Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Full story: Newsday

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Comments (Page 12,500)

Showing posts 249,981 - 250,000 of303,199
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#265995
Nov 23, 2012
 

Judged:

2

1

1

Feces, lymph fluid, toes, kidneys, epithelial cells, corpses, hair follicles, etc. You can't get a DNA sample from a "human being", only human cells.
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
:sigh: A human DNA sample comes from?.....

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#265996
Nov 23, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

1

"Human" is our species. Fetuses are not counted as members of a species; they must be born and alive. The more you try to inject science into this, the worse your argument becomes.
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
NR: A human DNA sample comes from?...
Bitner: A human.
_______
Yes. Yes the sample does come from a human.
Thanks for using human correctly in its noun form.
You must now admit that a human is killed during an abortion procedure. That wasn't so hard was it?

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#265997
Nov 23, 2012
 

Judged:

2

1

1

We don't need a reminder of what a fascist fetus-worshiper you are.
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
Dear Katie,
I wanted to provide a friendly reminder to posters of who you are at your core.
No Relativism

Wakarusa, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#265998
Nov 23, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

1

cpeter1313 wrote:
Feces, lymph fluid, toes, kidneys, epithelial cells, corpses, hair follicles, etc. You can't get a DNA sample from a "human being", only human cells.
<quoted text>
CPeter: You can't get a DNA sample from a "human being"

__________

Try again.
No Relativism

Wakarusa, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#265999
Nov 23, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

2

cpeter1313 wrote:
"Human" is our species. Fetuses are not counted as members of a species; they must be born and alive. The more you try to inject science into this, the worse your argument becomes.
<quoted text>
Look up "homo sapien"
No Relativism

Wakarusa, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#266000
Nov 23, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

cpeter1313 wrote:
"Human" is our species. Fetuses are not counted as members of a species; they must be born and alive. The more you try to inject science into this, the worse your argument becomes.
<quoted text>
Fetuses are considered homo sapiens in most states when legal homicide is involved.
No Relativism

Wakarusa, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#266001
Nov 23, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Kathwynn wrote:
<quoted text>
Good catch.. I doubt NR really comprehends what a fool he makes of himself here.
Don't you have a cemetery to dance in?
No Relativism

Wakarusa, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#266002
Nov 23, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

1

Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
Moron, neither of us said a human fetus isn't a human.
It is not, however a person, or a human being.
A human is a synonym for a human being.

You support the intentional & brutal killing of an innocent & defenseless human.

You spend hours promoting this evil act.

Pathetic.
No Relativism

Wakarusa, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#266003
Nov 23, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Purple Queen wrote:
<quoted text>
Junior, do you get what subjective even means? Sweetheart you just shot yourself in your own foot!{giggle!!} Too funny!
Of course I understand what "subjective" means.

Intentionally killing another innocent human being for subjective reasons will get you life in prison.
No Relativism

Wakarusa, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#266004
Nov 23, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Purple Queen wrote:
<quoted text>
Junior, do you get what subjective even means? Sweetheart you just shot yourself in your own foot!{giggle!!} Too funny!
Purple Queen: Do you get what subjective even means?

________

Do you agree w/ slave owners subjective belief that blacks were 2/3 persons?

Do you agree w/ Nazis subjective belief that Jews weren't persons?

Catch my drift?

Both groups are human beings w/ a right to life. And, so are those human beings in the womb.

“They will lose.”

Since: Apr 11

Falcon can hear the falconer

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#266005
Nov 23, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

1

Non Relativus wrote:
Libtard pundits are saying Obama has 55% chance of being re-elected. George Stephanopolous was all giddy the other day when reporting on a poll of prospective women voters (heavily in favor of Obama over Romney at this juncture).
Regardless, I predict Romney will win by 3-4% points in Nov. If election was held today, Obama might take it by 1-2% points.
Here are considerations for November:
1) Obama's women support will neutralize after contraception mandate situation works itself out. He energized female base, but forgot that in order to keep them energized he must not back down. He will be forced to concede because of Constitutional violations. The women will turn on him, thinking he turned on them (he set himself up like dope...he promises, but can't deliver).
2) Late June will likely bring bad news for Obama's health insurance mandate. His prize law that he spent TWO YEARS working on while unemployment numbers continued to rise will come back to bite him in his skinny ass. He listened to Pelosi and Reid, and didn't focus on the biggest issue in American households. That's called "piss poor leadership."
3) The Israel-Iran situation could change his chances irreversibly. If Israel attacks Iran w/out U.S. support, gas prices will sky rocket more than they already have. Obama will be blamed b/c of managing the Mideast crisis ineffectually.
4) Conservatives/Republicans have not yet gathered around one candidate yet. It's been a primary campaign that required chaos to settle some things between grass-roots conservatives, and establishment Republicans. When the dust settles & it becomes Romney v. Obama, forces will collect to remove the buffoon from office.
I do realize this country is filled with moronic libtards who are dumb enough to buy into Barack's nonsense (even after his pathetic record) but I'm not going to bow to the libtard pundits & their arrogant (read: wishful thinking) predictions.
So, there's that.

Carbon-12 wrote:
I will put this post aside, and we can look and see if you do any better this time than you did last election. Because it is fair to put some skin in the game:
Romney has such incredibly low enthusiasm, and a bad history (both recent and earlier) I am going to say it is not going to be very close. The Republicans take Texas, and no other big electoral vote state. Indiana goes to Obama.
Pure speculation: Gut feeling is that John Roberts is going to upset you.

_________

I am pretty happy with my answer. Your predictions were worth what I thought they would be. I do hope you will play again in 2015.

“They will lose.”

Since: Apr 11

Falcon can hear the falconer

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#266006
Nov 23, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

"Do you agree w/ slave owners subjective belief that blacks were 2/3 persons?"

This is a fairly tortured misunderstanding of what the Three-Fifths Compromise was all about.

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#266007
Nov 23, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

You can only get a DNA sample from a cell, twit.
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
CPeter: You can't get a DNA sample from a "human being"
__________
Try again.

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#266008
Nov 24, 2012
 
Just like any animal species, we are only counted as a member of the species after we are born.
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
Look up "homo sapien"

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#266009
Nov 24, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

No, they are not. Fetal homicide laws are based on the abrogation of the woman's right to carry to term if desired. Not one law gives fetuses rights or personhood, much less contradicts scientific rules of terminology.
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
Fetuses are considered homo sapiens in most states when legal homicide is involved.

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#266010
Nov 24, 2012
 
I don't recall the blacks living within the massahs, or the jews living inside the nazis. The fetus has no legal rights, and any you chose to confer on it could not supersede the woman's rights.
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
Purple Queen: Do you get what subjective even means?
________
Do you agree w/ slave owners subjective belief that blacks were 2/3 persons?
Do you agree w/ Nazis subjective belief that Jews weren't persons?
Catch my drift?
Both groups are human beings w/ a right to life. And, so are those human beings in the womb.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#266011
Nov 24, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Carbon-12 wrote:
Non Relativus wrote:
Libtard pundits are saying Obama has 55% chance of being re-elected. George Stephanopolous was all giddy the other day when reporting on a poll of prospective women voters (heavily in favor of Obama over Romney at this juncture).
Regardless, I predict Romney will win by 3-4% points in Nov. If election was held today, Obama might take it by 1-2% points.
Here are considerations for November:
1) Obama's women support will neutralize after contraception mandate situation works itself out. He energized female base, but forgot that in order to keep them energized he must not back down. He will be forced to concede because of Constitutional violations. The women will turn on him, thinking he turned on them (he set himself up like dope...he promises, but can't deliver).
2) Late June will likely bring bad news for Obama's health insurance mandate. His prize law that he spent TWO YEARS working on while unemployment numbers continued to rise will come back to bite him in his skinny ass. He listened to Pelosi and Reid, and didn't focus on the biggest issue in American households. That's called "piss poor leadership."
3) The Israel-Iran situation could change his chances irreversibly. If Israel attacks Iran w/out U.S. support, gas prices will sky rocket more than they already have. Obama will be blamed b/c of managing the Mideast crisis ineffectually.
4) Conservatives/Republicans have not yet gathered around one candidate yet. It's been a primary campaign that required chaos to settle some things between grass-roots conservatives, and establishment Republicans. When the dust settles & it becomes Romney v. Obama, forces will collect to remove the buffoon from office.
I do realize this country is filled with moronic libtards who are dumb enough to buy into Barack's nonsense (even after his pathetic record) but I'm not going to bow to the libtard pundits & their arrogant (read: wishful thinking) predictions.
So, there's that.
Carbon-12 wrote:
I will put this post aside, and we can look and see if you do any better this time than you did last election. Because it is fair to put some skin in the game:
Romney has such incredibly low enthusiasm, and a bad history (both recent and earlier) I am going to say it is not going to be very close. The Republicans take Texas, and no other big electoral vote state. Indiana goes to Obama.
Pure speculation: Gut feeling is that John Roberts is going to upset you.
_________
I am pretty happy with my answer. Your predictions were worth what I thought they would be. I do hope you will play again in 2015.
LOL! Bravo!!

I see something dragged the carrion back into the forum, and Lynne is in her glory as she thinks she has a playmate back. What worthless pieces of shit they both are.

I wonder how happy is that pretty much ALL of his predictions went down the sewer with him, after all, its good company for him.

More and more states are passing SSM laws, Obamacare is going forward and the world ISN'T ending. Go figure.

chip...chip...chip....

BTW, did you see this latest in the saga of the RCC's ignoring the molestation of children? This one may be the worst in history (so far...)

http://www.montrealgazette.com/literacy/raise...

Given the RCC took NO ACTION against Murphy, the one priest that molested over 200 children in his years in the RCC - it will be interesting to see if they ignore this too.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#266012
Nov 24, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

2

No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you agree w/ slave owners subjective belief that blacks were 2/3 persons?
Nobody believed that you idiot. That was about taxation, nobody claimed that slaves were 2/3 persons. DAMN you're stupid No Relevance.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#266013
Nov 24, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
Fetuses are considered homo sapiens in most states when legal homicide is involved.
Uh no. First ofs no such thing as "legal homicide" thus your point is both moot and stupid. As usual.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#266014
Nov 24, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
A human is a synonym for a human being.
You support the intentional & brutal killing of an innocent & defenseless human.
You spend hours promoting this evil act.
Pathetic.
Nonsense. Human being is a religious/philosophical concept, not scientific.

I don't support abortion at all.

Also, I've hardly been on this thread in ages, and haven't even debated abortion with anyone in almost as long.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 249,981 - 250,000 of303,199
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••

Flood Warning for Hartford County was issued at April 17 at 9:22PM EDT

•••
•••
•••
•••

Wethersfield Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Wethersfield People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••