Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Full story: Newsday 309,249
Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision. Read more

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#266582 Nov 27, 2012
Husker dunce wrote:
<quoted text>You didn't read whatI posted.
Yes actually I did. It said the same thing my link did, AGAIN without the RCC or religous stance & agenda.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#266583 Nov 27, 2012
Husker dunce wrote:
<quoted text>If you think that, you are very shallow and extremely stupid.
Feel free to show us where your jesus said ANYTHING about birth control. OR insurance for that matter.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#266584 Nov 27, 2012
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
Actually I not only did, I still do - she and I have kept in touch and are closer now than we were then. Thankfully she's grown up a lot in the last two years, unilke you for example.
She's my best friend and ex's neice, so F ** K you and the horse you rode in on Lynne. Seriously, you can take a very long walk off a very short pier and drop dead for all I care about YOU and your completely meaningless bullshit however.
I'm VERY sorry I'd never known anyone with a missing child before, and if I did the wrong things in your estimation when posting about it at the time, but FORTUNATELY she was found in large part TO people posting about her and getting her picture out there.
NO Lynne, I didn't know about age limits on amber alerts, and YES I posted her wrong age accidently at the time. BIG DAMN DEAL. A womans CHILD was missing, and her family, who I'm very close to, was frantic, we were ALL using the resources that we had of the internet and more to try our best to help her.
As a mother and a grandmother (as SICKENING as that concept is), YOU should not only know better, you should be ashamed to try to demean ANYONE for doing their best to help find a mothers missing child. Did I misspeak about her age? YES. And YES I said I was going to mention the Amber Alert to her mom when I spoke to her, and AGAIN - I never had to have the knowledge that there was an age limit on that - I know that NOW, but didn't then.
Big damn deal Lynne, I made a few mistakes, but I was TRYING. We did a LOT that helped directely at the time yes, and I'm PROUD of that. I arranged for her mom and aunt to stay with J's brother in Atlanta while they were looking for her, I helped with bus fare and plane tickets - and you're G-ddammed right I'm PROUD of that. Its more than YOU would do apparently. In fact, the woman that died a few weeks ago, was my BIL's husband's sister, and Ariel knew HER too, which is why she was just here for the memorial service.
But hey, guess we shouldn't expect better from a common CU Next Tuesday like you.
"As a mother and a grandmother (as SICKENING as that concept is), YOU should not only know better, you should be ashamed to try to demean ANYONE for doing their best to help find a mothers missing child."

Oh please. That coming from someone who frequently tries to demean another human being, who as a teen was pregnant, abused and miscarried due to abuse, and for which you so gleefully call the miscarriage "toilet twins"?

You're going to try to appeal to me about being sensitive, when you're the most abusively insensitive poster here? THAT's funny.

Also funny is how you're so desperately trying to make it appear as though my posts display a lack of care for some girl, when my posts only display a lack of care for your attempts to distance yourself from your own lies posted. Using the most inept excuses that no one with any intelligence or sense would buy.

The lies you posted weren't because of your inexperience in dealing with someone who was missing, because you've lied on every single topic you've ever posted on, and I've provided so many of your posts as proof of the lies you posted, on various topics, I've lost count.

Your "CU Next Tuesday", was just another psychological projection from you, Toots.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#266585 Nov 27, 2012
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>]
One last time for the stupid bitch. I wasn't lying then, and I'm not lying now. That said, I am NOT going to go over every detail again and again so YOU can feel like you've achieved some goal.
If you want to delude yourself, more power to you honey, you've been deluding yourself here for years.
<quoted text>
ROFLMAO Only YOU Lynne can contradict yourself twice in two sentences. You stupid shit.
"One last time..."

How many "one last times" are you going to post? lol

"I am NOT going to go over every detail again and again..."

You don't have to because the details don't help you. You LIED IN the details first, second third and subsequent times you posted.

I posted:

"My posts have nothing to do with the situation, as you like to try to make it appear. My posts are about your lies posted, that just so happen to be about that particular situation."

You reply, "Only YOU ... can contradict yourself twice in two sentences. You stupid shit."

Still displaying you can't read for comprehension.

I said, my posts are about YOUR LIES, not about the situation.

Meaning for those who can't read for comprehension; Posts about that situation are yours. My posts are only about your lies, regardless of what the subject matter is.
Just so happens YOUR LIES included being in posts about a particular situation, one in which YOU explopited someone here for your own self-serving agenda to feel important. Turned out, you weren't too quick to let everyone here know she had been found, because THAT wasn't important to you. I don't care about the details, I don't care about your excuses or anything you have to say on that subject, because that situation isn't what the topic of my posts is about. The topic of my posts is your lies in your posts, and proving you lied by displaying all the discrepancies in your posts that didn't add up to being truthful.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#266586 Nov 27, 2012
Point about the whole thing, Foo is a drama queeen who looks to feel relevant in stories she brings here.

Then like the drama queen she is, she uses DRAMA to try to excuse herself from her lies posted.

No, Foo, regardless of what the situation is, no matter how dramatic, people who aren't pathological liars and drama queens don't LIE in what they post. You did. No reason excuses that.

You said she was 14; LIE. She was 19-20, and one would think if you're that close to the people you'd at least know she was an adult and not a young teen.

You said recently that you corrected the age error the next evening; LIE. You didn't correct anything. A pro-lifer caught you in the lie and you were left to make excuses for the age you posted and never corrected.

The list of lies went on and on and using the excuse that you were so frantic is bullshit. People who are not liars don't make it up as they go along, as you did, and continued to do these 2 years later.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#266592 Nov 28, 2012
lil Lily wrote:
Point about the whole thing, Foo is a drama queeen who looks to feel relevant in stories she brings here.
Then like the drama queen she is, she uses DRAMA to try to excuse herself from her lies posted.
No, Foo, regardless of what the situation is, no matter how dramatic, people who aren't pathological liars and drama queens don't LIE in what they post. You did. No reason excuses that.
You said she was 14; LIE. She was 19-20, and one would think if you're that close to the people you'd at least know she was an adult and not a young teen.
You said recently that you corrected the age error the next evening; LIE. You didn't correct anything. A pro-lifer caught you in the lie and you were left to make excuses for the age you posted and never corrected.
The list of lies went on and on and using the excuse that you were so frantic is bullshit. People who are not liars don't make it up as they go along, as you did, and continued to do these 2 years later.
Lynne, YOUR list of LIES is almost 7 years long and began the day you started posting here in 2006, and continues to this day - so the irony of your bitching about what you THINK are lies from me is amusing at best. LOL!!

I may have made a few mistakes when I was posting about this back then, but I wasn't then, and am not now trying to exploit that girl for ANY reason.

YOU on the other hand are MORE than willing to in order to use her as a 'weapon' in your pitiful and pretty pathetic arsenal against me. So have at it Lynne and your suck fellow suck buddies, that you think its an appropriate thing to do says MUCH more about you than your percieved "lies" about me.

Have a good day all!! I'm off to help set up for what I'm hoping will be a rockin estate sale this weekend!
Ayakaneo

Oak Ridge, TN

#266593 Nov 28, 2012
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
Ayakaneo: "What claims have you proven? You actually think you can prove that someone is posting as someone else? No, you, yourself declare the poster proves it when they post."
You must be on drugs or something because girl, you never follow what's been posted, and you reply with out of the blue stupidity.
I never declared people prove who they are when they post. I also never said I've proven that someone is posting as someone else. I have stated opinions and reasons why I have those opinions as to who may be whom, but not once claimed something like that as fact.
Well yes you have, if you don't say it's your opinion then you're declaring it as a fact. I'm pretty sure we've been over this before just not long ago.
lil Lily wrote:
Ayakaneo: "You haven't proved Foo has lied about Ariel Richards either."
Yes, I have, repeatedly, but you're so stuck up her butt you can't read what's on these pages, not even from Foo.
Ayakaneo; "You're just so quick to want to catch her in a lie that you fail to think it through clearly before you accuse. You guys accused her of saying Ariel was 14 and not 20, but I being new to the situation and reading the post from 2010 made the distinction that there was another girl missing along with Ariel who was 14 and I posted that link for you several weeks ago I'm pretty sure."
Yes, you did post your opinion and you were wrong. The one who proved you wrong was Foo, herself.
She said she misspoke when saying Ariel was 14, but it wasn't that she misspoke, because she kept the charade up during talks of Amber alerts and when she claimed Ariels mother was meeting with someone from the Center for missing and exploited children, WHICH does not help in cases of 20 yr old adults who are missing.
Foo has never once said anything about another person being with her except 2 guys who "held her against her will". Certainly no one who was 14.
You're the one who reposted the post #98792 where Foo clearly states there was another with Ariel. You reposted it on October 10th #263312.
Here's the original post that you reposted:
Lilrabbitfoofoo
Baltimore, MD
Reply |Report Abuse|Judge it!|#98792Sep 16, 2010
Judged:1
Moncie wrote:
<quoted text>
There just aren't any words....
No, there really isn't. She ran away with a friend, and they got separated - nobody knows exactly how, as the other girl is a minor, and isn't being very forthcoming, and her parents aren't helping so far. The police aren't finding any evidence of either an attack or a rape or anything else where the guy is claiming it happened, tho they know she was with him at this Waffle House, willingly nor not, nobody is sure yet. The whole thing sucks...
lil Lily wrote:
The only reason I'm so quick to catch her in lies, is because she keeps posting them and contradicting what she's posted before. Bringing up the lies is easy. One only needs to PAY ATTENTION to what's posted, AND have adult reading comprehension skills. Both skills YOU don't have.
Yeah you're quick alright.

Since: Dec 09

Location hidden

#266594 Nov 28, 2012
lil Lily wrote:
Point about the whole thing, Foo is a drama queeen who looks to feel relevant in stories she brings here.
Then like the drama queen she is, she uses DRAMA to try to excuse herself from her lies posted.
I don't think so, she's not the one bringing up the past about this. Two years later and you're trying to prove she lied about it then and she continues to lie about it now. She has said repeatedly she misspoke the age but you can't accept that, and at the same time you misspoke by saying Foo never mentioned another person being with Ariel when in fact she did. She admitted her mistake, it takes integrity to do that.
lil Lily wrote:
No, Foo, regardless of what the situation is, no matter how dramatic, people who aren't pathological liars and drama queens don't LIE in what they post. You did. No reason excuses that.
You said she was 14; LIE. She was 19-20, and one would think if you're that close to the people you'd at least know she was an adult and not a young teen.
You said recently that you corrected the age error the next evening; LIE. You didn't correct anything. A pro-lifer caught you in the lie and you were left to make excuses for the age you posted and never corrected.
The list of lies went on and on and using the excuse that you were so frantic is bullshit. People who are not liars don't make it up as they go along, as you did, and continued to do these 2 years later.
She didn't continue she has said over and over recently that it was typo. Now what say you about your big ol blunder after you yourself provided the post where Foo says another girl was with Ariel and you claim she never said it?
Katie

Federal Way, WA

#266596 Nov 28, 2012
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
You people want it both ways. YOu dont want to let people die if medical technology of life support can keep them alive, but you wont allow medical technology to save someone if it means something not even born will die. Its F'd up and its STUPID.

Then again, many of these are the same people that thought it was perfectly okay to allow children to be raped by the leaders of the faith, and to keep moving them around to CONTINUE to molest children.

That's my opinion and guess what Skanky, I dont give to shits if you or anyone else likes it or not.
My opinions and thoughts regarding what others may think of it, too. Another is how willing some are to feel persecuted while ignoring their goal is stealing other women's rights based on false premises and deceit.
Katie

Federal Way, WA

#266597 Nov 28, 2012
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
"As a mother and a grandmother (as SICKENING as that concept is), YOU should not only know better, you should be ashamed to try to demean ANYONE for doing their best to help find a mothers missing child."
Oh please. That coming from someone who frequently tries to demean another human being, who as a teen was pregnant, abused and miscarried due to abuse, and for which you so gleefully call the miscarriage "toilet twins"?
You're going to try to appeal to me about being sensitive, when you're the most abusively insensitive poster here? THAT's funny.
Also funny is how you're so desperately trying to make it appear as though my posts display a lack of care for some girl, when my posts only display a lack of care for your attempts to distance yourself from your own lies posted. Using the most inept excuses that no one with any intelligence or sense would buy.
The lies you posted weren't because of your inexperience in dealing with someone who was missing, because you've lied on every single topic you've ever posted on, and I've provided so many of your posts as proof of the lies you posted, on various topics, I've lost count.
Your "CU Next Tuesday", was just another psychological projection from you, Toots.
Damn! You act like nobody ever offered you an olive branch or that you repeatedly refused to accept (and move on).

“2014 TDF”

Since: Mar 09

Boca Raton, FL.

#266599 Nov 28, 2012
sasssylicious wrote:
<quoted text> You recently converted to Judism and you are seriously asking "How do you know we're made in Gods image" and that you "don't believe in it"?
lol
Yes I am. It's a valid question. I may have "recently" converted to Judaism, but I had renounced to the concept of the "lord and savior" way, wayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy before that dweeb.

Fact is, theologists agree that between Genesis 1:1 and Genesis 1:2, a gap of approximately 400 years elapsed, within which the big bang occurred. Further, NO ONE was alive to factually corroborate the statement about man being made in G-d's image, so you either question it, or believe it blindly like dumb ass.

I prefer to question what I don't know, or what I know others can't easily prove.

Plus, I'm also allowed to have a little fun with the knutter.

“2014 TDF”

Since: Mar 09

Boca Raton, FL.

#266600 Nov 28, 2012
sasssylicious wrote:
<quoted text> Last time I checked,this topic was about humans not dogs and cats.
What is with you people? Do you have your animals on the very same level as your children?
In a manner of speaking, yes. What, you don't care for animals as you care for children? Or do you deny that animals are also creatures of G-d?

“2014 TDF”

Since: Mar 09

Boca Raton, FL.

#266601 Nov 28, 2012
sasssylicious wrote:
<quoted text>
""""g-ddam ned thing they can do about it""""
Hi Mr "I am Jewish", Um...God commanded us not to take his name in vain.
Just sayin....
Hence the reason for the "-" in place of the o.

It's a Jewish thing; you won't understand it, so please don't try to. Perhaps you can ask the pope to explain it to you.

“2014 TDF”

Since: Mar 09

Boca Raton, FL.

#266602 Nov 28, 2012
Husker du wrote:
<quoted text>Sex is a gift from God, He didn't have to make it so enjoyable, but
He did.
So why is it you don't enjoy it? Maybe your husband is a selfish prick.
Husker du wrote:
Using birth control leads to illicit sex,pornography etc not the way God intended sex to be.
And just how do you know what G-d intended sex to be; the pope told you?
Husker du wrote:
Sex is intended to be between husband and wife God made sex fun and for pleasure BETWEEN HUSBAND AND WIFE.and for procreation.
What about between husband and husband, or wife and wife? What about the 70 year old newly wed heterosexual couple who can't procreate? What about the lonely college student who resorts to sex with himself? Are they not supposed to enjoy sex?
Husker du wrote:
Back in Christ's time ,women were called wh*res for having pre marital sex.
Prostitution, knutter face, is the OLDEST profession in the history of man. It dates to the times of Genesis, way before your "christ."
Husker du wrote:
The ones who would use birth control were the wh*res. The Culture never had to deal with contraception
I suppose you know about birth control in those days from personal experience.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#266603 Nov 28, 2012
Ayakaneo wrote:
<quoted text> Well yes you have, if you don't say it's your opinion then you're declaring it as a fact. I'm pretty sure we've been over this before just not long ago.
<quoted text>You're the one who reposted the post #98792 where Foo clearly states there was another with Ariel. You reposted it on October 10th #263312.
Here's the original post that you reposted:
Lilrabbitfoofoo
Baltimore, MD
Reply |Report Abuse|Judge it!|#98792Sep 16, 2010
Judged:1
Moncie wrote:
<quoted text>
There just aren't any words....
No, there really isn't. She ran away with a friend, and they got separated - nobody knows exactly how, as the other girl is a minor, and isn't being very forthcoming, and her parents aren't helping so far. The police aren't finding any evidence of either an attack or a rape or anything else where the guy is claiming it happened, tho they know she was with him at this Waffle House, willingly nor not, nobody is sure yet. The whole thing sucks...
<quoted text>Yeah you're quick alright.
Wow...have to explain everything to you fools.

Ayakaneo: "Well yes you have, if you don't say it's your opinion then you're declaring it as a fact."

No, it's not. Anyone with an IQ above double digits knows that a fact is something you can prove. Without proof, it's only opinion. It's pro-choice ignorant buffoons who think that just by declaring someone is who they declare, that it makes it a fact. I'm not one of those people.

Foo posted: "...as the other girl is a minor, and isn't being very forthcoming, and her parents aren't helping so far."

MEANING: The "minor" (no age given and could have been 17 for all we know), wasn't with Ariel when Foo posted about this. She was already with her parents and not being forthcoming with info.

The ONLY time Foo mentioned the age "14" was in reference to Ariel, and she proved you wrong in what you thought she meant, each time she claimed she "misspoke" about the age.

Your opinion of what Foo was talking about is ignorant and displays you can't read for comprehension. Your ignorant opinion is NOT fact. What I posted in her words were the facts she posted, and people who can read for comprehension know what she said and meant.

No Relativism

Huntington, IN

#266604 Nov 28, 2012
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
Than our children? Not really. On the same level as the likes of you? Nope, not at all. They're worth MUCH MORE than your kind are.
Deathscort Foo to SweetSassy: "[Animals are] on the same level as the likes of you? Nope, not at all. They're worth MUCH MORE than your kind are."

^^^ Deathscort Foo ^^^

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#266605 Nov 28, 2012
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
Damn! You act like nobody ever offered you an olive branch or that you repeatedly refused to accept (and move on).
LOL WTH kind of out of the blue stupidity is that, NC?

I post a fact about Foo's sickening and abusive insensitivity about someone who was abused and miscarried due to the abuse,(mentioned because she's posted those types of things in the recent past); in reply to Foo saying I should be sensitive to some girl in a story she told, when all I'm doing is calling Foo on her lies and saying nothing nasty or insensitive about the girl; and that's what you think is an appropriate response to that?

You are not playing with a full deck, Toots.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#266607 Nov 28, 2012
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
Deathscort Foo to SweetSassy: "[Animals are] on the same level as the likes of you? Nope, not at all. They're worth MUCH MORE than your kind are."
^^^ Deathscort Foo ^^^
Foo has no humanity toward anyone who disagrees with her AND can display her lies in all their glory. Displaying her lies in all their glory is something Foo thinks warrants treating the person with less humanity than she would an animal. She doesn't have the sense to realize she's at fault for posting lies to begin with. But she has no humanity for anyone who see the lies she posted, or can prove what she posted are lies.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#266608 Nov 28, 2012
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
Lynne, YOUR list of LIES is almost 7 years long and began the day you started posting here in 2006, and continues to this day - so the irony of your bitching about what you THINK are lies from me is amusing at best. LOL!!
I may have made a few mistakes when I was posting about this back then, but I wasn't then, and am not now trying to exploit that girl for ANY reason.
YOU on the other hand are MORE than willing to in order to use her as a 'weapon' in your pitiful and pretty pathetic arsenal against me. So have at it Lynne and your suck fellow suck buddies, that you think its an appropriate thing to do says MUCH more about you than your percieved "lies" about me.
Have a good day all!! I'm off to help set up for what I'm hoping will be a rockin estate sale this weekend!
You didn't make mistakes, Toots, you lied. I'm not using anyone as a weapon. You exploited this girl here. I have only been using your own words posted as proof that you lie. The only weapon used against you are your own lying posts. Trying to USE Ariel the way you're doing now, trying to claim any of my posts are about her and using that excuse to try to shield yourself against the things we've proven about you and your lies is just more exploitation of her, by YOU.

As for lies I supposedly posted, again, where are they? Where's your proof that I posted lies.

You bring up stupidity that proves you can't read for comprehension, and that's the best you've been able to do.
No Relativism

Huntington, IN

#266609 Nov 28, 2012
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
@@ No what's "sick" are idiots like you still trying to exploit that girl over two years later as a way to "get" to me. And you FAIL at that too.
What's STUPID is expecting that I'd post anything after the way you freaks react to someone trying to help someone else. Some people asked in private, and what was going on was shared in private. After all, its not like you or Lynne gave a shit beyond what you thought you could use it for your own agenda.
Its kind of like your "religion" that way, you only break it out when you want to weild it as a weapon, otherwise, you can't be bothered.
You lied & embellished the situation of a 20 y/o for your own perverse gain.

Now, you try to blame YOUR abnormal behavior on others.

Which.....is typical for you and your kind.

It's always somebody else's fault..........

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Wethersfield Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 20 min John Galt 1,206,800
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 2 hr litesong 52,331
News Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 2 hr Cold Front 69,312
News More Advice On Acura TL Transmission Failures A... (Apr '09) 7 hr transmission problem 284
News MySpace In Sex Assault Probe (Feb '06) 14 hr max 423
News The 25 Most Dangerous Cities in the U.S. Are Mo... (Nov '10) 16 hr Save you lives 19,719
News Hartford Registrar Files Complaint Against City Sat sue 1
Wethersfield Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Wethersfield People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]