Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds up, leaving litt...

remaining climate blame believers...That one always cracks me up.

The right is the side that is small minded and cowardly; traitors to our country by stalling investment and research into sustainable energy and efficiency. There's a lot of money to be made in GREEN; just ask China, Germany, and Japan.

"Climate change is now an inevitable and unavoidable climate crisis." There, I said it. You condemn your children to the CO2 ovens, not us, LOL, "remaining climate blame believers".

And who says there's no connection between global warming advocacy and religion?

me me me getting mine in the 69 position wrote:

You remaining climate blame believers......

toxic topix AGW deniers seldom remain to earn science & mathematics degrees. toxic topix AGW deniers seldom remain in science chemistry astronomy physics algebra & pre-calc classes for their poorly (or non-) earned hi skule DEE-plooomaas.

As the name of "me me me getting mine in the 69 position" implies, the remains of "me me me getting mine in the 69 position" remains in bed.

motheaten wrote:

no connection between global warming advocacy and religion?

It is surety that toxic topix AGW deniers have no connection with science or mathematics.

toxic topix AGW deniers seldom remain to earn science & mathematics degrees. toxic topix AGW deniers seldom remain in science chemistry astronomy physics algebra & pre-calc classes for their poorly (or non-) earned hi skule DEE-plooomaas.

It is surety that toxic topix AGW deniers have no connection with science or mathematics.

motheaten wrote:

loon who talks to him/herself

It is the pure true tones of the Loon clearly showing that toxic topix AGW deniers have no talks with scientists or mathematicians.

"motheaten" thinks it can flap its lips & skinny out from under the fact that toxic topix AGW deniers seldom remain to earn science & mathematics degrees. toxic topix AGW deniers seldom remain in science chemistry astronomy physics algebra & pre-calc classes for their poorly (or non-) earned hi skule DEE-plooomaas.

It is surety that toxic topix AGW deniers have no talks with science or mathematics.

Mothra wrote:

And who says there's no connection between global warming advocacy and religion?

Just how would you like the information presented so you will be convinced that it's real.
I mean Big Al tried a global message and you choose to ignore it just because he doesn't live on the North Pole with Santa. All we ever hear about is his carbon footprint which in itself is an acknowledgement that it makes a difference.
Then we have all the worlds prominent scientists and they are dismissed on the basis of a global conspiracy to obtain funding.
Any politician that takes up the cause is slandered as a radical who is on a par with Hitler.
Then we have the UN who get labelled as wanting to turn the world into socialism rather than address the climate change.

So how can this message ever be heard by tin foil hat wearers who just choose not to listen. No different than a petulant child who blocks their ears and yells when their mum tells them they can't have candy. Do you think we should allow the fossil fuel industry to shout their message using every medium technology allows while the likes of Al Gore gets criticised because he is not living in a tree house. It's not a one sided game we are playing here, one side is armed with buckets of cash the other with knowledge.
They use that cash to try and make that knowledge worthless but lucky for us , it only convinces the ignorant.

motheaten wrote:

jackass loon

.....jackalope......

litesong wrote:

<quoted text>

I do hope your spending hours concocting your stupid posts. I consider it a public service that your not polluting Topix elsewhere.

Jackass loon.l

OzRitz wrote:

<quoted text>
Just how would you like the information presented so you will be convinced that it's real.
I mean Big Al tried a global message ...

So lets see... you're admitting many see global warming as a religion?

Wow... that's quite an admission.

And why do you keep bringing up Al Gore... and the kvetch when people challenge his hypocrisy?

Please... don't continue. You make such a fool of yourself, and apparently haven't the slightest idea of the disservice you do yourself.

OTOH... you are good for a laugh.

LOL

gcaveman1 wrote:

... There's a lot of money to be made in GREEN; just ask China, Germany, and Japan.

.

Japan slashes greenhouse-gas reduction goal on nuclear shutdown
WARSAW/TOKYO, Nov 15 (Reuters)- Japan on Friday drastically weakened its greenhouse-gas reduction target, bowing to the impact of a shuttered nuclear power industry but drawing international criticism at U.N. climate change talks....
http://money.msn.com/business-news/article.as...

.

European Programs to Carbon [Dioxide] Emissions Fail
...
In Germany, non-hydro renewable consumption makes up 8.3 percent of total primary energy consumption[iii], but over 70 percent of this energy is replacing the decline in nuclear production resulting from a government policy to prematurely retire its nuclear power plants due to the Fukushima accident related to a disastrous tidal wave in Japan. German nuclear consumption has fallen by 16.3 million metric tons oil equivalent from its peak in 2001, while non-hydro renewables have increased by 22.4 million metric tons of oil equivalent. While the remaining amount of renewable energy may have offset coal and natural gas consumption, it did nothing to offset global consumption of coal and natural gas, which has increased.

Despite German consumers paying the highest electricity prices in Europe....
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/...

.

Opec weighs pros and cons of future scenarios
Report assumes oil prices to remain stable in the long run
By Saadallah Al Fathi, Special to Gulf News
Published: 12:26 November 17, 2013

...Demand in the developing countries will probably equal that of the developed countries of the OECD by 2019 and rise thereafter. Rising transport capacities in the developing countries is a major factor.

The report says that passenger cars in China will increase from 43 per 1,000 population to 320 between 2010-35 and the total number of cars will increase by 380 million units. Other regions will experience growth but not as much, and the global base of commercial vehicles would pass the 500 million mark.
http://gulfnews.com/business/opinion/opec-wei...

.

‘[CO2 emissions] set to heat up despite clean-energy drives’
...Any prospect of reversing the continuing increase in the use of coal depended mostly on China, the world’s biggest energy consumer, which burns as much coal every year as the rest of the world combined....
http://www.thewww.ngrguardiannews.com/index.p...

Green is just marketing by crony capitalists wasting taxpayer's hard earned money.

.

gcaveman1 wrote:

... You condemn your children to the CO2 ovens, not us, LOL, "remaining climate blame believers".

The atmosphere isn't a "CO2 oven" and our kids can look after themselves. We teach them real science needs experimental tests when it advocates or produces technology and policies. We don't use pills untested by the FDA and we don't buy hoax climate change mitigation that's never been tried or tested.

Solar is hurting the big boys. They can't take fair market competition.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/11/15/us-...

Mothra wrote:

<quoted text>
So lets see... you're admitting many see global warming as a religion?
Wow... that's quite an admission.
...
LOL

Since that is one of the best arguments that you can muster, it is obvious that deniers must see global warming as such.

Global warming is science. The Earth is warming. CO2 is a GHG. Burning fossil fuels increases the CO2 in the atmosphere. Those are facts. Go pray to your denier god.

Mothra wrote:

<quoted text>

And why do you keep bringing up Al Gore... and the kvetch when people challenge his hypocrisy?
...
LOL

It is you and your fellow deniers who bring up Al Gore because you have no other good arguments against the science of global warming.

The science currently states that there is no statistically significant warming being measured. See: NOAA, GISS, HCRUT.

The science also suggests that the estimated global average temperature is rising at an alarming rate. See: NOAA, GISS, HCRUT.

http://www.skepticalscience.com/global-coolin...

NASA and climate scientists throughout the world have said, however, that the years starting since 1998 have been the hottest in all recorded temperature history.

B as in B S as in S wrote:

The science currently states that there is no statistically significant warming being measured. See: NOAA, GISS, HCRUT.

Close but no cigar. They said that the last 17 years with 'La-Nina' noise (similar to the profound warming in 1998 from El-Nino, but in the opposite direction) in 'not significant'.

B as in B S as in S wrote:

The science also suggests that the estimated global average temperature is rising at an alarming rate. See: NOAA, GISS, HCRUT.

Here they filter out the noise and say that the SIGNAL of global warming is still there and still rapidly increasing. This uses a 'filter length' appropriate to climate studies.

Patriot AKA Bozo wrote:

<quoted text>
Since that is one of the best arguments that you can muster, it is obvious that deniers must see global warming as such.
Global warming is science. The Earth is warming. CO2 is a GHG. Burning fossil fuels increases the CO2 in the atmosphere. Those are facts. Go pray to your denier god.

And once again, you bring up Al Gore, then obfuscate the simple little fact that he's a global warming hypocrite.

And no... that's not an argument on the "science" of global warming, but you love the mischaracterization to dodge the question once again.

Quit bringing Gore into the conversation, and I'll quit asking you to admit his hypocrisy.

But you can't... and I won't.

Patriot AKA Bozo wrote:

<quoted text>
It is you and your fellow deniers who bring up Al Gore because you have no other good arguments against the science of global warming.

Actually, no.

Al Gore is brought up again and again, because he SAYS it's a crisis, yet doesn't behave as it is.

AL GORE is likewise claiming it's "settled" science, but doesn't act as if it's the "crisis" he says the "science" supports.

Like your buddy Space Cadet, it's always 'someone else' who needs to change, but not him.

Do go on about Al Gore... I do love to throw his hypocrisy back in your face and then watch you try to invent another way to give him a free pass.

SpaceBlues wrote:

http://www.skepticalscience.co m/global-cooling-january-2007- to-january-2008.htm
NASA and climate scientists throughout the world have said, however, that the years starting since 1998 have been the hottest in all recorded temperature history.

Here we go again...

Another 'short term' analysis, yet those same short term studies are held out by warmists as cherry picking when it suits their arguments.

Geez... for 'settled' science, you'd think there would be some argumentative consistency.

Earthling-1 wrote:

The weird thing about this thread, apart from Bozo, is that it's almost 5 years old and Glowbull warming hasn't speeded up for well over 15 years, which makes an even bigger mockery of this thread than Bozo's presence.

In your last post... you lied big time..

P.S. Last, on Oct. 4