Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 311004 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

sassyliciouus

Jackson, NJ

#278616 Jan 21, 2013
Kathwynn wrote:
<quoted text>
So you are wiling to expand Obama care? Willing to expand health benefits in the form of mental health to all Americans?
Are saying in effect that you agree with the Affordable Health care and should be expanded..
Really?
You are a religious bigot that would oppose a woman right to make her own decisions concerning her pregnancy. Yet would at the same time be willing to expand ACA at the same time?
Seriously??
Did you read my post or are just responding to the first paragraph.
LOL all this ^^^ because a prolifers replied with a "well said" to his post to chicky (disagreeing with her).

Ut oh! Kathboy is shakin in his boots for not only going AGAINST chicky,but because a prolifer agreed with his post to her.

TAKE COVER!

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#278617 Jan 21, 2013
sassyliciouus wrote:
<quoted text> You already do "read what you want and respond how you want",so why can't you give someone else the same consideration?
Calm down. Relax. You're all uptight.
Okey dokey, Mami.
Katie

Seattle, WA

#278618 Jan 21, 2013
Susanm wrote:
<quoted text>
"There IS a difference between dying and killing, which was your question originally."
Thank you for finally answering my origional question.
She answered you way back when she said nobody's disputing this. Nobody is saying there is no difference between being killed and dying naturally. The difference lies with the living, in the criminal courts. By this distinction, you're trying to compare killing a ZEF to killing a Gramma. And there is no comparison.

Quit acting so thick headed.
sassyliciouus

Jackson, NJ

#278619 Jan 21, 2013
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
A little kid blew his own head off with his father's Uzi (just one of many many accidental gun deaths) and you do anything you can to justify it??
You're just plain sick.
Do you try to get alcohol banned?

A little girl was decapitated in a car accident because of a drunk driver hitting her car. The mom sat on the side of the road holding her daughters head.

Drinking and driving is illegal. People STILL do it. The DD related accidents are getting more frequent. PEOPLE are CHOOSING to abuse their rights to drink.

Will you justify this? or will you fight to have alcohol banned? Which one.

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#278620 Jan 21, 2013
sassyliciouus wrote:
<quoted text> Guns don't kill people. People kill people.
If you think otherwise,then you must be in favor of banning alcohol too. Do you think that alcohol kills people in drunk driving accidents? No.I am sure that you don't. PEOPLE kill people in drunk driving accidents.
Do you worry when the guy upstairs is drinking? Do you have issues with him going out for dinner and having a few? You should. After all,you could be driving when he is,and he could kill you because he had one too many.
I'll tell you what...when we see a story of a mass murderer heading into a school or any other crowded place and kills dozens of people by strangling them one by one then we'll have something to talk about.

Guns and alcohol have just made killing easier and more convenient. Now, I think that's one of your views on abortion...but it suits you to forget that in this argument, huh?

What kind of gun would Jesus prefer?

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#278621 Jan 21, 2013
Gtown71 wrote:
<quoted text>
I geuss that's a question I can't answer, becouse abortion never crossed her mind.
I geuss you can consider a couple never having kids are doing what's best for them, but there is only so many times you can enjoy eating out, or going to coffeee shops. Plus when older, and that stuff don't intrest you, its too late to have kids.
I geuss a guy could just stay single and live with his mom all his life, only leaving the basement long enough to try and get a woman for the night, and throw out pizza boxes???
I just don't know.o
Before I was saved (not found religion) I would've been for an abortion, but after??? I would still love her, and would stay with her.
Just like many things though, it would damage our relationship.
Many like to think we evolved from animals, and can do certain things and just forget about it.
This is not true.
Things in our past haunt us forever, but we don't have to let them.
God showed me mercy and grace, and I have no problem showing others.
What do you have against coffee shops?
Gtown71

United States

#278622 Jan 21, 2013
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
You are mistaken.
Nobody is trying to remove the civil right to bear arms and protect oneself/family/property.
Unlike you guys who ARE trying to remove women's civil rights to personal privacy and bodily autonomy.
When my daughter was born she was still part of my wifes body, and the doctor asked if I wanted to cut the cord.

What if before the cord is cut she changed her mind about motherhood?
Plus the doctor never asked her if she wanted the cord cut.

There may come a day when women can choose the fate of their baby up till the cord is cut, while the baby is still part of the womans body.
sassyliciouus

Jackson, NJ

#278623 Jan 21, 2013
SeattleVehix44 wrote:
<quoted text>if its not a person untill birth then why would u have a problem aborting it right before birth?
Oh,the age old question.

The answer you will get will go something like:

1. I have my reasons.
2. I agree with the law
3. Viability
4. the woman had ample time to decide
5. It is dangerous to abort at that stage
6. Or,you will just be ignored and told that they answered you already.

Since: Dec 09

Location hidden

#278624 Jan 21, 2013
Susanm wrote:
<quoted text>
So there is a difference between dying and killing.
In what context of the words? Evidently you mean dying as in natural death and killing as in murder. Of course there is a difference in this context. But killing isn't always murder and killing isn't always unlawful. Smoking is killing ppl of smoking related diseases, but cancer is a natural death even tho cigarettes kill ppl. In this context there is no difference. So do you see the confusion? State what you mean, which is a miscarriage is a natural death and abortion is murder. Don't play with words.
sassyliciouus

Jackson, NJ

#278625 Jan 21, 2013
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
I'll tell you what...when we see a story of a mass murderer heading into a school or any other crowded place and kills dozens of people by strangling them one by one then we'll have something to talk about.
Guns and alcohol have just made killing easier and more convenient. Now, I think that's one of your views on abortion...but it suits you to forget that in this argument, huh?
What kind of gun would Jesus prefer?
Do you fight to ban alcohol. Yes or no?
sassyliciouus

Jackson, NJ

#278626 Jan 21, 2013
Gtown71 wrote:
<quoted text>
When my daughter was born she was still part of my wifes body, and the doctor asked if I wanted to cut the cord.
What if before the cord is cut she changed her mind about motherhood?
Plus the doctor never asked her if she wanted the cord cut.
There may come a day when women can choose the fate of their baby up till the cord is cut, while the baby is still part of the womans body.
Yep. The baby is still part of the womans body,so she should(according to their logic)have the right to kill or not.

According to Katie,it is still a fetus.

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#278627 Jan 21, 2013
sassyliciouus wrote:
<quoted text> Do you try to get alcohol banned?
A little girl was decapitated in a car accident because of a drunk driver hitting her car. The mom sat on the side of the road holding her daughters head.
Drinking and driving is illegal. People STILL do it. The DD related accidents are getting more frequent. PEOPLE are CHOOSING to abuse their rights to drink.
Will you justify this? or will you fight to have alcohol banned? Which one.
I don't fight to ban anything...including guns. If I've written any post stating I want guns banned please show it, k'thanks.

Since: Dec 09

Location hidden

#278628 Jan 21, 2013
Junket wrote:
<quoted text>
Cancer can kill as can a variety of other diseases. She died of cancer. Heart disease is killing him.
LOL. Pretty much what i said.
Susanm

Emmaus, PA

#278629 Jan 21, 2013
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
She answered you way back when she said nobody's disputing this. Nobody is saying there is no difference between being killed and dying naturally. The difference lies with the living, in the criminal courts. By this distinction, you're trying to compare killing a ZEF to killing a Gramma. And there is no comparison.
Quit acting so thick headed.
The conversation began with comparing God to an abortionist which would mean that all zefs are killed.
Katie

Seattle, WA

#278630 Jan 21, 2013
Gtown71 wrote:
<quoted text>
When my daughter was born she was still part of my wifes body, and the doctor asked if I wanted to cut the cord.
What if before the cord is cut she changed her mind about motherhood?
Plus the doctor never asked her if she wanted the cord cut.
There may come a day when women can choose the fate of their baby up till the cord is cut, while the baby is still part of the womans body.
Only if the concept of being viable is left out of the law.

Why do you guys bother wasting your time thinking of such nonsense? We've long since moved on from leaving imperfect newborns to the elements. Yet a majority of you act as if that's what is going on or what will go on if abortion remains legal. Ridiculous, imo.

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#278631 Jan 21, 2013
elise in burque wrote:
<quoted text>What do you have against coffee shops?
I think he has a dim view of life if he thinks that's all childless people do with their time.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#278632 Jan 21, 2013
sassyliciouus wrote:
<quoted text> She asked you what you are going to do about it and you answered "why".
I don't care if you own a gun or not. Your fellow proaborts (like chicky,foo and others)are trying to take your rights away. You have not even once argued against that.
COWARD.
Fight for your rights,isn't that why you're here now?
No. It's not. I'm here, as I've told you many times, to counter the lies you people spout about reproductive choice. I fight for my rights where it does the most good, which is not on an internet forum.
Susanm

Emmaus, PA

#278633 Jan 21, 2013
AyakaNeo wrote:
<quoted text>In what context of the words? Evidently you mean dying as in natural death and killing as in murder. Of course there is a difference in this context. But killing isn't always murder and killing isn't always unlawful. Smoking is killing ppl of smoking related diseases, but cancer is a natural death even tho cigarettes kill ppl. In this context there is no difference. So do you see the confusion? State what you mean, which is a miscarriage is a natural death and abortion is murder. Don't play with words.
Bitner and Katie are playing with words, or more accuratly changing my words. I asked if there was a difference between two specific words.

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#278634 Jan 21, 2013
sassyliciouus wrote:
<quoted text> Do you fight to ban alcohol. Yes or no?
No hon, and I don't fight to ban guns either. So your favorite pastimes are safe from me.
sassyliciouus

Jackson, NJ

#278635 Jan 21, 2013
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
You can't prevent trying to provoke by being a b*tch, can you? You got nothing but criticism for someone who actually agrees with you regarding teens abstaining from sex. Unbelievable! But not surprising.
Excuse me? I took what Ocean said to him and repeated it back to her. I guess Ocean is not a b*tch when SHE said that to him,huh?

You're a joke Katie.

I have no problem with Oceans view of teens abstaining from sex. Where have I ever critized for that? Stop making stuff up okay?

I agree with alot of her posts regarding the reasons WHY to prevent teen motherhood,but I do disagree with her exxagerating of it.

btw...she is not just talking about teens. She is including just motherhood in general. Again,most of it is exxagerating. She also takes worst case scenerio's including her own miserable experiences and acts like it counts for ALL pregnancies and mothering experiences. She said her pregnancy SUCKED. Mine didn't. So,she should act like ALL pregnancy/mothering is a negative experience.

In fact,she even posted 1,000 reasons why not to become a mother.

Helloooooo....there proves my point that she is anti-motherhood in general. It's quite obvious Katie,and you know it. She is SO freakin happy to be pregnancy free for 20 plus years. GOOD FOR HER.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Wethersfield Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News The 25 Most Dangerous Cities in the U.S. Are Mo... (Nov '10) 13 min Asaad Khattab 20,209
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 36 min Jimmy 1,375,327
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 4 hr Patriot AKA Bozo 58,879
Whitney Beth Raymer 7 hr concerned 1
News Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 7 hr Budmo hey budmo heey 70,473
How DEPRESSING is it living in The State Of Con... 21 hr CT Tax Payer 860 1
News Trump Brings Fiery Message To Thousands in Hart... May 2 Teri 17
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Wethersfield Mortgages