“On Nov. 4 -- NO Tea Party”

Since: Sep 09

Say "NO" to TeaPub Elephants!

#77124 Feb 21, 2013
WTF is Norton is CRAZY wrote:
<quoted text>
WTF is this "BY THE DETERMINATE COUNSEL". what church is that?Determinate Counsel on Kolob????
your as nuts as Mittwitt and Glenn Beck... funny you
attack obama because your are not a Christian... you're a NUTTY Cultist!
you are a disgrace to Christians and the state of missouri
Yeah, "Norton" is totally clueless. Acts 2:22,23 say no such thing. Apparently, "Norton" has learned how to "copy-and-paste" from his apologetic heroes, and has abandoned what his Bible says. Of course, it was bound to happen. And "Norton" didn't understand it anyhow.

“On Nov. 4 -- NO Tea Party”

Since: Sep 09

Say "NO" to TeaPub Elephants!

#77126 Feb 21, 2013
TheJokster wrote:
<quoted text>
So basically you were saying what any first grader should know,,, That we are all the sons and daughters of God. And actually begotten is being the only offspring of its father, a past participle of beget, with beget meaning to be the cause of something, to be the father of a child.
No. In Genesis 6:2 and 6:4, a distinction is clearly made regarding "the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they [were] fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose."

If the meaning was that the "sons of men" saw the "daughters of men," the scripture would have said so.

Why does it upset you religious folks to think that God might have had sons other than Jesus? You don't have a problem with God having created angels. You DO believe in angels, don't you?

Regarding "beget":
1. Merriam-Webster. Definition 1: to procreate as the father : sire.
2. Dictionary.com :(typically of a man, sometimes of a man and a woman) Bring (a child) into existence by the process of reproduction.

(Your allegation that a man "begets" only one offspring is silly on the face of it. You are reaching, "Jokster," but you just can't get it.)

“The strength of science is”

Since: Jan 11

founded in facts.

#77127 Feb 21, 2013
TheJokster wrote:
<quoted text>
Dan the "jury" will always be out on here for no one is on trial or to be judged as you and old dawg try to do so much. You see this is a site of free thought including free speech, and in case you forgot that is the first amendment. So that freedom of speech applies to everyone to voice how and what they think and feel even if you don't agree. That is what separates us from the Hitler days; that we can and will speak what want instead of saying what others want us to say and think what we want to think instead of others thinking for us. If it ever came down to that your or dogs judgement of others mattered,,,, the world would be in a spiral to hell.
I'm sorry did you say something?

“The strength of science is”

Since: Jan 11

founded in facts.

#77128 Feb 21, 2013
Yellow Dawg Democrat wrote:
<quoted text>
No. In Genesis 6:2 and 6:4, a distinction is clearly made regarding "the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they [were] fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose."
If the meaning was that the "sons of men" saw the "daughters of men," the scripture would have said so.
Why does it upset you religious folks to think that God might have had sons other than Jesus? You don't have a problem with God having created angels. You DO believe in angels, don't you?
Regarding "beget":
1. Merriam-Webster. Definition 1: to procreate as the father : sire.
2. Dictionary.com :(typically of a man, sometimes of a man and a woman) Bring (a child) into existence by the process of reproduction.
(Your allegation that a man "begets" only one offspring is silly on the face of it. You are reaching, "Jokster," but you just can't get it.)
Carefull Dawg. You exercise your right to free speech on here and you get a lecture from some RF and later he is going to shoot up a movie theater.

“The strength of science is”

Since: Jan 11

founded in facts.

#77129 Feb 21, 2013
TheJokster wrote:
<quoted text>
Dan the "jury" will always be out on here for no one is on trial or to be judged as you and old dawg try to do so much. You see this is a site of free thought including free speech, and in case you forgot that is the first amendment. So that freedom of speech applies to everyone to voice how and what they think and feel even if you don't agree. That is what separates us from the Hitler days; that we can and will speak what want instead of saying what others want us to say and think what we want to think instead of others thinking for us. If it ever came down to that your or dogs judgement of others mattered,,,, the world would be in a spiral to hell.
Actually, it isn't a site for free thought and free speech. If Topix doesn't like what you say, they can and will yank it. Just like you are doing in your lecture.

However, the implication of your post is noted Herr Jockster.

“On Nov. 4 -- NO Tea Party”

Since: Sep 09

Say "NO" to TeaPub Elephants!

#77132 Feb 21, 2013
TheJokster wrote:
<quoted text>
Now Dawg if you would let your eyes and brain take in as much as you let you mouth spew out, you would see that Dan has already clarified that "albtraum" is female several hours ago. It seems that like you try to police the room and correct everyone even though the correction has been made, understood and answered hours ago. Just some friendly advice, use your eyes more, your mouth less and you can give those old arthritic fingers of yours a break and not over work them. I am beginning to think you suffer from that disease related to Alzheimerís,, called Sometimers. Whereas you don't look ignorant all the time, just sometimes.:-)
"Jokster," those are all interesting ad hominem arguments. But like all ad hominem arguments, that ignores the logical argument. And, by implication, means that you have no argument at all.

Let me educate you about cost accounting of inventory sales for tax purposes. There are two basic ways of doing such accounting. The problem is that the "cost of goods," especially for a large inventory, varies according to the unit price at the time of purchase.

Generally speaking, if the unit price of goods bought increases over time (as in an inflationary period, which is usually the case), a better tax procedure would be to use the "LIFO" method. "LIFO" means "last in, first out," which gives a higher accounting cost of goods sold, thus decreasing the tax liability for the lesser accounting profit.

The alternative method is "FIFO," meaning "first in, first out." That generally increases tax liability, since the apparent cost of goods sold is less than it would have been under the "LIFO" method (in the typical inflationary situation).

On Topix, I use the FIFO technique. I go back to the last comment I have read, and progress chronologically to the final comment of the thread. Thus, if some other person makes a comment to a post before I have read the comment to that post, you may find that the other person making the comment may well have answered the question prior to my post.

If you would prefer that I respond to comments using the LIFO method -- tough! I will continue to read, and respond to, comments in the order in which they were posted. It makes my life so much easier and well-organized, even thought that practice may confuse you at times.

Now, what were you saying about "Sometimers"? You appear to have begun suffering from Alzheimers disease yourself, because the actual alternative phase used is "oldtimers," not "Sometimers"! Were I you, I would get myself checked out -- pronto.

http://www.beedictionary.com/common-errors/ol...

“On Nov. 4 -- NO Tea Party”

Since: Sep 09

Say "NO" to TeaPub Elephants!

#77133 Feb 21, 2013
Norton wrote:
<quoted text>
I agree........you are not a bible scholar! Neither am I! Perhaps I just understand the Bible a little (lot) better than you. Sorry, don't mean to sound snobbish. It's just that you talk about things that you know nothing about. God had ONE son and that is Jesus Christ!(second person of the trinity that was sent to earth in human form)...
Those verses which I quoted from Genesis 6 clearly show that God has many sons.

When God sent Jesus to earth in "human form," Jesus had to be born of a woman. The word for that action is "begotten." Jesus was God's only BEGOTTEN son, because God did not send the rest of his sons to earth to redeem the sins of you lost sinners.(Although those other sons of God apparently "snuck off" and got into some of the sinning themselves.)

“On Nov. 4 -- NO Tea Party”

Since: Sep 09

Say "NO" to TeaPub Elephants!

#77134 Feb 21, 2013
DanFromSmithville wrote:
<quoted text>The jury is still out on that. Again, the introduction on this thread of completely new posters that come from out of nowhere yet all maintain a similar position, attitude and inate knowledge of various posters does seem miraculous. They come and go like leaves blowing on the breeze. What if this thread has a foursome instead of a threesome. Would that be a Quarternity, a Quartet or Bridge?
I would be inclined to vote for "Quarternity." Sort of has a ring to it, and alludes to the predecessor "Trinity"!

The way these ultra-religious folks keep adding gods, I doubt we have to wait very long before the Bible will announce a "Quarternity." Perhaps the Father, the Son, the Holy Spirit, and the Holy Moley!

(I am always a bit sad that no one honors Joseph. Of course, he may well have been cuckolded by the Holy Spirit. Or a Roman centurion.)

“The strength of science is”

Since: Jan 11

founded in facts.

#77135 Feb 21, 2013
TheJokster wrote:
<quoted text>
Donít be so cruel and witty. Let it flow out. Oh never mind, you have reached you limits. You are just another simpleton that relies on hopefully Dawg to dig your @ss out of your mouth. lol
How thoughtful. And you said you didn't care.

“On Nov. 4 -- NO Tea Party”

Since: Sep 09

Say "NO" to TeaPub Elephants!

#77136 Feb 21, 2013
Norton wrote:
<quoted text>
Who on here understands the Bible? One or two, maybe, a while back. I am just hoping there is someone on here that understands it just a little bit....
Poo does. And you just admitted that you do not understand it, not even just a little bit.

“The strength of science is”

Since: Jan 11

founded in facts.

#77137 Feb 21, 2013
TheJokster wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually if you talk sensible with no profanity topix will not interfere. And by talking sensible with no profanity all there is to worry about is people like you and Yelowdawg,,,, which is in fact is really no worry. So I guess you not only rely on dawg to cover your @ss and ignorance, you hope the topix site will do the same when someone hands you your @ss. What is that phrase you and your buds like to use,,,, let me think,,,, oh yes,,,, GAME POINT!
Actually, I have come to consider you to be "the people like you.' You are just another RFT. Nothing new or special, despite your opinion of yourself. But again, you don't care.

“On Nov. 4 -- NO Tea Party”

Since: Sep 09

Say "NO" to TeaPub Elephants!

#77138 Feb 21, 2013
TheJokster wrote:
To my Yellowdawg;
Where or where has my Yellowdawg gone? Oh where oh where can he be? Maybe he had to go change his depends because he can't control his urge to pee.
My Yellowdawg always runs his mouth like he is the king, but when it really comes down to it,, he is just an old ding-a-ling.
"TheJokster" is short for
A stinky jock strap.
The strap is always running,
but it is full of crap.

“The strength of science is”

Since: Jan 11

founded in facts.

#77139 Feb 21, 2013
Yellow Dawg Democrat wrote:
<quoted text>
I would be inclined to vote for "Quarternity." Sort of has a ring to it, and alludes to the predecessor "Trinity"!
The way these ultra-religious folks keep adding gods, I doubt we have to wait very long before the Bible will announce a "Quarternity." Perhaps the Father, the Son, the Holy Spirit, and the Holy Moley!
(I am always a bit sad that no one honors Joseph. Of course, he may well have been cuckolded by the Holy Spirit. Or a Roman centurion.)
Joseph doesn't get the credit he deserves. He stepped up to bat for a pregnant young girl, married her and took another "man's" child as his own. After all that, Christ calls God, father.

I like "Quarternity" too. It does have a symmetry with trinity, but like processors, the aspects of God probably follow something akin to Moore's law and there will be more every 18 months.

The jury is starting to come in on that case. I think they may be ready to pick a winner.

“On Nov. 4 -- NO Tea Party”

Since: Sep 09

Say "NO" to TeaPub Elephants!

#77140 Feb 21, 2013
TheJokster wrote:
<quoted text>{To DFS:}... That is what separates us from the Hitler days; ...
Yet another instance validating "Godwin's Law."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_Law

“The strength of science is”

Since: Jan 11

founded in facts.

#77141 Feb 21, 2013
TheJokster wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually if you talk sensible with no profanity topix will not interfere. And by talking sensible with no profanity all there is to worry about is people like you and Yelowdawg,,,, which is in fact is really no worry. So I guess you not only rely on dawg to cover your @ss and ignorance, you hope the topix site will do the same when someone hands you your @ss. What is that phrase you and your buds like to use,,,, let me think,,,, oh yes,,,, GAME POINT!
So you are saying someone else controls what we say on here. Then it isn't free speech then is it Dummy.

“On Nov. 4 -- NO Tea Party”

Since: Sep 09

Say "NO" to TeaPub Elephants!

#77142 Feb 21, 2013
TheJokster wrote:
<quoted text>{To "DFS":} Donít be so cruel and witty. Let it flow out. Oh never mind, you have reached you limits. You are just another simpleton that relies on hopefully Dawg to dig your @ss out of your mouth. lol
Your icon photo shows that your mouth is quite large. That's helpful, because you are always putting your foot in it.

“On Nov. 4 -- NO Tea Party”

Since: Sep 09

Say "NO" to TeaPub Elephants!

#77143 Feb 21, 2013
TheJokster wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually if you talk sensible with no profanity topix will not interfere. And by talking sensible with no profanity all there is to worry about is people like you and Yelowdawg,,,, which is in fact is really no worry. So I guess you not only rely on dawg to cover your @ss and ignorance, you hope the topix site will do the same when someone hands you your @ss. What is that phrase you and your buds like to use,,,, let me think,,,, oh yes,,,, GAME POINT!
Here are the Topix "Terms Of Service." A few years ago, those terms included more detail, like not revealing the name or address of any person who posts on Topix.

http://www.topix.com/topix/terms

One more time: "DanFromSmithville" can defend himself quite well without any help from me or anybody else.

“The strength of science is”

Since: Jan 11

founded in facts.

#77156 Feb 22, 2013
TheJokster wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes Dan it is free speech, with a clear and thoughtful mind intact and being respectful. But I would not expect you to know what a clear and thoughtful mind is being yours is always clouded from shyt from having your head up someoneís @ss.
No, it isn't free speech if you aren't allowed to speak freely Dummy. I may not know what a clear and thoughtful mind is, but I recognize what you pass off as a mind. I do know what a clear and thoughtful mind it too.

Again, you are not caring a great deal, which is much as I suspected it would be. You are just another RF that aspouses high standards for others that you have no ability to achieve on your own. Sorry that a clear and thoughtful mind had to inform you of that. Tsk, tsk, tsk.

“The strength of science is”

Since: Jan 11

founded in facts.

#77157 Feb 22, 2013
TheJokster wrote:
Sorry Dawg and Dan. I am late in my replies. I had a life to live and was busy and missed all your comments. I will try and do better tomorrow as long as life isnít calling my name to live it and have fun.
Were you out with your boys playing a game or two of pool? Perhaps you were planning your next trip to Jamaica? Perhaps a tryst with a couple of ladies you met on line. I know someone as dynamic as you hasn't the time to post more than 30 or 40 times a day.

“The strength of science is”

Since: Jan 11

founded in facts.

#77158 Feb 22, 2013
TheJokster wrote:
Oh Dawg and Dan make no mistake I am not anyoneís friend on here. I came in here and got in Triples Negs and Nortonís @ss because they seemed to be rambling idiots, you all in return got in mine. The way I see it is if you can't handle or donít like the hard recoil, donít fire the gun in the first place.
You seem to think we would want to call you friend. Why would you make such a glaring mistake? This faux wisdom and unwarranted arrogance was apparent in you from the get go. If you mistook some cavalry manuevers for overtures of friendship, then that is your mistake and understandably so.

My guess is that you are the one that has a dainty exterior otherwise you wouldn't need to allude to how tough you are. Don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

West Plains Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Low-Visibilty Paperboy 5 min star dust144 56
Get ready for more illegals from Cuba to flood ... 1 hr Nucking Futs 1
Well, Barack Hussein Obama has done it again! 1 hr Your Insane Leader 1
Michelle Obama Hates Racist Whities 2 hr Michelle Hussein ... 3
Report: ISIS beheads 4 Christian children 2 hr The Watch 26
Richards high school 3 hr GoodGrief 11
Why don't girls and women have ear hair? 6 hr The Real Nancy Pe... 4
West Plains Dating
Find my Match

West Plains People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

West Plains News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in West Plains

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 9:47 pm PST

NBC Sports 9:47PM
Raiders place Sio Moore on injured reserve
NBC Sports 8:10 AM
Chandler Catanzaro kicks way to NFC special teams honors
NBC Sports 8:20 AM
De'Anthony Thomas garners AFC special teams player of the week honors
Bleacher Report 9:43 AM
Offseason Should Start with Trading for Cutler
NBC Sports 2:15 PM
Should fantasy owners bench Eli Manning in Week 16?