Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 330509 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

No Relativism

Chicago, IL

#266417 Nov 27, 2012
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
All these quotes from me and others are taken out of context. If that's your only weapon, your tactics are comparable to a Mad Lib game.
Your words regarding your stance are equivalent to, "All women should rejoice in their pregnancies even when unhealthy or unwanted, regardless. If women don't feel like rejoicing, there is something unnaturally wrong with them. Therefore, their pregnancies should be continued as a punishing lesson in life, if they live." Ridiculous sounding, huh? Yeah, I think so, too.
"If you don't want your baby, just kill him. Don't be inconvenienced. Just kill."

Katie, you personify evil.

Since: Dec 09

Location hidden

#266419 Nov 27, 2012
elise in burque wrote:
<quoted text>Typical fundie behavior: Instead of backing their institutions' refusal to take steps to save the woman's life, she shoves her head in the sand. I'm so glad I'm a nurse in an area where that woman's death would be a crime.
It's been legal in Ireland since 1992 to perform an abortion for life and health. The law just hasn't been officially changed for 20 years therefore doctors fear prosecution. Wonder how many other women died in these same circumstances over the course? Wonder why the government is so slow to change it? Influence, from the religious leaders is my guess. This woman was obviously at risk for health issues when it was discovered the cervix was dilated but the fetus was still alive. And this was before she developed septicemia. They treated her for that and then did the abortion, they did not treat her for imminent miscarriage via abortion because a heartbeat was still detected.

Since: Dec 09

Location hidden

#266420 Nov 27, 2012
Husker du wrote:
<quoted text>Actually you are, you are blind to the truth. Tell everyone how you have soooo much time on your hands ... This is Christmas shopping season, you should be working, right?
Hanukkah.
No Relativism

Chicago, IL

#266421 Nov 27, 2012
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
All these quotes from me and others are taken out of context. If that's your only weapon, your tactics are comparable to a Mad Lib game.
Your words regarding your stance are equivalent to, "All women should rejoice in their pregnancies even when unhealthy or unwanted, regardless. If women don't feel like rejoicing, there is something unnaturally wrong with them. Therefore, their pregnancies should be continued as a punishing lesson in life, if they live." Ridiculous sounding, huh? Yeah, I think so, too.
Katie: "All women should rejoice in their pregnancies even when unhealthy or unwanted, regardless. If women don't feel like rejoicing, there is something unnaturally wrong with them. Therefore, their pregnancies should be continued as a punishing lesson in life, if they live." Ridiculous sounding, huh? Yeah, I think so, too.
__________

For someone who claims to be "prochoice," you sure don't promote adoption.

Ever.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#266422 Nov 27, 2012
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
"If you don't want your baby, just kill him. Don't be inconvenienced. Just kill."
Katie, you personify evil.
Given she not only DIDNT day what you've quoted her as saying, its YOU that pesonifies both evil AND stupidity No Relevance.

AGAIN, why do you feel you have to make shit up and attibuite it to others? OTHER than the fact that reality doesn't suit you I mean.

“2014 TDF”

Since: Mar 09

Boca Raton, FL.

#266423 Nov 27, 2012
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
Katie: "All women should rejoice in their pregnancies even when unhealthy or unwanted, regardless. If women don't feel like rejoicing, there is something unnaturally wrong with them. Therefore, their pregnancies should be continued as a punishing lesson in life, if they live." Ridiculous sounding, huh? Yeah, I think so, too.
__________
For someone who claims to be "prochoice," you sure don't promote adoption.
Ever.
For someone who claims to be "prolife" you sure promote adoption. But, you don't adopt. Ever.

Since: Dec 09

Location hidden

#266424 Nov 27, 2012
sasssylicious wrote:
<quoted text> *you* offering insurance to your employees has NO affect on me. If you want to offer birth control,that is YOUR business. Ones that can be an abortificant,go against your religion because it kills a humans life in the womb.
You don't care...OBVIOUSLY.
IF you were FORCED to give insurance to only straight people,you'd have a freakin meltdown because it would be going against your beliefs.
*Facepalm*
Husker du

United States

#266425 Nov 27, 2012
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
Nobody says you should dismiss it Knutbar, but many people live very religoius lives without and dont believe they have to legislate their views on people that dont share their faith.
An employer providing insurance doesn't affect that employer's religious beliefs in ANY way. Not many employers are paying for that insurance for one thing, employee's are paying the bill, and what happens between the employee's doctor the pharmacy and them is none of the employers business.
THATS REALITY.
It does when providing insurance means you have to pay for an intrinsic evil. Dang you are not very smart. And another thing, moral relativism is pure evil and causes chaos.
Husker du

United States

#266426 Nov 27, 2012
Conservative Democrat wrote:
<quoted text>
For someone who claims to be "prolife" you sure promote adoption. But, you don't adopt. Ever.
Do you? Many people try and get turned away for things like they are too old, their house is too small ,if only you made a couple more thousand a year, you have too many kids already etc. How many children have you adopted?

Since: Dec 09

Location hidden

#266427 Nov 27, 2012
lil Lily wrote:
The above quote of Foo's came from this post of hers:
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/abortion/T833...
101733 in this thread.
"she had been beaten and had been held against her will. She was found Wednesday, and was returned to her home in Florida last night after time in an Atlanta hospital."
Just as NR posted she said. No lie from NR. The lie came once again from Foo when she said he "changed" what she said, when the only thing he did was post the name of the person Foo was talking about in that statement. The lie also came from Googleiscious in also claiming he changed Foo's original quote. He changed nothing that altered her quote in any way.
Nope, the original quote says " I said what I know and am comfortable sharing so far. She was found because of a lead of someone that saw her picture and apparently a flier that was distributed, she had been beaten and had been held against her will. She was found Wednesday, and was returned to her home in Florida last night after time in an Atlanta hospital. That's all. Nothing else."

You see that big word that starts with an A and ends with Y? Do you see where she clearly says I said what I know and am comfortable sharing. You were aware in 2010 she was getting this information second hand.

APPARENTLY
1. As far as one knows or can see
2. Used by speakers or writers to avoid committing themselves to the truth of what they are saying.

She didn't commit that Ariel had been beaten or was in the hospital. Reading comprehension skills are a good thing.

Since: Dec 09

Location hidden

#266428 Nov 27, 2012
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
I do always post the truth. Find one post in which I posted a lie.
Not the old "you lie when you say you're not Lynne". That's not proof.
I'm NOT Lynne, I'm Lily.
This post.

“2014 TDF”

Since: Mar 09

Boca Raton, FL.

#266429 Nov 27, 2012
Husker du wrote:
<quoted text>Do you? Many people try and get turned away for things like they are too old, their house is too small ,if only you made a couple more thousand a year, you have too many kids already etc. How many children have you adopted?
If those are excuses for why NR has not adopted one child, I'd like to hear it from him, not from you Knutter. Stop defending the indefensible.

How many children have I adopted? Do dogs and cats count? If you're really "pro-life," they should. After all, they're my "children" too. I even have medical, I mean, veterinarian coverage on them as well.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#266430 Nov 27, 2012
Husker du wrote:
<quoted text>It does when providing insurance means you have to pay for an intrinsic evil. Dang you are not very smart. And another thing, moral relativism is pure evil and causes chaos.
YOU are not paying you frikkin moron. The EMPLOYEES PAY FOR THEIR OWN INSURANCE THROUGH THEIR PAY.

What an employee uses their insurance, THAT THEY PAY FOR, for is none of the employer's business.

It does not affect YOU in ANY way.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#266431 Nov 27, 2012
Conservative Democrat wrote:
<quoted text>
For someone who claims to be "prolife" you sure promote adoption. But, you don't adopt. Ever.
Welcome back CD! I see you've realised the resident ball-less wonder is back.

He CANT adopt. Nobody would allow children anywhere near his nasty ass.
No Relativism

Chicago, IL

#266432 Nov 27, 2012
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
Given she not only DIDNT day what you've quoted her as saying, its YOU that pesonifies both evil AND stupidity No Relevance.
AGAIN, why do you feel you have to make shit up and attibuite it to others? OTHER than the fact that reality doesn't suit you I mean.
1) I didn't attribute quote to Katie. I did say she personifies evil.

2) Your post personifies lack of spelling skills.

'she didn't day (sic) that'
'YOU pesonifies (sic) evil & stupidity'(Stupidity? Irony..)
'why do you have to attibuite (sic) it to others?'


Yee gads..........

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#266433 Nov 27, 2012
AyakaNeo wrote:
<quoted text>Nope, the original quote says " I said what I know and am comfortable sharing so far. She was found because of a lead of someone that saw her picture and apparently a flier that was distributed, she had been beaten and had been held against her will. She was found Wednesday, and was returned to her home in Florida last night after time in an Atlanta hospital. That's all. Nothing else."
You see that big word that starts with an A and ends with Y? Do you see where she clearly says I said what I know and am comfortable sharing. You were aware in 2010 she was getting this information second hand.
APPARENTLY
1. As far as one knows or can see
2. Used by speakers or writers to avoid committing themselves to the truth of what they are saying.
She didn't commit that Ariel had been beaten or was in the hospital. Reading comprehension skills are a good thing.
The fact is that Lynne and No Relevance dont know and further dont CARE what actually happened to this girl, ALL they give a damn about is that they can delude themselves that they're sticking it to me. Pity they're miserable failures at that as well. In fact, the futher we get from that event, the stupider they make themselves look.

If either of them DID want to know the particulars, they COULD call the police officer who's name they were provided with. Hell, I even offered to give them the phone number. But as I said, they dont actually care.
Husker du

United States

#266434 Nov 27, 2012
Conservative Democrat wrote:
<quoted text>
If those are excuses for why NR has not adopted one child, I'd like to hear it from him, not from you Knutter. Stop defending the indefensible.
How many children have I adopted? Do dogs and cats count? If you're really "pro-life," they should. After all, they're my "children" too. I even have medical, I mean, veterinarian coverage on them as well.
You are laughable and sad, animals are not the same as human beings,they are not our equal. Animals cannot reason. God put animals to serve man.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#266435 Nov 27, 2012
AyakaNeo wrote:
<quoted text>Nope, the original quote says " I said what I know and am comfortable sharing so far. She was found because of a lead of someone that saw her picture and apparently a flier that was distributed, she had been beaten and had been held against her will. She was found Wednesday, and was returned to her home in Florida last night after time in an Atlanta hospital. That's all. Nothing else."
You see that big word that starts with an A and ends with Y? Do you see where she clearly says I said what I know and am comfortable sharing. You were aware in 2010 she was getting this information second hand.
APPARENTLY
1. As far as one knows or can see
2. Used by speakers or writers to avoid committing themselves to the truth of what they are saying.
She didn't commit that Ariel had been beaten or was in the hospital. Reading comprehension skills are a good thing.
lol, you fool. The lies we've brought up that Foo posted were about what she posted at one time, then she DENIED POSTING at another time.

Also other lies like claiming someone was 14, when she was 20. Claiming she was so close to the situation that she supposedly went down there to help look for her, when the liar didn't even know her age? Too many things she posted didn't add up.

Yes, reading comprehension skills ARE a good thing. Too bad you don't have any because you look stupid each time you try to defend a pathological liar. Doing so with nothing more than a desire to kiss up to her and your own ignorance of facts. Facts that are in the form of Foo's own posts.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#266436 Nov 27, 2012
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
The fact is that Lynne and No Relevance dont know and further dont CARE what actually happened to this girl, ALL they give a damn about is that they can delude themselves that they're sticking it to me. Pity they're miserable failures at that as well. In fact, the futher we get from that event, the stupider they make themselves look.
If either of them DID want to know the particulars, they COULD call the police officer who's name they were provided with. Hell, I even offered to give them the phone number. But as I said, they dont actually care.
You didn't care about that girl either. You just came here and exploited her for your own selfish need to feel important. JUst like you did with the woman who had died because she refused an abortion.

You post lies when you tell stories and try to make yourself seem relevant in the stories, and it's your lies that are being brought back up, because you lied in the present about what you posted in the past.
grumpy

Pomona, NY

#266437 Nov 27, 2012
Husker du wrote:
Religion intertwines with how one lives, 0ne can't dismiss what and how you believe when it comes to social issues.
But the "No Relativism" tenet tells Catholics to dismiss what what and how others believe. So you are violating your religion's tenet.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Wethersfield Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 2 min Nostrils Waxman 1,706,802
News More Advice On Acura TL Transmission Failures A... (Apr '09) 39 min Acura buyer 330
News Man accused of secretly installing hidden video... (Feb '09) 46 min tsingram 23
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 1 hr FART DATES 64,460
News How Black Women Have Been Leaning In Forever (Aug '15) 1 hr YouPhartse 27
News Connecticut LGBT Advocate Says Military's Trans... (Jul '17) 4 hr Haters 8
Why are puerto ricans so lazy & don't work? (Nov '13) 4 hr Loser 32

Wethersfield Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Wethersfield Mortgages