Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 311487 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

“Proud to be a Wiccan Priest”

Since: Jul 09

Jonesboro AR

#266662 Nov 28, 2012
No Relativism wrote:
100 pregnant women walk into a Planned Parenthood. Only 3 leave with the baby in their womb still alive.(97 kill their baby during an abortion procedure).
If97 babies were killed yesterday why are you posting this on a public forum.. You should be calling 911.. Oh wait you are being the usual idiot.. Carry on...

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#266663 Nov 28, 2012
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
Dont confuse SKanky with FACTS LNM!
What was I thinking.
Katie

Tacoma, WA

#266664 Nov 28, 2012
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
Why don't you use your usual username, Pbfa, from AZ?
Only childish people make up stupid usernames like you did.
Pro-choicers here are a stupid bunch of people who post lies, act childishly, defend the lies they each post, and try to accuse pro-lifers using stupidity to try to deflect from the lies they post when all else fails.
So why do you want to post here?
What's in it for you?
Katie

Tacoma, WA

#266665 Nov 28, 2012
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
I suppose Joran van der Sloot has personal and objective perspective in life, too. Heck, Hitler prolly did, as well.
So, that said, I realize you think you can separate personal and objective perspectives when it comes to killing little human beings in utero.
Only your type is psychologically capable of doing such a thing....
What are you going on about now?
And stop referring me to as a Van der Sloot.
Not asking, either.
Have no patience where you are concerned, NR.
Kenose

Brooklyn, NY

#266666 Nov 28, 2012
lil Lily wrote:
Pro-choicers have proven none of them have credibility, while those of us who can and do provide proof of our claims of what someone posted, do have credibility. At least in the eyes of people who are intelligent, sensible, have adult reading comprehension skills and who have integrity in discussion. Leaves every single pro-choicer posting here out.
You post butchers proper grammar, you silly abortroll.

You proved yourself to be deceitful when you changed someones post to back up a BS claim you made. Keep the BS coming!
No Relativism

Chicago, IL

#266667 Nov 28, 2012
AyakaNeo wrote:
<quoted text>Well maybe the whole other 51 decided to keep their baby's.
You're the kind who tries to find zebras at a donkey petting zoo.
Kenose

Brooklyn, NY

#266668 Nov 28, 2012
*your post butchers....

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#266669 Nov 28, 2012
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
It doesn't. Just like it doesn't mention insurance.
Clearly that scripture had absolutely nothing to do with what I had said...nothing.
Katie

Tacoma, WA

#266670 Nov 28, 2012
Conservative Democrat wrote:
<quoted text>
I see, you're expecting me to accept the word of the Catholic church as the authority on this matter, when you are not willing to accept Jewish law as the authority on why if a pregnancy threatens a mother's life an abortion is mandatory, because the life of the unborn IS NEVER more paramount than that of the mother.
Duly noted.
Aren't they a strange bunch, CD?

“Proud to be a Wiccan Priest”

Since: Jul 09

Jonesboro AR

#266671 Nov 28, 2012
TomTom wrote:
<quoted text>
He is a faux jew like Lilrabbid. He proves it with his G-d silliness. A proabort pagan like most of them. Notice how he and Kathy show up at exactly the same time. Both are sexually confused and both disappeared at the same time.
Things that mnake you go Hmmm.
Hey the meds must have kicked in TomTom you are not raving quite so bad today...

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#266672 Nov 28, 2012
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
AGAIN, prove that your Jesus said ANYTHING about birth control.....
Oh wait, you cant so you deflect because he NEVER said shit about it.
Your RCC, like you, makes things up as they go along.
In FACT, the RCC didn't have an offical stance on BC at ALL until 1930, when at the same time, they declared that beating off was tantamount to murder.
Catholics have been ignoring the RCC on that issue before that and ever since.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/pill/peopleevent...
The RCC thinks they're the voice of God when in reality they're making their own rules.
Katie

Tacoma, WA

#266674 Nov 28, 2012
Kenose wrote:
<quoted text>
You post butchers proper grammar, you silly abortroll.
You proved yourself to be deceitful when you changed someones post to back up a BS claim you made. Keep the BS coming!
I know what you're referring to, the post where Triple L added a bunch of SNs she assumed La used or uses. She won't shut up about it until you link it again. If you have it handy, please shut her up, and link it. Thanks in advance :)
No Relativism

Chicago, IL

#266675 Nov 28, 2012
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
What are you going on about now?
And stop referring me to as a Van der Sloot.
Not asking, either.
Have no patience where you are concerned, NR.
Katie: "Have no patience where you are concerned, NR."

You only have patience where you are concerned.

....to the point you promote killing defenseless babies in utero.
Katie

Tacoma, WA

#266676 Nov 28, 2012
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
The RCC thinks they're the voice of God when in reality they're making their own rules.
That's exactly it.

Funniest of all is how some Catholics claim they cannot change as the times change because it'll F up their traditions. But if you go back and see just how the succession of Popes went in and made changes, you'll see how they sometimes contradicted themselves, prior Popes, or even future Popes in the process.

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#266677 Nov 28, 2012
Husker du wrote:
<quoted text>Sex is a gift from God, He didn't have to make it so enjoyable, but
He did. Using birth control leads to illicit sex,pornography etc not the way God intended sex to be. Sex is intended to be between husband and wife God made sex fun and for pleasure BETWEEN HUSBAND AND WIFE.and for procreation. Back in Christ's time ,women were called wh*res for having pre marital sex. The ones who would use birth control were the wh*res. The Culture never had to deal with contraception .
"Sex is a gift from God"

Where is your proof there even is a God?

"He didn't have to make it so enjoyable, but
He did."

When did he tell you this?

"Using birth control leads to illicit sex,pornography etc"

Proof? Scientific studies?? Who told you this? Your child raping priests?

"Sex is intended to be between husband and wife..."

And yet God and the creation of the human race far predates the institution of marriage. Hmmmm...

"Back in Christ's time ,women were called wh*res for having pre marital sex."

Did Christ approve of that? I doubt it. Follow his example for once.

" The Culture never had to deal with contraception ."

We have something called medical science. Birth control is a good thing. Many many people don't give a crap what the RCC thinks about it, and I'm one of those people.
Katie

Tacoma, WA

#266678 Nov 28, 2012
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
Katie: "Have no patience where you are concerned, NR."
You only have patience where you are concerned.
....to the point you promote killing defenseless babies in utero.
What? You draw an erroneous conclusion.
So I have even less patience with you.

Isn't there a basement you need to clean? A flat blow-up doll needing some of your abundance of hot air to bring her back to life?

You keep dishing it out unprovoked so don't come crying when your widdle finners get stepped on, NR.

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#266679 Nov 28, 2012
Husker du wrote:
<quoted text>If you think that, you are very shallow and extremely stupid.
No, Foo is right and you are the one who is extremely stupid.

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#266680 Nov 28, 2012
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
That's exactly it.
Funniest of all is how some Catholics claim they cannot change as the times change because it'll F up their traditions. But if you go back and see just how the succession of Popes went in and made changes, you'll see how they sometimes contradicted themselves, prior Popes, or even future Popes in the process.
Yeah, the Popes can switch up whatever they want but the common ignorant fundie has to just stagnate as the centuries pass them by. Remember how the Catholics couldn't eat meat on Fridays and then the Pope changed that and said it was okay? Did God call him up and say "hey I was wrong, give them the word they can go ahead and eat meat on Fridays".

Or maybe McDonald's paid him off.
grumpy

Pomona, NY

#266681 Nov 28, 2012
lil Lily wrote:
Pro-choicers have proven none of them have credibility, while those of us who can and do provide proof of our claims of what someone posted, do have credibility. At least in the eyes of people who are intelligent, sensible, have adult reading comprehension skills and who have integrity in discussion. Leaves every single pro-choicer posting here out.
But your entire thesis is based on an unprovable concept. How can demand proof of anything from anyone?
Katie

Tacoma, WA

#266682 Nov 28, 2012
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah, the Popes can switch up whatever they want but the common ignorant fundie has to just stagnate as the centuries pass them by. Remember how the Catholics couldn't eat meat on Fridays and then the Pope changed that and said it was okay? Did God call him up and say "hey I was wrong, give them the word they can go ahead and eat meat on Fridays".
Or maybe McDonald's paid him off.
LOLOL

Am going with McDonald's. Something about the pay off has a ring of truth to it, LNM. Plus, it's real, tangible.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Wethersfield Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 6 min Incognito4Ever 1,403,384
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 4 hr Earthling-1 60,657
News Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 11 hr TWP 72,037
News Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 13 hr Ize Found 70,826
News The 25 Most Dangerous Cities in the U.S. Are Mo... (Nov '10) 20 hr OMTE 20,386
PZC meeting on firearms store Jul 21 Dogmother 2
Elliot Zweig, MD - West Hartford CT Jul 20 Walter Dejanec 1

Wethersfield Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Wethersfield Mortgages