Another Peterson search, but still no...

Another Peterson search, but still no clues

There are 122 comments on the Chicago Tribune story from Nov 4, 2007, titled Another Peterson search, but still no clues. In it, Chicago Tribune reports that:

With their ranks swollen by increasing media attention, about 90 volunteers combed rural areas near Bolingbrook for a second day Sunday for clues to explain the disappearance of Stacy Peterson, the wife of a ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chicago Tribune.

Dots

AOL

#125 Nov 24, 2007
OK. Enough of the "she was 17 when they got married" stuff.

Their 4th anniversary was 10/18/07. She is 23. You do the math, no cheating.
orphanannie

Chicago, IL

#127 Nov 25, 2007
Will County wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't recall anyone saying that she was 17 when they got married. She was 17 when she got pregnant. The married when their child was over a year old. They were together more than 6 years.
There are absolutes in this world:
1) That math does not lie
2)that it takes approx. 37 weeks to gestate a human baby
3)Truth will prevail
4)That liars will eventually be caught in their own deceit
5) that there is a Higher Power Who will comfort and empower those who are looking for Stacy...
OMG

United States

#128 Nov 25, 2007
I think she ran off with another man....she DID get pregnant with his baby when she was just 17 yrs old...do the research,read the paper,watch the news etc.....He is guilty of infidelity that is a certain beyond that there is NO PROOF of anything....Are they investigating the man her husband caught her with that SHE exchanged racy perverted emails with?
OMG

United States

#129 Nov 25, 2007
She did get pregnant with his baby when she was 17....he caught her with another man that she exchanged perverted racy messages with.....she disappeared 10 days later....coincedence....I dont know I could call this either way she was abandoned by her own mother so she is probably capable of it herself she is a home wrecker...He was MARRIED when they met she got pregnant 3rd wife mysteriously dies....another coincedence....maybe he is GULITY of infidelity but beyond that PRESUMED innocennce until proven guilty.....But I still say she left.....Have the POLICE looked into the man she was caught with? Did they search HIS HOUSE? Leave Drew and his kids alone the media is all over they CANT leave their home......
WILL COUNTY ORPHAN

Milwaukee, WI

#131 Nov 25, 2007
Anybody notice that nobody has been arrested in this case yet? Hmmmmmm, that leads me to believe that there's no solid leads so the police clearly are no closer to solving this then they were on day one. That said why do people keep making inflamitory statements indicting Peterson when it's clear the police have yet to find anything. It's easy to blame somebody when you don't like their "character." Rushing to judgement helps nobody and thankfully the police are smart enough not to take the bored witch hunting housewife approach to their investigation. You can make up anything you want, get people kicked off message boards for their opinion if it's not the same as yours and pat yourself on the back for walking through the forest in search of a body but it doesn't make anybody any guilty of anything. Feel free to disagree as I'm sure you will and I'll continue to laugh at your pathetic attempts to play detective via your living room. Can I suggest you just go back to watching the Forensic Files to get your fill?

JUSTICE FOR DREW PETERSON
yea right

Park Ridge, IL

#132 Nov 25, 2007
Jen wrote:
I recently met his 1st wife Carol....she says he NEVER physically harmed or threatened or controlled her in anyway but he cheated on her....#2 wife Vicki said he was a little controlling...Drew actually CAUGHT Stacy with another man at a resteraunt 10 days before she disappeared her own mother left her so I think she would be capable of leaving her kids....I dont know I think if he killed her something would have surfaced by now.....Innocent until proven guilty
Jen's hoping to be #5
Where to begin -

Tracy, CA

#133 Nov 25, 2007
So is Will County Orphan.
whatever

United States

#134 Nov 25, 2007
I think you are all sad,pathetic bored souls who want to think a crime was commited instead of the possibility that she just left his old ass....she was 30 years younger then him and clearly bored or she wouldnt have "met" anyone and exchange sick emails.....
yea right

United States

#137 Nov 26, 2007
whatever wrote:
I think you are all sad,pathetic bored souls who want to think a crime was commited instead of the possibility that she just left his old ass....she was 30 years younger then him and clearly bored or she wouldnt have "met" anyone and exchange sick emails.....
I normally would think the same thing, whatever, if it weren't for the past history and obvious sociopathic and violent tendencies of the "husband". Look at his history. It's nothing less than suspicious.
madre

United States

#138 Nov 26, 2007
I know a mothers love is greater than ANY love I am a mother of 7 and I would NEVER leave my kids and there is no reason to believe Stacy would however why is everyone SO CERTAIN it was Drew it could be the FREAK she exchanged racy perverted email with that Drew CAUGHT her with at Dennys?
Les

United States

#139 Nov 26, 2007
Will County wrote:
<quoted text>
he didn't catch her with anybody. She met a group of friends and Drew KNEW about it ahead of time. Get current.
Not exactly. If it was so innocent why would Drew have asked the guy how HE would like it if it was HIS wife. And let's not forget that this was the same guy she was sending pornographic text messages to.

Don't make excuses for a woman who pulled the kind of sh!t behind her husband's back that would have made ANY man furious.
tamale

United States

#140 Nov 27, 2007
Will County wrote:
<quoted text>
he didn't catch her with anybody. She met a group of friends and Drew KNEW about it ahead of time. Get current.
Why dont YOU read the newspaper....The headline said D.P. CAUGHT Stacy with another man!!
tamale

United States

#141 Nov 27, 2007
Les wrote:
<quoted text>
Not exactly. If it was so innocent why would Drew have asked the guy how HE would like it if it was HIS wife. And let's not forget that this was the same guy she was sending pornographic text messages to.
Don't make excuses for a woman who pulled the kind of sh!t behind her husband's back that would have made ANY man furious.
Yeah Stacy was FAR from innocent what business did she have hooking up with him when she was ONLY 17 and he was STILL married to wife # 3???? I STILL think the cops should focus on the pervert she was exchanging those emails with....

“Ignore the BS and trolls!”

Since: Sep 07

Dallas, TX

#143 Nov 27, 2007
Will County wrote:
<quoted text>
he didn't catch her with anybody. She met a group of friends and Drew KNEW about it ahead of time. Get current.
This guy has said that he and Stacy were at the restaurant alone on at least one occassion, as well as part of a group. He was also in a few of her nursing classes. Get correct!

“Ignore the BS and trolls!”

Since: Sep 07

Dallas, TX

#147 Nov 27, 2007
Will County wrote:
<quoted text>
I am correct. I don't need the screwed up newspaper, especially WLS radio, to fill my head with false information. I get the info directly from Stacy's family. There would know much more about that situation than any media outfit. Innocent until proven guilty, right? So, you are now going to trust a media outlet new info over those who were directly connected? What kind of justice is that? Where is any truth in that?
There is none.
Did I say I got it from WLS? Why the need to attack me WC? You need to back off. Go on a search or something.

“Ignore the BS and trolls!”

Since: Sep 07

Dallas, TX

#149 Nov 27, 2007
Will County wrote:
blablablabla
Who is this Dr. Mitchell that Baden referred to on Greta's show? I know...do you?
Jen-WW

Westmont, IL

#150 Nov 27, 2007
before I jump to any conclusions I get the facts straight....everyone is entitled to their opinions but nobody knows what happened to Stacy except GOD and Stacy.....my gut tells me shes NOT DEAD but I dont know....My gut also tells me INNOCENT until PROVEN guilty and I dont think D.P. is the guilty one here I think that sleazy "friend" she met at Dennys and exchanged emails is and I think one of the coroners is a liar and I think its the second one....he just wanted to say HE solved the mystery....no mystery I believe it was an accident but only GOD knows that too.....

“Ignore the BS and trolls!”

Since: Sep 07

Dallas, TX

#151 Nov 27, 2007
Jen-WW wrote:
before I jump to any conclusions I get the facts straight....everyone is entitled to their opinions but nobody knows what happened to Stacy except GOD and Stacy.....my gut tells me shes NOT DEAD but I dont know....My gut also tells me INNOCENT until PROVEN guilty and I dont think D.P. is the guilty one here I think that sleazy "friend" she met at Dennys and exchanged emails is and I think one of the coroners is a liar and I think its the second one....he just wanted to say HE solved the mystery....no mystery I believe it was an accident but only GOD knows that too.....
Prepare for the hailstorm sister, prepare for the hail! LOL!!! Thanks for sharing your opinion.
yea right

Park Ridge, IL

#154 Nov 27, 2007
WC AND Sue, I wanted you to know that we got a hold of both families and they want to see the information we have. I hope this stuff helps. They were very open to it. We have some of the countrys top psychics giving information, but they really want to remain on the downlow because of the sensitive nature of this. At this point, if they're guilty or not...that's for the LE and the justice system to decide. All we want to do is find these women and this method is just a small part in the bigger picture. I will say sue that after reading your posts you do seem to want to be fair and balanced with it. Thats commendable. It's difficult for people not to get emotional about it if they feel an injustice was done. I see your points though.

“Ignore the BS and trolls!”

Since: Sep 07

Dallas, TX

#156 Nov 28, 2007
yea right wrote:
I will say sue that after reading your posts you do seem to want to be fair and balanced with it. Thats commendable. It's difficult for people not to get emotional about it if they feel an injustice was done. I see your points though.
If you look at all sides (and reserve judgement), you'll have a hard time missing something.

I have no desire to post whether or not I speak with the family or those closely connected. It is not relavant on this forum.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Westchester Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
lyons, il politics (Mar '07) 6 hr Anti Bullying 9,354
Chicago Rdige Trustee 9 hr NoWay 23
Chicago Ridge PTA Fri Winer 11
News Retired police sergeant found shot dead in back... (Jun '12) Fri WILDBILL 20
Bill Lammel Lied Fri Snoopy 14
Review: Asset Recovery Associates ARA Inc (May '16) Fri Freddie Blakley 198
UPS Adverse weather conditions (Jul '10) Fri mlg 137

Westchester Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Westchester Mortgages