Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Full story: Newsday 309,011
Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision. Full Story
grumpy

Stony Point, NY

#280546 Jan 28, 2013
Gtown71 wrote:
<quoted text>
You must not have read all of my post.
It's true, that my wife was married to two different men, yet just me.
She was a saved christian at age 11, and I was saved at 29.
I would ask her what being saved meant? She could never give me a answer that made sense to me.
I was just amazed at how much peace she had. Yet I didn't believe it had anything to do with God.
Even before I was saved I never demanded anything from her. I never asked her to cook me one meal. I was the one that cooked most of the time.
I will say we never had a dull marriage, but I'm not a very dull guy.
I loved her the best I knew how, but I just didn't know what real love was untill I met love.
God is love.
She would talk me into going to church with her ever so often, but I only went to make her happy.
I got nothing from it, and if anyone did act like they enjoyed being there,I just thought they did it for show, or they must get paid. Lol
I seriously had zero interest in going to church or reading a bible.
I was forced to go as a child, and "thought " I knew the "truth " about God.
I just assumed that there were those who were religious, and there were those like me, who knew the truth.
After I was saved -I became a brand new creature, just like the bible describes.
Which I read much later, after I was saved. It seemed like soneone had wrote a book, that told me exactly what happened to me.
Nothing or noone has ever been able to explain what happened to me.
I hd a deep desire to read the bible and attend church FOR THE FIRST TIME EVER.
Having God in you is amazing, and words cannot describe what takes place.
Plus knowing others who have experienced the same thing, only in a different way.
I gave a couple of names.
Lead guitar player of korn.
Crissy Moran -former porn star.
Many others who have a solid testimony of what Jesus can do for someone here on earth, and has the power to take their soul to Heaven.
I wish you well, my friend.
Ink

Bensalem, PA

#280547 Jan 28, 2013
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
Stay on point. It has nothing to do with abortion or reproduction. We're talking kids that are already here and starving.
Someone mentioned you don't need to feed a child to care about a child. You said there is enough food, but it's purposely being withheld by people.
It seems your solution is to bring more children into this.
Is doing that going to magically make the food readily available?
It is your favorite YES or NO kind of question.
Yes as a world power we used to have influence over corrupt countries so that we could at least provide food to the needy.

We seem to have little power now that we are helping extremists overthrow the stability of the countries that need help.

Many people are going to die, some with babies in their wombs. Do you think that will help feed the ones left?
Forum carlsbad nm

Hobbs, NM

#280548 Jan 28, 2013
elise in burque wrote:
<quoted text>Do you have any kids? Just curious...
Yes. I do.
Forum carlsbad nm

Hobbs, NM

#280549 Jan 28, 2013
grumpy wrote:
<quoted text>I wish you well, my friend.
What is a saved christian and what does born again mean?
They made it up.
God is for real. I think the end times means that he has given us
enough time to reconcile with him.
Cars flipping and children getting shot in school is crazy.
Who is the antichrist?
Gtown71

United States

#280550 Jan 28, 2013
grumpy wrote:
<quoted text>I wish you well, my friend.
And I you :)
Gtown71

United States

#280552 Jan 28, 2013
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
You lied about that as well. Athiests dont "hate" G-d. They dont believe in a g-d, thus there's nothing to hate.
Again, you're a stupid man.
You're wrong, but what's new.
There are atheist who hate everything about god and wish all who believed in god would die.

There are absolutes, so you're wrong again.

You're god is so great you don't wish to share, even when asked???
If you were talki.g about a child /boyfriend /any person you love, that you kept locked away from others, it would seem abit odd, but God?!?!? To keep Him to yourself, must mean you don't have one, and you're not interested in one.

It is a copout.

Just say you're uncomfortable talking about real issues.

You still defend the pic of the dead woman, blaming everything and everyone but her.

I'm not insecure in my faith at all, it is the only thing I have full assurance in, and just becouse you care not, doesn't mean others don't , since I have got positive feed back that would mean "in your own words ",that you, yea you are a liar.
God

Brooklyn, NY

#280553 Jan 28, 2013
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
You lied about that as well. Athiests dont "hate" G-d. They dont believe in a g-d, thus there's nothing to hate.
Again, you're a stupid man.
You are disapointing me.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#280554 Jan 28, 2013
Gtown71 wrote:
<quoted text>
You're wrong, but what's new.
There are atheist who hate everything about god and wish all who believed in god would die.
ROFLMAO You're full of shit.
There are absolutes, so you're wrong again.
Sorry Chuckles, no, there are NO absolutes when it comes to faith and religion.

That's what makes each relationship so private and unique.
You're god is so great you don't wish to share, even when asked???
Nope.
If you were talki.g about a child /boyfriend /any person you love, that you kept locked away from others, it would seem abit odd, but God?!?!?
I dont keep Him locked away from others in the appropriate situations during appropriate times and discussions. Appropriate suitations include those for whom I have love and respect. I have neither for you.

I dont keep my Lord, my child, my wife, or any person I love locked away from others either, as many here can attest.
To keep Him to yourself, must mean you don't have one, and you're not interested in one.
See? THere you go LYING and bearing false witness AGAIN.
It is a copout.
No, its a PRIVATE relationship. Privacy and the appropriacy of keeping some things private is something you dont seem to have a good grasp on.
Just say you're uncomfortable talking about real issues.
I'm not uncomfortable at all talking about real issues. I dont have any issues regarding my relationship with my Lord.

I'm 1000%+ comfortable with my relationship with G-d. I simply dont feel a need to discuss Him with the likes of you, OR to babble on endlessly about it. You clearly have ZERO respect for others beliefs, so why SHOULD I?

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#280555 Jan 28, 2013
Gtown71 wrote:
<quoted text>
You still defend the pic of the dead woman, blaming everything and everyone but her.
You're LYING yet again. Where EXACTLY did I ever "blame" ANYONE other than how the LAW let her down?

And where EXACTLY did I "DEFEND" the picture of Gerri Santoro? I posted it as a FACTUAL example of what happens and how women died when religious fools briefly took away the right of CHOICE from them. Period. There's no defense necessary.

Correcting yours and Lynne's stupidity is not defencse, its refuting garbage with FACTS.
I'm not insecure in my faith at all,
Clearly you are, or you woudldnt feel a need to babble on endlessly about it ALL the time as if it matters at the end of the day to anyone BUT you.

Clearly you ARE extremely insecure about the strength of your faith, or you wouldn't be so OBVIOUSLY threatened when people of OTHER faiths tell you frankly, that you're full of shit.

To US, you ARE 100000% full of crap. Your faith is YOURS. Your story is YOURS. Not anyone elses. After the first 10 times hearing it, its old. Topix is NOT your personal pulpit, and we are NOT your parishoners.

Want to preach? Go find a church. You've testified. Endlessly. Can you even express a thought WITHOUT going on about how you 'found g-d'? I doubt it. YOU are the poster child for an uneducated extremist, someone that's incapable of rational, independant, intellectually honest thought.
it is the only thing I have full assurance in, and just becouse you care not, doesn't mean others don't , since I have got positive feed back that would mean "in your own words ",that you, yea you are a liar.
ROFLMAO Clearly many's sarcasm goes over your head and between your knees. LOLOL! To Skanky and the one or two other idiots that egg you on, you're a useful idiot, nothing more. Hell, the ones that are giving you 'positive feed back" @@(Feedback is one word by the way moron) are as phonly in their "faiths" as you are turning out to be.

People can be both religious AND faithful, or simply just spiritual and be able to have whole discussions WITHOUT having to rant on about their religion incessently.

Now you're free to rant on endlessly, and uselessly here - that's your right and America is great that way. But WE are in return, free to call you out for the asshole you are. Deal with it.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#280556 Jan 28, 2013
God wrote:
<quoted text>
You are disapointing me.
Why should I care that I'm "disappointing" some freak with a g-d complex?
God

Brooklyn, NY

#280557 Jan 28, 2013
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
ROFLMAO You're full of shit.
<quoted text>
Sorry Chuckles, no, there are NO absolutes when it comes to faith and religion.
That's what makes each relationship so private and unique.
<quoted text>
Nope.
<quoted text>
I dont keep Him locked away from others in the appropriate situations during appropriate times and discussions. Appropriate suitations include those for whom I have love and respect. I have neither for you.
I dont keep my Lord, my child, my wife, or any person I love locked away from others either, as many here can attest.
<quoted text>
See? THere you go LYING and bearing false witness AGAIN.
<quoted text>
No, its a PRIVATE relationship. Privacy and the appropriacy of keeping some things private is something you dont seem to have a good grasp on.
<quoted text>
I'm not uncomfortable at all talking about real issues. I dont have any issues regarding my relationship with my Lord.
I'm 1000%+ comfortable with my relationship with G-d. I simply dont feel a need to discuss Him with the likes of you, OR to babble on endlessly about it. You clearly have ZERO respect for others beliefs, so why SHOULD I?
God says you are boring and need to get out more.

Since: Jun 08

Atrisco Village

#280558 Jan 28, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
And I eat empanadas in my ivory tower. My husband makes the best!
How cute. White girl knows a Spanish word. Whatever.

Since: Jun 08

Atrisco Village

#280559 Jan 28, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Your point is to forcibly abort the fetus from anyone who is poor?
How about a prohibition on more than one child around the world? That would cut down the population and give the pro aborts all the dead fetuses they could ever wish for. Maybe we could set the goal for half the number of people in one hundred years. Then only half of a smaller number would be hungry.
Dumb idea. You're weird.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#280560 Jan 28, 2013
God wrote:
<quoted text>
God says you are boring and need to get out more.
My Dog says you're a moron.

Bet my Dog is more correct than you are.

Since: Jun 08

Atrisco Village

#280561 Jan 28, 2013
Forum carlsbad nm wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes. I do.
Yikes.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#280562 Jan 28, 2013
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
Being reasonable is beyond your grasp. Take your crowns and wear these proudly.
I don't need crowns or any other type of nonsense you need. My intelligence and knowledge is reward enough for me. Too bad you can't claim the same rewards.

"In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of any
ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative bureaus and agencies of the United States, the words `person',`human being',`child', and `individual', shall include every infant member of the species homo sapiens who is born alive at any stage of development.

"As used in this section, the term `born alive', with respect to a member of the species homo sapiens, means the complete expulsion or extraction from his or her mother of that member, at any stage of development, who after such expulsion or extraction breathes or has a beating heart, pulsation of the umbilical cord, or definite movement of voluntary muscles, regardless of whether the umbilical cord has been cut, and regardless of whether the expulsion or extraction occurs as a result of natural or induced labor, cesarean section, or induced abortion."

"`Person',`human being',`child', and `individual' as including
born-alive infant.''.

Do you know what that's defining? It's legally defining a BORN INFANT, and to protect those infants born alive whether . Not a born alive fetus, not a fetus until cord is cut and 1st breath is taken, but born ALIVE, as they said: "means the complete expulsion or extraction from his or her mother of that member, at any stage of development, who after such expulsion or extraction breathes or has a beating heart, pulsation of the umbilical cord, or definite movement of voluntary muscles, regardless of whether the umbilical cord has been cut,..."

That's when a fetus becomes a newborn infant, "the expulsion or extraction occurs as a result of natural or induced labor, cesarean section, or induced abortion.", as we have said all along. NR keeps providing you with something legal that defines it. I've provided medical proof. You're the one trying to be right, when you're oh so wrong. Your whining about "crowns" just displays your immaturity, lack of ability to see reason and ineptitude in adult discussions.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#280563 Jan 28, 2013
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
Klueless Katiekins: "If there WERE a magical moment fetus becomes baby, it'd have to be when the newborn's circulatory system and gas exchange happen on its own WITHOUT help from the umbilical cord. Otherwise, it is equivalent to a fetus."
:Sigh:
Your ignorance is redundant. Remarkable. Here is an excerpt from the Born Alive Infant Protection Act correcting you. Again. Read it slowly...
"...complete expulsion or extraction from his or her mother of that member, at any stage of development, who after such expulsion or extraction breathes OR has a beating heart, pulsation of the umbilical cord, OR definite movement of voluntary muscles, REGARDLESS OF WHEHTER THE UMBILICAL CORD HAS BEEN CUT, and regardless of whether the expulsion or extraction occurs as a result of natural or induced labor, cesarean section, or induced abortion."
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-107publ207/...
Keep right on posting that, NR, and i borrowed it from you. It proves she's a nutcase with her claims.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#280564 Jan 28, 2013
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
If you're claiming this "...complete expulsion or extraction from his or her mother of that member, at any stage of development, who after such expulsion or extraction breathes OR has a beating heart, pulsation of the umbilical cord, OR definite movement of voluntary muscles, REGARDLESS OF WHEHTER THE UMBILICAL CORD HAS BEEN CUT, and regardless of whether the expulsion or extraction occurs as a result of natural or induced labor, cesarean section, or induced abortion," is the magical moment fetus becomes baby you cannot claim it's a baby at conception or it's a baby in utero.
If you are not claiming the above is the magical moment fetus becomes baby, then you cannot claim I am wrong either. Because I qualified my answer with the word WERE as it denotes the impossibility of a "magical moment" when fetus becomes baby. Like I've said and linked, it is a process. A long process. Part of the whole process of life.
Katie: "is the magical moment fetus becomes baby you cannot claim it's a baby at conception or it's a baby in utero."

lol, you inept fool. That's when a fetus becomes a newborn INFANT. That's what we've said, "infant", as opposed to "fetus" as you have claimed. Now you're trying to make some other delusional claim? This time about what we've supposedly said? You're such a fool.

Katie: "Because I qualified my answer with the word WERE as it denotes the impossibility of a "magical moment" when fetus becomes baby."

Your qualifier in itself is ridiculous. There's no need for a qualifier since every intelligent adult knows for a fact that a fetus becomes newborn infant upon expulsion from its mother's body. As we have said and proven. You're the one using the term "magical moment", and claiming it's impossible to state when fetus becomes newborn infant. We've proven it's an absolute as to when that happens; immediately upon exiting mother's body, cord attached and whether first breath was taken yet or not. As long as there is LIFE,(beating heart, pulsation of the umbilical cord, OR definite movement of voluntary muscles...), end of fetal life, beginning of newborn infant life. Proven medically and legally. Your proof; non-existant.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#280565 Jan 28, 2013
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
I've posted for you many occasions the moment medically & legally the preborn baby (fetal stage along human life spectrum) offically moves into the newborn baby stage.
It was right there for you in black and white.
Were you in special ed?
Doubtful, NR. They're much brighter than she is.

She's now trying to claim that you can't claim it's a "baby" in utero because you've stated once born it's a newborn "baby". Baby in utero, newborn baby. Two different phases, one doesn't negate the other. She's a mess.
Kenose

Bellmore, NY

#280566 Jan 28, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
There are long lists of would be parents waiting for babies, even those with colic. Why weren't they put up for adoption so that they could share a life with people who want them?
and how many have you adopted?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Wethersfield Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 14 min RUSH10ME 1,193,580
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 24 min Mothra 51,598
Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 2 hr Cold Front 69,144
2 Men Arrested In Willimantic Drug Raid (Mar '08) 3 hr REYR2000 63
Teachers Group Wants End To Major Standardized ... 4 hr parent 3
The 25 Most Dangerous Cities in the U.S. Are Mo... (Nov '10) 7 hr trying 19,643
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 18 hr orange 71,562
Wethersfield Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Wethersfield People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 8:43 pm PST