Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 312664 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#266279 Nov 26, 2012
AyakaNeo wrote:
<quoted text>Really? How many precious lives were murdered today while you and other self proclaimed pro life advocates post on an abortion forum discussing a subject from 2 years ago that has nothing to do with reproduction or Roe vs. Wade?
Speaking of deceitful, credibility, and subjects off topic do you believe that Lil Lily always tells the truth?
When you lose credibility, your opinion is meaningless.
Hope that helps with your answer, a simple yes or no will do.
I do always post the truth. Find one post in which I posted a lie.

Not the old "you lie when you say you're not Lynne". That's not proof.

I'm NOT Lynne, I'm Lily.

“They will lose.”

Since: Apr 11

Falcon can hear the falconer

#266280 Nov 26, 2012
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
Blacks were considered 3/5 of a person in the census.
To which our resident bonehead, Carbon Johnny, states "In no context that I consider important were black people considered 3/5ths of a person."
Including the census? Which outrightly degraded blacks to a 3/5 a person classification?
I guess if Johnny is okay with killing babies, considering blacks less than human fits his mindset.
If immorality & disrespect for human life is okay, in one area, same is bound to be true on other/most areaas.
Fool.
Your failure to understand is back around to being funny. I hope that you understand this argument enough one day to be properly embarrassed by your words.
Kenose

Brooklyn, NY

#266281 Nov 26, 2012
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
Listen Toots, I have challenged every pro-choicer here to PROVE I POST lies, and all have come up empty.
Difference between the accusations I make, and the accusations pro-choicers make; I can PROVE what I say, with posts in the pro-choier's words, with links and post numbers. Not one pro-choicer has been able to prove I post lies. Some have tried, but all they proved was they can't read for comprehension.
The lies Foo has told are proven and it's never a case of us misreading what she posted.
She "defies" people to prove this or that, and whenever we do, she just ignores it with personal attacks full of lies.
People with no integrity in discussion, like you, defend people like that with nothing better than,'she may be a liar but others are too' and you say it having nothing of proof.
You're the one who kept asking why some of us are so hell bent on prving things here. That's because people who CAN prove their claims are the ones who are credible, like me. People who can't, aren't, like you.
Remember when you quoted a post by feces for jesus and then changed the post and added your own words ??? You did that to try and back up your BS claim that feces for jesus is Ladi?

You can't be trusted.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#266282 Nov 26, 2012
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
...I misspoke about something I wrote about OVER TWO YEARS AGO regarding her age. Big deal. Grow the fuckup and move on.
Liar. It wasn't that you "misspoke", because you didn't just lead people on that one time about her being 14 when she was really 19-20. You kept on misleading people about her age when BS mentioned Amber alert, and you said you'd share that with the girl's mother. When Amber alert has an age limit of not above 18 yrs. of age. You also mentioned later that the mother and the Center for missing and exploited "children" which is also not for missing adults.

It wasn't that you "misspoke" about her age, it was that you lied about it. You kept lying about it until someone caught you in one of your lies about it. THEN you claimed you misspoke.

A person who misspeaks about someone being 14, when the person is really an adult, does not continue by mentioning organizations that are in place for missing children, not missing adults.

No, you lied about her age, and you kept lying about it.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#266283 Nov 26, 2012
Kenose wrote:
<quoted text>
Remember when you quoted a post by feces for jesus and then changed the post and added your own words ??? You did that to try and back up your BS claim that feces for jesus is Ladi?
You can't be trusted.
You've yet to prove you're not Ladilulu. You made a post about having an abortion. You claim you're a guy.
Kenose

Brooklyn, NY

#266284 Nov 26, 2012
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
You've yet to prove you're not Ladilulu. You made a post about having an abortion. You claim you're a guy.
Way to try to avoid the fact that you lied and changed someones post to back up your BS claim.

Oh, and you've yet to prove you're not Persevere..... or just mentally deranged.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#266285 Nov 26, 2012
Kenose wrote:
<quoted text>
Way to try to avoid the fact that you lied and changed someones post to back up your BS claim.
Oh, and you've yet to prove you're not Persevere..... or just mentally deranged.
Excuse me, but you haven't proven I lied. You only claim I have, with nothing I've posted to back up your claim. I haven't posted any lies. I believed you to be Ladilulu and posted why I believed that. That's my opinion, and my opinion is not a lie. It's not a claim I made as though it's fact.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#266286 Nov 26, 2012
It's not up to me to prove who I'm NOT, lamebrain.
Kenose

Brooklyn, NY

#266287 Nov 26, 2012
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
Excuse me, but you haven't proven I lied. You only claim I have, with nothing I've posted to back up your claim. I haven't posted any lies. I believed you to be Ladilulu and posted why I believed that. That's my opinion, and my opinion is not a lie. It's not a claim I made as though it's fact.
When you said that feces for jesus is Ladi and changed a post to back up your BS claim, you lied. You were deceitful and if you can't own up to that, you're lying again, you silly, mentally deranged liar.
No Relativism

Chicago, IL

#266288 Nov 26, 2012
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong again son. Bit was talking about a "human fetus", FETUS being the noun you dolt.
You are mistaken.

Bitner CLEARLY stated "a human". I clarified w/ her her noun usage, and she acknowledged.

Pay attention.

You just keep tripping all over yourself.

Get ahold of yourself.
No Relativism

Chicago, IL

#266290 Nov 26, 2012
Carbon-12 wrote:
<quoted text>
Your failure to understand is back around to being funny. I hope that you understand this argument enough one day to be properly embarrassed by your words.
Were blacks dignified and shown human respect by considering them 3/5ths of a person for the census?

Yes or no?

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#266291 Nov 26, 2012
Kenose wrote:
<quoted text>
When you said that feces for jesus is Ladi and changed a post to back up your BS claim, you lied. You were deceitful and if you can't own up to that, you're lying again, you silly, mentally deranged liar.
When you provide the post, then we'll talk. Until then, it's just you claiming something you haven't proven.

Back it up with a link to my exact post and post number, like we do. Otherwise you're just doing what you PC always do; trying to claim something as fact and not backing it up with proof.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#266292 Nov 26, 2012
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
You are mistaken.
Bitner CLEARLY stated "a human". I clarified w/ her her noun usage, and she acknowledged.
Pay attention.
You just keep tripping all over yourself.
Get ahold of yourself.
Bitner used the term "a human", which is a noun, as you said. Foo jumps in not knowing what she's talking about.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#266293 Nov 26, 2012
NR: "DNA analysis results of preborn babies states otherwise. Conclusively."

Bitner: "A DNA analysis would say human, not human being."

NR: ":sigh: A human DNA sample comes from?..... "

Bitner: "A human." < (NOUN)

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#266294 Nov 26, 2012
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
You are mistaken.
Bitner CLEARLY stated "a human". I clarified w/ her her noun usage, and she acknowledged.
Pay attention.
You just keep tripping all over yourself.
Get ahold of yourself.
So? It's still not a person, or human being. You have no point.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#266295 Nov 26, 2012
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
Were blacks dignified and shown human respect by considering them 3/5ths of a person for the census?
Yes or no?
A census is not about "dignity" or "human respect". It was not about their humanity at all. It's about numbers, and in that case, representation in gov't.

You're twisting yourself into a pretzel, and you're not proving anything. You just plain wrong.
No Relativism

Chicago, IL

#266296 Nov 26, 2012
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
So? It's still not a person, or human being. You have no point.
Foo: Bitner said "human fetus"....human used as an adjective.

NR: Bitner clearly said "a human"....its noun form.

Bitner: So?
________

Bitner just proved Foo wrong.

Again.
________

You know what else, Bitner? Foo said noun form of "Human" and "Human being" are interchangeable...synonyms.

How about that?
Kenose

Brooklyn, NY

#266297 Nov 26, 2012
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
When you provide the post, then we'll talk. Until then, it's just you claiming something you haven't proven.
Back it up with a link to my exact post and post number, like we do. Otherwise you're just doing what you PC always do; trying to claim something as fact and not backing it up with proof.
You know what you did and are nothing more than a coward with a holier-than-thou attitude. It's pretty pathetic you refuse to own up to your deceitful ways, little Ms. Abortroll. Troll on!
sasssylicious

Jackson, NJ

#266298 Nov 26, 2012
http://www.lifenews.com/2012/11/23/canada-491...

*sigh*

These abortions are coded as P96.4 or ‘Termination of pregnancy, affecting fetus and newborn’.”

The question that should immediately present itself is, why has there not been 491 homicide investigations or prosecutions in connection with these deaths? Section 223(2) of the Criminal Code (the accompanying subsection to the now infamous subsection that Mr. Woodworth’s motion 312 was examining) reads “A person commits homicide when he causes injury to a child before or during its birth as a result of which the child dies after becoming a human being.” That is to say, anyone who interferes with a pregnancy such that the child dies after it is born alive due to that interference, is guilty of homicide
No Relativism

Chicago, IL

#266299 Nov 26, 2012
U.S. Supreme Court orders review of HHS mandate

http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/supreme-cour...

The provisions of ObamaCare require that businesses with more than 50 employees make contraception available with no co-pay. Owners must provide pharmaceuticals that work as abortifacients, even if doing so violates their religious beliefs.

Staver says doing so is unconstitutional under the First Amendment and the 1993 Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA).

Legal observers expect the case will land before the Supreme Court as early as 2013.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Wethersfield Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 13 min Ize Found 71,231
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 18 min Earl 1,457,911
News The 25 Most Dangerous Cities in the U.S. Are Mo... (Nov '10) 8 hr coon dogs 20,695
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 9 hr Moans6157 62,300
News If ex-felons pay their dues to society, let's g... (Jun '08) 21 hr Squach 1,168
News The 10 commandments of cancer prevention (May '09) Dec 1 Trying to be hopeful 36
DCF Protest in CT & We want your stories!!! (Jul '12) Nov 29 Madmom 70

Wethersfield Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Wethersfield Mortgages