were your parents twins?
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
Your privates have probably already fallen off.
^^^ promiscuous gay men problems ^^^
STO

Vallejo, CA

#288026 Mar 5, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Where in Numbers 5 does it say that the wife was pregnant?
Where in the Bible is the word "pregnant"?

http://www.blueletterbible.org/search/transla...

Are you saying no woman was ever "pregnant" in the Bible.

Gen 30:2 And Jacob's anger was kindled against Rachel: and he said ,[Am] I in God's stead, who hath withheld from thee the fruit of the womb?

You think "fruit" refers to apples and oranges?
worships reality

United States

#288027 Mar 5, 2013
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
You use a whole of words to say nothing.
You and bit-o-honey said the same thing.
Nobody can claim the fetus didn't suffer injury prior to birth as a result of mother's fatal injuries from the car wreck. What else brought about its premature birth but the car accident and mother's injuries? Her injuries were his injuries. Without them, he'd still be in utero. And she'd still be alive.
of course it was the mother's injury and death that forced the baby's premature delivery. that doesn't mean the baby necessarily suffered any direct injury that caused it's death. the medical examiner's office was clear in its explanation as to the cause of death -- extreme prematurity. it was not viable because it was premature and it was premature because it was forced to be delivered due to injuries to the mother. it was not non viable because of injury to itself.
what i said and what bit-o-honey said couldn't have been more different. did you make it past 4th grade?
grumpy

Stony Point, NY

#288028 Mar 5, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
What is a normal circumstance? This child was 6-7 mon gestated and delivered from a deceased mother. Hardly normal circumstances.
The child survived ex-utero under the worst occurance. That is the ultimate in viability.
No Relativism

Chicago, IL

#288029 Mar 5, 2013
cpeter1313 wrote:
It would be quite inconvenient to be promiscuous without genitals.
Were your parents twins?
<quoted text>
cPeter: "It would be quite inconvenient to be promiscuous without genitals."

You've posted several times that you're the one who bends forward & grabs his ankles.
Ink

Philadelphia, PA

#288030 Mar 5, 2013
STO wrote:
<quoted text>
Where in the Bible is the word "pregnant"?
http://www.blueletterbible.org/search/transla...
Are you saying no woman was ever "pregnant" in the Bible.
Gen 30:2 And Jacob's anger was kindled against Rachel: and he said ,[Am] I in God's stead, who hath withheld from thee the fruit of the womb?
You think "fruit" refers to apples and oranges?
No. We were talking about Numbers 5:11-

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#288031 Mar 5, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
That is what I also read.
Of course you did. And as typical for your ilk, you ignored everything else that didn't fit your agenda, including FACTS.
Ink

Philadelphia, PA

#288032 Mar 5, 2013
grumpy wrote:
<quoted text>The child survived ex-utero under the worst occurance. That is the ultimate in viability.
Okay

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#288033 Mar 5, 2013
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
Your privates have probably already fallen off.
^^^ promiscuous gay men problems ^^^
While you had none to begin with.

^^^ petty little man syndrome problems^^^

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Wethersfield Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 5 min Grey Ghostmoron 1,384,349
News The 25 Most Dangerous Cities in the U.S. Are Mo... (Nov '10) 10 min see the truth 20,317
News Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 16 hr TRD 70,614
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 20 hr The Donald_ 59,545
News Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) Mon dGo mnaDed lyHo i... 72,026
News Suspect Had Quit Rehab (Mar '08) May 24 Ken Burke 135
CAR Accident on Friday April 22, 2016 Apr '16 MarcusT20073 1
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Wethersfield Mortgages