Why do black men get a warning?
WiseAmerican

Radnor, OH

#83 Feb 13, 2013
rowdy01 wrote:
<quoted text>
I dunno. I'm about as whitebread as it gets !
How about this then : you can take a hick outta the holler but you can't take the holler out the hick.
Adif understanding

United States

#84 Feb 13, 2013
Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:
<quoted text>Yep. Right now every sleazy "civil rights" lawyer in SoCal is ready to pounce.
And they should be. The LA cops aren't the Andy Griffiths and Barney Fifes going out and doing good while making a mistake here or there. There is a long history of them being corrupt, killing unarmed suspects, even one who's only suspicion was sleeping in her car under a street lamp in a shopping center parking lot. In their rage to kill this Dorner guy without any trial or conviction, they have without provocation, opened fire on not one, but two separate vehicles severely injuring 3 people, one of which they had already pulled over and cleared before ramming him off the road and emptying their guns into the car.
Now they come out and tell the sambos to do as they are told when they are harassed or they will get it because they all look alike. Their entire shoot first ask questions later tells me that they are incompetent and looking to either hide something incriminating or they are willfully ignoring the US constitution as well as the California State Constitution and decided this person will die at their hands just like the President declared he can do.
Now, don't get me wrong. There is nothing admirable about this Dorner guy. Even if he was correct and his claims of officers abusing the civil rights of others was 100% true, he lost any reasonable compassion when he started killing innocent civilians just because they were related to cops. Even the cop killing places him in low regard. I'm not in any way sticking up for the guy, but the LA cops who learned their lessons from Wacko well and threw two distinct types of Tear Gas into the cabin because the second kind is known for catching the first kind on fire, have not acted in any chivalrous or courageous ways here. They have trampled on people's rights, publicly told colored people they would, they make Jack Booted Thugs look like Nursery School teachers.
WiseAmerican

Radnor, OH

#85 Feb 13, 2013
Those 'sambos', as you call them, will be ready to break LAPD's necks at the next community out break. You never heard reports of the cops finding all the weapons that were taken from gun store during 92'. The good stuff that's not in the display cases.
Adif understanding

United States

#86 Feb 13, 2013
WiseAmerican wrote:
Those 'sambos', as you call them, will be ready to break LAPD's necks at the next community out break. You never heard reports of the cops finding all the weapons that were taken from gun store during 92'. The good stuff that's not in the display cases.
Those sambos will be unarmed and facing cops with assault riffles who have plenty of high capacity magazines while not giving a crap about the constitution, due process, or your mouth.

And sambo is a racial slures that will pass topix's filters designed o impose the sense of racial harmony the LAPD exerts.
WiseAmerican

Columbus, OH

#87 Feb 13, 2013
Adif understanding wrote:
<quoted text>Those sambos will be unarmed and facing cops with assault riffles who have plenty of high capacity magazines while not giving a crap about the constitution, due process, or your mouth.
And sambo is a racial slures that will pass topix's filters designed o impose the sense of racial harmony the LAPD exerts.
What part about never found the stolen weapons did you not understand? Those two bank robbers with AK-47's during that stand off years back, gave LAPD hell. What do you think 50 or 100 with those type weapons could do?
Adif understanding

United States

#88 Feb 13, 2013
WiseAmerican wrote:
<quoted text> What part about never found the stolen weapons did you not understand? Those two bank robbers with AK-47's during that stand off years back, gave LAPD hell. What do you think 50 or 100 with those type weapons could do?
What part about opening fire unprovoked on 3 innocent people do you not understand. While you are digging those guns up, they will be thinning the herd. One of them will give you away when you are scrambling to figure out which stash trevon and philik didn't know about and pawn for some dope and white castles.
VADoc

Duluth, GA

#89 Feb 14, 2013
FKA Reader wrote:
<quoted text>
What is saddest and most insidious about the nature of racism is that we are never really going to know the extent to which Dorner spoke truthfully. There have been official stories to account for Dorner's behavior--that he "accumulated grievances" leading to his recent explosion. There is the official pronouncement that LAPD is not what it was when Rodney King was beaten.
The problem, of course is that when Rodney King was beaten similar claims were made.
Many years ago Bill Cosby made a film called Black History, Lost, Stolen or Strayed. I believe that is where someone talked about the black smile that served as cover or mask for the things that could never be spoken aloud to white people. Likewise, there have always been white conversations that did not take place in front of black people. This dual dishonesty that not only ensured the survival of black people unable to fight back, but also ensured the continuation of a system of racism has left us scarred, to the point that we no longer know what to believe of one another when a black former cop levels accusations of racism against a PD with an acknowledged recent history of institutional racism.
I think you have the product of 30 years of preaching political correctness. People are afraid (with good reason) to speak their minds about what they feel in public because of stiff penalties. So people don't speak their minds they just play the game. Of course if your anti Christian or anti white then you get a pass and nothing happens when you speak your mind.

If you think I'm wrong you haven't obviously been reading and comprehending what is said on these boards.

You want people to speak honestly and openly about race, sex, religion? Then you can't complain when you're offended. That's what happens when people have free speech and are honest. You can't have it both ways. People have a right to believe what they want whether I agree with it or not. I mean black rhino obviously has a very warped sense of the world, but hey if that's how he feels I don't begrudge his option. I don't condone it or agree with it and will argue against it but that doesn't mean he's wrong in his own mind.

“Meh.”

Since: Aug 10

Location hidden

#90 Feb 14, 2013
VADoc wrote:
<quoted text>
I think you have the product of 30 years of preaching political correctness. People are afraid (with good reason) to speak their minds about what they feel in public because of stiff penalties. So people don't speak their minds they just play the game. Of course if your anti Christian or anti white then you get a pass and nothing happens when you speak your mind.
If you think I'm wrong you haven't obviously been reading and comprehending what is said on these boards.
You want people to speak honestly and openly about race, sex, religion? Then you can't complain when you're offended. That's what happens when people have free speech and are honest. You can't have it both ways. People have a right to believe what they want whether I agree with it or not. I mean black rhino obviously has a very warped sense of the world, but hey if that's how he feels I don't begrudge his option. I don't condone it or agree with it and will argue against it but that doesn't mean he's wrong in his own mind.
Is it stifling speech to call out racist speech as such? I didn't see anything in that quote asking that the speech be limited or showing offense, just calling out racist speech. I don't imagine that accurately labelling hate speech is going to keep people from speaking their minds. You point to the board as an example, so I will as well. Have you noticed labelling of or speaking out against racist speech as having an impact in stifling those utterances?

There seems to be plenty of material to go around.
VADoc

Duluth, GA

#91 Feb 14, 2013
tranpsosition wrote:
<quoted text>
Is it stifling speech to call out racist speech as such? I didn't see anything in that quote asking that the speech be limited or showing offense, just calling out racist speech. I don't imagine that accurately labelling hate speech is going to keep people from speaking their minds. You point to the board as an example, so I will as well. Have you noticed labelling of or speaking out against racist speech as having an impact in stifling those utterances?
There seems to be plenty of material to go around.
Wow you totally misunderstood what I was saying. Reader was opining that people don't speak truthfully in public, and I was explaining why. If you don't support certain ideas you are persecuted under the umbrella of political correctness. You can be as racist and vocal as you want if you are in a certain group, but if you belong to another (Christian, white, male) you've not got a leg to stand on and pretty much have to hold your tongue.

You prove my point though by saying that speaking against hate speech isn't stifling. So us all saying wise American and black rhino are idiots and should be banned from topix because of their anti white rhetoric is fine? I don't see it that way. If they want to say such racist and vile things that's their right under the 1st amendment. Just like someone who disagrees with homosexual lifestyles or Muslim lifestyles should have a right to say what they want.

People have been so brainwashed and forced to be PC that an honest discourse on racism, sexism, religion, etc. will never be possible.

You don't think labeling something as hate speech will keep people from speaking their minds? Maybe not on the Internet, but in real life it will.

Why don't you try going into public and calling someone of another race a racial slur and see what happens to you.

“Meh.”

Since: Aug 10

Location hidden

#92 Feb 14, 2013
VADoc wrote:
<quoted text>
Wow you totally misunderstood what I was saying. Reader was opining that people don't speak truthfully in public, and I was explaining why. If you don't support certain ideas you are persecuted under the umbrella of political correctness. You can be as racist and vocal as you want if you are in a certain group, but if you belong to another (Christian, white, male) you've not got a leg to stand on and pretty much have to hold your tongue.
You prove my point though by saying that speaking against hate speech isn't stifling. So us all saying wise American and black rhino are idiots and should be banned from topix because of their anti white rhetoric is fine? I don't see it that way. If they want to say such racist and vile things that's their right under the 1st amendment. Just like someone who disagrees with homosexual lifestyles or Muslim lifestyles should have a right to say what they want.
People have been so brainwashed and forced to be PC that an honest discourse on racism, sexism, religion, etc. will never be possible.
You don't think labeling something as hate speech will keep people from speaking their minds? Maybe not on the Internet, but in real life it will.
Why don't you try going into public and calling someone of another race a racial slur and see what happens to you.
Sorry, when did I call for anyone to be banned for hate speech?

There seems to be plenty of hate speech still in circulation, both on and offline. I can't possibly imagine you're advocating people not label hate speech when they see it, in order to not make the people producing hate speech uncomfortable?

People have and continue to be free to express themselves as they see fit. In the same way that people exposed to their expressions can respond, including labelling speech commonly or personally held to be inappropriate as such.

“Meh.”

Since: Aug 10

Location hidden

#93 Feb 14, 2013
I think I'm probably the last one to want to ban racist speech here.

Low status, racist white guys on here absolutely make my day. You get folks like sidekick or spook trying to pick out full sentences about minorities in something approximating an adult level of English but then getting to call minorities sir and ma'am when plowing their driveways, washing their cars or bagging their shopping.

Yes, it's vile speech and all that. But the dynamic is just too delicious. I want them posting more, not less!
WiseAmerican

Columbus, OH

#94 Feb 14, 2013
Adif understanding wrote:
<quoted text>What part about opening fire unprovoked on 3 innocent people do you not understand. While you are digging those guns up, they will be thinning the herd. One of them will give you away when you are scrambling to figure out which stash trevon and philik didn't know about and pawn for some dope and white castles.
Lol, in your mind you think that blacks are just a bunch of buffoons or druggies looking for the next hit. Just keep believing that, Adolf. If you think those weapons were put into the hands of Amos n Andy types, then you are a clueless redneck bigot. Also, There's thousands of Dorners in the PD's and military who just keep their cool day to day.
Cannon fodder are used in all wars, FYI., and a guerilla street battle won't be any different.
WiseAmerican

Columbus, OH

#95 Feb 14, 2013
VADoc wrote:
<quoted text>
I think you have the product of 30 years of preaching political correctness. People are afraid (with good reason) to speak their minds about what they feel in public because of stiff penalties. So people don't speak their minds they just play the game. Of course if your anti Christian or anti white then you get a pass and nothing happens when you speak your mind.
If you think I'm wrong you haven't obviously been reading and comprehending what is said on these boards.
You want people to speak honestly and openly about race, sex, religion? Then you can't complain when you're offended. That's what happens when people have free speech and are honest. You can't have it both ways. People have a right to believe what they want whether I agree with it or not. I mean black rhino obviously has a very warped sense of the world, but hey if that's how he feels I don't begrudge his option. I don't condone it or agree with it and will argue against it but that doesn't mean he's wrong in his own mind.
And what evidence do you have that proves B Rh wrong?
WiseAmerican

Columbus, OH

#96 Feb 14, 2013
VADoc wrote:
<quoted text>
Wow you totally misunderstood what I was saying. Reader was opining that people don't speak truthfully in public, and I was explaining why. If you don't support certain ideas you are persecuted under the umbrella of political correctness. You can be as racist and vocal as you want if you are in a certain group, but if you belong to another (Christian, white, male) you've not got a leg to stand on and pretty much have to hold your tongue.
You prove my point though by saying that speaking against hate speech isn't stifling. So us all saying wise American and black rhino are idiots and should be banned from topix because of their anti white rhetoric is fine? I don't see it that way. If they want to say such racist and vile things that's their right under the 1st amendment. Just like someone who disagrees with homosexual lifestyles or Muslim lifestyles should have a right to say what they want.
People have been so brainwashed and forced to be PC that an honest discourse on racism, sexism, religion, etc. will never be possible.
You don't think labeling something as hate speech will keep people from speaking their minds? Maybe not on the Internet, but in real life it will.
Why don't you try going into public and calling someone of another race a racial slur and see what happens to you.
Correction, I don't speak in terms of 'anti white' when I post truth about the treatment that blacks and others have suffered because of white bigotry and racism! I plainly speak against racism and anti black bigotry coming from people of your mentality. Not all whites, are of your ilk, so I distinguish between those of your thinking and those who're not vile racist separatists like you and Hey Now. So get it right when you mention me, chump.
WiseAmerican

Columbus, OH

#97 Feb 14, 2013
This kind of BS is what I talk about, chump.

Nurse sues hospital over alleged racist note
By Liz Gelardi
Feb 13, 2013 4:51 p.m.

FLINT, MI (WNEM)- A nurse is suing Hurley Medical Center over allegations of discrimination.

A lawsuit filed against Hurley claims she found a note in a patient's file stating, "No African American nurse to take care of baby."

According to court documents, the nurse was caring for a baby in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit when the baby's father asked to speak with a supervisor. The lawsuit states he told the nurse in charge that he didn't want any African Americans taking care of his baby, then he pulled up a sleeve showing a tattoo believed to be a Swastika.

The lawsuit states the baby was re-assigned to another nurse.

Court documents read "[She] was shocked, offended and in disbelief that she was so egregiously discriminated against based on her race and re-assigned."

An attorney for the nurse said when the nurse returned to work the next day she found the note posted on the assignment clipboard.

The nurse has worked at the hospital since 1988. To read the full complaint, click here.

WNEM TV5 reached out to Hurley Medical Center and they released this statement, "Hurley Medical Center does not comment on past or current litigation."

Stay with WNEM.com and TV5 as we continue to follow this developing story.

Copyright 2013 WNEM (Meredith Corporation). All rights reserved.
The good the bad and the

New Albany, OH

#98 Feb 14, 2013
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, because we all know that the registration requirements for Topix ensure that only the most stable, educated, well-read, intelligent, and cultured people will be permitted entry into the exclusive club, and those registered will never be forced to change their registered names numerous times because they post offensive, hateful messages for their own personal aggrandizement.
woof
Very well said. The registered posters all get drunk at Glitter's on a regular basis and will always agree to hate outsiders.

“Where did I put my tiara?”

Since: Dec 11

Columbus, OH

#99 Feb 14, 2013
The good the bad and the wrote:
<quoted text>
Very well said. The registered posters all get drunk at Glitter's on a regular basis and will always agree to hate outsiders.
Hiccup...I don't not now what you speaketh of. Hole onn let me aks the other peeps hear.

Oh, there is no one here. Keep using your imagination as to who knows what and whom. Go hang with Reader, she needs a friend.

“Don't trust the internet!”

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

#100 Feb 14, 2013
The good the bad and the wrote:
<quoted text>
Very well said. The registered posters all get drunk at Glitter's on a regular basis and will always agree to hate outsiders.
Hey!

Gotta stand up here.

I'm registered and I neither drink nor hang with Glitter.

But it is amusing to see who the imbibers are who don't know enough not to drink and post.

“Paper Or Plastic?”

Since: Nov 11

Albakoikee

#101 Feb 14, 2013
FKA Reader wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey!
Gotta stand up here.
I'm registered and I neither drink nor hang with Glitter.
But it is amusing to see who the imbibers are who don't know enough not to drink and post.
You have never seen me post drunk. Not that I haven't, you just haven't seen me.
Anonymous

Dublin, OH

#102 Feb 14, 2013
WiseAmerican wrote:
<quoted text> Lol, in your mind you think that blacks are just a bunch of buffoons or druggies looking for the next hit. Just keep believing that, Adolf. If you think those weapons were put into the hands of Amos n Andy types, then you are a clueless redneck bigot. Also, There's thousands of Dorners in the PD's and military who just keep their cool day to day.
Cannon fodder are used in all wars, FYI., and a guerilla street battle won't be any different.
Regarding the buffoon comment, that would include you - bragging about a certain body part and how you could use it.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Westerville Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Poll Who Do You Support For President 3 hr They cannot kill ... 63
Worst President in History 3 hr Male 258
Affordable Care Act 3 hr Bazooka Joe 205
Do Atheist Firemen go to Hell or Heaven? 4 hr notlocal 139
Congress votes to have Obama exorcised 4 hr Amy and Mia 1
dana turtle 4 hr They cannot kill ... 16
Hillary Clinton 2016? (Apr '13) 4 hr Pale Rider 249
More from around the web

Westerville People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]