Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

[Ink]

Bitner wrote:

<quoted text>
Sorry, Witless, but the intellectual dishonesty is yours. Your bigotry was disproven, and so you tried to changed the subject, and lied about my statements.

You need to do some reading.

http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/Quran/012-a...

[Bitner]

Ink wrote:

<quoted text>
I asked if they were extremist governments and you couldn't answer.

Pay attention, Witless. That post of mine was not in response to that question.

You are a hypocrite, whining about people doing to Christians what many of the Christians on here also do.

Now, it's not that I couldn't answer. It's that I refuse to let you derail the subject to deflect from my point.

[Bitner]

Ink wrote:

<quoted text>
You need to do some reading.
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/Quran/012-a...

Again, you Imbecile, the subject was NOT apostasy.

[Bitner]

Obskeptic wrote:

<quoted text>
I find it interesting that the only ones accused of being bigots are those who value life.

It has nothing to do with her position on abortion. She is a religious bigots.

It's just a coincidence that the ones who are showing bigotry also happen to be anti-choice.

[Kenose]

Gtown71 wrote:

<quoted text>
I draw the line when the conspiracy guys say the government set up the world trade center. I've even heard the gov set jp sandy hook, it is almost like they are trying to speed up Bible prophecy.
Before the night God woke me up, I never thougbt about any of this stuff, and would have NEVER had watched 10 mins of a Hovind vid.
I also don't agree with statements Hovind makes about pre -marriage sex.
I realize God sees it the very same as He views adultery, but Hovind acts as if people have done that, that there is not alot of hope for their marriage.
I have friends who have dismissed hovind all together, but I do believe in creation, as explained in the bible, and will not take the word from some nut on the internet who says there is no hell, no soul, etc.
Plus many laugh at hovind and call him and all who watch him an idiot, but NEVER have any answers of the own.
Their biggest one is "you just don't understand the process stupid "
Lol

I've not claimed that hel (which is the original spelling) or a soul does not exist. All I've done is explain to you that these words are not in your bible. Facts are your enemy.

[Kenose]

Gtown71 wrote:

<quoted text>
Well I must admit I like you and foo.
I have an idea, instead of calling someone ideas about something idiotic and running away like a 5 year old, why not offer up some ideas of your own?
You greatest answer is "you just stupid, and don't understand science " which could be the tittle to you vid or book.
Inside it could just be you repeating that statement over and over
Lol
Perhaps come with free stickers, and word.puzzles? Lol
Then you could come out with a new book each month.
Book like "there is no Hell ",by Kenose. Lol
And the soul never dies, becouse there is No soul. By Kenose :)

More stupidity from you.... or are you willfully distorting the things I've said?

You can't even understand the simple things I've repeated in this thread and to you.

[Ink]

Bitner wrote:

<quoted text>
Pay attention, Witless. That post of mine was not in response to that question.
You are a hypocrite, whining about people doing to Christians what many of the Christians on here also do.
Now, it's not that I couldn't answer. It's that I refuse to let you derail the subject to deflect from my point.

Sure.

[Ink]

LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:

<quoted text>

FUnny how the site you stole this from left out the CONTEXT as well as the critical last line:
"But if they repent and establish worship and pay the poor-due, then leave their way free. Lo! Allah is Forgiving, Merciful."
You're bigotry and ignorance is typical Inkstain.
Want to start taking lines from your version of the bible out of context?

Repent for what? Eight years in prison and tortured is punishment for Saeed Abedani not repenting?



Quran (9:29)- "Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth,(even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued." "People of the Book" refers to Christians and Jews. According to this verse, they are to be violently subjugated, with the sole justification being their religious status. This was one of the final "revelations" from Allah and it set in motion the tenacious military expansion, in which Muhammad's companions managed to conquer two-thirds of the Christian world in the next 100 years. Islam is intended to dominate all other people and faiths.

From religionofpeace

[Ink]

Bitner wrote:

<quoted text>
Again, you Imbecile, the subject was NOT apostasy.

The subject was non conversion and the punishment was even more ugly. I do feel that you accept the brutality of today's consequence of Muslim rejection. Have you noticed that all these barbaric regimes are Muslim?

[Bitner]

Ink wrote:

<quoted text>
The subject was non conversion and the punishment was even more ugly. I do feel that you accept the brutality of today's consequence of Muslim rejection. Have you noticed that all these barbaric regimes are Muslim?

The subject was not about Muslims leaving their religion, Witless. The point I made was about the other idiots accusations about what Islam teaches, which had nothing to do with apostasy. Again, I will not let you deflect from my point just because the bigotry was disproven. I will not let you make up a position for me, and then demand I defend things I haven't said in the first place. Period.

Your source is an antagonistic one. Should we learn about Christianity from a Muslim site?

[The Prince]

Big Stoopid Sky wrote:

G-d came into me one night. He filled me with his flowing spirit. G-d kept coming into me every night and made me cry out with such ecstasy. He filled me night after night with his flowing love! G-d filled me to my very core!

That was not God, it was your brother. And yes you enjoyed it, pagan.

[cpeter1313]

Not me, o imam of ignorance.

Guppy wrote:

Peter is pretending to be lots of people. Oh dear.

[The Prince]

Ink wrote:

<quoted text>
I guess I was wrong, you don't have the intelligence needed or the intellectual honesty.

Oh now you have done it. bitter gets very angry when you remind her that she has trouble keeping up with the rest of the class. She will start to tell you how dumb 'YOU' are. She is a sad case, so please be careful with her.

[Ink]

The Prince wrote:

<quoted text>
Oh now you have done it. bitter gets very angry when you remind her that she has trouble keeping up with the rest of the class. She will start to tell you how dumb 'YOU' are. She is a sad case, so please be careful with her.

LOL She already has. She can't carry forward from the 10th century to now and follow the dots.

[cpeter1313]

My, what a festering cesspool of bile you are.

Women "stayed home where they belonged"? My, how neanderthal. My mother worked most of her adult life, mostly as a teacher. She and my father worked AND raised a family with 7 kids.

The media coverage of AIDS was abysmal; very little useful info was given out in the press. Look at you; you never even had enough data to learn how to spell it correctly.

I'm 54. You're what...12?

Guppy wrote:

<quoted text>
O my gosh. Your mother and i are in competition with each other. Sigh.
Your mother did NOT tell you everything she was feeling. She didn't want to hurt you. She withheld her true feelings. You know that.
Women in the 40's? Most stayed home where they belonged when they had kids. Your mother tried to get a job and was rejected?
Yes, media was all over the aides situation. It was everywhere. TV, papers, magazines etc. You couldn't get away from it. Your mother read and watched tv. She knew.
You must be pretty old if your father was in World War 2.

[Anonymous]

Bitner wrote:

<quoted text>
Not one bit of this has danything to do with the subject at hand. And much of it is crap.

You're opinion, but I was saying all who know Jesus Christ, or are known of Jesus Christ are true christians.

All others are christians by name only.

The other fact remains, is all of the religions in the world cannot be right.

They all disagree with each other.

Many are taught to worship cows, but cows will not help anyone when they die.

Only A true God will.

[cpeter1313]

They are not the everyday citizenry; they are taliban extremists, and they are in power. Which is exactly why secular governments are best.

The middle east is an entirely different culture and views torture differently than we do...although not TOO differently, considering gitmo and waterboarding.

Ink wrote:

<quoted text>
What kind of people have laws that torture and imprison human beings that don't agree with their religion? These aren't extremists. They are the everyday people of the country.

[The Prince]

cpeter1313 wrote:

My, what a festering cesspool of bile you are.
Women "stayed home where they belonged"? My, how neanderthal. My mother worked most of her adult life, mostly as a teacher. She and my father worked AND raised a family with 7 kids.
The media coverage of AIDS was abysmal; very little useful info was given out in the press. Look at you; you never even had enough data to learn how to spell it correctly.
I'm 54. You're what...12?
<quoted text>

AIDS was brought to this country by pateint 1, a gay airline pilot. It came from Eurpoe after some inter species sex bewteen a gay man and a monkey eventually evolved into the disease it is today.

[Bitner]

Gtown71 wrote:

<quoted text>
You're opinion, but I was saying all who know Jesus Christ, or are known of Jesus Christ are true christians.
All others are christians by name only.
The other fact remains, is all of the religions in the world cannot be right.
They all disagree with each other.
Many are taught to worship cows, but cows will not help anyone when they die.
Only A true God will.

LOL, another bunch of crap. Your ignorance of other religions is sad. Which religion do you erroneously believe "worships" cows?

[cpeter1313]

The SCOTUS didn't suddenly find it; it hadn't had to deal with the issue before. At the time the constitution was written, abortion was legal.

Obskeptic wrote:

<quoted text>
The liberal courts didn't "discover" it in the constitution until the 1970's. The constitution was written in the mid 1770,s and not adopted until the 1780's, so what history are you referring to. The history you make up for your own convenience?