Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 340596 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#279890 Jan 25, 2013
SeattleVehix44 wrote:
<quoted text>i said steaks? oops
but it just figures ud mock me instead of someone defending mass murderers... only a liberal
It's okay when YOU mock people though, right? There's that faux-Christian hypocrisy again.

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#279891 Jan 25, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
Okay, this is an instance of you lying. I've told you I'm not a liberal. We've had whole conversations about it. And here you are, doing it again.
So don't fuss at LNM about calling you a liar. You're not "making mistakes". You're lying.
I've also told Seattle repeatedly that I'm not a liberal yet he keeps saying I'm a liberal. Seattle is a flaming prolific Liar for Jesus.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#279892 Jan 25, 2013
SeattleVehix44 wrote:
<quoted text>you, like most on here, support unmidigated abortion, for any reason, in any numbers, you love Obama, you hate guns, etc........what are you then??
You're an idiot. I f*cking own guns. And oh, please, do show me just ONE post where I've ever said, or implied, that I love Obama. Just one.

Like I said, we've had whole conversations about this. You've either gone senile, or you're lying.

I support the 2nd Amendment. I support the 1st Amendment. I'm a Republican. I truly believe in limited gov't interference in personal matters. I have absolutely zero problems with the death penalty. I fully support our military. In fact, I'm the daughter, daughter-in-law, wife, sister-in-law and mother of veterans. I'm in favor of welfare reform, while being fine with my taxes going to help those truly in need, and am conservative on immigration. I am pro-choice on reproductive issues.

And we've had this EXACT conversation at least half a dozen times.

So please, do tell me how all that adds up to "liberal".

I can't WAIT to hear this.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#279893 Jan 25, 2013
SeattleVehix44 wrote:
<quoted text>you, like most on here, support unmidigated abortion, for any reason, in any numbers, you love Obama, you hate guns, etc........what are you then??
Oh, and I don't support abortion at all.

And the word is unmiTigated, you illiterate thing.

You, like most anti-choicers on here, are so one dimensional in your thinking.

You see people, THIS is why I repeat myself. Because YOU people can't remember jack shit.

Since: Feb 07

Never forgotten

#279894 Jan 25, 2013
Forum carlsbad nm wrote:
<quoted text>
For every baby that you kill. I hate you more.
Why are you still here?
I'm pro-life and Catholic. I still think the question BraveCon asked was inappropriate. You can hate me all you want. I just pity you.

Since: Feb 07

Never forgotten

#279895 Jan 25, 2013
Forum carlsbad nm wrote:
<quoted text>
Why don't these abortionists fear that God will burn them
back with their chemicals or dismember their body parts
the same way they dismember the babies. They might just have to live in their pain. "An eye for an eye". God help them.
I don't think God would do such a thing.

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#279896 Jan 25, 2013
The reaves family is looking for a big payoff. So far, there is no proof of any malpractice, and she surely signed a waiver after being told the risks. Whether the abortion was medically-necessary is irrelevant; she chose to take the risks.
bman wrote:
Gtown71

United States

#279897 Jan 25, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
You're not very bright, are you?
No woman must parent. She can opt to adopt the child out.
Hey great idea, it beats killing it.
Tell your friends.

Glad to see you switch sides!

Makes me know our work is not in vain :)

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#279898 Jan 25, 2013
You aren't defending life, you're supporting suppression of women's rights. You have neither the right nor legal standing to interfere with a woman's medical choices.

Why would I care what avatar someone puts up? Don't you believe in free speech?
SeattleVehix44 wrote:
<quoted text>i just dont get why you think IM a moron for taking up for LIFE
how would u like it if one of your lib buddies here put an avatar of Ghengis Khan ? wouldnt that throw you aboot?
sasssylicious

Jackson, NJ

#279900 Jan 25, 2013
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
"You specifically used the term "shallow" to describe an abortion choice. Can you explain please?"
I did not. I clearly stated that I felt BC was inferring that women who have had abortions did so for shallow reasons. I personally did not use that term to describe abortion as a choice. You are being dishonest about my post to BC.
LNM..."And in its way, it infers that the ones who have had an abortion did so for shallow reasons."
Exactly what I said. You mentioned "shallow reason". What defines an abortion done for "shallow reasons"?.

I also asked you another question. Would you ever have an abortion or support your daughters choice to have one?. Yes or no?
sasssylicious

Jackson, NJ

#279901 Jan 25, 2013
STO wrote:
<quoted text>
"It is just the woman who miscarries and has no other children, never had an opportunity to "mother " her child."
I'm sure that's true of some women, but others don't consider themselves to be mothers when they have no children, are trying to have children, and miscarry.
You wouldn't tell that woman she's the mother of a dead child would you?
Why would I tell a woman that she is the mother of a dead child? Would someone tell me that I am the wife of a dead husband?

Your strange.
sasssylicious

Jackson, NJ

#279902 Jan 25, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
You're not very bright, are you?
No woman must parent. She can opt to adopt the child out.
Exactly.

But don't suggest that to proaborts. They will tell you that it's cruel and that the kid will end up abused. They would think that mercy killing would be the solution.

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#279903 Jan 25, 2013
Porterhouse or ribeye, you illiterate whiner?
SeattleVehix44 wrote:
<quoted text>
I think Vlad Jr. gets off on the idea of Romanias enemies having steaks slowly shoved inside them as they die slowly...
sick
sasssylicious

Jackson, NJ

#279904 Jan 25, 2013
elise in burque wrote:
<quoted text>I made it abundantly clear that that is my personal opinion, nothing more. I think Katie provided her rationale for her argument, already. Why don't you look up the subject and find a rationale for yours? Do your own research, lady.
You're a nurse, correct? Tell me what it is "technically".

Kthanks.

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#279905 Jan 25, 2013
sasssylicious wrote:
<quoted text>Exactly what I said. You mentioned "shallow reason". What defines an abortion done for "shallow reasons"?.
I also asked you another question. Would you ever have an abortion or support your daughters choice to have one?. Yes or no?
"Exactly what I said. You mentioned "shallow reason". What defines an abortion done for "shallow reasons"?"

Ask BC. He's the one who made the inference. That was my perception of HIS comments. I'd be interested in his answer, too.

"I also asked you another question. Would you ever have an abortion or support your daughters choice to have one?. Yes or no?"

Wrong, you asked "Why wouldn't you choose an abortion?" and I answered you. You did not ask if I would support my daughter's choice to have one. Yes, I would support her choice because it is HER choice. But, like with things our kids sometimes do, that doesn't mean I have to like it, but I would support her decision.

Since you keep rewriting what you originally wrote I assume you're trying to get something specific? Why don't you stop playing games and just come out with what you're looking for?

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#279906 Jan 25, 2013
sasssylicious wrote:
<quoted text> Exactly.
But don't suggest that to proaborts. They will tell you that it's cruel and that the kid will end up abused. They would think that mercy killing would be the solution.
Another blanket statement? Did I ever say such a thing? Did Bitner? Who are these "proaborts" you mention?

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#279907 Jan 25, 2013
cpeter1313 wrote:
You aren't defending life, you're supporting suppression of women's rights. You have neither the right nor legal standing to interfere with a woman's medical choices.
Why would I care what avatar someone puts up? Don't you believe in free speech?
<quoted text>
But he'll come here shrieking about HIS rights.
sasssylicious

Jackson, NJ

#279908 Jan 25, 2013
Gtown71 wrote:
<quoted text>
Would you support, or did you support the aborting of late term babies, for the only reason being becouse the woman did wake up in the 8th month, and decided she didn't want to be pregnant?
Has foo answered this yet?

She says supports choice. Besides, according to her, it is nothing but a "medical decision"anyway. YET...she ALSO says that she doesn't think a woman should have an elective choice after a certain point.

To sum it up, she's a walking contradiction.

Fraud is more like it.

Realistically, many women don't find out that they are pregnant until late in pregnancy or perhaps her husband left her while 8 months pregnant. Wonder why she wants.to FORCE this woman to 'gestate '....left with no choices. Total inconsistencies.
Chick Brilliance Returns

Southington, CT

#279909 Jan 25, 2013
SeattleVehix44 wrote:
<quoted text>BS! catholics believe its a person at conception, most anyway
second, NO catholic in their right mind thinks that its not a person until the last FOOT slides out! how stupid are u??
"Sure ya did, pee wee. You just got caught lying" - oh quiet YOU, there WERE guns back then, wolf-hair guns..........i NEVER said there were firearms back then
troll
I am enjoying it as you continue to prove what an idiotic liar you are.
Chick Brilliance Returns

Southington, CT

#279911 Jan 25, 2013
SeattleVehix44 wrote:
dunno what you RUBES have against wolfhair guns of Christ's time.......
They aren't real, you lunatic. Never existed. You lie.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Wethersfield Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 7 min RoxLo 1,760,139
News The 25 Most Dangerous Cities in the U.S. Are Mo... (Nov '10) 4 hr Maryann 21,698
News Democrats back Bysiewicz for lieutenant governor 6 hr BPT 4
News Woman accused of stabbing police officer in thr... Sun Committee For Dec... 1
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) Sun FARTS DOG 64,672
Gangstalking and Harassment (Jan '13) Sat Pusses 328
Cromwell-the most racist town in CT (Jun '10) May 18 Josh and Tammy 34

Wethersfield Jobs

Personal Finance

Wethersfield Mortgages