First Prev
of 3
Next Last

“Larchmont's Leading Citizen”

Since: Dec 12

Hilliard, OH

#45 Feb 2, 2013
zazmo wrote:
<quoted text>
Toshiba Satellites are rated low with a very poor track record. Of course that's because Satellites are Toshiba's low-end budget models.
My experience so far has been excellent. If it lasts three years, it's a bargain.

“Larchmont's Leading Citizen”

Since: Dec 12

Hilliard, OH

#46 Feb 2, 2013
sidekick wrote:
<quoted text>
Technic's turntables were top notch, right along with Realistic. Them two were Radio Shacks big sellers for DJ equipment. It's unreal on the equipment i use today, compared to the 80s stuff, but damn, the old school shit was built to last....
Yeah, I just read up on Motorola owning Quasar.
Interesting. I had a fair bit of Technics stereo equipment 30 years ago. Never knew it was Motorola.
zazmo

Columbus, OH

#47 Feb 2, 2013
Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:
<quoted text>My experience so far has been excellent. If it lasts three years, it's a bargain.
See what I mean? You can't stand anyone who dares to differ with your opinion. You are a mere insect among giants.
just sayin

Columbus, OH

#48 Feb 2, 2013
Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:
<quoted text>Interesting. I had a fair bit of Technics stereo equipment 30 years ago. Never knew it was Motorola.
Technics was marketed by Panasonic not Motorola.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technics_ (brand)
Enzyte Bob

Blacklick, OH

#49 Feb 2, 2013
Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:
<quoted text>Interesting. I had a fair bit of Technics stereo equipment 30 years ago. Never knew it was Motorola.
No-no-no!- Technics was always Panasonic. Quasar was Motorola and Panasonic bought them out.

“Larchmont's Leading Citizen”

Since: Dec 12

Hilliard, OH

#50 Feb 2, 2013
zazmo wrote:
<quoted text>
See what I mean? You can't stand anyone who dares to differ with your opinion. You are a mere insect among giants.
Looks like you're the one who has an issue with another opinion, kid. I was merely relating my experience, not saying that you were necessarily wrong.
I'm also obviously living rent free inside your "giant" empty skull.

“Larchmont's Leading Citizen”

Since: Dec 12

Hilliard, OH

#51 Feb 2, 2013
just sayin wrote:
<quoted text>
Technics was marketed by Panasonic not Motorola.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technics_ (brand)
Interesting. Thanks.

“Queen of my domain”

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#52 Feb 2, 2013
zazmo wrote:
<quoted text>
Toshiba Satellites are rated low with a very poor track record. Of course that's because Satellites are Toshiba's low-end budget models.
I've had excellent experience with mine. Bought in November 2010 and not a lick of a problem. For home use, no need to buy a higher end.
Enzyte Bob

Blacklick, OH

#53 Feb 4, 2013
gokeefe wrote:
<quoted text>
I've had excellent experience with mine. Bought in November 2010 and not a lick of a problem. For home use, no need to buy a higher end.
My brother has a Toshiba and he was bytching about it. But then again, he's the type who always switches cable companies and phone providers. All I know is that I am happy with my many times dropped HP, even though I had to replace the keyboard and the hinges that hold the screen to the base.

It's not pretty because there was no way to get to the hinges without breaking the bezel, but it still works after 3 1/2 years.

“Queen of my domain”

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#54 Feb 4, 2013
Enzyte Bob wrote:
<quoted text>
My brother has a Toshiba and he was bytching about it. But then again, he's the type who always switches cable companies and phone providers. All I know is that I am happy with my many times dropped HP, even though I had to replace the keyboard and the hinges that hold the screen to the base.
It's not pretty because there was no way to get to the hinges without breaking the bezel, but it still works after 3 1/2 years.
Go buy a ruggedized PC? We used to buy a lot of Panasonic Toughbooks for outdoor/surveyor/engineer use LOL.(EXPENSIVE! But hey, they survived engineers and surveyors dropping them or driving over them.../sigh.)

However....I don't think we'll see a lot more improvements in laptops. Probably they'll get them a wee bit more thinner, a wee bit more lighter. Can't do much more to them before it becomes a tablet, and those are already on the market. But most brands these days are pretty reliable and durable/dependable. And at the price range they are now, say between $300 for low end and $700-$900 for higher end (bigger screen, faster CPU, more memory), if it lasts 3-4 years, you're good. The competition is too tight now for the quality to be too poor between the brands right now.
Enzyte Bob

Blacklick, OH

#55 Feb 4, 2013
gokeefe wrote:
<quoted text>
Go buy a ruggedized PC? We used to buy a lot of Panasonic Toughbooks for outdoor/surveyor/engineer use LOL.(EXPENSIVE! But hey, they survived engineers and surveyors dropping them or driving over them.../sigh.)
However....I don't think we'll see a lot more improvements in laptops. Probably they'll get them a wee bit more thinner, a wee bit more lighter. Can't do much more to them before it becomes a tablet, and those are already on the market. But most brands these days are pretty reliable and durable/dependable. And at the price range they are now, say between $300 for low end and $700-$900 for higher end (bigger screen, faster CPU, more memory), if it lasts 3-4 years, you're good. The competition is too tight now for the quality to be too poor between the brands right now.
The big thing to me has always been how fast the unit moves and how the keyboard feels. Toshiba, HP and IBM have always been excellent in that regard. HP incorporated Compaq designs into their laptops when they bought them out, and Toshiba and IBM were always great. Dell, I never cared for because the ones I've used (last one 5 years ago) always seemed clunkier than the name brands.

I was trying out an Acer at Staples the other day. That thing was slow. Never will buy an Acer again.

“Queen of my domain”

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#56 Feb 4, 2013
Enzyte Bob wrote:
<quoted text>
The big thing to me has always been how fast the unit moves and how the keyboard feels. Toshiba, HP and IBM have always been excellent in that regard. HP incorporated Compaq designs into their laptops when they bought them out, and Toshiba and IBM were always great. Dell, I never cared for because the ones I've used (last one 5 years ago) always seemed clunkier than the name brands.
I was trying out an Acer at Staples the other day. That thing was slow. Never will buy an Acer again.
Latitudes clunky? Nope.

Worse laptop I ever had: IBM Stinkpad. But that was back about 1998. Unreliable from the get-go, out of the box.

Demo computers are probably not optimized. Who knows how much porn the sales crew was watching on it without a virus checker installed....

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 3
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Westerville Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Columbus man on a deadly mission, caught 18 min BizzyBee 71
Do Atheist Firemen go to Hell or Heaven? 23 min George 80
Hillary for President (Apr '14) 38 min Scourge 171
Critics of Islam were right 1 hr they 19
Mus lims are such peaceful people 1 hr they 72
Is Barack Obama Doing a Good Job as President? (Aug '13) 1 hr d pantz 6,132
Poll Do you support Affirmative Action? (Oct '12) 1 hr Pam 84
More from around the web

Westerville People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]