Once slow-moving threat, global warmi...

Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds up, leaving litt...

There are 63619 comments on the Newsday story from Dec 14, 2008, titled Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds up, leaving litt.... In it, Newsday reports that:

When Bill Clinton took office in 1993, global warming was a slow-moving environmental problem that was easy to ignore.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#43171 Feb 5, 2014
flack wrote:
<quoted text> One day you libtards will wake up to the fact that going into Iraq was the right thing to do. The problem was the terrorists decided to attack us there causing us to stay longer than planned. Better there, however, than in Afghanistan, where fighting them in the hills would have been much worse. Bush decided not to follow the Russians into Afghanistan.
Right, it unbalanced the whole Middle East. Even Daddy Bush understood that.

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

Gauley Bridge WV

#43172 Feb 5, 2014
SpaceBlues wrote:
<quoted text>What lies!
You are confused. Read this now:
Coastal flood damages are expected to increase significantly during the 21st century as sea levels rise and socioeconomic development increases the number of people and value of assets in the coastal floodplain. Estimates of future damages and adaptation costs are essential for supporting efforts to reduce emissions driving sea-level rise as well as for designing strategies to adapt to increasing coastal flood risk. This paper presents such estimates derived by taking into account a wide range of uncertainties in socioeconomic development, sea-level rise, continental topography data, population data, and adaptation strategies.[pnas]
'are expected" Ever notice how the experts are always "surprised" when their predictions fall flat?

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

Gauley Bridge WV

#43173 Feb 5, 2014
SpaceBlues wrote:
<quoted text>What lies!
You are confused. Read this now:
Coastal flood damages are expected to increase significantly during the 21st century as sea levels rise and socioeconomic development increases the number of people and value of assets in the coastal floodplain. Estimates of future damages and adaptation costs are essential for supporting efforts to reduce emissions driving sea-level rise as well as for designing strategies to adapt to increasing coastal flood risk. This paper presents such estimates derived by taking into account a wide range of uncertainties in socioeconomic development, sea-level rise, continental topography data, population data, and adaptation strategies.[pnas]
This is how loony you people are!!!
According to a statement issued yesterday by the US National Science Foundation:

For an 18-month period beginning in 2010, the oceans mysteriously dropped by about seven millimeters.

This is pretty wacky, as warming ocean temperatures ought to mean that the oceans expand. Furthermore, there's no disagreement about the fact that the world's ice sheets and glaciers have been steadily melting for a long time - otherwise Europe would still be covered in ice. And there's no reason they'd suddenly stop melting. So how could sea levels actually go down?

In short, it's probably human-caused climate change that did it: specifically the Australian flooding of 2010 and 2011, which is generally thought by climate scientists to be at least partly attributable to rising atmospheric carbon levels caused by human fossil-fuel burning.

"It's a beautiful illustration of how complicated our climate system is," says John Fasullo of the US National Center for Atmospheric Research.

"The smallest continent in the world can affect sea level worldwide."

Australia's dry Outback interior, being ringed to a large extent by coastal mountains, doesn't tend to let go of any rain once it's got some: and in 2010 and 2011, huge amounts of rain fell there. Essentially, an awful lot of the world's oceans turned into clouds and then fell on Australia - and stayed there.
SpaceBlues

United States

#43174 Feb 5, 2014
flack wrote:
<quoted text> 'are expected" Ever notice how the experts are always "surprised" when their predictions fall flat?
Who would you prefer make predictions, the experts on the subject or the politicians?

No, I'm not suprised because their science progresses with continued improvements in their predictions.
SpaceBlues

United States

#43175 Feb 5, 2014
flack wrote:
<quoted text>
This is how loony you people are!!!
According to a statement issued yesterday by the US National Science Foundation:
For an 18-month period beginning in 2010, the oceans mysteriously dropped by about seven millimeters.
This is pretty wacky, as...
Do you know what you are talking about?

I'd rather follow science studies than your political rants..
denier

Zion, IL

#43176 Feb 5, 2014
And all this snow where does it come from, not the outerspace!
SpaceBlues

United States

#43177 Feb 5, 2014
flack wrote:
<quoted text>
This is how loony you people are!!!
According to a statement issued yesterday by the US National Science Foundation:
For an 18-month period beginning in 2010, the oceans mysteriously dropped by about seven millimeters.
This is pretty wacky, as warming ocean temperatures ought to mean that the oceans expand. Furthermore, there's no disagreement about the fact that the world's ice sheets and glaciers have been steadily melting for a long time - otherwise Europe would still be covered in ice. And there's no reason they'd suddenly stop melting. So how could sea levels actually go down?
In short, it's probably human-caused climate change that did it: specifically the Australian flooding of 2010 and 2011, which is generally thought by climate scientists to be at least partly attributable to rising atmospheric carbon levels caused by human fossil-fuel burning.
"It's a beautiful illustration of how complicated our climate system is," says John Fasullo of the US National Center for Atmospheric Research.
"The smallest continent in the world can affect sea level worldwide."
Australia's dry Outback interior, being ringed to a large extent by coastal mountains, doesn't tend to let go of any rain once it's got some: and in 2010 and 2011, huge amounts of rain fell there. Essentially, an awful lot of the world's oceans turned into clouds and then fell on Australia - and stayed there.
blah blah you are wrong.. not yesterday, old news:

August 19, 2013

Three atmospheric patterns came together above the Indian and Pacific Oceans in 2010 and 2011. When they did, they drove so much precipitation over Australia that the world's ocean levels dropped measurably.

Unlike other continents, the soils and topography of Australia prevent almost all its precipitation from flowing into the ocean.

The 2010-11 event temporarily halted a long-term trend of rising sea levels caused by higher temperatures and melting ice sheets, according to a team of researchers at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) in Boulder, Colo., and other institutions.

Now that the atmosphere's circulation has returned to its previous patterns, the seas are again rising.

These results will appear next month in the journal Geophysical Research Letters, published by the American Geophysical Union.

Co-authors of the paper are affiliated with NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory and the University of Colorado at Boulder.

The research was funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF), which sponsors NCAR, and by NASA.

"The scientists conclude that the Outback region in Australia played a crucial role in trapping a large amount of rainfall when widespread floods occurred over the continent," says Anjuli Bamzai, program director in NSF's Division of Atmospheric and Geospace Sciences, which funded the research.
SpaceBlues

United States

#43178 Feb 5, 2014
denier wrote:
And all this snow where does it come from, not the outerspace!
Send it back or to California.

“BET DAP”

Since: Feb 09

GOOM BOWN

#43179 Feb 5, 2014
denier wrote:
And all this snow where does it come from, not the outerspace!
maybe from the shallow ocean depths? I hear its an inferno down deeper!
Sarah

Miami Beach, FL

#43180 Feb 5, 2014
tim ob wrote:
im up here in Minnesota..CAN SOMEONE PLEASE SEND SOME OF THE FRIKKING GLOBAL WARMING UP OUR WAY!! Were freezing our asses of here.
LOL. I would love for a large helping of global warming to hit Duluth asap. I have to go there and dread 0 degrees.:-(
The way my uncle is preparing for GW is he is selling his costal properties here in Florida and moving to a big beautiful home in Orlando. He is still keeping his condo on the beach though. I look forward to milder winters up north! Hope to see it in my lifetime!
denier

Zion, IL

#43181 Feb 5, 2014
SpaceBlues wrote:
<quoted text>Send it back or to California.
wouldn't that be a concept there's plenty of it here and we could sell it on the "white market", it would boost the economy! For us

Since: Jul 11

Location hidden

#43182 Feb 5, 2014
flack wrote:
<quoted text>
This is how loony you people are!!!
According to a statement issued yesterday by the US National Science Foundation:
For an 18-month period beginning in 2010, the oceans mysteriously dropped by about seven millimeters.
..........
Australia's dry Outback interior, being ringed to a large extent by coastal mountains, doesn't tend to let go of any rain once it's got some: and in 2010 and 2011, huge amounts of rain fell there. Essentially, an awful lot of the world's oceans turned into clouds and then fell on Australia - and stayed there.
The fact that you consider this normal weather the same as the US big freeze which is going on at the moment shows how distorted your logic is. I mean these are SUPPOSED to be once in 100 yr events and now we get them every 2nd year. Why don't you geniuses explain how that happens, Sandy, Typhoon Haiyan, Floods & the Heatwaves in Australia, England & Europe under water, USA frozen, West coast starving for water all this in the past 3 yrs. WTF is wrong with you people that you don't get the message.
denier

Zion, IL

#43183 Feb 5, 2014
ritedownthemiddle wrote:
<quoted text>maybe from the shallow ocean depths? I hear its an inferno down deeper!
what no chart or graph?

“BET DAP”

Since: Feb 09

GOOM BOWN

#43185 Feb 5, 2014
denier wrote:
<quoted text>what no chart or graph?
dont need them! If gore and his liberal lemmings here say it is so....then it must be true.

Since: Jul 11

Location hidden

#43186 Feb 5, 2014
Lord Hater wrote:
<quoted text>
It's called weather. Its not predictable. All the predictions made by Gore and other scientists have not come to pass.
Oh I see, you still refuse to associate warming with weather. So no matter how bad it gets warming will play no part in it. Even thou logic would suggest with such an increased frequency of weather events globally something just might be amiss.
denier

Zion, IL

#43187 Feb 5, 2014
OzRitz wrote:
<quoted text>
The fact that you consider this normal weather the same as the US big freeze which is going on at the moment shows how distorted your logic is. I mean these are SUPPOSED to be once in 100 yr events and now we get them every 2nd year. Why don't you geniuses explain how that happens, Sandy, Typhoon Haiyan, Floods & the Heatwaves in Australia, England & Europe under water, USA frozen, West coast starving for water all this in the past 3 yrs. WTF is wrong with you people that you don't get the message.
High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

Gauley Bridge WV

#43188 Feb 5, 2014
Read it and weep


10 Snowiest Winters in the Twin Cities
1983-84
98.6 inches
1981-82
95.0
1950-51
88.9
2010-11

86.6

1916-17
84.9
1991-92
84.1
1961-62
81.3
1951-52
79.0
1966-67
78.4
2000-01
75.8


10 Least Snowy Winters in the Twin Cities
1930-31
14.2
1894-95
16.2
1986-87
17.4
1967-68
17.5
1958-59
19.1
1920-21
20.6
1980-81
21.1
1957-58
21.2
1901-02
22.4
1913-14
22.5

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

Gauley Bridge WV

#43189 Feb 5, 2014
UK snow events

On 25 September 1885 snow was reported to have fallen at London and Wallington in Surrey making it the earliest fall of snow on the capital.
On 2 June 1975 snow showers forced the abandonment of several cricket matches across the country.
The snowiest winter of the twentieth century in the United Kingdom was 1947. Between 22 January and 17 March snow fell every day somewhere in the country.
The most disastrous avalanche in the United Kingdom occurred in Lewes, East Sussex on 27 December 1836. Eight people were killed and several houses were destroyed.
denier

Zion, IL

#43191 Feb 5, 2014
ritedownthemiddle wrote:
<quoted text>dont need them! If gore and his liberal lemmings here say it is so....then it must be true.
wait I thought you were a lemming?, was I wrong?
litesong

Everett, WA

#43192 Feb 5, 2014
[QUOTE who="lord doesn't matter"]... will not admit that.....[/QUOTE]

.......that it doesn't have science, chemistry, astronomy, physics, algebra, or pre-calc in its poorly (or non-) earned hi skule DEE-plooomaa.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Wethersfield Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 1 hr Trump did curtsy 1,534,740
News Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 11 hr TRD 71,288
News Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision (Jan '08) 12 hr ThomasA 314,308
News The 25 Most Dangerous Cities in the U.S. Are Mo... (Nov '10) Mon bayonne nj 21,037
News Bridgeport man pleads guilty to offering teen f... Mon Gavone 7
News Why Suzanne Somers loves bioidentical hormones (Jun '09) May 19 Spotted Girl 95
News Bankruptcy Should Be A Last Resort For Struggli... May 18 America Gentleman... 1

Wethersfield Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Wethersfield Mortgages