Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 322197 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#266558 Nov 27, 2012
sasssylicious wrote:
<quoted text> Did I not give you scripture that proved you wrong?
HE WHO HEARS YOU(PETER)HEARS ME.
Who gives a shit about your version of "scripture" that doesn't follow your version of "faith" Skanky?

ESPECIALLY when it comes from a phony like YOU?

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#266559 Nov 27, 2012
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
No, you did not. I wrote that Jesus said nothing about birth control. Where in that scripture does Jesus mention birth control?
It doesn't. Just like it doesn't mention insurance.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#266560 Nov 27, 2012
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>

Why do you dishonestly ignore the reason I'd have had an abortion?
Because it supports her agenda.

Oh, AND because she's as dishonest as her idiot buddies here are.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#266561 Nov 27, 2012
sasssylicious wrote:
<quoted text>""" "Than our children? Not really"""" """"
So,if you had a choice to save either your daughter or your cat,you'd perhaps choose to save your cat?
WOW,just WOW.
Which letters of which word in the TWO WORD sentence "NOT REALLY" confused you Skanky.

Now if I had to save my cat or you? Hands down, the cat ANY day. Wouldnt even have to give it a second thought.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#266562 Nov 27, 2012
sasssylicious wrote:
<quoted text> I don't support the choices. I don't support the womans *legal* rights. I would NEVER abort my child.
You can't say the same.
Doesn't matter why you'd abort. YOU'D ABORT. PERIOD. You not only support a womans right..YOU PERSONALLY would act on that choice.
And the fact remains that I don't "support" the choices. I support a woman's legal, and moral, right to make her own choice. Period.

I'm sorry you're too stupid to understand.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#266563 Nov 27, 2012
sasssylicious wrote:
<quoted text> Okay,let's see. You keep saying that the Jewish faith "requires" an abortion if the womans life is in danger. Yet,you also say that it is between the woman,Dr and Rabbi. Sounds like a contradiction. Which is it...REQUIRED or a DECISION made between Doc,Rabbi and woman?
If a woman is dying on the table and 'so called' REQUIRES an abortion,then WHO has time to have mom,Rabbi and Dr "decide".
]

Again for the stupid thing - YOU keep saying "dying on the table" not me or anyone else. Those in the Jewish faith dont need to wait that long if there's indications before hand.
Again, YOU support a woman electively aborting so you are going against your own religious beliefs.
AGAIN you're wrong. Stop lying. I support her right to make her own CHOICE. Period.
""""" "In fact, weirdly, one of the only methods that's frowned upon is in the Orthodoxy, and that's condom use, and that's because its against MAN'S requirement to be fruitful and multiply""" """"" """""
Condom...or any other contraceptive...is forbidden because it prevents man's requirement to be fruitful and multiply. In other words, using the act(sex) that God intended for that purpose(to be fruitful and multiply)while PREVENTING is "frowned upon".
Thank you for proving my point that God forbids artificial contraception.
You're not only a moron, but you're wrong. Again AND as usual.

Try actually READING the links you're given about other faiths Skanky.

"In principle, birth control is permitted, so long as the couple is committed to eventually fulfilling the mitzvah to be fruitful and multiply (which, at a minimum, consists of having two children, one of each gender).

The issue in birth control is not whether it is permitted, but what method is permitted. It is well-established that methods that destroy the seed or block the passage of the seed are not permitted, thus condoms are not permitted for birth control. However, the pill and IUD are acceptable forms of birth control under Jewish law."

Now I realise you ENJOY making yourself look like an ass because you refuse to acknowledge the FACTS about other faiths, AND I'm more than HAPPY to oblige helping you make an even BIGGER idiot of yourself, but damn bitch, you MIGHT just want to actually LEARN something one [email protected]@

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#266564 Nov 27, 2012
sasssylicious wrote:
<quoted text>
Look up the RCC teachings(Catholic Catechism) on artificial birth control.
It will always give you biblical proof.
What I mentioned about "church teachings" was instituted by God and Christ.
AGAIN, prove that your Jesus said ANYTHING about birth control.....

Oh wait, you cant so you deflect because he NEVER said shit about it.

Your RCC, like you, makes things up as they go along.

In FACT, the RCC didn't have an offical stance on BC at ALL until 1930, when at the same time, they declared that beating off was tantamount to murder.

Catholics have been ignoring the RCC on that issue before that and ever since.

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/pill/peopleevent...

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#266565 Nov 27, 2012
sasssylicious wrote:
<quoted text>The male or female offspring/child of that woman is just as valuable in the eyes of God. The hospitals job is to save BOTH mom and child.
Bullshit. The hospital's life is to save the life they CAN save.
Again,where is the proof that this woman would have lived had the abortion taken place. I'd like to see it.
Then perhaps you should actually do some research about it. After all, its not like you're going to "see" what I or anyone else shows you that goes against your agenda. You like to ignore what you dont agree with.

In THIS case, you dont know shit about the case at all, and are just mouthing off in your typical ignorance. LOL!
Husker du

United States

#266566 Nov 27, 2012
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
No, you did not. I wrote that Jesus said nothing about birth control. Where in that scripture does Jesus mention birth control?
Sex is a gift from God, He didn't have to make it so enjoyable, but
He did. Using birth control leads to illicit sex,pornography etc not the way God intended sex to be. Sex is intended to be between husband and wife God made sex fun and for pleasure BETWEEN HUSBAND AND WIFE.and for procreation. Back in Christ's time ,women were called wh*res for having pre marital sex. The ones who would use birth control were the wh*res. The Culture never had to deal with contraception .

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#266568 Nov 27, 2012
sasssylicious wrote:
<quoted text> No. YOU bashed the Catholics on this thread. You blamed this womans death on us. You lied and THAT is why you refuse to provide the "real facts" of this womans death. You gave TWO different versions of the womans death.
It is YOU that used this poor woman for YOUR agenda...(your bigotry AND your abortion motives).
Shame on you.
Your posts PROVED that you deliberately exploited Ariel too.
Now you can kick and scream ALL you want,but you only have yourself to blame.
You're an idiot SKanky. I gave ONE version of her death - placental abruption and HER refusal to allow an abortion, and some POSSIBLE reasons it MAY have happened the way it did.

Yes we DO know more now and NO I will not share it with the likes of you that has proven you will exploit whatever you can in the pursuit of YOUR agenda. Suffice to say that she died of a placental abruption and her refusal of treatment because of her faith.

I didn't blame YOU at all. I dont believe you are a catholic to begin with, you're nothing but a mouthy and phony POS.

I DO blame a "faith" that puts such fear into women that they would rather die than have their lives saved when they CAN be saved. I blame a "faith" that creates assholes like you that would rather their CHILDREN die than abort. I blame a faith that demands a hospital allow someone to die WHEN THAT PERSON COULD BE SAVED.

I think that ANY faith that thinks their "g-d" would rather his child die than be saved is SERIOUSLY f'd up.

You people want it both ways. YOu dont want to let people die if medical technology of life support can keep them alive, but you wont allow medical technology to save someone if it means something not even born will die. Its F'd up and its STUPID.

Then again, many of these are the same people that thought it was perfectly okay to allow children to be raped by the leaders of the faith, and to keep moving them around to CONTINUE to molest children.

That's my opinion and guess what Skanky, I dont give to shits if you or anyone else likes it or not.
Husker du

United States

#266569 Nov 27, 2012
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
AGAIN, prove that your Jesus said ANYTHING about birth control.....
Oh wait, you cant so you deflect because he NEVER said shit about it.
Your RCC, like you, makes things up as they go along.
In FACT, the RCC didn't have an offical stance on BC at ALL until 1930, when at the same time, they declared that beating off was tantamount to murder.
Catholics have been ignoring the RCC on that issue before that and ever since.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/pill/peopleevent...
Read the whole thing http://www.catholic.com/tracts/birth-control

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#266572 Nov 27, 2012
sasssylicious wrote:
<quoted text> I don't support the choices. I don't support the womans *legal* rights.
We know. Fortunately, other than being a willfully ignorant fool on a messageboard, you're meaningless in real life in the scheme of things.
Husker du

United States

#266573 Nov 27, 2012
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
AGAIN, prove that your Jesus said ANYTHING about birth control.....
Oh wait, you cant so you deflect because he NEVER said shit about it.
Your RCC, like you, makes things up as they go along.
In FACT, the RCC didn't have an offical stance on BC at ALL until 1930, when at the same time, they declared that beating off was tantamount to murder.
Catholics have been ignoring the RCC on that issue before that and ever since.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/pill/peopleevent...
Ding dong your wrong.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#266574 Nov 27, 2012
Husker du wrote:
<quoted text> Read the whole thing http://www.catholic.com/tracts/birth-control
Yes Knutter. I just posted the same thing, without the RCC slant.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#266575 Nov 27, 2012
Husker du wrote:
<quoted text> Apostolic Tradition
The biblical teaching that birth control is wrong is found even more explicitly among the Church Fathers, who recognized the biblical and natural law principles blah blah blah blah....
FACT: Your Jesus said NOTHING AT ALL about birth control OR abortion.

Period.

You can justify it all you want with the 'teachings' of your faith, but the FACT is that your g-d said NOTHING about it.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#266576 Nov 27, 2012
Husker du wrote:
The apostolic tradition’s condemnation of contraception is so great that it was followed by Protestants until 1930 and was upheld by all key Protestant Reformers. Martin Luther said, "[T]he exceedingly foul deed of Onan, the basest of wretches ... is a most disgraceful sin. It is far more atrocious than incest and adultery. We call it unchastity, yes, a sodomitic sin. For Onan goes in to her; that is, he lies with her and copulates, and when it comes to the point of insemination, spills the semen, lest the woman conceive. Surely at such a time the order of nature established by God in procreation should be followed. Accordingly, it was a most disgraceful crime.... Consequently, he deserved to be killed by God. He committed an evil deed. Therefore, God punished him."
John Calvin said, "The voluntary spilling of semen outside of intercourse between man and woman is a monstrous thing. Deliberately to withdraw from coitus in order that semen may fall on the ground is doubly monstrous. For this is to extinguish the hope of the race and to kill before he is born the hoped-for offspring."
John Wesley warned, "Those sins that dishonor the body are very displeasing to God, and the evidence of vile affections. Observe, the thing which he [Onan] did displeased the Lord—and it is to be feared; thousands, especially of single persons, by this very thing, still displease the Lord, and destroy their own souls." (These passages are quoted in Charles D. Provan, The Bible and Birth Control, which contains many quotes by historic Protestant figures who recognize contraception’s evils.) from the link I posted.
Thank you for proving your faiths leaders and their offshoots were nuts.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#266577 Nov 27, 2012
Husker du wrote:
<quoted text>Ding dong your wrong.
Yet the spam you just posted was EXACTLY what I just posted you MORON.

Ding Dong, you're drunk again I see.

That Mad Squirrel 20/20 is rotting that brain cell Knutbar.
Husker du

United States

#266578 Nov 27, 2012
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes Knutter. I just posted the same thing, without the RCC slant.
You didn't read whatI posted.
Husker du

United States

#266579 Nov 27, 2012
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
Yet the spam you just posted was EXACTLY what I just posted you MORON.
Ding Dong, you're drunk again I see.
That Mad Squirrel 20/20 is rotting that brain cell Knutbar.
You didn't understand , did you.
Husker du

United States

#266580 Nov 27, 2012
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
FACT: Your Jesus said NOTHING AT ALL about birth control OR abortion.
Period.
You can justify it all you want with the 'teachings' of your faith, but the FACT is that your g-d said NOTHING about it.
If you think that, you are very shallow and extremely stupid.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Wethersfield Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 4 min RoxLo 1,657,954
News Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 10 min Eric 72,044
News The 25 Most Dangerous Cities in the U.S. Are Mo... (Nov '10) 52 min Jo Dancer 21,283
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 20 hr NAME 64,308
News Manchester Police Create LGBTQ Liaison Wed not special 1
News Ganim's campaign pays city for mileage, not driver Mon BPT 7
News DCF Supervisor Charged With ATM Theft (Apr '09) Dec 9 Fredman 244

Wethersfield Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Wethersfield Mortgages