Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 311216 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

Ink

Bensalem, PA

#275612 Jan 10, 2013
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
Ink claimed we "all agree" with it so let her dig herself out of her own shitpile and prove it.
Let's see ink pull up posts from "all" of us clearly stating that we "agree" with it.
And BTW, you've asked me this a couple of times before and then ignored my answers.
Elise already said any reason is fine. So has Bitner. If you dfeel different, say so.

“2014 TDF”

Since: Mar 09

Boca Raton, FL.

#275613 Jan 10, 2013
Forum carlsbad nm wrote:
Ask the babies if they would like to live.
"Baby, do you want to live?"

Wahh Wahh Wahh!!!!

Sorry, speak English; do you want to live?

Wahh Wahh Wahh!!!
Katie

Seattle, WA

#275614 Jan 10, 2013
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
"I cry when I read about how hard he fought."
You HYPOCRITE!
You people have spent countless pages arguing that {manner of death} doesn't matter, because the END RESULT is the same; death. There you are proving [manner of death] DOES matter, and are proving why it matters.
It matters just as much when a fetus dies by natural causes or is killed by abortion. The result is the same, the MANNER OF DEATH is the difference. You just proved it with your own words.
Boneheads.
Your anger is misplaced.
As is your "argument".

Do you know how to properly debate?
Or just fling ad homs like monkeys fling sh*t?

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#275615 Jan 10, 2013
BraveCon wrote:
<quoted text>
I find it a bit ironic that for the women 'who never wanted to GET pregnant in the first place' made the decision to have sex with a man. If they truly never want to get pregnant, the most logical solution is not to have sex with a man.
What planet are you from?

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#275616 Jan 10, 2013
BraveCon wrote:
<quoted text>
I would say that every time a woman has sex she should expect to get pregnant. Being shocked that you've become pregnant, even though you're taking contraceptives or the man always uses condoms, still shouldn't shock any woman because having sex with a man always carries with it the possibility of pregnancy.
So the reality is no pregnany is truly 'unplanned' or 'unwanted'.
Any sexually active woman who is shocked by pregnancy is really either pretty naive about sex or just pretty stupid.
Who says a woman is shocked when she gets pregnant? The fact is that she doesn't have to stay pregnant if she doesn't want to. Why do you think you have a right to make law forcing her to stay pregnant against her will?
Ink

Bensalem, PA

#275617 Jan 10, 2013
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
You made the claim that we "all agree" with it. You do the work to prove it. Show a post for each of us stating that we each "agree" with it. We don't have to shit for you.
If you don't think that gender selection is acceptable, say so.

Otherwise supporting abortion on demand includes aborting one sex for the other.

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#275618 Jan 10, 2013
BraveCon wrote:
<quoted text>
Remember that woman in Texas, Andrea Yates, who made the decision to drown her five kids in the bathtub?
She made the decision to terminate her five kids. It was her choice to do so.
I don't find any difference between her and any woman who has had five abortions in her lifetime.
Well, then, you really are an idiot.

“2014 TDF”

Since: Mar 09

Boca Raton, FL.

#275619 Jan 10, 2013
elise in burque wrote:
<quoted text>What planet are you from?
LB426.

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#275620 Jan 10, 2013
Gtown71 wrote:
<quoted text>
You do realize that there are those who are just as Godless as you, and still find the killing on evolutions tinest things, to be a horrific thing, don't you?
Plus, if a country is not going to recognize a baby in the womb as a human, then that country should never charge anyone for the death of the baby in the womb, if the baby dies for any reason, as a result of their actions.
Anyway you slice it, it is a double standard. The very same ones who accuse pro lifers as being control freaks, are in FACT the control freaks themself.
They want it to be a baby if they say it is, or they want it to be equal to a tumor, that needs removing, so that the woman can get on with 'her ' life.
The reason the pro death people would fight so hard against a law, that said anything before birth is not human, is becouse the first pregnant lady that is just days away from delivery, that gets shot through the stomach by a stray bullet, and all the guy would get was recklous indangerment of "1" human life, then it becomes all to real that the bundle she carried was in fact a child.
I pray that one day people will look back and see how america was, and that the holucost was nothing compared to what we allowed to happen to soo many of our own people.
What?
Katie

Seattle, WA

#275621 Jan 10, 2013
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
All of what I said applies and it's your own argument that doesn't apply. In order for you to have an argument about sentience, you'd have to be making it about temporary non-sentience, because it's a fact that the human life in utero is non-sentient only temporarily. If left alone and if all goes well, it'll become as sentient as we all are.
Uh no, your post does not apply to what I asked zef regarding his claim that sentience had no impact on life or living life. I'm interested in reading his reasons for this claim. So I asked some follow up questions. Your butting in and demanding what the topic should be about is no exception for your display of willful ignorance.
Katie

Seattle, WA

#275622 Jan 10, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
You would be one that would say whatever reason is okay.
See Katie?
What am I supposed to see that you think I don't?

You're the one who, after years of posting with me, can't remember I don't necessarily like abortion. However, the possibility of women losing their civil rights to personal privacy and bodily autonomy disturbs me more than an individual woman safely and legally aborting an unwanted or unhealthy pregnancy. For you, it's the opposite. You focus on drivel and call it good.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#275623 Jan 10, 2013
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't understand why you pea brains keep trying to deflect with nonsense. Foo was OWNED again while she tried to argue what a pedophile is, and her response was nothing more than a desperate attempt at deflection. So is yours.
Lynne, you have a seriously PATHETIC need to "OWN" people, yet you are the one being OWNED pretty regularly.

LOL

I wasn't arguing what a pedophile is. I simply gave a singluar FACTUAL dictionary definition that states its when an older man is sexually aroused by a child.

YOU have chosen to argue about it by coming up with every explaination you can cut and paste - yet NONE of which proves Merriam-Webster wrong.

You aint arguing with me Lynniekins, you're trying to argue with a dictionary definition that doesnt say what you WANT IT TO.

ROFLMAO!

Like it or not, you were A CHILD. You were an immature brat back then - and the adult man that you claimed you were SO mature and could handle it .... you couldn't.

ANd you made THAT claim as an adult. Clearly you never grew out of the immature brat stage LOL!

By MANY, that man could and would be considered a pedophile, a predator, a statutory rapist.

Its a good thing in a way that you lost all those "children" - beacuse they'd have had a pedophile, a predator, a rapist for a papa, not to mention a lunatic for a mutha. LOL

Carry on Lynniekins. Its fun to wind your stupid ass up and see how long you go!
Ink

Bensalem, PA

#275624 Jan 10, 2013
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
What am I supposed to see that you think I don't?
You're the one who, after years of posting with me, can't remember I don't necessarily like abortion. However, the possibility of women losing their civil rights to personal privacy and bodily autonomy disturbs me more than an individual woman safely and legally aborting an unwanted or unhealthy pregnancy. For you, it's the opposite. You focus on drivel and call it good.
Only a good pro choicer would call aborting a baby drivel.

Only a good pro choicer would turn a blind eye to girl babies being aborted in favor of boys.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#275625 Jan 10, 2013
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
What a shame that would be, to be in that condition (temporarily)and not even be able to trust your own mother to not have you ripped apart while being put to death. Imagine that.
Imagine what? You're MORONIC hypothetical that has NO basis in reality? No mother is having their child ripped apart while in a coma you dunce.

And YES Lynnie, I know you're now making the claim that this is what's happening during an abortion. But since zygotes, embryo's and fetus's dont have the capacity to trust, it makes your post just moronic.

For example - and this is using YOUR "logic":

Its a shame that your "children" couldn't trust YOU enough while they were in that condition, to have you protect them, and at least two of them ended up as fetal floaters in a toilet.

You didn't rip them apart, but you certainly sent them for a dip in some cold water, and the poor things couldn't even swim.....
Problem isn't being in that condition so much as having people, like your own mother for example, responsible for your care who can't be trusted to CARE FOR YOU.
Well we KNOW You couldn't be trusted.
Like way too many little ones in utero who can't trust their mothers to care for them.
And you're a living example of that at LEAST three times over.
Obviously, because there you sit typing stupidity over the internet and you were once one of those insentient Tic Tac sized nothings you describe.
And YOUR insentient Tic Tac's were fished out of a toilet, because they couldn't trust mommy to care for them properly. Funny how that works huh?

Since: Sep 09

Location hidden

#275626 Jan 10, 2013
Ink, do you have any proof that gender selection is taking place in the USA? If so, do you have further documentation that males are being favored?

If anything, fewer males are being born:

http://abcnews.go.com/Health/ReproductiveHeal...

**********
Granted, the link is dated. Likely not much has changed though - feel free to look if you are so inclined.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#275627 Jan 10, 2013
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
"I cry when I read about how hard he fought."
You HYPOCRITE!
You people have spent countless pages arguing that {manner of death} doesn't matter, because the END RESULT is the same; death. There you are proving [manner of death] DOES matter, and are proving why it matters.
It matters just as much when a fetus dies by natural causes or is killed by abortion. The result is the same, the MANNER OF DEATH is the difference. You just proved it with your own words.
Boneheads.
Lynne, you TRULY are demented.

Whether a woman has a natural abortion or a medical one, the manner does NOT matter to ANYONE except who its happening to.

Just look at your own case. Nobody gave a shit when you almost flushed the potty twins, Tic & Tac, OR when you lost ANOTHER pregnancy to that same pedophile/predator/rapist. Not your parents, not your doctor, nobody.

Gee. No wonder you're such a bitter old harridan now. It explains SO much actually. Negative attention is better than none for you Lynne.

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#275628 Jan 10, 2013
cpeter1313 wrote:
Scott peterSON rings a bell, idiot. And that "popping out" why he was convicted of murder for the child--that's called being BORN, and rights and status acrued at that moment, because evidence determined it was still alive when it popped out.
Yes, somepeople ARE in jail "becouse[sic] they did something to cause the death of some womans (choice)"; that's exactly what fetal homicide laws are--protection of the woman against those who would thwart her right to carry to term. EVERY such law contains language differentiating it from abortion. Some states have no FHL's at all, and those that do vary on when they kick in and what the punishment is.
Get your god to explain it, next time you speak to him, because it will take a miracle for you to grasp this concept.
<quoted text>
He won't understand that. You need to use simple words and short sentences.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#275629 Jan 10, 2013
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
I do not understand for one minute why LyingLynneLily would want to continue carrying on this farce. It's a new year. Year 3 of her claiming NOT to be Lynne D. We all know better, though. She and Lynne D share the same DNA.
She should 'fess up and be done with it. She'll feel so much better. And, perhaps, conversing with her would be a little more interesting.
Nah. Wont happen. She did as Perverse and look how badly that went for her. LOL

Nah, she can play this game, and it gets her all the negative attention she's ever wanted.

She ONLY deludes herself.

But you just came up with a new way for her to ignore/deny she's Lynne.

HEY LYNNIEKINS!!

If you and Lynne D were tested, would you share DNA?

LOLOL!
Forum Mod
#275630 Jan 10, 2013
elise in burque wrote:
<quoted text>Well, then, you really are an idiot.
Please refrain from gratuitous name calling.
We reserve the right to remove any post we determine to be inappropriate.

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#275631 Jan 10, 2013
Gtown71 wrote:
<quoted text>
So these fetal laws are only for protecting womens rights again?
Not for the protection of the fetus?
Plus, thanks for the education on how untill a (whatever you call it) comes out, so then we know we can call it a baby, that the (baby) feels no pain untill accualy born. I knew the dang pro lifers lied to me, when they said babies would cry and try to move Away From the death pipe, that was there to suck them up one piece at a time.
Wow, were you this ignorant be forever the Lawd took up residence in your brain?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Wethersfield Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 15 min Grey Ghostmoron 1,384,179
News Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 9 hr TRD 70,614
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 13 hr The Donald_ 59,545
News The 25 Most Dangerous Cities in the U.S. Are Mo... (Nov '10) 19 hr Samuel-7g-Jackson 20,316
News Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) Mon dGo mnaDed lyHo i... 72,026
News Suspect Had Quit Rehab (Mar '08) May 24 Ken Burke 135
CAR Accident on Friday April 22, 2016 Apr '16 MarcusT20073 1
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Wethersfield Mortgages