Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 311629 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#282713 Feb 7, 2013
Gtown71 wrote:
<quoted text>
Perhaps she seen for herself what abortion really is?
Its more then just removing a tiny bit of "tissue ",and that it enough to make anyone stop laughing about abortion. Well most anyway.
Yes, abortion is a somber issue, as are most medical issues. Nobody has been laughing about it, dear. Just because we are pro-choice doesn't mean we are cavalier about abortion. Guppy is mocking both sides of the abortion issue and she actually has been antagonistic about homosexuality. Please read and pay attention.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#282714 Feb 7, 2013
Obskeptic wrote:
<quoted text>
Just like the term anti-choice is a left wing label projected onto those of us that consider ourselves pro-life. As I have stated before, just because you couch the act of terminating the life of a baby with the label pro-choice does not magically change what the act is. It is killing a human life. Society has set standards from the beginning of time. If I were to declare that I like having sex with little girls and called it my right and freedom to do so, and had your bully crowd declaring that it was my right, that would not change the reality of how sick that would be for an adult man to engage in. Just because you and your godless minions declare its ok to pull apart little babies in the womb and throw them away like trash does not make it moral or right.
They like to try to pretend the "choice" they support the right to is ABORION. There are 2 choices, life OR killing of the human life in utero.

Obviously pro-life is FOR the LIFE choice, and against the killing choice, otherwise we'd be pro-choice.. Pro-"choice" obviously means pro-the choice to kill the human life in utero.

They claim it's just a simple medical procedure, then turn around and get pissed off when one of them is judged about an abortion one or more don't regret. Doesn't make sense. I had my tonsils removed. They can go ahead and judge that, I don't care. lol.

They claim removing the human life in utero surgically is nothing more than a medical procedure, yet turn around and call videos of a surgical abortion "abortion porn", as Katie did, and as though PLers any one would sexual gratification from the video. Calling it "porn" was so far from a reasonable it's off the charts. They're offended by those videos. Why? Can't be because it's just a medical procedure, because someone can show a video of any other surgery, like open heart surgery, and I wouldn't be offended or accuse them of posting "open heart surgery porn".

The people posting here claimng to be PC are mental cases.

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#282715 Feb 7, 2013
Gtown71 wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes I agree, if it were men that had the babies, and all other was just the way it is now, then there would be No women who would dare speak out against abortion. They would want the man to be free to 'choose ".
Yea right! Lol
If men were the ones having babies -ocean would be pro -life, and fight against abortion, just as hard as she fights for it now.
Anyone who reads her post know it!
She just doesn't care much for men.
Honey, I don't know what you are going on about. I just stated my opinion. Don't worry about it.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#282716 Feb 7, 2013
elise in burque wrote:
<quoted text>Yes, abortion is a somber issue, as are most medical issues. Nobody has been laughing about it, dear. Just because we are pro-choice doesn't mean we are cavalier about abortion. Guppy is mocking both sides of the abortion issue and she actually has been antagonistic about homosexuality. Please read and pay attention.
Bullshit, Elise. PCers like Chicky, and Foo and even you are cavalier about abortion. You have tried to mock pro-lifers about your own abortion, and all you did was mock your own child killed in utero.

WHY would abortion be a "somber" issue to YOU people, when most of you have equated the child in utero to a tumor; an intruder to your home; a parasite; teeth...? You're full of shit if you think any reasonable person is going to read that post from you and see anything other than STUPID and LIE in it.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#282717 Feb 7, 2013
To Obskeptic, correction in a sentence in post to you.
~
They (PCers) like to try to pretend the "choice" they support is (not) the right to ABORTION. There are 2 choices, life OR killing of the human life in utero...~

None of them makes sense when they try to dance around the "choice" they support the right to.
No one needs a law to have a right to allow their unborn children to live. So that's not part of what pro-"choice" is. Pro-choice is about ONE thing; the right to have an abortion.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#282718 Feb 7, 2013
elise in burque wrote:
<quoted text>Honey, I don't know what you are going on about. I just stated my opinion. Don't worry about it.
You can't stand behind your opinions with any explanation; or present the facts on which you've based your opinions to display how your opinions would be based on some sort of knowledge and sense; or rebut anything we've posted with facts, knowledge or sense.

Your posts are meaningless here in this abortion forum. You're like a moron coming in here posting your opinion that the human life in utero is not someone's unborn child; having that human life killed is no big deal. You don't present anything to back your opinion and then make posts about PLers as though they're idiots, because they dare challenge you to back what you say, or prove that what you said is senseless. Your little snide remarks are impotent.

Because you can't back what you say, you just hide behind your, "I just stated an opinion". Why are you here? If all you're going to do is "state your opinion" and not present facts and knowledge as to why your opinion is what it is, you're just here to waste space and troll.

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#282719 Feb 7, 2013
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
Bullshit, Elise. PCers like Chicky, and Foo and even you are cavalier about abortion. You have tried to mock pro-lifers about your own abortion, and all you did was mock your own child killed in utero.
WHY would abortion be a "somber" issue to YOU people, when most of you have equated the child in utero to a tumor; an intruder to your home; a parasite; teeth...? You're full of shit if you think any reasonable person is going to read that post from you and see anything other than STUPID and LIE in it.
Wow.... I'm sorry you're so upset. A little over the top, don't you think? Whew! Anyway, you are incorrect, dear. I take the abortion issue very seriously. You're just up in arms that I believe that the woman's rights supersede any that the fetus may have. Not everyone agrees with you. Relax. It happens. Often. Get used to it.

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#282720 Feb 7, 2013
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
You can't stand behind your opinions with any explanation; or present the facts on which you've based your opinions to display how your opinions would be based on some sort of knowledge and sense; or rebut anything we've posted with facts, knowledge or sense.
Your posts are meaningless here in this abortion forum. You're like a moron coming in here posting your opinion that the human life in utero is not someone's unborn child; having that human life killed is no big deal. You don't present anything to back your opinion and then make posts about PLers as though they're idiots, because they dare challenge you to back what you say, or prove that what you said is senseless. Your little snide remarks are impotent.
Because you can't back what you say, you just hide behind your, "I just stated an opinion". Why are you here? If all you're going to do is "state your opinion" and not present facts and knowledge as to why your opinion is what it is, you're just here to waste space and troll.
Your obsession with me is getting creepy. Please try to stop it. I'm asking nicely.

Since: Oct 08

Location hidden

#282721 Feb 7, 2013
Ocean56 wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh PLEASE. Reproduction is the process of human biology, nothing more than that.
What gets anti-choice religionists like you so ticked off is that women can reject your archaic beliefs just as easily as they can reject motherhood, with NO penalties whatsoever. Well, too bad for you, sparky. The fact remains that motherhood is OPTIONAL, not required. I suggest you deal with it.
Your right, it is human biology. Now the Anti-Choice religion thing does have some history behind it. The fact that Roe v Wade made motherhood optional from a legal standpoint doen't diminish the arguement the choice made prevents another human from entering the universe! One may call it archaic beliefs, but for many those beliefs have survived over 2000 years of history, not many can make that claim! You don't believe, fine, you have that right, but those who believe, also have that right. The real issue is, is allowing abortions contributing to the moral fiber of our society or tearing it at it seams? Are we a better and stronger society today because we condone the prevention of human life, or are we merely being selfish and minimizeing the value of such life?

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#282722 Feb 7, 2013
elise in burque wrote:
<quoted text>Wow.... I'm sorry you're so upset. A little over the top, don't you think? Whew! Anyway, you are incorrect, dear. I take the abortion issue very seriously. You're just up in arms that I believe that the woman's rights supersede any that the fetus may have. Not everyone agrees with you. Relax. It happens. Often. Get used to it.
You're not displaying anything but ignorance and ineptitude in your responses. Not just in discussing the abortion topic, but also in thinking your inane remarks are clever, witty or even effective insults. You don't have the intelligence to be effective.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#282723 Feb 7, 2013
elise in burque wrote:
<quoted text>Your obsession with me is getting creepy. Please try to stop it. I'm asking nicely.
Replying to posts on a public discussion forum isn't "obsession", mental case. If you weren't posting here and I'd mention you or your name in just about every post; then maybe you would make sense with seeing it as obsession.

In the meantime, since that's not the case, saying that just makes you look like an ignorant buffoon, as you regularly display.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#282724 Feb 7, 2013
elise in burque wrote:
<quoted text> ... Anyway, you are incorrect, dear. I take the abortion issue very seriously....
That's a lie proven by your own tag line here in an abortion forum, Toots.

~elise in burque
“Why So Serious, Folks?”~

If you took the abortion issue seriously, why in an abortion forum would you ask on your tag line, "Why So Serious, Folks?"

One reason only, you DON"T take it seriously. You admitted long ago that you're not here to be serious, so you lie in claiming you do.

Now, come back with another of your inane remarks, because you don't have the ability to reply intelligently.

Since: Oct 08

Location hidden

#282725 Feb 7, 2013
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
The phrase "pro deathers" is Catholic propaganda. It's made its way into the PLM and is their mantra.
It means squat.
Prochoicers are freedom lovers. Free people making free decisions about their own personal privacy and bodily autonomy. Without interference from the gov't, the clergy, or nosy parker busy bodies like you.
60 plus year of Catholism and never once have I heard that term "pro-deather" I always question the term Pro-Choice as well, however, because I am not sure all the parties were given the choice. The law is clear, and while you have a legal right to prevent or as I have seen on this thread, the option of motherhood, is that option/choice, to prevent another human life to enter our universe, the best choice, or merely a selfish one? I guess only you and those who like the "freedom" can answer that question!

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#282726 Feb 7, 2013
so you lie in claiming you (are).

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#282727 Feb 7, 2013
Niether of the Above wrote:
<quoted text>Your right, it is human biology. Now the Anti-Choice religion thing does have some history behind it. The fact that Roe v Wade made motherhood optional from a legal standpoint doen't diminish the arguement the choice made prevents another human from entering the universe! One may call it archaic beliefs, but for many those beliefs have survived over 2000 years of history, not many can make that claim! You don't believe, fine, you have that right, but those who believe, also have that right. The real issue is, is allowing abortions contributing to the moral fiber of our society or tearing it at it seams? Are we a better and stronger society today because we condone the prevention of human life, or are we merely being selfish and minimizeing the value of such life?
It's not about "allowing" abortion. Women have always had abortions. It's about women having the right to make that choice without endangering their lives. It's another pregnancy option that we have a right to make, privately, without interference. I don't see that RvW has weakened our society. I do think it would be a problem if we allow our medical autonomy to be denied us.

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#282728 Feb 7, 2013
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
Replying to posts on a public discussion forum isn't "obsession", mental case. If you weren't posting here and I'd mention you or your name in just about every post; then maybe you would make sense with seeing it as obsession.
In the meantime, since that's not the case, saying that just makes you look like an ignorant buffoon, as you regularly display.
... really?... Okay...

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#282729 Feb 7, 2013
Just saw this news:

http://www.chron.com/news/nation-world/articl...

"From wire and online reports | February 7, 2013 | Updated: February 7, 2013 1:57pm
MEXICO CITY — Mexican authorities say a 9-year-old girl has given birth in western Mexico and they are looking for the purported father, a 17-year-old.

Jalisco state police spokesman Lino Gonzalez says the baby girl was born last week at a hospital in the city of Guadalajara. He says the girl and her baby are doing well.

The girl identified as Dafne by the Telegraph, was reportedly only 8 years old when she became pregnant.

The Telegraph reports the baby was born on Jan. 27 in Zoquipan Hospital weighing 5.7 pounds and both girls were released over the weekend.

Gonzalez said Wednesday that the girl's family alerted authorities after she gave birth and the alleged father has not been seen since in the neighborhood the both live in."

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#282730 Feb 7, 2013
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
That's a lie proven by your own tag line here in an abortion forum, Toots.
~elise in burque
“Why So Serious, Folks?”~
If you took the abortion issue seriously, why in an abortion forum would you ask on your tag line, "Why So Serious, Folks?"
One reason only, you DON"T take it seriously. You admitted long ago that you're not here to be serious, so you lie in claiming you do.
Now, come back with another of your inane remarks, because you don't have the ability to reply intelligently.
Ummm, LPL? Hello... Did you know that there are hundreds of forums and thousands of threads on Topix? Unlike you, I have many interests. I read and post on a myriad of topics. No one but you has ever taken umbrage with my tag line. I actually discuss many other subjects besides abortion, honey. Your myopia is severely strangling your perspective. Now, you may continue to harp on me, if you really must, but forgive me if I disregard your bile. I really hate being nagged.

Have a nice day.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#282731 Feb 7, 2013
elise in burque wrote:
<quoted text> It's not about "allowing" abortion. Women have always had abortions. It's about women having the right to make that choice without endangering their lives. It's another pregnancy option that we have a right to make, privately, without interference. I don't see that RvW has weakened our society. I do think it would be a problem if we allow our medical autonomy to be denied us.
Elsie: "It's about women having the right to make that choice without endangering their lives. "

Really, that's what it's about? You seem to be making a statement of fact, so how about proving that's what it's about.

At viability, women don't have that "right" in many states, and there are still some having late term abortions, "endangering their lives" to illegally abort a viable fetus. Explain that basing it on your claim.
Forum

Hobbs, NM

#282732 Feb 7, 2013
lil Lily wrote:
Just saw this news:
http://www.chron.com/news/nation-world/articl...
"From wire and online reports | February 7, 2013 | Updated: February 7, 2013 1:57pm
MEXICO CITY — Mexican authorities say a 9-year-old girl has given birth in western Mexico and they are looking for the purported father, a 17-year-old.
Jalisco state police spokesman Lino Gonzalez says the baby girl was born last week at a hospital in the city of Guadalajara. He says the girl and her baby are doing well.
The girl identified as Dafne by the Telegraph, was reportedly only 8 years old when she became pregnant.
The Telegraph reports the baby was born on Jan. 27 in Zoquipan Hospital weighing 5.7 pounds and both girls were released over the weekend.
Gonzalez said Wednesday that the girl's family alerted authorities after she gave birth and the alleged father has not been seen since in the neighborhood the both live in."
Why are men so stupid?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Wethersfield Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 57 min Susanm 1,420,898
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 4 hr mdbuilder 61,095
News The 25 Most Dangerous Cities in the U.S. Are Mo... (Nov '10) 7 hr agree 20,506
News Kelly's Pub Provides A New Brew: The Theater (Nov '07) Mon m1o2o3t 27
News Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) Mon Ize Found 70,974
CAR Accident on Friday April 22, 2016 Apr '16 MarcusT20073 1
In The War on Police Traffic Stops Have Become ... (Aug '15) Dec '15 Anthony Wall 11

Wethersfield Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Wethersfield Mortgages