Scientists say they have proved climate change is real, now mus...

Scientists studying the changing nature of the Earth's climate say they have completed one crucial task - proving beyond a doubt that global warming is real. Full Story

“Science not Conservatism”

Since: Jan 12

Progress, not Denial

#8137 Mar 21, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
No, Arrehenius didn't say "halving of CO2 would decrease temperatures by 45 C (Celsius), but doubling of CO2 would cause a temperature rise of 56 C". He found a symetrical effect which he estimated at 4C for each doubling of CO2. Neither has anyone experimentally demonstrated a temperature change in climate from man made greenhouse gasses.

>>Actually, he DID say that, Brian. You're lying.

"Arrhenius estimated that halving of CO2 would decrease temperatures by 45 C (Celsius) and a doubling of CO2 would cause a temperature rise of 56 C.[8]"

-Wikipedia, "Svante Arrehenius"

I have an objective standard for my belief climate change mitigation is a hoax; the experimental record. What would cause you to change your mind about climate change mitigation?

You have nothing but Denial, Brian, and the need (even obsession) to constantly post the same idiotic, unsupported, and dishonest claims. That makes you a Denier Troll, Brian. And that's all you seem able to do here.

“I Luv Carbon Dioxide”

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

#8138 Mar 21, 2013
"In his 1906 publication, Arrhenius adjusted the value downwards to 1.6 C..."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Svante_Arrhenius

BTW, the Earth is 4.5 billion years old, it's survived far worse than humans can possibly do.

Since: Apr 08

"the green troll"

#8139 Mar 21, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
"In his 1906 publication, Arrhenius adjusted the value downwards to 1.6 C..."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Svante_Arrhenius
BTW, the Earth is 4.5 billion years old, it's survived far worse than humans can possibly do.
It has.

http://www.greenmanstudio.com/wardco2big.jpg
litesong

Everett, WA

#8140 Mar 21, 2013
brian_g stumble butt dumpster diver wrote:
I accused tha Professor of not knowing science.
"brian_g stumble butt dumpster diver" is looking for company, since he has no math or science in its poorly earned hi skule DEE-plooomaa, AND has errors of 1million TIMES, 1000 TIMES, 3000 TIMES & 73 million TIMES in its few attempts at topix topix AGW forum mathematics.
The Iron Dictator

Podgorica, Montenegro

#8141 Mar 21, 2013
tha Professor wrote:
<quoted text>
No, Arrehenius didn't say "halving of CO2 would decrease temperatures by 45 C (Celsius), but doubling of CO2 would cause a temperature rise of 56 C". He found a symetrical effect which he estimated at 4C for each doubling of CO2. Neither has anyone experimentally demonstrated a temperature change in climate from man made greenhouse gasses.
>>Actually, he DID say that, Brian. You're lying.
"Arrhenius estimated that halving of CO2 would decrease temperatures by 45 C (Celsius) and a doubling of CO2 would cause a temperature rise of 56 C.[8]"
-Wikipedia, "Svante Arrehenius"
I have an objective standard for my belief climate change mitigation is a hoax; the experimental record. What would cause you to change your mind about climate change mitigation?
You have nothing but Denial, Brian, and the need (even obsession) to constantly post the same idiotic, unsupported, and dishonest claims. That makes you a Denier Troll, Brian. And that's all you seem able to do here.
The scientists say Jewish control of Mass Media and Banks in USA is rea,now we must do something.

“Science not Conservatism”

Since: Jan 12

Progress, not Denial

#8142 Mar 22, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
"In his 1906 publication, Arrhenius adjusted the value downwards to 1.6 C..."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Svante_Arrhenius
BTW, the Earth is 4.5 billion years old, it's survived far worse than humans can possibly do.
Others have adjusted it upwards, as the next sentence would tell you. But honesty isn't important if you're a Denier troll, is it Brainless?

Your "faith" is utterly unscientific, which confirms your lack of credibility here.

“Science not Conservatism”

Since: Jan 12

Progress, not Denial

#8143 Mar 22, 2013
Here's the part Brainless_G the Climate-Denying Faith Healer left out:

"Recent (2007) estimates from IPCC say this value (the Climate sensitivity) is likely to be between 2 and 4.5 C. Arrhenius expected CO2 levels to rise at a rate given by emissions in his time. Since then, industrial carbon dioxide levels have risen at a much faster rate: Arrhenius expected CO2 doubling to take about 3000 years; it is now estimated in most scenarios to take about a century."

Oh, gosh, you mean Arrenhius DIDN'T KNOW EVERYTHING?

LOL

“Science not Conservatism”

Since: Jan 12

Progress, not Denial

#8144 Mar 22, 2013
The Iron Dictator wrote:
<quoted text>The scientists say Jewish control of Mass Media and Banks in USA is rea,now we must do something.
You're an anti-Semitic nutball. Please leave this thread.

“I Luv Carbon Dioxide”

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

#8145 Mar 22, 2013
tha Professor wrote:
Others have adjusted it upwards, as the next sentence would tell you. But honesty isn't important if you're a Denier troll, is it Brainless? Your "faith" is utterly unscientific, which confirms your lack of credibility here.
My standard is the experimental record; there's never been a successful experiment that shows either man made climate change or climate change mitigation. If I were to see a successful experiment,I'd change my mind.

What would it take for you to change your mind about climate change mitigation? If you can't answer; I'd say your view is based on faith.

Since: Mar 09

Parsons, KS

#8146 Mar 23, 2013
Big_Goof is either a paid shill or simply a brainless denier. Either way, there is nothing gained by responding to his inane posts. It is like arguing with a two year old.

“Science not Conservatism”

Since: Jan 12

Progress, not Denial

#8147 Mar 25, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>My standard is the experimental record; there's never been a successful experiment that shows either man made climate change or climate change mitigation. If I were to see a successful experiment,I'd change my mind.
What would it take for you to change your mind about climate change mitigation? If you can't answer; I'd say your view is based on faith.
Nuts. Spam. Clueless.

“Sharia, NOT!”

Since: Jul 10

Chesapeake, VA

#8148 Mar 25, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>My standard is the experimental record; there's never been a successful experiment that shows either man made climate change or climate change mitigation. If I were to see a successful experiment,I'd change my mind.
What would it take for you to change your mind about climate change mitigation? If you can't answer; I'd say your view is based on faith.
You know, I remember in 6th grade we had a terrarium in our classroom that was self-sustaining as a scientific fact of an ecosystem.

I would imagine a "scientist" might create one and increase the levels of CO2 in one and record the results.
Perhaps they have and to their chagrin they find that the green plants in it thrive better and produce more oxygen which in turn aids the lifeforms in it.
Of course the flaw is that an external source of CO2 is introduced which contradicts an ecosystem. But, I think the results could be eye-opening. Just wouldn't be able to obtain any grant money to fund the truth afterwards.
litesong

Everett, WA

#8149 Mar 25, 2013
Patriot AKA Bozo wrote:
Big_Goof is either a paid shill...... It is like arguing with a two year old.
Correction:
"Big_Goof is either a paid shill......" should be,
"brian_g stumble butt dumpster diver is paid to shrill......"

&
Two years old? Why so much credit.

“Science not Conservatism”

Since: Jan 12

Progress, not Denial

#8150 Mar 25, 2013
Socialism is for Sissies wrote:
<quoted text>You know, I remember in 6th grade we had a terrarium in our classroom that was self-sustaining as a scientific fact of an ecosystem.
I would imagine a "scientist" might create one and increase the levels of CO2 in one and record the results.
Perhaps they have and to their chagrin they find that the green plants in it thrive better and produce more oxygen which in turn aids the lifeforms in it.
Of course the flaw is that an external source of CO2 is introduced which contradicts an ecosystem. But, I think the results could be eye-opening. Just wouldn't be able to obtain any grant money to fund the truth afterwards.
An idiot whose understanding of science ended at the 6th grade level wouldn't get any science grant money at all.

Of course, you MIGHT get a hefty grant from the Koch Bros. or other Big Energy financial source to spread your brand of "science" across the 'net and aid and abet the cause of Denierism. That's where all the money is anyway, might as well give it a try...:)

“Sharia, NOT!”

Since: Jul 10

Chesapeake, VA

#8151 Mar 25, 2013
tha Professor wrote:
<quoted text>
An idiot whose understanding of science ended at the 6th grade level wouldn't get any science grant money at all.
Of course, you MIGHT get a hefty grant from the Koch Bros. or other Big Energy financial source to spread your brand of "science" across the 'net and aid and abet the cause of Denierism. That's where all the money is anyway, might as well give it a try...:)
Whatsa matter? Simple science confound you? Not smarter than a 6th grader?

I just presented a very simple way of proving what is being shoveled is BS and yet you can refute noting with facts.

What a joke.

I bet you think that biofuel is the answer of the future, don't you?

I went to a lab at a university receiving grant money for this "wonderful scientific break through" using algea to create this fuel. I asked a simple question of the scientists showing their wonderful program and it shut them down as the follow-on questions from the other dignitaries began to fly.

"So, how will this fuel be more efficient since it's energy density is about 1/5 of that of gasoline?"

See? Science requires real questions based on real world science and not grant money fantasies.

“EnvironMENTAList ”

Since: Feb 07

Near Detroit

#8152 Mar 25, 2013
Science says comet hits are real but not climate change!
Show us former climate change believers just one single IPCC warning report that is not full of "maybes". Show us ANY scientific paper that says a climate crisis WILL happen. Science has never said any crisis was certain, imminent, eventual, inevitable or "WILL" happen yet science can say comet hits are a real eventual crisis but science has NEVER said the same for climate change crisis. Prove us wrong!
27 years of maybe means it won't be.

Since: Aug 12

Istanbul, Turkey

#8153 Mar 25, 2013
Already these climatic changes doesnt periodically for thousands of years ?

“Science not Conservatism”

Since: Jan 12

Progress, not Denial

#8154 Mar 25, 2013
Socialism is for Sissies wrote:
<quoted text>Whatsa matter? Simple science confound you? Not smarter than a 6th grader?
I just presented a very simple way of proving what is being shoveled is BS and yet you can refute noting with facts.
What a joke.
I bet you think that biofuel is the answer of the future, don't you?
I went to a lab at a university receiving grant money for this "wonderful scientific break through" using algea to create this fuel. I asked a simple question of the scientists showing their wonderful program and it shut them down as the follow-on questions from the other dignitaries began to fly.
"So, how will this fuel be more efficient since it's energy density is about 1/5 of that of gasoline?"
See? Science requires real questions based on real world science and not grant money fantasies.
You "presented" a 6th-grade experiment which proves that plants need C02. Wow, I would NEVER have thought of that myself, what a GENIUS!

LOL

Nice biofuel strawman, incidentally...:)

“Science not Conservatism”

Since: Jan 12

Progress, not Denial

#8155 Mar 25, 2013
mememine69 wrote:
Science says comet hits are real but not climate change!
Show us former climate change believers just one single IPCC warning report that is not full of "maybes". Show us ANY scientific paper that says a climate crisis WILL happen. Science has never said any crisis was certain, imminent, eventual, inevitable or "WILL" happen yet science can say comet hits are a real eventual crisis but science has NEVER said the same for climate change crisis. Prove us wrong!
27 years of maybe means it won't be.
Idiot. All science is full of "maybes" in the sense that there are few if any absolute certainties.

Climate change is real, "belief" has nothign to do with it. A climate crisis IS happening. Will it continue to happen? Depends on a lot of factors, including whether humans try to do anything about it.

Comets and asteroids HAVE hit the earth...one was a few weeks ago. Did you miss it? It was all over the internet, seriously.

"Prove" who "wrong" about what? What are you babbling about?

“Science not Conservatism”

Since: Jan 12

Progress, not Denial

#8156 Mar 25, 2013
Socialism is for Sissies wrote:
..EDITED...I went to a lab at a university receiving grant money for this "wonderful scientific break through" using algea to create this fuel. I asked a simple question of the scientists showing their wonderful program and it shut them down as the follow-on questions from the other dignitaries began to fly.
"So, how will this fuel be more efficient since it's energy density is about 1/5 of that of gasoline?"
..EDITED....
Why would I believe that any of this actually happened? You're clearly not smart enough to confound a room full of otters, much less one full of scientists.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Wethersfield Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 7 min EasyEed 1,126,955
Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 1 hr Yumpin Yimminy 68,664
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 3 hr grave digger 47,499
The 25 Most Dangerous Cities in the U.S. Are Mo... (Nov '10) 3 hr Judith Feinberg 19,384
Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision (Jan '08) 3 hr The_Box 306,276
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 4 hr scirocco 70,102
Popular '80s West Hartford Music Hall To Be Dem... (Jun '09) 20 hr AWXYZ 254
Wethersfield Dating
Find my Match

Wethersfield Jobs

Wethersfield People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Wethersfield News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Wethersfield

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]