xxxrayted

Cleveland, OH

#20074 Aug 21, 2013
Pops wrote:
Lord! I have so much to add that I would have to key punch like Loren to get it done & I am not that good! lol
Truman was prez when I was born so your msg is something that I LIVED!!
Communities, families & churches took care of their own & 'Uncle Sam' does NOT realize that Uncle Sam is NOT quite a family member.
Thomas Jefferson also said..." A government big enough to give you everything that you want is also big enough to take it all away."
A very wise man.
What was better was how much less government we had.

I remember police pulling over drunks and following them home to make sure they didn't get in an accident instead of taking them to jail. I remember kids jumping up and down on the back seat or wrestling in the back of a station wagon with no child restraints. They didn't even wear seat belts, but then again, adults didn't either.

When two guys got into an argument at a bar or something, they agreed to do the gentlemanly thing and go outside. They didn't have knives or guns, they had pride. And if a police officer did come along, he would separate the two and tell them to cut it out.

You didn't need a city permit every time you wanted to put up a pool or install a new electrical outlet. Kids actually rode their bicycles with no safety gear. I remember those little stores where the clerks would sell kids cigarettes because back then, it was no big deal. The State wasn't sending out agents to act like minors and then give you a $1,000 fine or haul you off to jail.
xxxrayted

Cleveland, OH

#20075 Aug 21, 2013
woo-boy wrote:
<quoted text>I see you have selective memory- "We're going to do anything we can to make sure that this is a one term President" Yurtle the Turtle Kentucky idiot.
So what's your point?

If anything, the Republicans tried to help DumBama. Imagine the debt we'd be in today without the Republicans. It's the Republicans who fought the biggest jobs killer--Commie Care. It's the Republicans who pushed for shorter periods of unemployment benefits because employers look down on people that have been on unemployment for months on end. DumBama's solution? Make a law that says employers can't do that.
xxxrayted

Cleveland, OH

#20076 Aug 21, 2013
woo-boy wrote:
<quoted text>In case you haven't noticed, this is 2013 not 1776. Did people think government was a tyranny when everything was rationed during WWII? I could explain it but I can't make your fascist attitude understand it.
Obviously you don't understand it if you're trying to compare rationing to forcing people to purchase healthcare insurance, telling people how much salt they are allowed to have, if a restaurant is allowed to use transfats in their menu, how much you are allowed to weigh if you drive a truck for a living.

I bet if you cradle-to-gravers had your way, you would have government over your house to wipe your mouth after you ate dinner made from the food stamps they gave you.
xxxrayted

Cleveland, OH

#20077 Aug 21, 2013
UdintBuildThat wrote:
So rationing is good now? Bread lines will be good too I assume?
Why not? According to Piglosi, unemployment is good for economy. See how much better we are today now that we've had those millions of people on unemployment throughout this recession?
xxxrayted

Cleveland, OH

#20078 Aug 21, 2013
HypocritePops wrote:
I can see why I don't fit the bill. Statistically speaking, it takes a toddler to get a Republican stiff.
And a new government handout to make a Democrat stiff.
xxxrayted

Cleveland, OH

#20079 Aug 21, 2013
Old Guy wrote:
<quoted text>
The MAIN goal of elected officials should be to serve our country by working together, not to spend most of your effort to thwart your opponents in the next election.
"Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, in an astoundingly telling moment halfway through President Obama's first term, told a reporter what had been the guiding strategy of Republicans in Congress. "The single most important thing we want to achieve," McConnell said, "is for President Obama to be a one-term president." They figured that if they refused to cooperate on anything, they could later tell voters that the president hadn't accomplished anything and that he had failed to reach across the aisle. McConnell and his caucus dove into that project hook, line and sinker, threatening to destroy the nation's economy by not raising the debt limit, blocking jobs legislation, eschewing compromise on the Bush tax cuts, refusing to staff the newly-created Consumer Financial Protection Bureau or the National Labor Relations Board, and blocking even uncontroversial federal judicial nominees.
The "one-term president" strategy created plenty of gridlock, set back the country's economic recovery and resulted in a historic vacancy crisis in the federal courts. The one thing it did not achieve was a one-term presidency."
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/marge-baker/whe...
Wow, you mean a Republican actually wanted less government and less taxes. That's a shock. No Republican has ever run on that platform before ;-D
Pops

Newport, KY

#20080 Aug 21, 2013
Old Guy wrote:
<quoted text>
The MAIN goal of elected officials should be to serve our country by working together, not to spend most of your effort to thwart your opponents in the next election.
"Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, in an astoundingly telling moment halfway through President Obama's first term, told a reporter what had been the guiding strategy of Republicans in Congress. "The single most important thing we want to achieve," McConnell said, "is for President Obama to be a one-term president." They figured that if they refused to cooperate on anything, they could later tell voters that the president hadn't accomplished anything and that he had failed to reach across the aisle. McConnell and his caucus dove into that project hook, line and sinker, threatening to destroy the nation's economy by not raising the debt limit, blocking jobs legislation, eschewing compromise on the Bush tax cuts, refusing to staff the newly-created Consumer Financial Protection Bureau or the National Labor Relations Board, and blocking even uncontroversial federal judicial nominees.
The "one-term president" strategy created plenty of gridlock, set back the country's economic recovery and resulted in a historic vacancy crisis in the federal courts. The one thing it did not achieve was a one-term presidency."
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/marge-baker/whe...
I don't know who the other Pops from Batavia is but I do agree with officials being there to serve the country & the people but unfortunately, it doesn't seem to be that way. I think it is past time to replace McConnell, he has been there too long with too little to show for his time.
I also agree with the other pops on one thing, whether spoken or not, it is still the strategy or why campaign if not in effort to win?
The reason to run should be to serve the people & improve the country. The initial effort is still to win. The long term goal is to serve.
Pops

Newport, KY

#20081 Aug 21, 2013
HypocritePops wrote:
<quoted text>
Cry some more about name calling.
Someone got you Canton. I have never been to or posted from Batavia & I have never posted during typical work hours.
The other Pops didn't actually call anyone any name either.
You are so anxious to denigrate & ridicule others that you stepped in this one yourself by not looking where you were going. ROFL !
xxxrayted

Cleveland, OH

#20082 Aug 21, 2013
Pops wrote:
<quoted text>I don't know who the other Pops from Batavia is but I do agree with officials being there to serve the country & the people but unfortunately, it doesn't seem to be that way. I think it is past time to replace McConnell, he has been there too long with too little to show for his time.
I also agree with the other pops on one thing, whether spoken or not, it is still the strategy or why campaign if not in effort to win?
The reason to run should be to serve the people & improve the country. The initial effort is still to win. The long term goal is to serve.
It's a liberal talking point.

What they are trying to mislead us on is that the Republicans deliberately stopped the advancement of our economy in order to make DumBama a one term President. That's not what any Republican said.

The truth of the matter is DumBama's only plan is to promote Socialism and more government dependency. He has no idea how to create jobs because job creation is done through the private sector--not government.

Much like with Bush, the liberals are trying to cover DumBama's azz by saying his failures are not his fault. DumBama's failures are the Republican Congresses fault. So they use Mitch as the poster boy for that poor excuse.

Looking at Republicans initiatives, most were designed to actually help our country. It's DumBama that's stopping the Republican progress--not the other way around.

The biggest obstruction with economic development is Commie Care, and most business leaders have stated so. It's the Republicans who introduced the repeal of Commie Care dozens of times which DumBama will have nothing to do with. Commie Care is the most Socialist law that ever plagued our country. It's a jobs killer and DumBama knows this which is why he stopped the employee mandate until after next election even though he has no authorization to do so. He believes he's the dictator now and nobody is going to stop his goal to keep Democrats in power in spite of their F-ups.
Old Guy

New Carlisle, OH

#20083 Aug 21, 2013
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
It's a liberal talking point.
What they are trying to mislead us on is that the Republicans deliberately stopped the advancement of our economy in order to make DumBama a one term President.
Not just the economy --- judicial appointments, debt limits all kinds of actions that were done routinely done in the past became impossible to do, because Republicans were more concerned with making Obama look bad than doing their jobs. So they were happy to gum up the works by any means possible.

"The filibuster has been a tool of the minority in the Senate to defeat legislation supported by the majority. Historically, it was used only rarely to defeat critical legislation or presidential appointments. Since Democrats gained a majority in the Senate in the post Bush-Cheney era, Republicans have used it more in one year than it was previously used in 50."

http://www.shreveporttimes.com/article/201308...

Since: Aug 12

United States

#20084 Aug 21, 2013
“Ideologies aren't all that important. What's important is psychology. The Democratic constituency is just like a herd of cows. All you have to do is lay out enough silage and they come running. With Democrats all you have to do is make a lot of noise, lay out the hay, and be ready to use the ole cattle prod in case a few want to bolt the herd.
.
Eighty percent of the people who call themselves Democrats don't have a clue as to political reality. What amazes me is that you could take a group of people who are hard workers and convince them that they should support social programs that were the exact opposite of their own personal convictions. Put a little fear here and there and you can get people to vote any way you want. The democrat voter is basically dumb and lazy.
.
Truth is relative. Truth is what you can make the voter believe is the truth. If you're smart enough, truth is what you make the voter think it is.
Pops

Newport, KY

#20085 Aug 21, 2013
Old Guy wrote:
<quoted text>
Not just the economy --- judicial appointments, debt limits all kinds of actions that were done routinely done in the past became impossible to do, because Republicans were more concerned with making Obama look bad than doing their jobs. So they were happy to gum up the works by any means possible.
"The filibuster has been a tool of the minority in the Senate to defeat legislation supported by the majority. Historically, it was used only rarely to defeat critical legislation or presidential appointments. Since Democrats gained a majority in the Senate in the post Bush-Cheney era, Republicans have used it more in one year than it was previously used in 50."
http://www.shreveporttimes.com/article/201308...
So you don't believe that the bulk of contention between the two 'sides' is a simple difference of philosophy as opposed to simply 'making Obama look bad'? That would mean using tactics & strategy agreeable & disagreeable to some because of the plain logic of opposing views, wouldn't it?
That would be parallel to those that call Obama's opposition "racists". People shouldn't forget that he is equally white, 50% to 50%.
So why did MORE than 90% of the black population vote for Obama? Why did he campaign ONLY as BLACK; NOT Afro-American or Black American? Some have argued that he didn't even campaign as an AMERICAN. He resisted wearing even an American flag pin or putting his hand over his heart during the Pledge of Allegiance OR the Star Spangled Banner. Then he bowed to other Heads-of-State & apologized for America's behavior. How would a pragmatic person NOT see bias in those FACTS?
What flavor is their Kool-Aid?
Old Guy

New Carlisle, OH

#20086 Aug 21, 2013
UdintBuildThat wrote:
"Truth is relative. Truth is what you can make the voter believe is the truth. If you're smart enough, truth is what you make the voter think it is."
It's true that some people are very gullible. They fall for hoaxes and false information all the time, especially if it supports some prejudice they already have.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/quotes/carvill...

Since: Aug 12

United States

#20087 Aug 21, 2013
Old Guy wrote:
<quoted text>
It's true that some people are very gullible. They fall for hoaxes and false information all the time, especially if it supports some prejudice they already have.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/quotes/carvill...
Did i say Carville said it?
.
Hmmmmm this makes you the gullible one! Since these words do in fact hit the nail on the head.... I knew you'd refer to snopes ya dope!
Old Guy

New Carlisle, OH

#20088 Aug 21, 2013
Pops wrote:
<quoted text>So you don't believe that the bulk of contention between the two 'sides' is a simple difference of philosophy as opposed to simply 'making Obama look bad'?
No, I don't believe that. Why then would you repeatedly use the filibuster to block non-controversial judicial appointments? Why would you routinely deny a President his staff appointments and leave senior positions in his administration unfilled for years?
Old Guy

New Carlisle, OH

#20089 Aug 21, 2013
UdintBuildThat wrote:
<quoted text>
Did i say Carville said it?
No, you quoted it as a fact to support your position. IT'S A LIE. And now you say you knew it was a lie when you posted it.

Since: Aug 12

United States

#20090 Aug 21, 2013
Old Guy wrote:
<quoted text>
No, you quoted it as a fact to support your position. IT'S A LIE. And now you say you knew it was a lie when you posted it.
Wrong again.... Just like Obama and the regime.

How vile was it for Regime spokes person Joshy to joke about Christians being killed in Egypt? Stupid dumbass MFers...
.
The White House’s deputy press secretary today downplayed Muslim attacks on Christians in Egypt, joking about the savagery  that has left at least six Christians dead.
.
Press secretary Josh Earnest was asked by Fox News’ correspondent, Ed Henry, if President Barack Obama has a “red line” beyond which he would act against Muslim attacks on Egyptian Christians.
.
“Well, I didn’t bring my red pen out with me today,” Earnest joked. Dumbass F-tard!!!!
.
After making his joke, Earnest said the administration is “outraged… and concerned” about the Muslim attacks on almost 100 churches, monasteries, orphanages and other marked Christian sites. Many Christians’ shops and homes have also been looted and burned by mobs.
.
But Earnest didn’t name or criticize the attackers, even though he did charge the military with perpetrating “violence… against peaceful protesters.”
.
They refuse to mention the Muslim Brotherhood by name… but they continue to attack the Egyptian military. Playing favorites is a basic Obama strategy… and thousands of innocent people continue to suffer the consequences.
woo-boy

Waverly, OH

#20091 Aug 22, 2013
UdintBuildThat wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong again.... Just like Obama and the regime.
How vile was it for Regime spokes person Joshy to joke about Christians being killed in Egypt? Stupid dumbass MFers...
.
The White House’s deputy press secretary today downplayed Muslim attacks on Christians in Egypt, joking about the savagery  that has left at least six Christians dead.
.
Press secretary Josh Earnest was asked by Fox News’ correspondent, Ed Henry, if President Barack Obama has a “red line” beyond which he would act against Muslim attacks on Egyptian Christians.
.
“Well, I didn’t bring my red pen out with me today,” Earnest joked. Dumbass F-tard!!!!
.
After making his joke, Earnest said the administration is “outraged… and concerned” about the Muslim attacks on almost 100 churches, monasteries, orphanages and other marked Christian sites. Many Christians’ shops and homes have also been looted and burned by mobs.
.
But Earnest didn’t name or criticize the attackers, even though he did charge the military with perpetrating “violence… against peaceful protesters.”
.
They refuse to mention the Muslim Brotherhood by name… but they continue to attack the Egyptian military. Playing favorites is a basic Obama strategy… and thousands of innocent people continue to suffer the consequences.
Well I suppose you expect him to put on his Superman cape and fly over there to save your precious christian's from something that has been going on over there for centuries. Those people are radicals and have been killing each other over their religion's long before we were even a country. I got it, he'll just snap his finger and it will all stop and just go away, by your way of thinking.

Since: Aug 12

United States

#20092 Aug 22, 2013
Joking about this makes this regime the biggest pile of steaming shitt ever.
woo-boy

Waverly, OH

#20093 Aug 22, 2013
Found a page out of the GOP-Teabagger Health Care Plan;
After the 11th child a redneck couple decided that was enough, as they could not afford a larger bed, so the husband went to the veterinarian and told him that he and his cousin didn't want to have any more children.
The vet told him about a vasectomy but it was very expensive.
"A cheaper alternative" said the vet, "Is to go home, get a cherry bomb,(fireworks are legal in redneck country) light it, put it in a beer can, then hold the can up to your ear and count to ten."
The redneck said,"I may not be the smartest tool in the shed, but I don't see how that's going to work."
"Trust me" the vet said.
So the man went home, lit a cherry bomb and put it in a beer can. He held the can up to his ear and began to count!
1?
2?
3?
4?
5?
At which point, he paused, placed the beer between his legs and continued counting with the other hand.
This procedure works in Texas, Tennessee, Kentucky, Louisiana, Arkansas, Missouri, Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, West Virginia and the Carolina's.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Westlake Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Cut screen interpreted as attempted break in: O... Sun BLB 1
OH Who do you support for Treasurer in Ohio in 2010? (Oct '10) Sat They cannot kill ... 191
April Marie Tinsley Case and Amy Renee Mihalije... Sep 13 Advanced Technology 4
'Amy Mihaljevic' author draws 100 (May '07) Sep 11 Advanced Technology 4
Urine bucket challenge, Shermanfest reaction, w... Sep 8 Old school justice 2
Rattlesnake Island Revealed (Sep '08) Aug 16 Sam 21
FitzGerald says there was nothing improper in 2... Aug '14 mike 2
•••
•••
Westlake Dating

more search filters

less search filters

•••

Westlake Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••
•••

Westlake People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Westlake News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Westlake
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••