JoJoe

Marion, AR

#83 Oct 19, 2012
Stratusfear wrote:
Well I'm still waiting...to be proven wrong? All you've proven is that (correctly I might add) that Mr. Braga proposed the Alford plea first, Nice try still awaiting proof that the defense went to the state first? You were told this but just because lies are told (and fools believe them) don't make them true. Show the proof...not hearsay or some article from the WM3 hating CA..not a newsclip from channel 7 or kait 8. Because they like you non-supporters only regurgitate the lies they are told by scumbags that lie. Where is your real proof? The burden of proof is on you. After all you are the ones repeating the lie not me. I know the truth and when you go to get the proof you will find the truth as well.(I bet you don't even look). Much easier to simply stick to and repeat the lie that "the WM3 defense approached the state to avoid the Dec, hearing." It's the other way around in reality. You will all soon see that once again the only thing non supporters have is speculation and lies. Nice bunch huh? sheesh ::eyeroll::
So the live television interview between Russ Mitchell of CBS and Stephen Braga where Braga says "We initiated the plea on behalf of Damien" is not proof that the defense approached prosecution?

You're either in denial or quite stupid. Which is it?
jus sayin

Marion, AR

#84 Oct 20, 2012
Stratusfear wrote:
>>All the police did was make sure he had the correct times because his story wasn't clear...<<

In a real or true confession, this isn't necessary.

As for the trash comments? Everyone knows that the one who judges others and labels this one trash or that one not trash...are the real or true trash.

the world is still waiting to see the "evidence" of the WM3's guilt?

The 500 and the JM confessions are NOT evidence of guilt.

Why did the state approach the WM3 defense with a plea deal if they are so guilty?

Why did the state (& the idiot non supporters in tow) agree to let so-called child killers go free if they are so guilty?

Why was avoiding the ASSC call for a new hearing so important to these true devil worshipers?

I mean if they are SO guilty then a new hearing and/or trial should have been (and be) welcomed to prove guilt once and for all?

Where are the celebrities that support WM3 guilt? Where is that movement? I mean since they are so guilty and all?

The truth is coming out and these self righteous pieces of trash will slink back into the woodwork when it does.

Don't let them upset you. Their time is short. The true trash in this case will disappear faster than the Hoax Board did after the Alford pleas.

When the dust settles and the truth is out and it will be...(because this isn't over). Who is the real trash and devil worshipers in this case will be out and these slime-balls hiding behind Internet anonymity will disappear. Watch and see.

Truly evil people that condone the persecution of innocents rather than give up their hollow victory against the devil, and protect the scumbag authorities they worship that instigated this tragedy.
I believe they offered the deal because had the new trial taken place these young men would have been found innocent and the conviction overturned. The city nor state could have afforded the lawsuits that would follow.
jus sayin

Marion, AR

#85 Oct 20, 2012
Kelly wrote:
<quoted text>Ummm, Jessie most certainly did confess to the police! Infact supporters love to claim that the police somehow tricked poor dumb Jessie into the confessions, although he confessed one of the times in the presence of his dad and attorney! Not to mention, the prison guard that Jessie confessed to also! So the supporter's argument that jessie was somehow trickeddoes not hold water! Listen to the actual confessions on utube and judge for yourself! It is very obvious that Jessie is telling the truth in these confessions, these guys are child murderers and anyone who can't see the obvious is blinded by Hollywood propaganda!@ heather.....and who is the moron? Quit believing everything that hbo and Johnny depp tell u to believe.... Use your own brain for a change and you will see that these monsters were not wrongly convicted!
Jesse was also illegally interrogated. He was a minor and had neither parent or lawyer present during this time. And being someone with a lower than average IQ he should have never been questioned in that manner. Or are we supposed to believe that law enforcement officers were too stupid to identify vthe fact that Jesse didn't have a normal range of intelligence for someone of his age?
Kelly

Haslet, TX

#86 Oct 21, 2012
jus sayin wrote:
<quoted text>Jesse was also illegally interrogated. He was a minor and had neither parent or lawyer present during this time. And being someone with a lower than average IQ he should have never been questioned in that manner. Or are we supposed to believe that law enforcement officers were too stupid to identify vthe fact that Jesse didn't have a normal range of intelligence for someone of his age?
you must not have read my last post very carefully I said that one of the confessions were in front of his dad and attorney. Although his attorney advised him not to talk, he said that he just wanted "to get it off his chest" and he confessed anyway. U may argue that the first two confessions were illegal, but the third was not. U may argue that the confessions shouldn't have been used against them in court and that their innocent due to a "technicality". But you will have a hard time convincing me that Jessie was not being 100% honest when he told the very detailed story of how those three kids were tortured, killed and left in a muddy ditch! The thing I dnt get is how anybody could listen to those confessions and believe that Jessie was making it all up!
jus sayin

Marion, AR

#87 Oct 21, 2012
Kelly wrote:
<quoted text>you must not have read my last post very carefully I said that one of the confessions were in front of his dad and attorney. Although his attorney advised him not to talk, he said that he just wanted "to get it off his chest" and he confessed anyway. U may argue that the first two confessions were illegal, but the third was not. U may argue that the confessions shouldn't have been used against them in court and that their innocent due to a "technicality". But you will have a hard time convincing me that Jessie was not being 100% honest when he told the very detailed story of how those three kids were tortured, killed and left in a muddy ditch! The thing I dnt get is how anybody could listen to those confessions and believe that Jessie was making it all up!
You must have no experience with the mind of a child....which is basically what Jesse had at the time.
Kelly

Haslet, TX

#88 Oct 21, 2012
jus sayin wrote:
<quoted text>You must have no experience with the mind of a child....which is basically what Jesse had at the time.
that's my point.. If he has the mind of a child, it should be easy to determine if he is lying or telling the truth. If you will listen to all of the confessions on utube,most will agree that he appears to be telling the truth. Someone with the mind of a child can't lie or act as well as Jessie did in those taped confessions!
Ibegone

United States

#89 Oct 21, 2012
His confession is troubling. He's not tetarded. He's stupid. There is a difference. His attorneys played the low iq card because that's all they had. He's was a stupid kid.
jus sayin

Marion, AR

#90 Oct 21, 2012
Ibegone wrote:
His confession is troubling. He's not tetarded. He's stupid. There is a difference. His attorneys played the low iq card because that's all they had. He's was a stupid kid.
At the time his IQ classified him as borderline retarded.
umm

West Memphis, AR

#91 Oct 21, 2012
jus sayin wrote:
<quoted text>
At the time his IQ classified him as borderline retarded.
Didn't he hold jobs? Didn't he know the rules and understand wrestling? Wasn't he in regular classes at school and not remedial? Didn't he have a drivers license? Sounds like he was functioning in life just as well as you and I.

Maybe I just don't follow why you supporters want to make him out as some type of blabbering, brain-dead idiot.
Support

United States

#92 Oct 22, 2012
I support him . Keep fighting
Ibegone

United States

#93 Oct 22, 2012
jus sayin wrote:
<quoted text>
At the time his IQ classified him as borderline retarded.
Pull me over for speeding and "I didn't know the speed limit officer". Arrest me for shoplifting and "I thought I already paid for that officer". Arrest me for killing 3 little boys and I confess, "My client is retarded you honor. Look at how stupid he is, he confessed because he's retarded". Give me life in prison and I'll scream my innocence till the day I die. And why not? What else is left to do? Just because Johnny drop, Eddie Vedder, and Melanie Manes, make it "cool" to support the so called "outcast" doesn't mean they're not guilty. Jessie's attorneys made him out as a retard because that's all they had. His biggest strength to play on was the fact he was a trailer park dumb ass. Beef it up to trailer park retard and roll with it. Like I said, he's not border line retarded. He's just stupid.
jus sayin

Marion, AR

#94 Oct 22, 2012
umm wrote:
<quoted text>Didn't he hold jobs? Didn't he know the rules and understand wrestling? Wasn't he in regular classes at school and not remedial? Didn't he have a drivers license? Sounds like he was functioning in life just as well as you and I.

Maybe I just don't follow why you supporters want to make him out as some type of blabbering, brain-dead idiot.
Don't people and children with ADD and ADHD have the capability to focus on something they're interested in? Yes. Just because someone has a low IQ doesn't mean they don't understand anything. They have understanding, just not of all things and not at the level of someone with a higher IQ.
well now

Jonesboro, AR

#96 Oct 22, 2012
I work with MR adults. You really think some of them don't have the capacity to plan ahead, lie, and/or inflict physical harm? Even kill? You are a fool if you think that.
jus sayin

Marion, AR

#97 Oct 23, 2012
well now wrote:
I work with MR adults. You really think some of them don't have the capacity to plan ahead, lie, and/or inflict physical harm? Even kill? You are a fool if you think that.
Ok. Then answer the million dollar question. Why let guilty, convicted murders out of prison when one was sentenced to death and the other two sentenced to spend the rest of their lives without parole in prison?
wrong facts again

United States

#99 Oct 23, 2012
jessie is not boarderline retarded, and he was not illegaly interrogated. his parents could not be reached. he was picked up and charged as an adult, and he did not want a lawyer. he gave the ok to talk to police. he was also there only a couple of hours. and they were mostly talking to other wittneses.
jus sayin

Marion, AR

#100 Oct 24, 2012
wrong facts again wrote:
jessie is not boarderline retarded, and he was not illegaly interrogated. his parents could not be reached. he was picked up and charged as an adult, and he did not want a lawyer. he gave the ok to talk to police. he was also there only a couple of hours. and they were mostly talking to other wittneses.
There’s a broad range between “average intelligence” and “mentally retarded”. Jessie’s cognitive level falls somewhere in the middle of that broad range. That better for you?

Since: Feb 12

TX

#101 Oct 24, 2012
Jessie just confessed again!

Well, maybe not, but if u buy him a beer...
wants to know

Wynne, AR

#102 Oct 29, 2012
JoJoe wrote:
<quoted text>
Consider this: The killers are pulling shoe strings out to tie up the children and the string used to tie up Michael Moore came from Stevie Branch's shoe. Easy explanation of the hair transfer but I'm sure you'll refuse that explanation.
Name one lie that you know Hobbs told. Just one...come on, you can do it.
one lie is he didnt see the boys that day but later it came out that he was one of the last few people to se rhem alive a neighbor seen the kids playing in his yard and him talking to them so why lie about seeeing them if you wasnt the one guilty]
read it dumdum

United States

#103 Oct 29, 2012
he spanked his son that day, and told police he didnt see because he may become a suspect.

Since: Feb 12

TX

#104 Oct 29, 2012
The witnesses that place Hobbs w/ the boys came fwd 16 years later.

I find that suspect and would say they lack credibility.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

West Memphis Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Swinging is a sin 4 hr lmao 18
Poll Did you vote today? (Jun '10) 4 hr Guest 32,771
why is the FBI always picking on the wmpd?? (Mar '13) 9 hr Wmr 20
Daycare 11 hr Observer 3
Hearts of stone Thu Cocerned 1
Naming a Street after D'Aunte Farrow (Aug '07) Thu my name is not toby 17
Evan Wynn Running for Mayor Dec 7 Choco Stain Blane... 31

West Memphis Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

West Memphis Mortgages