Don't watch these Black Racist Actors

[Really]

The Truth wrote:

Someone asked in another discussion in this forum "Why do Black people walk in the middle of the street." Because the topic of this discussion is centered around Blacks and their expectations, here's my reply.
Blacks walk in the middle of the street because of their sense of entitlement.
They have an instinctive mindset through which they believe they are entitled to do whatever they want, whether legal or not. They feel they are entitled to not work yet collect payment, not provide for their children yet continue to produce them, not give respect yet demand it for themselves...often using violence to "punish" those they feel have "disrespected" them.
They believe that they are entitled to illegally use firearms and engage in narcotics trade and personal and property crimes, yet feel they should be left alone and allowed to continue their criminal activities. In any city, Blacks account for the majority of the perpetrators of crime, regardless of the offense.
As "nuffsaid" demonstrates above, Blacks feel they are unequivocally attractive to White women, yet the only ones they can manage to have sex with are fat and unattractive White women either with self-esteem issues or motives of revenge against their family and/or friends.
Blacks, because of their instinctive habits of deception and selfishness, know that complimenting these unattractive women will make them believe they are attractive and desirable. The Black man then leeches off the woman, all the while using "sweet talk" to reinforce the woman's feeling for him. When the woman finally begins questioning the Black man's motives, the Black man impregnates and then dumps the woman, leaving the woman to care for the child, who will grow up and more likely than not, repeat the cycle.
This is the typical modus operandi of the Black man, again, achieved through a sense of entitlement. The Black man's psyche revolves around his sexual needs and is the impetus for most every action.
To summarize, blacks walking in the street is symptomatic of the Black man's behavior which causes social and economic damage in every American city.
The biggest mistake the White man made was bringing Blacks from Africa for slavery. They have been paying for it ever since.

You focused on the black man in your post...Why? Secondly would you care to narrate the negative stereotypes white people tend exhibit and the reasoning behind them?...

"The biggest mistake the White man made was bringing Blacks from Africa for slavery."... I think the "white man" should have a bigger regret than bringing slaves from Africa...Stealing land and basically killing off an entire race of people (Native Americans) should have been the biggest mistake...Since you want to live in the past...I personally don't believe that anyone should be responsible the choices their ancestors made.

BTW...I actually agree with some of your points...But I think people tend to forget that black people were not always like the way you illustrated. I can't pin point when the change happened. But black people (back in the day) were strong, they were determined and they were the hardest worker people because they HAD to be...So when you judge the "black man" today try not to include the black people who paved the way...Who could have known that the modern "black man" would choose not to walk on that path.

[Really]

booligan wrote:

<quoted text>I'm sorry that you're not very observant because if you haven't been paying attention to the racists he has associated with, then I rest my case. HIs comments of his Grandmother as a 'typical white person', Beergate, Moochell not be proud to be American until a black man ran for president, comments about JIm Crowe philosophy existing today, support of the New Black Panther Party via racist Eric Holder, race baiting comments about the Bush administration's handling of Katrina, In Dreams of My Father -how he didn't want to advertise his mother's race for fear of ingratiating himself to white, admitted to nursing animosity towards the white race and finally the libs flooded the Internet with pro lib propaganda burying articles about obama's racism. They began this as soon as Jeremiah Wright was exposed, then Beergate and so on. This was a smart move to keep the masses ignorant.

Alright I'll look into what you are saying a little deeper, with a more open mind...Then I will form my own opinion, but its just hard to believe because his whole family (besides his wife and kids) seemed to only be white...Every story about his black side I heard was negative...Like the one with his African aunt who was in the U.S. illegally.(Even though that shouldn't have anything to do with Obama)...People wanted blacks to think Obama was racist (toward black people meaning he just wanted to exploit them) and in the next breath they say blacks only voted because he was black...and that Obama is racist toward whites.

[Really]

booligan wrote:

<quoted text> Your bigotry is telling.
There is no reason for people to feel ashamed about stepping up and challenging these black racists like Morgan Freeman.

Of course not...Here we go again, do I even want to know about Morgan Freeman.(lol)

[Russia1513]

Really wrote:

<quoted text>
You focused on the black man in your post...Why? Secondly would you care to narrate the negative stereotypes white people tend exhibit and the reasoning behind them?...
"The biggest mistake the White man made was bringing Blacks from Africa for slavery."... I think the "white man" should have a bigger regret than bringing slaves from Africa...Stealing land and basically killing off an entire race of people (Native Americans) should have been the biggest mistake...Since you want to live in the past...I personally don't believe that anyone should be responsible the choices their ancestors made.
BTW...I actually agree with some of your points...But I think people tend to forget that black people were not always like the way you illustrated. I can't pin point when the change happened. But black people (back in the day) were strong, they were determined and they were the hardest worker people because they HAD to be...So when you judge the "black man" today try not to include the black people who paved the way...Who could have known that the modern "black man" would choose not to walk on that path.

The CHANGE you are talking about is the one that happened when somebodies wonderful idea was that they were not intelligent enough to get their own jobs, pay their own way, raise their own kids. Someone (a progressive) taught them to be lazy - that the white man owed them something.
And we sure did owe them - but I think the debt is paid, frankly.

[The Truth]

Really wrote:

<quoted text>
You focused on the black man in your post...Why? Secondly would you care to narrate the negative stereotypes white people tend exhibit and the reasoning behind them?...
"The biggest mistake the White man made was bringing Blacks from Africa for slavery."... I think the "white man" should have a bigger regret than bringing slaves from Africa...Stealing land and basically killing off an entire race of people (Native Americans) should have been the biggest mistake...Since you want to live in the past...I personally don't believe that anyone should be responsible the choices their ancestors made.
BTW...I actually agree with some of your points...But I think people tend to forget that black people were not always like the way you illustrated. I can't pin point when the change happened. But black people (back in the day) were strong, they were determined and they were the hardest worker people because they HAD to be...So when you judge the "black man" today try not to include the black people who paved the way...Who could have known that the modern "black man" would choose not to walk on that path.

The post focused on Black men, but the actual thought behind it was Black women as well. I didn't mention Black women because I didn't want to appear any more redundant through the use of the terms. Black women have their own set of social and economic faults.
There is no doubt that what the White man did to Native Americans was criminal and inhumane. However, I'm talking about the present day. I agree with you that Blacks didn't always act like they do today. I have nothing but respect for Black men and women who live a decent honest life and work for what they want. Unfortunately, today those people seem to be the exception rather than the rule. In most every major city, Blacks perpetrate the majority of any criminal act. It's sad and unfortunate that law-abiding Black people have these miscreants in their midst.
The courts and prison systems are filled with Black men and women who feel they don't have to abide by society's rules and laws. Yes, there are many Whites, Hispanics and Asians who are like-minded, but the very clear majority of offenders are Black. It's these people against whom I speak, and they not only are a blight on this country, they are a blight on good and decent Black people as well who have to suffer the hatred and dispersions they don't deserve.

[Spurned]

Russia1513 wrote:

<quoted text>
That's where you're wrong. I don't think I'm superior to anybody else, and believe it or not, a lot of white people don't think they're superior to anybody else, you know why? Because to display that kind of behavior is FIRST OF ALL wrong. It's snooty. Secondly, we've all be hammered and bullied into SILENCE, until there's no dialogue for peace and harmony possible. Because a lot of black people think when you're actually trying to understand and be their friend, that you want something, when there is NOTHING I could possibly want from a black exCEPT friendship. Just as I hope they wouldn't want anything from me except the same. We all want friendship and acceptance, but why bother trying when you're shot down, snubbed or ignored? So yea, fear it is.... But without the pressure of mixing the races adn offending every single person you come across, whites could indeed get along just fine.

Dennis Rodman turn you down? My god,that was in 199? wasn't it? Get over it.

[Russia1513]

Spurned wrote:

<quoted text>Dennis Rodman turn you down? My god,that was in 199? wasn't it? Get over it.

I do not recall mentioning his name. Get over it.

[Russia1513]

I don't believe that blacks voted for Obama based on his race.

If you put up Herman Cain or Allan West up as a Republican candidate, and you found some rich, old-money, old guy to run for Democrats, those who are gaming the system (including whichever blacks are as well (wanna sound as PC as possible here lest I offend someone)), would crawl over broken glass to vote for the Democrat.

[Linda Bledsoe]

Russia1513 wrote:

I don't believe that blacks voted for Obama based on his race.
If you put up Herman Cain or Allan West up as a Republican candidate, and you found some rich, old-money, old guy to run for Democrats, those who are gaming the system (including whichever blacks are as well (wanna sound as PC as possible here lest I offend someone)), would crawl over broken glass to vote for the Democrat.

The Republicans will have a better chance of winning if they run a black candidate. They will still get most of the loyalist Republicans while also pulling millions of black votes.

[Pontificating]

Linda Bledsoe wrote:

The Republicans will have a better chance of winning if they run a black candidate.

Before Obama was elected Clarence Thomas was the most powerful black man in America. I personally think that Clarence Thomas should be celebrated as a prime example of how a person who grows up in a poor family can rise to greatness. The black community doesn't just dislike Thomas, I've heard some openly wish for him to die.

As for loyalist Republicans supporting a black candidate, I have my doubts about that too. I know of a prominent Republican statistician and fundraiser who didn't vote for McCain because he didn't want to see Palin in the White House. On both sides of the political aisle who the candidate is and what they have to say carries more weight than the color of their skin.

[Russia1513]

Linda Bledsoe wrote:

<quoted text>
The Republicans will have a better chance of winning if they run a black candidate. They will still get most of the loyalist Republicans while also pulling millions of black votes.

Indeed, and unlike Romney, I could actually see myself ACTIVELY working to help his campaign.

[hahahahahaha]

Linda Bledsoe wrote:

<quoted text>
The Republicans will have a better chance of winning if they run a black candidate. They will still get most of the loyalist Republicans while also pulling millions of black votes.

Not if a bejeweled Herman Cain were running. I used to think Colin Powell until his racism was exposed. You don't go from being a capitalist to communist just like that. There would not be enough black votes to make a difference because the majority will vote democrat.

In this day and age, Republicans need a rock star with charisma and experience. They need to be moderate in social issues. Republicans must seperate their relgious beliefs from their politics.

Republicans would have a better chance of winning if they focused on fiscal responsibility and distanced themselves from the religious fanatics that want to impose their socially conservative ideas on the people. It's NOT going to work especially when you have a liberal mainstream media using them for target practice over these issues.

The only way to beat the libs is with a solid plan, good Internet coverage on fiscal conservative politics, and to align with intelligent people who will not expose themselves to ridicule by the media. REpublicans made it easy for the media to discredit them this election. Paul Ryan, Newt, Sarah Palin, Michelle Bachmann, Herman Cain, Rick Santorum, Chris Christie, etc. are not ideal candidates because they expose themselves to ridicule with their extreme social views. I say Chris Christie because he is loud and fat. Then, when you have Murdock and Akin, embarrassing the party...what do you expect? Why in the world did the party let them in the door?

[Linda Bledsoe]

Russia1513 wrote:

<quoted text>
Indeed, and unlike Romney, I could actually see myself ACTIVELY working to help his campaign.

I thought that the mess Obama created in his first 4 years would guarantee his pink slip, but it didn't happen. I find it somewhat offputting that a welfare scumbag's vote carries the same weight as a contibuting member of society, but that is the law I suppose. When our position as a nation is further deteriorated in 2016, I wonder if the dems will still be able to win with a new colored candidate and a campaign that focuses mainly on George Bush.

[Adam]

Tired of black racism wrote:

Wish we could ship them all back to africa

how about you go back to Europe ! Problem solved !

[Really]

Linda Bledsoe wrote:

<quoted text>
I thought that the mess Obama created in his first 4 years would guarantee his pink slip, but it didn't happen. I find it somewhat offputting that a welfare scumbag's vote carries the same weight as a contibuting member of society, but that is the law I suppose. When our position as a nation is further deteriorated in 2016, I wonder if the dems will still be able to win with a new colored candidate and a campaign that focuses mainly on George Bush.

Obama didn't really create the mess he just had a hard time fixing it. "Welfare scumbags" you do know that everyone on welfare isn't lazy and abusing the system right? So it makes sense that their vote would be the same as yours no matter how much you claim you "contribute" to society. Why do you feel the need to focus on race? Why would you assume the Democrats have another "colored" president? Plus the last the election was not won by blaming Bush...But its funny that Republicans quickly forget the fact that they elected Bush twice with no shame.

[Really]

Linda Bledsoe wrote:

<quoted text>
The Republicans will have a better chance of winning if they run a black candidate. They will still get most of the loyalist Republicans while also pulling millions of black votes.

You have lost this debate with several people...That there was no significant difference in black people voting for the Democratic party in the past compared to the last two elections. Yet you ignorantly still believe what you WISH to believe...I think its very closed minded of you to actually think that MILLIONS of black voters or as you like to call them "colored voters" would actually vote republican, but based on your logic wouldn't the republican party lose MILLIONS of other voters (apparently more important voters) because of this future black candidate?

[Really]

Linda Bledsoe wrote:

<quoted text>
They will still get most of the loyalist Republicans while also pulling millions of black votes.

Why is it okay to have loyal Republicans but it's politically uneducated for a voter to be a loyal Democrat?(If you are Democratic you want free stuff because you're on welfare, you're black, or gay or you were just too stupid to vote on anything other than race) Never mind the fact that those people contribute to the minority of the votes...But somehow they are credited for the Democratic victory?

[The Godfathers Sausage]

Russia1513 wrote:

<quoted text>
Indeed, and unlike Romney, I could actually see myself ACTIVELY working to help his campaign.

As his mistress?

[Linda Bledsoe]

Really wrote:

<quoted text>
Obama didn't really create the mess he just had a hard time fixing it.

Are you that blinded by ignorance that you think none of the issues faced by your fellow Americans over the past 4 years resulted from failed leadership by Obama? He has been the president for 4 years. Blaming Bush was certainly trendy in 2008 and even 2009, but it has run its course. He has been retired for 4 years. The recent divisiveness, economic difficulties, and discontent are a product of Barack Obama's policies. He is the president and has been for 4 years. I know you guys struggle with accountability and want to blame others for your failures, but it is very liberating to own up to your faults and try to improve upon them.

For the record, I thought that overall, Bush was a very big failure as president. However, Obama has been much worse. Just look at unemploymnt, the economy, household income, taxes, divisiveness, racial relations, healthcare, etc.

[Really]

Linda Bledsoe wrote:

<quoted text>
Are you that blinded by ignorance that you think none of the issues faced by your fellow Americans over the past 4 years resulted from failed leadership by Obama? He has been the president for 4 years. Blaming Bush was certainly trendy in 2008 and even 2009, but it has run its course. He has been retired for 4 years. The recent divisiveness, economic difficulties, and discontent are a product of Barack Obama's policies. He is the president and has been for 4 years. I know you guys struggle with accountability and want to blame others for your failures, but it is very liberating to own up to your faults and try to improve upon them.
For the record, I thought that overall, Bush was a very big failure as president. However, Obama has been much worse. Just look at unemploymnt, the economy, household income, taxes, divisiveness, racial relations, healthcare, etc.

Okay, but you can't just ignore the fact that some effects of the Bush Administration are still lingering today. There is no expiration date on when that stops...It will stop when its fixed. It's like this...If you buy a car that has a lot of maintenance problems, from the previous owner and you try to repair it little by little and 4 years later it breaks down...Are you saying the only person responsible is the current owner? Solely because they wasn't able to fix everything within 4 years?...You don't directly blame that person but you don't pretend like the previous owner didn't cause those problems either.

And how is Obama a worse president than Bush when Bush inherited a VERY stable government and then messed it up? He went from good to bad. You could argue Obama went from "bad to worse" but that still doesn't beat Bush.

I can only assume you are Republican... So are you saying you didn't vote for Bush his second term? By the way Bush gave away "free stuff" too so maybe it was the "colored people" who voted him in office.