Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 345946 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#276706 Jan 14, 2013
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually, LNM has a great sense of humor. On the other hand, you dont have ANY feel for intelligence.
Hee hee hee!
Tom Tom

Allentown, PA

#276707 Jan 14, 2013
Ocean56 wrote:
<quoted text>
REALLY, and which Planned Parenthood facility did that? I doubt that your little story is true.
Personally, I went to Planned Parenthood quite often when I was 18+ and had just moved to a big city after graduating high school and vocational school. I knew that if I chose to have sex at some point, I DIDN'T want to get pregnant, so I needed reliable contraception to PREVENT that unwanted outcome. They charged very LITTLE money for that contraception, and I was very grateful to get it. I would have had to pay MORE anywhere else.
The Planned Parenthood facility I went to was terrific. The medical staff were very knowledgable and helpful, they answered all my questions on preventing unwanted pregnancy and STD's, and finally set me up with the contraception that I felt would work best for me. Thanks to Planned Parenthood and its wonderful staff, I never got pregnant before the time when I WANTED to become a mother, which wasn't until my 30's. I never got a sexually transmitted disease either. I went OFF birth control when I decided I was ready for the responsibility.
I strongly suggest that teens avoid all types of sexual activity with partners while in middle or high school because even WITH the use of birth control and condoms, unwanted pregnancy is still a possibility. Must protection always be used if for any reason a teen girl or guy decides to have sex? ABSOLUTELY, and EVERY time too. Is that protection a GUARANTEE a girl will never get pregnant? Absolutely NOT. All birth control methods can and do fail occasionally. When BC fails and a pregnancy results, it is still the girl's/woman's decision whether to continue it or not.
With all your tricks dropping yo off, I am sure you were on a first name basis with the staff. "Yank out the condoms, she's back!!"

“Never give up”

Since: Dec 12

Avon, OH

#276708 Jan 14, 2013
cpeter1313 wrote:
Depends on what you call "truth"; everybody has their own truth.
I've known a lot of medical professionals; I worked in the medical field for years. Everyone had different reasons and reactions to to what they did.
What's important to me is that women's civil rights are upheld.
<quoted text>
There's only one truth for me concerning abortion:

A fetus is alive before an abortion and it is dead after an abortion.

Abortion destroys life, and this is what makes it wrong and worth fighting against.
bman

Commack, NY

#276709 Jan 14, 2013
Ocean56 wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh PLEASE. Do you really expect me to believe such nonsense? If you do, get used to disappointment, junior.
There's an old joke that goes like this:
Q. What do you call a couple that relies ONLY on "natural family planning" as their primary form of birth control?
A. PARENTS.
That is why the Catholic Church approves of it while FORBIDDING all other forms of birth control that are far more reliable in preventing unwanted pregnancy. The church doesn't WANT married couples to prevent pregnancy indefinitely, or to take the step of voluntary sterilization. The church wants married couples to start the procreation process sooner or later, and preferably sooner.
Such backward beliefs concerning sex and reproduction is one of the many reasons I kicked the toxic baggage of Catholicism to the curb over 20 years ago. I haven't regretted that decision for a New York minute. I make my OWN decisions in those highly personal matters, rather than allowing a bunch of male clerics in dresses to make those choices for me.
OK, like I said I have nothing against contraception, abortion isn't contraception. I was just telling someone that there IS a way to have sex in marriage but not have kids and not use artificial birth control. If you want to do it your way, that's your buisness. BUT don't use what I just said as a privacy argument for abortion because contraception is different from abortion. Abortion is much different because you're dealing with something that has it's own DNA and heartbeat. While I personally wouldn't use artificial birth control myself, it's a medicine that I don't mind because it doesn't hurt the unborn.
Tondaleyo lives

United States

#276710 Jan 14, 2013
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
You're SO full of shit Skankdawg. The FACT is that many women that lose a pregnancy, whether its naturally or by abortion, simply move on with their lives, and do NOT regret it.
My mom and I had a discussion once about her miscarriage. She told me that knowing what they know now about HER illness,(that the medical community didn't know back then), she was actually THANKFUL that she miscarried - because between the MS and diabetes, and knowing what they also knew about my father's genetic heart conditions in the men in the family - she would NEVER have wished those kinds of health issues onto her child.
Conversely, I know women - some of whom have posted here - who have ALSO said they're not only not sorry they had an abortion, they are THANKFUL they did.
For whatever reason, you have this really sick NEED to inflict YOUR f'd up vision & desire for regret, spiritual misery, shame, depression and more on others.
FORTUNATELY, MOST women dont and wont suffer any such things from having an abortion.
Only a complete idiot like you will hear women tell you THEY DO NOT REGRET their decisions, and ignore that, only to be so insistant on trying to put YOUR words in THEIR mouths.
Wow, you are full of your own filth. Funny thing, I know women who have type one diabetes and have children, and are very sad when they miscarry, my mom miscarried and felt the sadness way into her later years. I would say you cannot speak for women because you refused to be a wife and mother by your choice. Yeah, God gave you free will, you chose wrong, you chose evil. You will be accounted for your choice when you meet Christ face to face. AND YOU WILL. Many women do suffer from an abortion, many have regretted it and spent years in therapy, Martin Luther King Jrs neice and others have gone through years of pain. You can see it in tv stars when they are desperate to have children but admit they have had to
en or more abortions and because of that they can't. You cannot speak for God when your views are so demonic.

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#276711 Jan 14, 2013
sassyliciouus wrote:
<quoted text>
I will say this one more time. I am not anyone else but sassy. If you don't believe me,don't. I really don't care.
But let me ASSURE you that I would never EVER joke about supporting abortion in any way,shape or form. That is well known of me.
Now,carry on....
Where did anyone say it was a joke? I said you inserted it in to make it look like bsman isn't you, yet absolutely everything else bsman posts sounds exactly like you. The fact that you come back claiming you would never say that is exactly the point I was making, so thanks for your help proving me right.

Now you carry on Gagalicious/bsman.
Gtown71

United States

#276712 Jan 14, 2013
cpeter1313 wrote:
Or, they can do what they want and you can butt out.
<quoted text>
That sounds like it is easy enough, and pro lifers hear it all the time, and most want nothing to do with peoples bedrooms or homes, But when those people expect us to pay for part or all of their desicions (and they do), then it does give us a right to speak up.

It 's easy to say stay out of peoples buisiness, but "their " business stops, when it interferes with "our " business..

Even if all abortions were paid for, by those getting the abortions, like you have stated before -You have a right to stand up for human rights. You use your voice to help those who have their own voice. We use our voice to help the helpless.

If anyone should buttout, it is the prodeath crowd. They don't need you.
Geuss what? They can speak for themselves.
Tom Tom

Allentown, PA

#276713 Jan 14, 2013
Kathwynn wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh Bullshyt.. you are trying to generalize and the world does not work that way.
You know and if were honest would acknowledge it.
You are not honest. you are a delusional at best and moronic f*cktard at worse.
Here is how it works out in the real world..
She gets pregnant. She decides to allow her husband to know she is pregnat. he may or may n be happy about this situtation.
Depending on where their lives are both economically, as a married couple, Her health, and what their long term plans are, if any.
She decides on what choice to keep or abort. It is her decision. He does not necessarily have to like it. But at the end will accept it as being her choice. As a mature adult should.
In your scenario he acts out like a spoiled brat for not getting his way. An immature little shyt. Which really points out a problem with their relationship. She needs to make a decision. Which Roe V Wade makes plain is hers alone.
As man I find the fact that many men, invariably are part of one of the Abrahamic religions, act as though they should always get the final word on what their wives should do with their bodies. The flimsy excuses of they love their wives or the worse one. Their god some how says so. Is just an immature response that is both pathetic and stupid.
In the real world a man support his partner and understands that it is not always about him. That sometimes the hardest decision is made when no one else can make it for you.
This is one such place in the real world. A woman does not need her husband having a snit. When she is the one that has to make and live with the decision. Regardless of which one she makes.
I know I just made to much sense again..
Sorry kathy, you misspelled this one, "As man I find the fact that many men,"

You meant to write, " As an Azz man, I find many men."

I am sure you do kathy, I am sure you do. At lerast you aren't causing any abortions riding the chocolate freeway.
Tom Tom

Allentown, PA

#276714 Jan 14, 2013
Conservative Democrat wrote:
<quoted text>
Let's see YOU remove this; go suck a mean hard one ya koos!!
Now you have done it. You have kathy and vlady fighting each other to get to you.
Tondaleyo lives

United States

#276715 Jan 14, 2013
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
That law doesn't prove SHIT about whether Connor was born or not when they were killed.
In fact, the autopsy reports stated they could NOT say if he'd been born or not.
The law was in response to the crime and other crimes like it you moron, NOT to whether or not he was murdered before OR after he was born.
Douay-Rheims Bible
I know thy tribulation and thy poverty, but thou art rich: and thou art blasphemed by them that say they are Jews and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.
Tom Tom

Allentown, PA

#276716 Jan 14, 2013
Conservative Democrat wrote:
<quoted text>
And just who told you I "feel" criticized? Cake boss? I support a woman's right to choose whether to terminate her pregnancy, or carry her pregnancy to term. And I support both choices EQUALLY.
<quoted text>
Woopty f*cking doo.
<quoted text>
I'm not only pro-choice, I'm also pro-law. And the law says that there are limits to elective abortion. I support that as well.
<quoted text>
Is there any better suggestion for adoption than actually adopting?
<quoted text>
Not that it offends me, because nothing you or any other idolater hypocrite could say can offend me, but fact is, you pout, kick and scream every time you're called an anti-choicer and a hypocrite. So if it's good for the goose..........
That makes you a hypocrite and not really pro-choice as you are limiting the right of a woman to do as she wants with her body.

“Never give up”

Since: Dec 12

Avon, OH

#276717 Jan 14, 2013
Gtown71 wrote:
<quoted text>
That sounds like it is easy enough, and pro lifers hear it all the time, and most want nothing to do with peoples bedrooms or homes, But when those people expect us to pay for part or all of their desicions (and they do), then it does give us a right to speak up.
It 's easy to say stay out of peoples buisiness, but "their " business stops, when it interferes with "our " business..
Even if all abortions were paid for, by those getting the abortions, like you have stated before -You have a right to stand up for human rights. You use your voice to help those who have their own voice. We use our voice to help the helpless.
If anyone should buttout, it is the prodeath crowd. They don't need you.
Geuss what? They can speak for themselves.
Pro-Choice people get upset that us Pro-Life people try to 'interfere with their business', yet when they get an abortion they are interfering with the continuing development of a human being. This makes them hypocrites in my opinion.
Tom Tom

Allentown, PA

#276718 Jan 14, 2013
cpeter1313 wrote:
Depends on what you call "truth"; everybody has their own truth.
I've known a lot of medical professionals; I worked in the medical field for years. Everyone had different reasons and reactions to to what they did.
What's important to me is that women's civil rights are upheld.
<quoted text>
"I worked in the medical field for years"

Cleaning up after all the abortions at the Planned Deathhood clinic is not working in the medical field, pagan.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#276719 Jan 14, 2013
Conservative Democrat wrote:
<quoted text>
You proved nothing, other than you can copy and paste.
Not a single medical professional could tell whether Conner died in uteri, or after birth.
So, unless you know more than those doctors do (you're probably going to throw the "their knowledge comes from books" crock of shit at me), you need to shut your f*cking mouth.
Hey Dummy, "uteri" is plural. Maybe you should stop trying to learn Latin and start learning English.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/uteri

"
uterus
[yoo-ter-uh&#8201;s] Show IPA

noun, plural uteri [yoo-tuh-rahy] "

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/in%...

"Definition of IN UTERO

: in the uterus : before birth <a disease acquired in utero> <an in utero diagnosis>

Origin of IN UTERO

Latin
First Known Use: 1713"

You're ignorant and uneducated buffoon. You PC all claim to be educasted and yet your posts belie your claims. You accuse PLers of not being educated and we're the ones proving you for the dummies you are. Funny stuff.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#276720 Jan 14, 2013
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
That is exactly what the law is suggesting. That the ZEF will be treated as a human being, same as its victimized mother, for purposes of sentencing punishment. Just like Ayaka posted.
I posted: "I haven't suggested anything. That law seems to be suggesting it, though, doesn't it, bonehead? "

Katie posted: "That is exactly what the law is suggesting. That the ZEF will be treated as a human being, same as its victimized mother, for purposes of sentencing punishment."

Why do you reply to my posts saying the exact same thing I said? Why not just post that you agree?

That's not what Ayakaneo was saying.

She's combining 2 different discussions, and the reason I posted that law had nothing to do with the reason that thouight I did. She thought it had something to do with a discussion she was having with NR. Can you people at least TRY to pay attention so you can stop looking like stupid fools who can't follow along?

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#276721 Jan 14, 2013
Gtown71 wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, and I agree, if married couples don't want kids, then they don't have to have kids, and if they are certain they Never want kids, then they can have medical procedures done to make sure they never do, but again to wait and decide if you want kids After the wife is pregnant, is no different then waiting to see if you really want to be married, After you get married. It is just a bad deal all the way around. Even Hilary Clinton said abortion, should be legal, safe, and RARE.
So, who has said that abortion shouldn't be rare? When has anyone said otherwise?

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#276722 Jan 14, 2013
Conservative Democrat wrote:
<quoted text>
No you didn't. And thank you for validating my argument without even knowing you were. Did they teach you that in "Honorary Law School" Lynne? You've made it a very clear point that a fetus is an "unborn child" and a "person" and a "human being." Yet, nothing of what you've cited to bolster your f*cked up argument, trumps the law that says it isn't.
<quoted text>
That only goes to prove you idiots are all of the same IQ; -100.
You're an idiot, CD. You prove it with each post.

You admit that I did NOT say what you had claimed I was saying when you replied, "No you didn't." to my saying I never said what you claimed I said.

You then claim, "And thank you for validating my argument without even knowing you were" trying to sound lawyerly because you claim to be one; and you said it because you're an idiot who can't recognize he just got OWNED yet again by someone who isn't a lawyer and never claimed to be. How funny is that?


Please state the exact words from RvW where they are saying a fetus is NOT an "unborn child", or NOT a "human being". Thanks.

The Victims of Violence Act of 2004 says they are, for purposes of a mother who did NOT choose to have hers killed in UTERO through the violent act someone subjected them to.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#276723 Jan 14, 2013
Conservative Democrat wrote:
<quoted text>
You may be right Katie. I'll get clarification on that tonight from my wife.
And if it turns out I'm wrong, you know me; I have no qualms with being the first to admit it, when I am.
You ARE wrong you fool, and you need your WIFE to tell you that? Look it up you imbecile.

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#276724 Jan 14, 2013
Gtown71 wrote:
<quoted text>
I realize that we don't live in a perfect world, and that sin abounds.
You act as if a child is no different then a 4- wheeler.
The husband has a right in Gods eyes to have what the two created.
God created evil, for without evil, then freewill would not truly be freewill.
you and those like you call evil good, and good evil.
Your personal religious beliefs may be that a man has a right "to what the two created," but unless the woman allows it, you have no say about it. Pregnancy is not something men can control, except through prevention. Boys, wear a condom.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#276725 Jan 14, 2013
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
You TRULY are a sanctimonious bitch Lynniekins.
You can cite the paragraphs 432 MORE times in your lame attempts to twist existing laws to suit your agenda, but you are simply not intelligent enough and thus FAIL to recognize and realise something even the LAW recognizes:
The Victims of Violence act recognizes the fetus as AN ADDITIONAL VICTIM to the woman doing the gestating, but it does NOT recognize or grant PERSONHOOD to that fetus.
In fact, in 2012, one of the idiot tea-pary members of congress from Tennessee tried to get a bill AMENDING the VOV Act to INCLUDE personhood. It was called the Fetal Awareness and Personhood Act of 2012.
It was struck down. Failed miserably.
In fact, in regard to this kind of stupidity, groups like Parents Against Personhood have cropped up to fight such legislation.
http://parentsagainstpersonhood.com/
THEY on the other hand, are NOT failing.
Thankfully, not EVERYONE is as stupid as you are Lynne.
Foo: "The Victims of Violence act recognizes the fetus as AN ADDITIONAL VICTIM to the woman doing the gestating...

Exactly what I saisd.

Foo, "... but it does NOT recognize or grant PERSONHOOD to that fetus."

Never said it did, you ignorant buffoon. None of you fools gets that I only posted that for the purpose of proving Kathwynn wrong in his claim that Connor died "after popping out" of his mother. He died BEFORE, while still in utero, was the point.

You all post off of each other's stupidity in what you think someone posted or why they posted it.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Wethersfield Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 24 min Watcher 1,780,754
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 6 hr Bill Farted 64,838
News The 25 Most Dangerous Cities in the U.S. Are Mo... (Nov '10) 9 hr None 21,984
News Schools Prepare for Temperatures in the 90s Monday 10 hr Gavone 7
News Newington Discusses Curbing Panhandling Mon Bruddah Z 1
News Convicted In Slaying, Man Faces Unrelated Charges (Aug '08) Mon Smh 9
In need of xnax/dderall/xy/H/Tr?etc Sun Odicaty 1

Wethersfield Jobs

Personal Finance

Wethersfield Mortgages