Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Full story: Newsday

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Comments (Page 12,512)

Showing posts 250,221 - 250,240 of303,334
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#266270
Nov 26, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

1

Googleicious wrote:
<quoted text>
I see that this NR person hasn't been here for more than a year, and came back on - likely at your behest - to harass someone about something that happened apparently years ago.
I see that its you and he ONLY that are exploiting something and someone that isn't even ON this board in your zeal to harass another poster that's "OWNED" you so many times its not funny anymore.
It really does seem that this two year old incident IS the ONLY thing you think you've got on her, so you're exploiting it and in the process showing how sad and hapless you really are. Grow up, get over it and move on.
How do yu know "this NR person hasn't been here for more than a year"? It hasn't been that long since he was last here.

Funny how you pro-choicers keep calling challenging someone on the lies they POSTED HERE as harassment. What a cop out claim to try to deflect from Foo's lies.

No, a 2 yr. old incident isn't the only thing pro-lifers have on Foo. I've provided Foo's lies and proof of them in many various areas of discussion that she's posted on, presnt and also past when links have been provided. Proof of not just the pathetic attempts of attention seeking for herself, using stories she makes up. Proof she's made them up keep coming back to haunt her whenever she lies about it again in the present.

Her fault for posting lies in the first place. Not the fault of anyone who sees the lies she's posting in the present about the same situations, and proves she's lying as much now about it as she did when she first posted about it. I just take a little time doing a bit of research to be able to see whether or not the one/s providing the links are representing the truth or not.

NR has consistently provided the truth, with links and that he can read for comprehension when he does provide a post for proof. Whereas, Foo consistenly has provided proof she lies and also that she can't read for comprehension when she's trying to provide a post for proof of her claims.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#266271
Nov 26, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

2

No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
Foo is a proven liar, and all you have to respond with is "other people lie, too."
Although you are desperately trying to soften the blow against the Fabricating Foo, all you've done is admitted defeat.
Next..........
"Foo is a proven liar, and all you have to respond with is 'other people lie, too.'"

That sums it up.
She also said it accusing me of posting lies, and did it with no proof.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#266272
Nov 26, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

1

No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
Foo: "I misspoke about something I wrote about OVER TWO YEARS AGO regarding her age."
You also misspoke about me being a "lying sack of shit" regarding your quote:
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/abortion/T833...
You "misspeak" a lot. Sounds like your definition of "misspoke" is the same as lying.
Why is it that when Foo brings up posts from much further back than "OVER 2 YEARS AGO" when she's trying to prove she's telling the truth, yet only proving she can't read for comprehension and lied; it's okay for Foo to do and it's not viewed by her or other pro-choicers as pathetic or harassing, and her claims she tried to prove was the truth but she proved were lies are ignored by all PC, defended by some?

But, when a pro-lifer brings up a post from 2 years ago and it proves the truth about Foo's lies, it's not okay, it's harassment and pathetic to do, according to Foo and her lie enabling PC friends?

Glaring double standard, hypocrisy and lack of integrity in discussion by PC here, among other things.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#266273
Nov 26, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

1

No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm sure you've noticed your friend Foo fumbling all over the place. Did you see her call me a "lying sack of shit" related to her quote?==>
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/abortion/T833...
Could you comment on this real-time situation? TIA.
lol, of course she can't and won't. Seems to me she's taken on the duty here of only posting to defend pro-choicers who post lies, and to accuse those who prove the lies of harassing the proven liars, then she reports those of us who have integrity in discussion, who don't post lies and who only use what's posted here to prove the lies posted by pro-choicers.

I'm positive it's no coincidence that both Googleiscious and Ayakaneo showed up here at approx. the same time and immediately had taken to defending Foo and her lies from the moment they each started posting here. Both also have admitted to reporting me for "harassment" because I was posting what I saw as Foo exploiting yet someone else here. A woman whom Foo claimed she knew and who supposedly died because she had chosen not to get an abortion (due to religious reasons), and Foo using it to attack pro-lifers about it, like we had anything to do with it.

Ayakaneo and Gooleicious both reported me for harassment, also for name calling because I called them names like "bonehead" and "pea brain".

Coincidence they both came on defending Foo and reporting me? Hardly.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#266274
Nov 26, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

1

No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
Bringing up a poster's lack of credibility has relevance & merit in ANY Topix Forum. Wouldn't you agree? Yes or no?
Of course it does.

The problem for the PCers here is that whenever we accuse them of lying, thereby proving they have no credibility or integrity in discussion, we can prove it using their posts.

Whenever PCers accuse us of lying, they have no proof. I've challenged them to prove I've POSTED lies, and all they come back with is the "you lie every time you post you're not Lynne", as though just saying it proves that I'm Lynne. lol. Or they say I lie about my past, when not only have I not lied about anything from my life, but when they use Lynne's posts to try to prove something they're claiming about Lynne, it only proves THEY lied about her life.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#266275
Nov 26, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

1

Googleicious wrote:
<quoted text>
You did change her quote in your original posting. Pot, meet kettle. It appears as if revisionist history also applies to you.
Defending Foo's lies with your own lies?

Foo posted: "she had been beaten and had been held against her will. She was found Wednesday, and was returned to her home in Florida last night after time in an Atlanta hospital."

NR posted Foo said, "Ariel Richards had been beaten and had been held against her will. She was found Wednesday, and was returned to her home in Florida last night after time in an Atlanta hospital."

What exactly did he "change" that altered anything in the quote?

He changed the word "she" for "Ariel Richards" only to indicate who the "she" was that Foo was referring to.

If anyone's guilty of "harassing", it's you. Harassing NR with your impotent lying claims about him and your inept defense of a proven pathological liar using lies of your own.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#266276
Nov 26, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

1

The above quote of Foo's came from this post of hers:
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/abortion/T833...

101733 in this thread.

"she had been beaten and had been held against her will. She was found Wednesday, and was returned to her home in Florida last night after time in an Atlanta hospital."

Just as NR posted she said. No lie from NR. The lie came once again from Foo when she said he "changed" what she said, when the only thing he did was post the name of the person Foo was talking about in that statement. The lie also came from Googleiscious in also claiming he changed Foo's original quote. He changed nothing that altered her quote in any way.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#266277
Nov 26, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

1

AyakaNeo wrote:
<quoted text>Oh so you beat me up without even having to raise a fist? I really could care less to tell you the truth. I just don't see the point in bringing it up again because that's just going to raise questions AGAIN about Lil lying about being Lynne D. Her credibility is no better, yet you defend her, so how are we different in regards to that?
"about Lil lying about being Lynne D."

I haven't posted any lies, and none of you has proven I have. I prove every claim I make, you have proven none of yours.

THAT, my dear, is the relevance of using what's been posted here. Credibility.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#266278
Nov 26, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

1

Googleicious wrote:
<quoted text>
Absolutely. And given if a poll was taken, I'd venture to say that Lilrabbit has more credibility than YOU have here or on ANY Topix forum.
What say you posters?
LOL! "What say you posters?"
All that can be proven with that kind of stupidity is that there are more lying pro-choicers like her here, who lack integrity in discussion, than there are people who have integrity in discussion and who don't post lies.
Pro-lifers have already made that known, no poll needs to be taken. lol

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#266279
Nov 26, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

1

AyakaNeo wrote:
<quoted text>Really? How many precious lives were murdered today while you and other self proclaimed pro life advocates post on an abortion forum discussing a subject from 2 years ago that has nothing to do with reproduction or Roe vs. Wade?
Speaking of deceitful, credibility, and subjects off topic do you believe that Lil Lily always tells the truth?
When you lose credibility, your opinion is meaningless.
Hope that helps with your answer, a simple yes or no will do.
I do always post the truth. Find one post in which I posted a lie.

Not the old "you lie when you say you're not Lynne". That's not proof.

I'm NOT Lynne, I'm Lily.

“They will lose.”

Since: Apr 11

Falcon can hear the falconer

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#266280
Nov 26, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
Blacks were considered 3/5 of a person in the census.
To which our resident bonehead, Carbon Johnny, states "In no context that I consider important were black people considered 3/5ths of a person."
Including the census? Which outrightly degraded blacks to a 3/5 a person classification?
I guess if Johnny is okay with killing babies, considering blacks less than human fits his mindset.
If immorality & disrespect for human life is okay, in one area, same is bound to be true on other/most areaas.
Fool.
Your failure to understand is back around to being funny. I hope that you understand this argument enough one day to be properly embarrassed by your words.
Kenose

Hicksville, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#266281
Nov 26, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
Listen Toots, I have challenged every pro-choicer here to PROVE I POST lies, and all have come up empty.
Difference between the accusations I make, and the accusations pro-choicers make; I can PROVE what I say, with posts in the pro-choier's words, with links and post numbers. Not one pro-choicer has been able to prove I post lies. Some have tried, but all they proved was they can't read for comprehension.
The lies Foo has told are proven and it's never a case of us misreading what she posted.
She "defies" people to prove this or that, and whenever we do, she just ignores it with personal attacks full of lies.
People with no integrity in discussion, like you, defend people like that with nothing better than,'she may be a liar but others are too' and you say it having nothing of proof.
You're the one who kept asking why some of us are so hell bent on prving things here. That's because people who CAN prove their claims are the ones who are credible, like me. People who can't, aren't, like you.
Remember when you quoted a post by feces for jesus and then changed the post and added your own words ??? You did that to try and back up your BS claim that feces for jesus is Ladi?

You can't be trusted.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#266282
Nov 26, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
...I misspoke about something I wrote about OVER TWO YEARS AGO regarding her age. Big deal. Grow the fuckup and move on.
Liar. It wasn't that you "misspoke", because you didn't just lead people on that one time about her being 14 when she was really 19-20. You kept on misleading people about her age when BS mentioned Amber alert, and you said you'd share that with the girl's mother. When Amber alert has an age limit of not above 18 yrs. of age. You also mentioned later that the mother and the Center for missing and exploited "children" which is also not for missing adults.

It wasn't that you "misspoke" about her age, it was that you lied about it. You kept lying about it until someone caught you in one of your lies about it. THEN you claimed you misspoke.

A person who misspeaks about someone being 14, when the person is really an adult, does not continue by mentioning organizations that are in place for missing children, not missing adults.

No, you lied about her age, and you kept lying about it.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#266283
Nov 26, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Kenose wrote:
<quoted text>
Remember when you quoted a post by feces for jesus and then changed the post and added your own words ??? You did that to try and back up your BS claim that feces for jesus is Ladi?
You can't be trusted.
You've yet to prove you're not Ladilulu. You made a post about having an abortion. You claim you're a guy.
Kenose

Hicksville, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#266284
Nov 26, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
You've yet to prove you're not Ladilulu. You made a post about having an abortion. You claim you're a guy.
Way to try to avoid the fact that you lied and changed someones post to back up your BS claim.

Oh, and you've yet to prove you're not Persevere..... or just mentally deranged.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#266285
Nov 26, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Kenose wrote:
<quoted text>
Way to try to avoid the fact that you lied and changed someones post to back up your BS claim.
Oh, and you've yet to prove you're not Persevere..... or just mentally deranged.
Excuse me, but you haven't proven I lied. You only claim I have, with nothing I've posted to back up your claim. I haven't posted any lies. I believed you to be Ladilulu and posted why I believed that. That's my opinion, and my opinion is not a lie. It's not a claim I made as though it's fact.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#266286
Nov 26, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

It's not up to me to prove who I'm NOT, lamebrain.
Kenose

Hicksville, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#266287
Nov 26, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
Excuse me, but you haven't proven I lied. You only claim I have, with nothing I've posted to back up your claim. I haven't posted any lies. I believed you to be Ladilulu and posted why I believed that. That's my opinion, and my opinion is not a lie. It's not a claim I made as though it's fact.
When you said that feces for jesus is Ladi and changed a post to back up your BS claim, you lied. You were deceitful and if you can't own up to that, you're lying again, you silly, mentally deranged liar.
No Relativism

Wakarusa, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#266288
Nov 26, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong again son. Bit was talking about a "human fetus", FETUS being the noun you dolt.
You are mistaken.

Bitner CLEARLY stated "a human". I clarified w/ her her noun usage, and she acknowledged.

Pay attention.

You just keep tripping all over yourself.

Get ahold of yourself.
No Relativism

Wakarusa, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#266290
Nov 26, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Carbon-12 wrote:
<quoted text>
Your failure to understand is back around to being funny. I hope that you understand this argument enough one day to be properly embarrassed by your words.
Were blacks dignified and shown human respect by considering them 3/5ths of a person for the census?

Yes or no?

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 250,221 - 250,240 of303,334
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••

Fire Warning for Hartford County was issued at April 24 at 3:37AM EDT

•••
•••
•••
•••

Wethersfield Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Wethersfield People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••