Who do you support for U.S. Senate in Missouri in 2010?

[Norton]

Ernest T Bass wrote:

<quoted text>No response to John 3:16 Dawg? It answers the question about Atheists and others. Come on Dawg,you can't avoid the obvious passage that does describe the fate of Atheists......

He's probably in hiding!:)

CHEERS!

[Yellow Dawg Democrat]

Illegal Muslim Prez wrote:

OBAMACARE AMENDMENT FORBIDS GUN AND AMMO REGISTRATION
Good news -- it has become known that hidden deep within the massive 2800-page bill called Obamacare there is a Senate Amendment protecting the right to keep and bear arms.
It seems that in their haste to cram socialized medicine down the throats of the American people, then-Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) and Barack Obama overlooked Senate amendment 3276, Sec. 2716, part c.
According to reports, that amendment says the government cannot collect "any information relating to the lawful ownership or possession of a firearm or ammunition."
CNN is calling it "a gift to the nation's powerful gun lobby."
And according to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV), that's exactly right. He says he added the provision in order to keep the NRA from getting involved in the legislative fight over Obamacare, which was so ubiquitous in 2010.
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/...

Don't go getting all exited on us, "IllegalMuslim." A mere "stroke of the pen" can sign a new law removing those rights. Congress giveth, and congress can taketh away.

[Yellow Dawg Democrat]

GOP NeoConfederacy wrote:

<quoted text>
Golly gee, tell us another fairy tale uncle "FAKE vet”
They actually believe that if you keep telling the same lies over and over and louder and louder that somehow they will become true.

Agree. At no place in the Senate subcommittee report on Benghazi does it say "Benghazi Blood On Obama’s Hands." As usual, pure propaganda. Don't believe me? Click the link I included in a prior comment.

[Yellow Dawg Democrat]

Everyday Joe wrote:

http://cpmo.us/
Seven Principles Of The Constitution Party:
&#9632;Life: For all human beings, from conception to natural death;
&#9632;Liberty: Freedom of conscience and actions for the self-governed individual;
&#9632;Family: One husband and one wife with their children as divinely instituted;
&#9632;Property: Each individual's right to own and steward personal property without government burden;
&#9632;Constitution And Bill Of Rights: interpreted according to the actual intent of the founding fathers;
&#9632;State's Rights: Everything not specifically delegated by the Constitution to the federal government, nor prohibited by the Constitution to the states, is reserved to the states or to the people.
&#9632;American Sovereignty: American government committed to the protection of the borders, trade, and common defense of Americans, and not entangled in foreign alliances.

"Joe," I think you are full of &#9632;

[Yellow Dawg Democrat]

Largelanguage wrote:

<quoted text>
Then they should be more specific in that case then. The greek lexicon is online in the blue letter bible, look it up anyday.

If you cannot read the Bible in its original Aramaic and Greek, you don't know what you are talking about.

[Yellow Dawg Democrat]

That Guy Over There wrote:

I love how this forum is still alive long past its usefulness, nothing about 2010 senate election is being discussed on it anymore even.

Feel free not to read it.

[Largelanguage]

Yellow Dawg Democrat wrote:

<quoted text>
Don't go getting all exited on us, "IllegalMuslim." A mere "stroke of the pen" can sign a new law removing those rights. Congress giveth, and congress can taketh away.

Not of the constitution. The constitution is made by the people, not by the congress.

[Largelanguage]

Yellow Dawg Democrat wrote:

<quoted text>
Agree. At no place in the Senate subcommittee report on Benghazi does it say "Benghazi Blood On Obama’s Hands." As usual, pure propaganda. Don't believe me? Click the link I included in a prior comment.

Yes, but it was probably biased.

[Largelanguage]

Yellow Dawg Democrat wrote:

<quoted text>
If you cannot read the Bible in its original Aramaic and Greek, you don't know what you are talking about.

I look it up when ever I read the bible.

[Yellow Dawg Democrat]

The_Dems_are_STILL_LYING wrote:

<quoted text>
Just as I suspected. You are a lazy bum and want others to do your homework! LOL Come on, baby, slam me some more! Make my nipples hard with that democrat mean way, sweetie!:)

ROFL! You alleged, "Maybe you should read how the bible defines blasphemy! That dictionary isn't even close to the bible's definition!:)"

I challenged you to cite chapter and verse of "the bible's definition" of blasphemy. You cannot. Your nipples will never get as hard as your head.

[Yellow Dawg Democrat]

Norton wrote:

<quoted text>
Huh? Are you talking about yourself? You finally figured yourself out? Are you standing in front of the mirror? AAhh, thot' so!...

"Norton." The "Remote Viewer."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remote_viewing

[Yellow Dawg Democrat]

Largelanguage wrote:

<quoted text>
I asked him before whether he has figured himself out! He hasn't yet whatsoever, he will rot in his own juvenile confusion!

Hey, Mr. "Wrexham, UK" Man! You never answered me about my seeing a folly in Wales.

[Ernest T Bass]

Yellow Dawg Democrat wrote:

<quoted text>
If you cannot read the Bible in its original Aramaic and Greek, you don't know what you are talking about.

What would it matter what form the Bible was written in since you do not believe in it,or God. Be careful Dawg, your subconscious feelings about God and religion are showing through.

[Yellow Dawg Democrat]

Largelanguage wrote:

<quoted text>
But Biden and Obama haven't bothered addressing it, you are such a stagnated loney man.

1. What's to address? It is an official Senate subcommittee report.

2. You are such a stagnated looney man.

[Yellow Dawg Democrat]

Ernest T Bass wrote:

<quoted text>No response to John 3:16 Dawg? It answers the question about Atheists and others. Come on Dawg,you can't avoid the obvious passage that does describe the fate of Atheists......

John 3:16? Ah yes! The Bible verse which clearly states that God had sons other than Jesus. That, of course, agrees with Genesis 6:4. The conclusion is obvious.

[The_Dems_are_STI LL_LYING]

Yellow Dawg Democrat wrote:

<quoted text>
ROFL! You alleged, "Maybe you should read how the bible defines blasphemy! That dictionary isn't even close to the bible's definition!:)"
I challenged you to cite chapter and verse of "the bible's definition" of blasphemy. You cannot. Your nipples will never get as hard as your head.

How do you know I have a "hard" head, baby! Are you assuming I am male? LMAO Maybe you are hoping I am hard! LMAO I challenge you to read it and do your OWN homework, you lazy bum! LOL In the mean time, get my juices flowing, you manly democrat. Put me down, talk dirty to me, call me names.....do the typical democrat dance, sweetheart!:)

[Poos ur daddy]

The_Dems_are_STILL_LYING wrote:

<quoted text>
How do you know I have a "hard" head, baby! Are you assuming I am male? LMAO Maybe you are hoping I am hard! LMAO I challenge you to read it and do your OWN homework, you lazy bum! LOL In the mean time, get my juices flowing, you manly democrat. Put me down, talk dirty to me, call me names.....do the typical democrat dance, sweetheart!:)

I won't bother stimulating you myself, but I might let you spend time with my goat....

[Ernest T Bass]

Yellow Dawg Democrat wrote:

<quoted text>
John 3:16? Ah yes! The Bible verse which clearly states that God had sons other than Jesus. That, of course, agrees with Genesis 6:4. The conclusion is obvious.

Weak comeback Dawg. Jesus is the son of God. The 6:4 Genesis reference can be explained.The expression “sons of God” is taken from bene-ha’elohim, while “daughters of men” is derived
from benoth ha’adham.1 While few would argue with the common rendering of the latter phrase, some
would say that the former should read “sons of the gods” or “lesser gods. Although a reference to a plurality
of gods or god-like characters may be inferred, the word ‘elohim in the Old Testament most often
refers to the One God of the Israelites, and hence the former usage cannot be used to affirm the pagan
definition as the only option.

[Yellow Dawg Democrat]

Everyday Joe wrote:

http://cptennessee.files.wordp ress.com/2013/0...
Darrell Castle (Conscience of the Constitution Party) talks about John Owen Brennan’s appointment by President Obama to become Director of the C.I.A.

\

Wow! I'm IMPRESSED! The Constitution Party even has some guy appointed to be their official "Conscience." How brilliant!

[Poos ur daddy]

Ernest T Bass wrote:

<quoted text>What would it matter what form the Bible was written in since you do not believe in it,or God. Be careful Dawg, your subconscious feelings about God and religion are showing through.

I certainly see why you chose your namesake...