Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 310236 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#269992 Dec 14, 2012
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
If Deathscort Foo was your counselor, she would have told you to abort your daughter. She also would have been more than tickled to escort your daughter to her execution.
Actually, I would have done nothing of the kind. I would have made sure that IF she'd have known about that BEFORE her daughter was born (which is impossible of course), I'd have helped her educate herself before hand on the syndrome, and helped her set up help to deal with it.

And since I've never and WILL never escort ANYONE to AN execution, let alone their own, that's just you flat out LYING again.

Tell us No Relevance, did you learn to lie like this in the Roman Catholic Church? Did they teach you to be a Jackass For Jesus?

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#269993 Dec 14, 2012
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
Foochie: WTF would YOU know about a "good dad" Lynne? Yours was an alcholic abuser.
You're a 'recovered' drug addict who refused to complete 12 Step program. Once a drug addict, always a drug addict.#DryDrunk
You're a moron No Relevance. I not only DID complete it, I LIVE the program every day of my life, and been doing it successfully for over 20 years now.

And while I might ALWAYS be an addict, I will ALSO ALWAYS maintain my recovery. Why? Because life is MUCH better in the REAL world, you should try it sometime asshole.
Foochie: Lynne, you TRIED to have a child, but instead "murdered" FOUR of them with pathetic excuses for men.
I was here when Lynne D. explained her situatino. She did not intentionally try to kill her babies.
She didn't intentionally try to SAVE them either, in fact, after having two of them "murdered" by the abusive pedophile she was with, she STAYED with the abusive pedophile and tried to have yet ANOTHER pregnancy with him. But that one was screwed (pun intended) because of "faulty sperm" as she claimed.
For a feminist, you sure don't stand up for abused women.#FakeFeminist
Who said I was a feminist? For 7 years I've watched Lynne, both here AND in private corrispondance, BE abusive as well as crave it. There's no reason to believe she wasn't mutually abusive back then either. In fact, evidence would support it.

You REALLY want to start this up again No Relevance? Because I'll be HAPPY to help you make an ass of her AGAIN.#fakeman
You are a deathscort & an abortion promoter.
Actually I'm neither, but YOU are a liar. ANd a pathetic one at that.
YOU are an accomplice to many baby murders. You even kill baby girls.#FakeFeminist
Again, you're outright lying. I've never been an accomplice to ANY murder - baby or otherwise, of EITHER gender.#fakecatholic
I don't remember Lynne D. ever discussing being charged w/ felonous check fraud. Do you?
I was charged with MISDEMEANOR "Bad Check Violation". No fraud, I paid the check and moved on with my life. Not that big a deal. You're REALLY trying to compare writing a bad check to the "murder" of FOUR children (by your kind's standards) No Relevance?

Nice try at deflection.

Pity you're a failure as always huh?

#fakecatholic

Your a mess
YOU'RE a moron, as well as a fake catholic.

Carry on little boy. ROFLMAO!

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#269994 Dec 14, 2012
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
How's Ariel Richards, CallsItHowFooSeesIt?
Ariel's great, saw her just over a month ago. I'll let her know how much you care! LOL!

Not sure what that last part is about, but hey, you're clearly mentally ill, so we can just chalk that up to more stupidity from you huh?

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#269995 Dec 14, 2012
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
So you changed Jesus into one of many minor historical figures. Then I guess you don't believe anything He said about Himself.
First off, you DO know that for most that dont follow Christianity, he wasn't even a MINOR historical figure, he's completely meaningless.

Second, if he's meaningless to those not of your version of faith, why SHOULD anyone even believe he said ANYTHING about himself, let alone belive it?
For some strange reason, many folks think that Jesus was a sort of “universal guru” who app........**DELETED PLAGERIZED COMMENTARY FOR THEFT AND STUPIDITY ****......
Does Curt Daniel know you plagerized his work unlinked and uncredited? Dont worry, I let him know.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#269996 Dec 14, 2012
I said:

You claimed your daughter ISN'T being able to raise her kids that way, because she's getting conflicting messages from her athiest husband that interferes.
If they're like you, you're a family of idiots.
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
I never claimed that. I said his atheist views made things more complicated and difficult. My granddaughters are being raised Catholic as they should be.
You're a liar, You certainly DID both say AND imply that:
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
I'll tell you where the confusion is. I have a Catholic daughter married to an athiest. She is trying to raise her daughters Catholic and his mocking and scoffing of God is beyond impossible for her and the values she is trying to instill in her girls is being made a joke of. The girls don't know who to believe, Mom or Dad.
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/bethlehem-pa/...
No Catholic is going to give in to an atheist.
No actual CATHOLIC should be MARRIED to an athiest. Marrying outside your faith is AGAINST your faith and there's no way in hell any bishop would give a special dispensation to a couple to have even a civil marriage when one is a jackass like you've made your SIL look when it comes to his wife's faith.

Nice try at backtracking Inkstain, but ONCE AGAIN, you said something that was especially stupid, EVEN FOR YOU and its backfired on your ridiculous ass.

No Relativism

Huntington, IN

#269997 Dec 14, 2012
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
And you're an unrepentAnt lying POS.
I can see how your creator will have issues with YOU.
You know, whenever tragedies like today happen, I have to wonder why unrelenting assholes like you still walk this earth, when children die in schools at the hands of idiots that are likely just LIKE you.
You're a mess, foo.

You get on your soapbox about the 20 small children executed today by a perpetrator.

Meanwhile, you supported & promoted the 4,000 babies executed in American abortuaries today.

You are a worse person than the 20-year-old nutcase who shot the children today.

^^^ Deathscort Foo ^^^

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#269998 Dec 14, 2012
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
You guys make this stuff up as you go along. Too bad because it is hard to have an honest conversation.
One can't have an honest conversation with you Inkstain, for many reasons. One is because YOU lie about what you've said and then you lie about what OTHERS say too.

Nobody is making anything up. YOU claimed your son in law was making it "impossible" for your daughter to teach your grandkids her faith. Oh and lets not forget that you also claimed that you havent bothered to get in his face about it because he lives across the country, and likely you dont want to get involved.

Let me tell you sister, if ANYONE had tried to keep my father or mother from educating their grandchild about THEIR faith, they've have faced a righteous wrath, and rightfully so. And similarly, if anyone had tried to keep me from trying to let her keep a connection to HER MOTHERS faith, they'd have gotten it from ME with both barrels.

One can only conclude that either

A) you were lying about the whole thing to begin with ...or...

B) you were exaggerating about the whole thing, and in your usual stumblefooted way - made yourself, your daughter and your son-in-law ALL look like idiots ....or....

C) You're just a moron, you're SIL really IS that big a jackass and now you're trying to backpedal from making him AND you look as bad as you did.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#269999 Dec 14, 2012
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Then why are you folks complaining about women dying due to abortions before R v W?
WTF are you babbling about now? YOU asked a question and I responded, and it had NOTHING to do with these stupid comments.

G-d DAMN Inkstain, you're really hitting the sause early tonight.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#270000 Dec 14, 2012
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Why? He sounds like every other atheist on this thread. You make the call.
No actually he doesn't. You made him sound like a serious ass who should be removed from the influence of children.

In fact, every one of us has said here that there ARE extremists on both sides of the issues. You made HIM sound as extremist as YOU make YOURSELF seem. Think: No Relevance with no claimed belief in Jesus. THAT is what your daughter is married to, or that's what you made it seem like.

I'd say that MOST of the athiests on this thread wouldn't force their view on their kids or grandkids, and further, MOST athiests I know RELY on education about various religious beliefs, they are not AGAINST learning.

Now that said, MOST PEOPLE regardless of their faith (or lack of it) are not against education.

INDOCTRINATION is what they're against.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#270001 Dec 14, 2012
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
You don't believe the gospels so why do you include Him as one of your gods.
Yes Bitner, Inkstain REALLY IS this stupid.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#270002 Dec 14, 2012
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
No I didn't. I said that if 'one of my children' turned from Christ, I would tell them they were crazy.
Yes you did liar.
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh I would find out what and why and then tell them how crazy they were and to get back on track. That's my job as their mother.
http://www.topix.com/forum/us/politics/T833PC...

That's your job as a BIGOT.
He 'is' young and doesn't understand the 'confusion' he causes in the kid's minds.
He's got kids, its time for him to grow up. Your daughter has kids, its time for HER to grow up and stand up to something that's WRONG.

IF she actually gives a shit that is.

YOUR job as a "mom" would be to aid them in doing that. Oh wait, I forgot, you dont discuss it with them.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#270003 Dec 14, 2012
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
Why is it not your job?
Because she dosen't actually care about it other than as she can use it here as a "morality tale".

Since: Jun 08

Atrisco Village

#270004 Dec 14, 2012
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Is that you, Elise?
Did you refuse your meds again, Ink?

Since: Jun 08

Atrisco Village

#270005 Dec 14, 2012
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
No you keep changing the senario. but what if---but what fi---but what if.
So, yes eventually I get to where you think you want me to be. So that you can see it as a win for your argument.
I said that I would fight with all the influence I have and ultimately pray.
Lol! Yes, dear, sure, sure...

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#270006 Dec 14, 2012
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
I think you are talking about cursing. That wasn't done by the poster.
n.
1.
a. An appeal or prayer for evil or misfortune to befall someone or something.
b. The evil or misfortune that comes in or as if in response to such an appeal: bewailed the curse of ill health.
2. One that is accursed.
3. A source or cause of evil; a scourge: "Selfishness is the greatest curse of the human race" (William Ewart Gladstone).
4. A profane word or phrase; a swearword.
5. Ecclesiastical A censure, ban, or anathema.
6. Slang Menstruation. Used with the.
v. cursed or curst (kūrst), curs·ing, curs·es
v.tr.
1. To invoke evil or misfortune upon; damn.
2. To swear at.
3. To bring evil upon; afflict: was cursed with crippling arthritis.
4. Ecclesiastical To put under a ban or an anathema; excommunicate
You REALLY ARE a moron. Look at #4 you MORON. You asked

"
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Where does it say that Christians can't cuss?
Nice try at backtracking, but once again, you''ve only made yourself look like an ass.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#270007 Dec 14, 2012
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
He's not my kid. I didn't raise him and teach him our family values and faith.
And apparently you dont care about him, your daughter OR your grandkids enough to try to teach him why its so important.

You apparently didn't raise your daughter and teach HER your family values or faith either. If you did, and the lesson took, she wouldn't be putting up with his bullshit.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#270008 Dec 14, 2012
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
He's not your son too? He's not family? He's not interferring with your daughter's religious education of your grandchildren?
Forget it, Witless. I'm guessing this point will sail right over your empty little head, too.
You gotta give it to her Bit, NOBODY can play stupid as well as Inkstain.

Tho one HAS to wonder why she thinks making themselves look like complete morons is a good thing....

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#270009 Dec 14, 2012
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
I have complete faith that my daughter can handle it. That's her job.
Well according to you, she's failing miserably if the kids are SO confused.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#270010 Dec 14, 2012
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
I have complete faith that my daughter can handle it. That's her job.
And you think YOUR job is over huh?@@ Glad you weren't MY grandmother. I'd hate to end up as stupid as you are. Of course No Relevance would have LOVED you as a grandma. He would have still been stupid, but perhaps a bit less bitter.

Frankly, if your daugher could handle it, and IF her faith is that important to her, she shouldn't have married him to begin with.

After all, what's likely confusing to the kiddies is ALSO that mommy married outside her faith, without the special dispensation of her bishop, and - oh yeah - that's AGAINST her faith....

Guess she's teaching them to take what they like about the "Faith" and ignore the rest. After all, that's what she learned from you.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#270011 Dec 14, 2012
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
You are unique. Pro choice groups oppose waiting periods for abortions.
STop making LYING and MORONIC blanket statements. They dont want UNREASONABLE waiting periods, like the ones that would prevent using the morning after pill. Generally speaking, NORMAL folks who dont have a political agenda aren't against 24 hour or so waiting periods and COMPREHENSIVE education.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Wethersfield Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 9 min TSM 1,278,997
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 1 hr SpaceBlues 54,634
News The 25 Most Dangerous Cities in the U.S. Are Mo... (Nov '10) 2 hr Ramos Talking 20,112
News Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 3 hr TRD 70,163
News More Advice On Acura TL Transmission Failures A... (Apr '09) 16 hr wallE 292
tennis 🎾 for kids Thu Tats 1
Review: Nirenstein Horowitz And Associates (Sep '12) Wed carolb38 51
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Wethersfield Mortgages