Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 311911 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#266535 Nov 27, 2012
sasssylicious wrote:
<quoted text>""" "just like we dont have the same problems with abortion.""" """"
The Jewish faith is against abortion.
No actually its not. The Jewish faith doesn't CONDONE abortion, but it REQUIRES it when its determined that the woman's life is endangered.

The Jewish faith believes that the decision to abort should be between the woman, her doctor and her rabbi.

They dont give two shits about anyone ELSES abortion, and in fact, believe that there should NOT be faith based legislation regarding it at all as evidenced by this open letter from the Amercian Jewish Congress that you've ignored at LEAST two or three dozen times before.

http://www.violence.de/ajc/ajc.pdf
I didn't say that it was against birth control use. The pill and IUD *can* be abortificants.


And in general, the Jewish faith doesn't give a shit about either one.

In fact, weirdly, one of the only methods that's frowned upon is in the Orthodoxy, and that's condom use, and that's because its against MAN'S requirement to be fruitful and multiply.

http://www.mechon-mamre.org/jewfaq/sex.htm
According to YOU,your faith allows abortion for the life of the mother(i.e DYING on the table).
A) Its NOT according to ME, its according to Jewish law.

B) Dying on the table has nothing to do with it. Stop making shit up.
So how can you sit here and tell me that we "don't" have the same problems with abortions.?
You obviously like to twist your religion to suit your own agenda.
Because Jews DONT have the same theological issues with abortion that your faith does. That's a simple FACT. Your "faith" would allow a woman to die rather than abort, while MY faith would REQUIRE an abortion to save her life.

In FACT, MY faith wouldnt allow it to get that far, requiring the abortion BEFORE it endangered her life.

YOUR "faith" thinks a zygote is a "person" while MY faith knows better.

Do you REALLY want to go through this again - where you misrepresent my faith for days on end, and I show the forum not only how wrong but what an asshole you are by trying to misrepresent the Jewish faith AGAIN? I've got the OFFICAL Jewish links ALL ready for you to ignore for the 367th time.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#266537 Nov 27, 2012
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
Planned Parenthood 2009 Report: We Perform 340 Abortions for Every Adoption Referral
http://liveaction.org/blog/planned-parenthood...
Oh look, No Relevance is misquoting again.

Now funny, this is the ACTUAL report, and it doesn't say any such thing.

http://www.plannedparenthood.org/files/PPFA/P...

Gee No Relevance and his little anti-choice site was lying again.

Is ANYONE shocked??

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#266538 Nov 27, 2012
sasssylicious wrote:
<quoted text> Did I not give you scripture that proved you wrong?
HE WHO HEARS YOU(PETER)HEARS ME.
No, you did not. I wrote that Jesus said nothing about birth control. Where in that scripture does Jesus mention birth control?

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#266539 Nov 27, 2012
sasssylicious wrote:
<quoted text>Of course you support the choices themselves. You said you'd have an abortion if you got pregnant.
What am I missing here?
Who cares what the "reason" is. You'd do it. You in fact support that choice because you'd have had one.
Bitler Bitler Bitler.
*deep sigh*
No, I don't support the choices. I support the woman's rights.

Why do you dishonestly ignore the reason I'd have had an abortion?

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#266540 Nov 27, 2012
sasssylicious wrote:
<quoted text>Why is it news that an Irish Catholic hospital refuses an abortion?
Gee I dont know Skanky, perhaps becasue its not a hospital's job to let a patient DIE when she COULD BE SAVED??

Gee, what a concept huh??

You fkn IDIOT.
Maybe not but it just might change the facts that she might have not needed an abortion in order to save her life. Perhaps her death ws imminent at that point. We can't just make up our own version in order to satify our own personal agenda..
ROFLMAO Yet here you are doing EXACTLY that.

The FACT is that its NOT inconclusive that she died when an abortion could have saved her.

You didn't even bother to do ANY reading on this at all did you? You're just talking out your ass again.
sasssylicious

Jackson, NJ

#266541 Nov 27, 2012
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
No actually its not. The Jewish faith doesn't CONDONE abortion, but it REQUIRES it when its determined that the woman's life is endangered.
The Jewish faith believes that the decision to abort should be between the woman, her doctor and her rabbi.
They dont give two shits about anyone ELSES abortion, and in fact, believe that there should NOT be faith based legislation regarding it at all as evidenced by this open letter from the Amercian Jewish Congress that you've ignored at LEAST two or three dozen times before.
http://www.violence.de/ajc/ajc.pdf
<quoted text>
And in general, the Jewish faith doesn't give a shit about either one.
In fact, weirdly, one of the only methods that's frowned upon is in the Orthodoxy, and that's condom use, and that's because its against MAN'S requirement to be fruitful and multiply.
http://www.mechon-mamre.org/jewfaq/sex.htm
<quoted text>
A) Its NOT according to ME, its according to Jewish law.
B) Dying on the table has nothing to do with it. Stop making shit up.
<quoted text>
Because Jews DONT have the same theological issues with abortion that your faith does. That's a simple FACT. Your "faith" would allow a woman to die rather than abort, while MY faith would REQUIRE an abortion to save her life.
In FACT, MY faith wouldnt allow it to get that far, requiring the abortion BEFORE it endangered her life.
YOUR "faith" thinks a zygote is a "person" while MY faith knows better.
Do you REALLY want to go through this again - where you misrepresent my faith for days on end, and I show the forum not only how wrong but what an asshole you are by trying to misrepresent the Jewish faith AGAIN? I've got the OFFICAL Jewish links ALL ready for you to ignore for the 367th time.
Okay,let's see. You keep saying that the Jewish faith "requires" an abortion if the womans life is in danger. Yet,you also say that it is between the woman,Dr and Rabbi. Sounds like a contradiction. Which is it...REQUIRED or a DECISION made between Doc,Rabbi and woman?

If a woman is dying on the table and 'so called' REQUIRES an abortion,then WHO has time to have mom,Rabbi and Dr "decide".

@@

Again, YOU support a woman electively aborting so you are going against your own religious beliefs.

""""" "In fact, weirdly, one of the only methods that's frowned upon is in the Orthodoxy, and that's condom use, and that's because its against MAN'S requirement to be fruitful and multiply""" """"" """""

Condom...or any other contraceptive...is forbidden because it prevents man's requirement to be fruitful and multiply. In other words, using the act(sex) that God intended for that purpose(to be fruitful and multiply)while PREVENTING is "frowned upon".

Thank you for proving my point that God forbids artificial contraception.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#266542 Nov 27, 2012
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
Another shallow child. It's such a shame that you must pick on someone for their looks. I guess schoolyard insults are all you have left. You most certainly don't have a good argument to put forth.
I find it particularly amusing when they dont even know what someone looks like. Its the insult from 1st grade that they never got past.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#266543 Nov 27, 2012
sasssylicious wrote:
<quoted text> Do you have your animals on the very same level as your children?
Than our children? Not really. On the same level as the likes of you? Nope, not at all. They're worth MUCH MORE than your kind are.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#266544 Nov 27, 2012
sasssylicious wrote:
<quoted text>Knit is referring to the employer being forced to provide abortificants and birth control.
You're as big an idiot as she is. NO employer in this country has ever or WILL ever have to provide "abortificants and birth control" to ANY employee. Not one.

Employers are being forced to offer INSURANCE that the EMPLOYEE WILL PAY FOR. No birth control or aborficants involved at all.

If the employee CHOOSES to USE their insurance to GET those, its none of the employers business.
sasssylicious

Jackson, NJ

#266545 Nov 27, 2012
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
No, you did not. I wrote that Jesus said nothing about birth control. Where in that scripture does Jesus mention birth control?
Look up the RCC teachings(Catholic Catechism) on artificial birth control.

It will always give you biblical proof.

What I mentioned about "church teachings" was instituted by God and Christ.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#266546 Nov 27, 2012
sasssylicious wrote:
<quoted text>
""""" Fact: Foo mentioned Ariel was found as an afterthought, 3 days after she was found, and only AFTER someone posted a question asking her about her trip to Atlantic City. Ariel found on a Wed. Foo's post announcing she was found on a Wed. was done 3 days after she was found, posted on a Sat. Even though she had been here the entire 3 days posting about anything and everything else, and even though she had posters here worried about someone while she had posted about it exploiting that person, she apparently didn't feel any rush to let people here know she had been found. People so close to the situation that they "went down to go help look for" her would have been told she was found at most, the day after, not 3 days later, and would have written a post voluntarily while here. Not as an answer to a question""" """
I never even realized that until now.
((sassy rolls her eyes))
That is just sick.
@@ No what's "sick" are idiots like you still trying to exploit that girl over two years later as a way to "get" to me. And you FAIL at that too.

What's STUPID is expecting that I'd post anything after the way you freaks react to someone trying to help someone else. Some people asked in private, and what was going on was shared in private. After all, its not like you or Lynne gave a shit beyond what you thought you could use it for your own agenda.

Its kind of like your "religion" that way, you only break it out when you want to weild it as a weapon, otherwise, you can't be bothered.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#266547 Nov 27, 2012
sasssylicious wrote:
<quoted text>
""""Tho I will be leaving soon for my classes that I'm taking"""
ENTER GOOGLICIOUS
Really? Where?@@ Skanky, you ARE a dope.
sasssylicious

Jackson, NJ

#266548 Nov 27, 2012
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
Than our children? Not really. On the same level as the likes of you? Nope, not at all. They're worth MUCH MORE than your kind are.
""""Than our children? Not really"""" """"

So,if you had a choice to save either your daughter or your cat,you'd perhaps choose to save your cat?

WOW,just WOW.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#266549 Nov 27, 2012
sasssylicious wrote:
<quoted text>
""""g-ddam ned thing they can do about it""""
Hi Mr "I am Jewish", Um...God commanded us not to take his name in vain.
Just sayin....
Your "g-d" commanded you to do a LOT of things you disregard as it suits you skanky hypocrite.
sasssylicious

Jackson, NJ

#266550 Nov 27, 2012
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
Gee I dont know Skanky, perhaps becasue its not a hospital's job to let a patient DIE when she COULD BE SAVED??
Gee, what a concept huh??
You fkn IDIOT.
<quoted text>
ROFLMAO Yet here you are doing EXACTLY that.
The FACT is that its NOT inconclusive that she died when an abortion could have saved her.
You didn't even bother to do ANY reading on this at all did you? You're just talking out your ass again.
The male or female offspring/child of that woman is just as valuable in the eyes of God. The hospitals job is to save BOTH mom and child.

Again,where is the proof that this woman would have lived had the abortion taken place. I'd like to see it.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#266551 Nov 27, 2012
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
How exactly are your rights being taken away and preventing you from practicing your religion?
Nobody is forcing you to use birth control.
sasssylicious wrote:
<quoted text>
*sigh*
You are correct. NOBODY is *forcing* me to go against my beliefs.
But,we are not talking about the EMPLOYEE here. We are talking about EMPLOYERS being FORCED to.
Nobody's FORCING the employer to use birth control either you MORON. Nobody's FORCING them to distribute birth control for that matter either.
sasssylicious

Jackson, NJ

#266552 Nov 27, 2012
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
@@ No what's "sick" are idiots like you still trying to exploit that girl over two years later as a way to "get" to me. And you FAIL at that too.
What's STUPID is expecting that I'd post anything after the way you freaks react to someone trying to help someone else. Some people asked in private, and what was going on was shared in private. After all, its not like you or Lynne gave a shit beyond what you thought you could use it for your own agenda.
Its kind of like your "religion" that way, you only break it out when you want to weild it as a weapon, otherwise, you can't be bothered.
No. YOU bashed the Catholics on this thread. You blamed this womans death on us. You lied and THAT is why you refuse to provide the "real facts" of this womans death. You gave TWO different versions of the womans death.

It is YOU that used this poor woman for YOUR agenda...(your bigotry AND your abortion motives).

Shame on you.

Your posts PROVED that you deliberately exploited Ariel too.

Now you can kick and scream ALL you want,but you only have yourself to blame.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#266553 Nov 27, 2012
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
What they are providing is health insurance. The employer is not providing birth control. They are simply providing health insurance. What the employee uses the insurance for is not the employer's business.
Dont confuse SKanky with FACTS LNM!
sasssylicious

Jackson, NJ

#266554 Nov 27, 2012
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
No, I don't support the choices. I support the woman's rights.
Why do you dishonestly ignore the reason I'd have had an abortion?
I don't support the choices. I don't support the womans *legal* rights. I would NEVER abort my child.

You can't say the same.

Doesn't matter why you'd abort. YOU'D ABORT. PERIOD. You not only support a womans right..YOU PERSONALLY would act on that choice.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#266555 Nov 27, 2012
sasssylicious wrote:
<quoted text>
;)
ENTER GOOGLICIOUS (like I said).
LOL
Riiiiight Skanky. Three hours AFTER I left, and an two hours BEFORE I came back on. For ONE post.

Yeah. That's me.@@

You idiot.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Wethersfield Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 7 min Susanm 1,433,633
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 2 hr Hypocrite Hillary 61,520
News Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 2 hr Ize Found 71,061
News The 25 Most Dangerous Cities in the U.S. Are Mo... (Nov '10) 10 hr Mini mouse 20,637
News Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) Wed rabbee yehoshooah... 72,039
CAR Accident on Friday April 22, 2016 Apr '16 MarcusT20073 1
In The War on Police Traffic Stops Have Become ... (Aug '15) Dec '15 Anthony Wall 11

Wethersfield Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Wethersfield Mortgages