Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 311628 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#267565 Dec 2, 2012
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
Right back to you....by your "incites" (lol) do you mean YOUR "prejucees"? Whatever "prejucees" are..lol!
Fruit before you put it in the juicer? LOL.
No Relativism

Chicago, IL

#267566 Dec 2, 2012
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
Again...the debate was about the use of the word "being" not human.
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
"You know very well that there's no debate that it's "human" and that the debate was really over the term "being"."
Foo said Bitner used "human" in its adjective form.

I appropriately responded that that is false. Bitner said "a human" exists in the womb (noun form). Bitner admits she used/uses human in noun form when referring to those in utero.

Then, you interject and say Bitner's argument was refusing to acknowledge nouns "Human" and "Human being" are not synonyms.

Again: I was correcting Foo's inaccurate account of Bitner using "human" as an adjective.

You got all wee-weed up becuase I didn't tell foo "Bitner has a problem with human vis a vis human being."

Let's incorporate your concern into the conversation:

NR: Bitner acknowledges that a human exists in the womb.

Foo: Bitner used human as and adjective, not a noun.

NR: Bitner doesn't think "human" & "human being" are synonyms.

(which does not address foo's error that Bitner considers "human" an adjective when referring to those in the womb.)

Looks like LNM needs to retake Dialogue 101.
Ink

Bensalem, PA

#267567 Dec 2, 2012
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
I notice that your critique didn't include what disparaging/confusing things a Christian person might be teaching about other religions. Should I imagine a Christian parent confusing a child by telling them their other non-Christian parent is going to burn in hell for not accepting Jesus as their savior?
Again another reason why it is confusing to children to try to raise them in two very different religions.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#267568 Dec 2, 2012
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
Foo said Bitner used "human" in its adjective form.
I appropriately responded that that is false. Bitner said "a human" exists in the womb (noun form). Bitner admits she used/uses human in noun form when referring to those in utero.
Then, you interject and say Bitner's argument was refusing to acknowledge nouns "Human" and "Human being" are not synonyms.
Again: I was correcting Foo's inaccurate account of Bitner using "human" as an adjective.
You got all wee-weed up becuase I didn't tell foo "Bitner has a problem with human vis a vis human being."
Let's incorporate your concern into the conversation:
NR: Bitner acknowledges that a human exists in the womb.
Foo: Bitner used human as and adjective, not a noun.
NR: Bitner doesn't think "human" & "human being" are synonyms.
(which does not address foo's error that Bitner considers "human" an adjective when referring to those in the womb.)
Looks like LNM needs to retake Dialogue 101.
I do consider human as an adjective when referring to an embryo or fetus.

Your desperation is pathetic. Truly.

“Proud to be a Wiccan Priest”

Since: Jul 09

Jonesboro AR

#267569 Dec 2, 2012
Orangelion wrote:
<quoted text>
Absolutely, young one, the bible has proved itself time and time again.
You bible proof is what you want it to be.. It is not proof of anything other than as guide to being a christian which you and other here provide the proof of what happens when you follow a guide to closely and turn your thinking off.

You bible is meaningless to me.

Also as I have been on this planet for 5 decades and more. I am hardly a child, little one.

And a little FYI to you.. You are living in a secular society not a christian theocracy. Your bible has no place in either the Constitution or case law.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#267570 Dec 2, 2012
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Again another reason why it is confusing to children to try to raise them in two very different religions.
Like Stupid Sassy, you're missing the point. Parents would teach what the beliefs are. I've never seen anywhere a Jew say that Judaism teaches that "Jesus was a lying imposter". It DOES teach that Jesus did not fulfill the requirements to be considered the Messiah.

Obviously, you've never stepped outside of YOUR narrow little world, since you don't seem to know any multifaith families. Or, cared enough to ask them about it.

Parents teaching the beliefs are not belittling the other faiths. Why would they?

Again, as an example....even though we are not a multifaith family, I did teach my children what other religions teach, factually. I said to them, this is what I believe, and these are the beliefs of others, and what they believe is a matter for their own hearts. Parents of multifaith families that I know do the same, except that the parents are each teaching their own religions. Where's the confusion?

“Proud to be a Wiccan Priest”

Since: Jul 09

Jonesboro AR

#267571 Dec 2, 2012
Orangelion wrote:
<quoted text>
Shows doesn't it, you have no desire you have children. I am sick of how people in society actually treat being childree as a simple case as it being their choice and their being nothing wrong with it, go to hell, it is one of the strongest indicators of a selfish mindset.
BUWHAHAHAHA my don't you make a lot of assumptions..

Let me guess your god told you it was OK to judge people. Oh wait according to that collection of books mentions things like turn another cheek. I also know it states that one should not judge others.. That one you little fools constantly fail at.. Like right now..
feces for jesus

East Meadow, NY

#267572 Dec 2, 2012
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL, you call THAT lying, you big baby?
That post was me quoting what YouFoolMeNot wrote;
You fool me not wrote:
<quoted text>
"Where is [LadiLulu]/Dodo/Kenosis/Ocean5 6/ F**** for Jesus/IronScab/BabesRus?
She is not hiding under another pseudonym again, is she?
LOL!"
I stated in that post that the 1st name mentioned was Ladilulu with the following:
[First name mentioned was Ladilulu]
Then I posted some of the names YouFoolMeNot called you: feces for jesus/ladilulu//BabiesRus wrote
<quoted text>
"I am right here, you crybaby hypocrite. You are scum and nothing more.
The others can address you themselves."
That's not ME lying you dimwit, and I did NOT make a claim that was your username, because everyone saw the post you made under "fecesforjesus".
As I've said, you people CA NOT provide a post in which I POSTED any lies.
All you come back with is stupidity like this, because you're a bonehead who didn't get what I was doing in using what YouFoolMeNot used, which was what YOU replied to.
You are lying human garbage.

You claimed my post, the post you altered, was proof that I was someone else. Then, last week, you lied when you refused to acknowledge what you did. You asked for "proof" with post numbers, I gave them to you, and you still can't own up to your lies.

Again, you are lying human garbage
No Relativism

Chicago, IL

#267573 Dec 2, 2012
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
So? The embryo/fetus is nothing but potential until actually born and breathing. You can imagine it's something more, but reality is not on your side.
What is it you think you're proving here, aside from your own lacking comprehension?
Katie: The embryo/fetus is nothing but potential until actually born and breathing. You can imagine it's something more, but reality is not on your side.
_________

You stand alone. Your fellow prochoicers disagree that a newborn is a fetus until after umbilical cord is cut.

You are so extreme and posted: "There is no 'exact moment' as fetus changing to baby is a process begun during labor and continuing after delivery well into the first 24-48hrs after childbirth."

In addition to your wacky "fetus after birth" claims, you also demonstrate a cold & unsypmathetic view of those in utero: "I don't think calling fetuses in general 'a useless wad of cells' is belittling to anyone."

You stand alone, because you have left reality long ago.
Ink

Bensalem, PA

#267574 Dec 2, 2012
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
Like Stupid Sassy, you're missing the point. Parents would teach what the beliefs are. I've never seen anywhere a Jew say that Judaism teaches that "Jesus was a lying imposter". It DOES teach that Jesus did not fulfill the requirements to be considered the Messiah.
Obviously, you've never stepped outside of YOUR narrow little world, since you don't seem to know any multifaith families. Or, cared enough to ask them about it.
Parents teaching the beliefs are not belittling the other faiths. Why would they?
Again, as an example....even though we are not a multifaith family, I did teach my children what other religions teach, factually. I said to them, this is what I believe, and these are the beliefs of others, and what they believe is a matter for their own hearts. Parents of multifaith families that I know do the same, except that the parents are each teaching their own religions. Where's the confusion?
I'll tell you where the confusion is. I have a Catholic daughter married to an athiest. She is trying to raise her daughters Catholic and his mocking and scoffing of God is beyond impossible for her and the values she is trying to instill in her girls is being made a joke of. The girls don't know who to believe, Mom or Dad. This isn't a problem in families where parents share the same beliefs and values.
Ink

Bensalem, PA

#267575 Dec 2, 2012
Bitner, what do Jews teach about Christ the Son of God?

“Proud to be a Wiccan Priest”

Since: Jul 09

Jonesboro AR

#267576 Dec 2, 2012
Orangelion wrote:
<quoted text>
How is it a valid choice? Having children means wanting to see humans grow and develop, out of you, and their future being yours. Wanting to have children is one of the most humane choices a person could ever desire.
Actually, it one of several choice people make for themselves. fathering or giving birth to a child is neither an obligation(religious or otherwise) nor is it the most humane act either. In spite of your opinion. There are many ways to to go through life and be humane and childless.

You way of trying to force people to have kids is neither a selfless nor humane. It is however the mark of a fool and an impotent control freak.
No Relativism

Chicago, IL

#267577 Dec 2, 2012
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
I do consider human as an adjective when referring to an embryo or fetus.
Your desperation is pathetic. Truly.
But that's not what you said. You clearly said multiple times that "a human" (noun) is in the womb. When I called you on it, you quipped that you've never said otherwise.

Your desperation to save Foo is pathetic. Truly.

“Proud to be a Wiccan Priest”

Since: Jul 09

Jonesboro AR

#267578 Dec 2, 2012
Orangelion wrote:
<quoted text>
Can't disprove the bible can you? Still gotten nowhere.
Prove jesus lived with out referring to your collection of faith based books.. Oh wait you can't.. You lose.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#267580 Dec 2, 2012
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
I'll tell you where the confusion is. I have a Catholic daughter married to an athiest. She is trying to raise her daughters Catholic and his mocking and scoffing of God is beyond impossible for her and the values she is trying to instill in her girls is being made a joke of. The girls don't know who to believe, Mom or Dad. This isn't a problem in families where parents share the same beliefs and values.
And it isn't a problem in all multifaith families just because you know one person who makes it a problem. We were talking, by the way, about families of more than one religion. Atheism is not a religion.

You're such an idiot.

“Proud to be a Wiccan Priest”

Since: Jul 09

Jonesboro AR

#267581 Dec 2, 2012
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
Katie: The embryo/fetus is nothing but potential until actually born and breathing. You can imagine it's something more, but reality is not on your side.
_________
You stand alone. Your fellow prochoicers disagree that a newborn is a fetus until after umbilical cord is cut.
You are so extreme and posted: "There is no 'exact moment' as fetus changing to baby is a process begun during labor and continuing after delivery well into the first 24-48hrs after childbirth."
In addition to your wacky "fetus after birth" claims, you also demonstrate a cold & unsypmathetic view of those in utero: "I don't think calling fetuses in general 'a useless wad of cells' is belittling to anyone."
You stand alone, because you have left reality long ago.
Have you ever been right about anything? No, I didn't think so...

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#267582 Dec 2, 2012
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
But that's not what you said. You clearly said multiple times that "a human" (noun) is in the womb. When I called you on it, you quipped that you've never said otherwise.
Your desperation to save Foo is pathetic. Truly.
So? It's still a descriptive term when appled to th NOUNS embryo or fetus.

By the way, your first descent into nonsense was when I was talking about a DNA test result. My comment was general, I was not talking about just fetuses. No DNA test result, taken from any human tissue, is going to come back saying "human being".

And that's when you went off on the irrelevant grammar tangent.

Again, you desperation is pathetic.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#267583 Dec 2, 2012
Ink wrote:
Bitner, what do Jews teach about Christ the Son of God?
I just told you, in that rather long post. Do try to pay attention, Witless.

But, you're STILL missing the point.

Which IS to teach what each parent believes in their own religion, and let the children decide what THEY believe. It's perfectly possible to do that without denigrating the other religion, and without confusing the children.

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#267584 Dec 2, 2012
Orangelion wrote:
<quoted text>
They are different, others do it out of free choice, because they are selfish bastards, like your kind.
So, people don't become nuns, priests, monks, etc out of free choice? Lol, sorry, pal, you can blurt your little opinion all you want. However, you can't even begin to state them as anything more. You bray the stupidest blanket statements and think you sound credible. That entertains me. Continue, knave...

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#267586 Dec 2, 2012
Orangelion wrote:
<quoted text>
Absolutely, young one, the bible has proved itself time and time again.
When did it prove that there's a God? Let's start with the basics.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Wethersfield Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 5 min Yeah 1,419,728
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 4 hr Not Documented 61,059
News Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 7 hr Ize Found 70,958
News The 25 Most Dangerous Cities in the U.S. Are Mo... (Nov '10) Sat Hipocrit 20,505
Chris Powell Editor of the JI investigated for ... Aug 22 HCourantsub 1
News SEA CLIFF: Paramedic arrested on child harm cha... (Jun '08) Aug 21 Greg 55
CAR Accident on Friday April 22, 2016 Apr '16 MarcusT20073 1

Wethersfield Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Wethersfield Mortgages