"What prolifer "considers a fertilized an infant"?. Stop being so dishonest STO."<quoted text> For one I disagree with what you claimed about prolifers. What prolifers "like to start their argument at viability"? No they dont. The only reason viability is mentioned AT ALL is because that is where you proaborts get tripped in your deceit. I don't agree that "most PLets agree with exceptions" either.
It is also dishonest of you to refer to anti-choicers after viability(agreeing with restrictions) as PRochoicers.
What prolifer "considers a fertilized an infant"?. Stop being so dishonest STO.
Two humans can share ONE body wwithout "diminishing" the rights of the other.(As per mom and her child).
Think siamese twins.
He can't Sassy. It must be in the pro-choicer's genetic make-up to lie, because the ones here ALL do.