Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 311926 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

“Proud to be a Wiccan Priest”

Since: Jul 09

Jonesboro AR

#269222 Dec 10, 2012
TomTom wrote:
<quoted text>
"Those facts are all to real."
That should be "too" not "to". I know they don't teach those things in pagan school. Carry on with your proabort rant. CD is very proud.
Aww looky every one the moron is trying to be a fool. How sweet..

“Proud to be a Wiccan Priest”

Since: Jul 09

Jonesboro AR

#269223 Dec 10, 2012
TomTom wrote:
<quoted text>
Vile and evil post. She should report you!
Yeah well you good bud was the one that wished that on another poster. You can take that up with her....

“2014 TDF”

Since: Mar 09

Boca Raton, FL.

#269224 Dec 10, 2012
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>Cpeter: If you cloned humans, the DNA test would read the same as that of a non-clonal human.

Even your liberal ilk believe cloning humans is beyond the pail. It's illegal, and makes your point moot. Again.
Just as moot as all your fuss about abortion being murder, since it is legal.

“Proud to be a Wiccan Priest”

Since: Jul 09

Jonesboro AR

#269225 Dec 10, 2012
Junket wrote:
<quoted text>
Abortion terminates a pregnancy. Cold, but true nonetheless.
Truth, reality, and facts just are not their best friends...

“2014 TDF”

Since: Mar 09

Boca Raton, FL.

#269226 Dec 10, 2012
Junket wrote:
<quoted text>Puddles, you can not seem to resist attacking a poster when you've run out of ways to counter a post.

It's childish on your part. Granted, my naming you "Puddles" is also immature, but I figured you liked it better than "Basement Boy" or "No Relevance".
Or Eunuch

Hiya Pippy!!!

“2014 TDF”

Since: Mar 09

Boca Raton, FL.

#269227 Dec 10, 2012
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>"pail"? Try "PALE" you moron.

[QUOTE] It's illegal, and makes your point moot. Again.
"

So are most LTA's except those for a woman's health - yet your kind keep babbling about them as if they're still happening.

Nice double standard there No Relevance.
Happy Hanukkah Foo. Best to your family.
worships reality

AOL

#269228 Dec 10, 2012
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually, often it is.
actually it never is.

My Lai Massacre mean anything to you dunce?
the victims at my lai were not considered collateral damage. they were most certainly the intended targets of their killers.

research collateral damage before you decide to weigh in, dunce.

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/collateral+d...
HuskerDu

United States

#269229 Dec 10, 2012
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
WTF are you babbling about Knutbar?
You were so upset that I said this woman made up her hate crime. YOU really believed this woman's story. I guess the crack you smoked is making you absent minded.
Katie

Seattle, WA

#269231 Dec 10, 2012
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
That should read "they've broken out that shared SN again. Too cowardly is all.
Yeah. Not surprised, though.
Are you?

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#269232 Dec 10, 2012
worships reality wrote:
<quoted text>
actually it never is.
<quoted text>
the victims at my lai were not considered collateral damage. they were most certainly the intended targets of their killers.
research collateral damage before you decide to weigh in, dunce.
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/collateral+d...
I know what collateral damage is you dumbass. And your comment was

"and collateral damage during war is not intentional killing for inconvenience."

My Lei, being MURDERS certainly was considered collateral damage as it pertained to civillian deaths during the WAR.

Collateral damage encompasses of all the people who have killed or injured, whom nobody particularly intended to kill or maim, but who just happened to be in the way.

That was My Lei. Captain Ernest Medina who ordered the clearing of the village, did not intend for the civillians to be raped and killed, thus, they were collateral damage even tho they were intentionally murdered by Calley and his cronies.

And as CD pointed out, Hiroshima was yet another example.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#269233 Dec 10, 2012
HuskerDu wrote:
<quoted text>You were so upset that I said this woman made up her hate crime. YOU really believed this woman's story. I guess the crack you smoked is making you absent minded.
Knutbar, I have NO idea what the hell you're babbling about. Your link didn't work, and I dont know what "her" you're raving about.
worships reality

AOL

#269234 Dec 10, 2012
Junket wrote:
<quoted text>
Really.
yeah, really

So when there's a massacre at a movie theater, the deaths were not intentional?
of course they were. which means they were not collateral damage. they were the intended targets

Seems to me that there's little difference between deliberate targeting and happenstance.
duh, ya think?
You seem to disagree. Okey dokey.
"seem" to? your elevator doesn't seem to go all the way to the top floor

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#269235 Dec 10, 2012
worships reality wrote:
<quoted text>
yeah, really
<quoted text>
of course they were. which means they were not collateral damage. they were the intended targets
<quoted text>
duh, ya think?
<quoted text>
"seem" to? your elevator doesn't seem to go all the way to the top floor
And you seem to be just another little pissant coward venting its spleen meaninglessly on a messageboard LOL!
worships reality

AOL

#269236 Dec 10, 2012
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
I know what collateral damage is you dumbass.
no you don't. and what's written below proves it.
And your comment was
"and collateral damage during war is not intentional killing for inconvenience."
accurate
My Lei, being MURDERS certainly was considered collateral damage as it pertained to civillian deaths during the WAR.
no it wasn't
not all civilian caualties during war are necessarily collateral damage
Collateral damage encompasses of all the people who have killed or injured, whom nobody particularly intended to kill or maim, but who just happened to be in the way.
my lai victims were most certainly their killers targets. by your own definition in order to be considered collateral damage "nobody particularly intended to kill or maim". my lai victims did not qualify
That was My Lei. Captain Ernest Medina who ordered the clearing of the village, did not intend for the civillians to be raped and killed, thus, they were collateral damage even tho they were intentionally murdered by Calley and his cronies.
ridiculous. if i as a commander give the order to "defeat the enemy", and my subordinates interpret that to mean that deliberate killing of civilians is the way to do that, it doesn't mean my subordinates' victims are collateral damage simply because i didn't intend for them to kill them.
And as CD pointed out, Hiroshima was yet another example.
civilians were targeted in those bombings. they were not considered collateral damage.
worships reality

AOL

#269237 Dec 10, 2012
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
And you seem to be just another little pissant coward venting its spleen meaninglessly on a messageboard LOL!
but in this instance, a right little pissant coward :-)

you think your countless vents here are any less meaningless than mine?
HuskerDu

United States

#269238 Dec 10, 2012
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
Knutbar, I have NO idea what the hell you're babbling about. Your link didn't work, and I dont know what "her" you're raving about.
http://bigstory.ap.org/article/prosecutor-neb...
worships reality

AOL

#269239 Dec 10, 2012
AyakaNeo wrote:
<quoted text>Right, so the medical and legal scholars recommend using Merriam?
merriam-webster "medical" dictionary genius. you think they just made it up?

http://www2.merriam-webster.com/cgi-bin/mwmed...

here's still another for you.

http://www.emedicinehealth.com/script/main/ar...

but what do you say instead of beating up every medical definition i come up with, you provide one of your own that proves me wrong?
HuskerDu

United States

#269240 Dec 10, 2012
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
Knutbar, I have NO idea what the hell you're babbling about. Your link didn't work, and I dont know what "her" you're raving about.
Here's another one http://journalstar.com/news/local/crime-and-c...

Since: Dec 09

Location hidden

#269241 Dec 10, 2012
worships reality wrote:
<quoted text>
merriam-webster "medical" dictionary genius. you think they just made it up?
http://www2.merriam-webster.com/cgi-bin/mwmed...
here's still another for you.
http://www.emedicinehealth.com/script/main/ar...
but what do you say instead of beating up every medical definition i come up with, you provide one of your own that proves me wrong?
Well your Merriam Webster says OR UNBORN OFFSPRING. So there ya go. There does not have to be a developing fetus in the uterus. Unborn alive or unborn dead she's still pregnant.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#269243 Dec 10, 2012
worships reality wrote:
<quoted text>
no you don't. and what's written below proves it.
***pat pat***

You keep thinking that Sparky.
<quoted text>
no it wasn't
Yes actually it was.
not all civilian caualties during war are necessarily collateral damage
If they were not intentionally targeted, or if their deaths were not specifically anticipated, then yes, they are.

<quoted text>
my lai victims were most certainly their killers targets.
They were not the MILITARY'S targets. And CERTAINLY not in that manner.
by your own definition in order to be considered collateral damage "nobody particularly intended to kill or maim". my lai victims did not qualify
Except they DID qualify, since their deaths was not intended by Calley's superiors.
ridiculous. if i as a commander give the order to "defeat the enemy", and my subordinates interpret that to mean that deliberate killing of civilians is the way to do that, it doesn't mean my subordinates' victims are collateral damage simply because i didn't intend for them to kill them.
If you as a commander are a moron, and fail to give SPECIFIC enough orders that fail to include "and oh by the way guys, lets not rape and murder innocent women and children and toss them in ditches" then YOU are as much at fault as your murdering subordinates.

HOWEVER, that was NOT the military's intention, thus, they WERE collateral damage in that way. If only because of the military's failures to judge the readiness and sanity of its soldiers and their failure to anticipate such atrocities.
civilians were targeted in those bombings. they were not considered collateral damage.
SOME were targeted, but the DEGREE of the deaths and destruction was NOT anticipated. Everything out of the ANTICIPATED kill and damage zones was collateral damage, and that was ENORMOUS. The decision to use the first atomic bombs in history to halt the worst war the world had ever known created collateral damage in both cities bombed. They crippled the nation of Japan for many years, and THAT was not anticipated, nor was the long term affects of the radiation - ALL collateral damage, in some cases still felt to this day.

Was SOME of it anticipated? Yes, but not all, and THAT is where the collateral damage comes in.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Wethersfield Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 30 min Earthling-1 61,525
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 2 hr RoxLo 1,433,986
News Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 5 hr TRD 71,067
News The 25 Most Dangerous Cities in the U.S. Are Mo... (Nov '10) 8 hr New york 20,648
DCF Protest in CT & We want your stories!!! (Jul '12) 13 hr Stephanie 66
anybody remember (Aug '12) 22 hr Hagatha Christie 4
News Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) Sep 28 rabbee yehoshooah... 72,039

Wethersfield Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Wethersfield Mortgages