Yes Lynniekins, you stupid thing, I misread it. As in "She AND her baby want this over turned.<quoted text>
Foo: "I mis-read "had" for "and"."
Sure you did, you ignorant fool. lol
Try using what you claim you misread in that sentence and it still doesn't make sense the way you read it. That's because you can't read for comprehension, ever.
"She had her baby and wants this overturned."
You misread "had" for "and", you say?
This was the sentence as it was typed, which anyone who can read for comprehension understood as it was.
So which way did you "mis-read "had" for "and", Fool?
This way? She [and] her baby and wants it overturned.
Or this way? She had her baby [had] wants it overturned.
Either way you claim is STUPID, because neither way makes any sense, you ignorant buffoon.
Now go on and try to act like you haven't been owned by me, AGAIN, dimwit, with a bunch of stupidity that makes you look even more stupid than you already made yourself look with your inability to read for comprehension, and stupid argument you came back with because of it.
Good lord, I made a mistake. Big deal. All you have is nit-picking garbage you pathetic bitch. Grow up already Lynne. Own your OWN history and ignorance here before you pick on someone elses errors.