Who do you support for Governor in Oh...
Pops

Cincinnati, OH

#28682 May 23, 2014
Pope Che Reagan Christ I wrote:
<quoted text>
Not everything negative about Obama is racist, just the racist stuff is.
Now that is funny ! Really. I like it.
Pope Che Reagan Christ I

Medina, OH

#28683 May 23, 2014
Pops wrote:
<quoted text>Oh OK, I see what you mean. 1st I want to repeat that I am NOT a Birther. I always felt that it would be totally ludicrous for someone NOT eligable to run for & win the presidency only to eventually have EVERYTHING that they signed to be ruled unlawful & moot. So why do it? No good reason at all.
But it still seems to me that he started with statements, then a copy & so on as I stated B4.
Obama has NOT been the 'most transparent' at anything yet. But I won't get into that.
Maybe instead of relying on what "seems to you" you should give facts a try.
Pops

Cincinnati, OH

#28684 May 23, 2014
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
* George Bush started the Iraq war to get even for his father.
* George Bush got a DUI 20 years before he ran for his first term as President.
* Mitt Romney tied his dog cage to the roof of his car when he went on vacation.
* Mitt Romney forcibly gave a kid a haircut in high school.
* George Bush used cocaine which is why he didn't turn over his medical records.
* George Bush was AWOL from his military service.
Anything else you would like? How about the several books written against GW? Or what about a cartoon show about GW? How about a million dollar internet site against GW? A video game of GW where the object was to shoot and kill him?
You forgot about Senator Ted Stevens of Alaska & all of 7 false charges that kept him from being re-elected only to be COMPLETELY exonerated right after the election.
xxxrayted

Berea, OH

#28685 May 23, 2014
Pope Che Reagan Christ I wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh no. Referring to his wife as a "silverback gorilla" isn't racist.
Who made that statement?
Pope Che Reagan Christ I

Medina, OH

#28686 May 23, 2014
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
Who made that statement?
At least three or four of the regulars here have said it.
xxxrayted

Berea, OH

#28687 May 23, 2014
Pope Che Reagan Christ I wrote:
<quoted text>
He just saw a prime opportunity to screw you without you blaming him for it.
Nope.

Democrats have long realized they have a huge voting base in the lazy and irresponsible. These people are prime candidates for government dependency. Democrats are hell bent on expanding this base. So how could Democrats do that? By making as many people government dependent as they possibly can.

Hillary had the first plan with HillaryCare. Citizens strongly rejected it which led to the first Republican led Congress in over 40 years. Along comes DumBama and he did the exact same thing, except he succeeded.

Most working citizens depended on their employer for their healthcare coverage. So the plan had to include removing employers for this huge benefit and replacing it with government. Commie Care had that in mind. In fact, in the 2010 National Registry, DumBama's administration wrote that they predicted up to 80% of people will lose their coverage because of Commie Care thus giving that power to the government. It's what won DumBama Lie Of The Year award.

Fast forward to today, and over 6 million people lost their healthcare coverage while (according to the Communist) 8 million people now have it through Commie Care; 8 million more government dependents.

See, you sheep don't understand the ultimate plan. And that is if the Democrats can make most people depend on government, they believe they will keep leadership forever. Think the expansion of welfare, Obama Phones, SS disability, unemployment extensions and food stamps was a fluke? Think again. You DumBama supporters are leading us to a state of government dependency. And every time one of you sticks up for DumBama or the Democrats, I picture you like a bunch of frogs in a pot of cold water under the fire on the stove.

You just don't understand yet. By the time you do, it will be all over.
xxxrayted

Berea, OH

#28688 May 23, 2014
Pope Che Reagan Christ I wrote:
<quoted text>
Awww, are you going to play semantics games? The only reason the discussion about McCain happened is because you said that the Obama Birther loons were no crazier than those on the left that you claimed did the same thing to McCain.
My what a short memory. See what sniffing glue does to you?

Old Guy asked why nobody ever questioned the citizenship of Republicans. I pointed out to him that there were questions about a Republican presidential candidates citizenship. That's all.
Pope Che Reagan Christ I

Medina, OH

#28689 May 23, 2014
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
Nope.
Democrats have long realized they have a huge voting base in the lazy and irresponsible. These people are prime candidates for government dependency. Democrats are hell bent on expanding this base. So how could Democrats do that? By making as many people government dependent as they possibly can.
Hillary had the first plan with HillaryCare. Citizens strongly rejected it which led to the first Republican led Congress in over 40 years. Along comes DumBama and he did the exact same thing, except he succeeded.
Most working citizens depended on their employer for their healthcare coverage. So the plan had to include removing employers for this huge benefit and replacing it with government. Commie Care had that in mind. In fact, in the 2010 National Registry, DumBama's administration wrote that they predicted up to 80% of people will lose their coverage because of Commie Care thus giving that power to the government. It's what won DumBama Lie Of The Year award.
Fast forward to today, and over 6 million people lost their healthcare coverage while (according to the Communist) 8 million people now have it through Commie Care; 8 million more government dependents.
See, you sheep don't understand the ultimate plan. And that is if the Democrats can make most people depend on government, they believe they will keep leadership forever. Think the expansion of welfare, Obama Phones, SS disability, unemployment extensions and food stamps was a fluke? Think again. You DumBama supporters are leading us to a state of government dependency. And every time one of you sticks up for DumBama or the Democrats, I picture you like a bunch of frogs in a pot of cold water under the fire on the stove.
You just don't understand yet. By the time you do, it will be all over.
Wow. The crazy is strong with you.
Pops

Cincinnati, OH

#28690 May 23, 2014
Pope Che Reagan Christ I wrote:
<quoted text>
Maybe instead of relying on what "seems to you" you should give facts a try.
I am Honest enough to point out what is an opinion of mine as compared to stating 'pretend facts' like others.
I don't post B.S. that I know nothing or little about as Fact & that should give me some credibility.
On this particular subject, part of my point was/is that I disagree with the Birthers & I told why. And why I didn't follow all of the 'details'/allegations.
The Birthers made no good sense. Even Sheriff A from Arizona OR Don Trump.
But it was their money & time to waste
Professor

Cincinnati, OH

#28691 May 23, 2014
I think all of you need to read and understand the Constitution. It is not for you and me, it is for the people in Washington D.C., Porto Rico, Guam, and the other territories they own along with the federal employees.

Article ll, Section l,#5 says: No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

That means there has never been a legal President of the United States ever.

Food for thought. The more you know the better. You probably went to the same school of fools as I did. The Government has been lying to us for over 226 years, why would they change now?
Old Guy

Mason, OH

#28692 May 24, 2014
Professor wrote:
That means there has never been a legal President of the United States ever.
How did you reach that conclusion? I see nothing in Article II Section I to support it.

“Meh.”

Since: Aug 10

Location hidden

#28693 May 24, 2014
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
Nope.
Democrats have long realized they have a huge voting base in the lazy and irresponsible. These people are prime candidates for government dependency. Democrats are hell bent on expanding this base. So how could Democrats do that? By making as many people government dependent as they possibly can.
Hillary had the first plan with HillaryCare. Citizens strongly rejected it which led to the first Republican led Congress in over 40 years. Along comes DumBama and he did the exact same thing, except he succeeded.
Most working citizens depended on their employer for their healthcare coverage. So the plan had to include removing employers for this huge benefit and replacing it with government. Commie Care had that in mind. In fact, in the 2010 National Registry, DumBama's administration wrote that they predicted up to 80% of people will lose their coverage because of Commie Care thus giving that power to the government. It's what won DumBama Lie Of The Year award.
Fast forward to today, and over 6 million people lost their healthcare coverage while (according to the Communist) 8 million people now have it through Commie Care; 8 million more government dependents.
See, you sheep don't understand the ultimate plan. And that is if the Democrats can make most people depend on government, they believe they will keep leadership forever. Think the expansion of welfare, Obama Phones, SS disability, unemployment extensions and food stamps was a fluke? Think again. You DumBama supporters are leading us to a state of government dependency. And every time one of you sticks up for DumBama or the Democrats, I picture you like a bunch of frogs in a pot of cold water under the fire on the stove.
You just don't understand yet. By the time you do, it will be all over.
Wait. So you don't have insurance because you couldn't be bothered to complete the application. And this means that all these other people are lazy. And that it's their fault you don't have insurance?

You could stand to have a long think about personal responsibility
xxxrayted

Berea, OH

#28694 May 24, 2014
tranpsosition wrote:
<quoted text>
Wait. So you don't have insurance because you couldn't be bothered to complete the application. And this means that all these other people are lazy. And that it's their fault you don't have insurance?
You could stand to have a long think about personal responsibility
Comprehension problems I see. Don't feel bad, comprehension problems are very common with liberals. So let's try this again:

I lost my healthcare because of DumBama and the Democrats. That's it. I can't make it much simpler than that. If not for DumBama, I would still have healthcare insurance today, and so would the other 6 million that lost their insurance as well.

Liberals have this false belief that money and goodies appear out of nowhere by just voting for it. There is no truth to that. Government doesn't have anything because government doesn't produce anything. Therefore, if government gives you a television set, they first had to take that television from somebody else. Government can't give you something that they don't have.

Government cannot force somebody or some people to give you something they don't have either. Want free government cell phones, then somebody has to pay for those cell phones and 250 anytime minutes per month. Cell phones just don't magically appear. Those free cell phones come from paying cell phone customers. We have to pay for those phones and time through our cell phone bill.

Government healthcare no different. You want a plan that costs half as much as an individual plan before? Somebody has to pay for those plans. Government taxpayers have to pay for those plans. People with individual plans (not on Commie Care) have to pay for those plans. Employers that provide health insurance to their employees have to pay for those plans. Insurance companies do not have a money machine to pay for all those people that have cheaper insurance and preexisting conditions.

When that happens, insurance companies get that money by increasing premiums on people that are not on Commie Care. The result of that is individuals and employers dropping those plans because they are no longer affordable. That's what happened to me and millions of others.
Professor

Cincinnati, OH

#28695 May 24, 2014
Old Guy wrote:
<quoted text>
How did you reach that conclusion? I see nothing in Article II Section I to support it.
No President has been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States. That means he has to have lived in Washington D.C. for 14 years. None have ever lived there for 14 years.
They don't even obey their own laws. Apparently you don't know what the Constitution means, it was for the people living in and officials in D.C.(The United States).

Further more the laws the President makes only applies to Washington D.C. Porto Rico, Guam and the territories they own like Federal parks in the states. In fact the laws of the State of Ohio only apply on Federal property. The people believe they apply to them but it does not. Please tell me where you live.
A.) In The State of Ohio
B.) In Ohio State
C.) In The United States

You can learn more if you read "The Organic Laws" , they are in the 1st law book that the attorneys do not get, it is "The Unites States Code" book Title 1-General Provisions to Title5.
woo-boy

Van Wert, OH

#28696 May 24, 2014
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
Comprehension problems I see. Don't feel bad, comprehension problems are very common with liberals. So let's try this again:
I lost my healthcare because of DumBama and the Democrats. That's it. I can't make it much simpler than that. If not for DumBama, I would still have healthcare insurance today, and so would the other 6 million that lost their insurance as well.
Liberals have this false belief that money and goodies appear out of nowhere by just voting for it. There is no truth to that. Government doesn't have anything because government doesn't produce anything. Therefore, if government gives you a television set, they first had to take that television from somebody else. Government can't give you something that they don't have.
Government cannot force somebody or some people to give you something they don't have either. Want free government cell phones, then somebody has to pay for those cell phones and 250 anytime minutes per month. Cell phones just don't magically appear. Those free cell phones come from paying cell phone customers. We have to pay for those phones and time through our cell phone bill.
Government healthcare no different. You want a plan that costs half as much as an individual plan before? Somebody has to pay for those plans. Government taxpayers have to pay for those plans. People with individual plans (not on Commie Care) have to pay for those plans. Employers that provide health insurance to their employees have to pay for those plans. Insurance companies do not have a money machine to pay for all those people that have cheaper insurance and preexisting conditions.
When that happens, insurance companies get that money by increasing premiums on people that are not on Commie Care. The result of that is individuals and employers dropping those plans because they are no longer affordable. That's what happened to me and millions of others.
Spreading bull makes you as happy as a oppossum eatin' cowcrap:

www.factcheck.org/2009/10/the-obama-phone/

www.azcentral.com/news/politics/azfactcheck/f...

www.benefitspro.com/2014/05/09/killing-employ...
xxxrayted

Berea, OH

#28697 May 24, 2014
woo-boy wrote:
Comprehension problems I see. Not to worry, comprehension problems are very common among liberals. From your article:

"The companies often charge customers to fund their contributions in the form of a universal service fee you might see on your monthly phone bill. The fund is then parceled out to companies, such as América Móvil, that create programs, such as SafeLink, to provide telecommunications service to rural areas and low-income households."
woo-boy

Van Wert, OH

#28698 May 24, 2014
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
Comprehension problems I see. Don't feel bad, comprehension problems are very common with liberals. So let's try this again:
I lost my healthcare because of DumBama and the Democrats. That's it. I can't make it much simpler than that. If not for DumBama, I would still have healthcare insurance today, and so would the other 6 million that lost their insurance as well.
Liberals have this false belief that money and goodies appear out of nowhere by just voting for it. There is no truth to that. Government doesn't have anything because government doesn't produce anything. Therefore, if government gives you a television set, they first had to take that television from somebody else. Government can't give you something that they don't have.
Government cannot force somebody or some people to give you something they don't have either. Want free government cell phones, then somebody has to pay for those cell phones and 250 anytime minutes per month. Cell phones just don't magically appear. Those free cell phones come from paying cell phone customers. We have to pay for those phones and time through our cell phone bill.
Government healthcare no different. You want a plan that costs half as much as an individual plan before? Somebody has to pay for those plans. Government taxpayers have to pay for those plans. People with individual plans (not on Commie Care) have to pay for those plans. Employers that provide health insurance to their employees have to pay for those plans. Insurance companies do not have a money machine to pay for all those people that have cheaper insurance and preexisting conditions.
When that happens, insurance companies get that money by increasing premiums on people that are not on Commie Care. The result of that is individuals and employers dropping those plans because they are no longer affordable. That's what happened to me and millions of others.
As per the Benefits Pro article- Employers with less than 50 employees are EXEMPT. The other mandates are delayed also. Another lie shot down.

“Meh.”

Since: Aug 10

Location hidden

#28699 May 24, 2014
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
Comprehension problems I see. Don't feel bad, comprehension problems are very common with liberals. So let's try this again:
I lost my healthcare because of DumBama and the Democrats. That's it. I can't make it much simpler than that. If not for DumBama, I would still have healthcare insurance today, and so would the other 6 million that lost their insurance as well.
Liberals have this false belief that money and goodies appear out of nowhere by just voting for it. There is no truth to that. Government doesn't have anything because government doesn't produce anything. Therefore, if government gives you a television set, they first had to take that television from somebody else. Government can't give you something that they don't have.
Government cannot force somebody or some people to give you something they don't have either. Want free government cell phones, then somebody has to pay for those cell phones and 250 anytime minutes per month. Cell phones just don't magically appear. Those free cell phones come from paying cell phone customers. We have to pay for those phones and time through our cell phone bill.
Government healthcare no different. You want a plan that costs half as much as an individual plan before? Somebody has to pay for those plans. Government taxpayers have to pay for those plans. People with individual plans (not on Commie Care) have to pay for those plans. Employers that provide health insurance to their employees have to pay for those plans. Insurance companies do not have a money machine to pay for all those people that have cheaper insurance and preexisting conditions.
When that happens, insurance companies get that money by increasing premiums on people that are not on Commie Care. The result of that is individuals and employers dropping those plans because they are no longer affordable. That's what happened to me and millions of others.
But you didn't even complete the application to get a quote!

Claiming that Obama cost you your health insurance seems a bit bold. It sounds like any change with your existing plan that required you to fill out a form would have also left you lacking insurance as the only thing that kept you from being insured was filling in the application.

Just, wow. The gall of someone who couldn't be bothered finishing an application wanting to blame others.
woo-boy

Van Wert, OH

#28700 May 24, 2014
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
Comprehension problems I see. Not to worry, comprehension problems are very common among liberals. From your article:
"The companies often charge customers to fund their contributions in the form of a universal service fee you might see on your monthly phone bill. The fund is then parceled out to companies, such as América Móvil, that create programs, such as SafeLink, to provide telecommunications service to rural areas and low-income households."
I'm not the idiot that keeps calling it the Obamaphone. You've proved time and time again at using selective memory and comprehension problem as you constantly skip the facts that you don't like. That's an every day occurrence with teabaggers like you. Tell us again how the ACA lost you health insurance when the mandates aren't even in effect and the little company you work for is EXEMPT. Throw us another lie.
Pope Che Reagan Christ I

Medina, OH

#28701 May 24, 2014
Pops wrote:
<quoted text> I am Honest enough to point out what is an opinion of mine as compared to stating 'pretend facts' like others.
I don't post B.S. that I know nothing or little about as Fact & that should give me some credibility.
On this particular subject, part of my point was/is that I disagree with the Birthers & I told why. And why I didn't follow all of the 'details'/allegations.
The Birthers made no good sense. Even Sheriff A from Arizona OR Don Trump.
But it was their money & time to waste
If you don't know what the facts are, what possible good does it do for you to post what you think the facts might be? An incorrect statement of facts isn't an opinion.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Westlake Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News North Ridgeville honors distinguished alumni fo... May 19 Jane 2
Attorney Stephen Wolf. Apr '16 Stephen Wolf Atto... 4
danger Apr '16 KDKGJ 1
Lily Eyring (Oct '13) Mar '16 Uncle Daryl 2
Toczek Mar '16 Uncle Daryl 1
Trying to find Winifred Hohmann (Jan '08) Mar '16 Mildred Hohman 3
News 10 Things to Know for Thursday Mar '16 USA today 1
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Westlake Mortgages