Clark seeks third term as sheriff

Clark seeks third term as sheriff

There are 39 comments on the The Brattleboro Reformer story from Jun 12, 2014, titled Clark seeks third term as sheriff. In it, The Brattleboro Reformer reports that:

On his office's website, Windham County Sheriff Keith Clark says he believes "the sheriff's department can only be successful with the support of its surrounding communities."

Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Brattleboro Reformer.

First Prev
of 2
Next Last
vern

Brattleboro, VT

#21 Jul 2, 2014
What we are seeing now is acts of desperation. When someone's keyboard is being commandeered by someone on the outside, even in spite of the fact that no threats are made and the content is not inappropriate, you know the time is drawing near that they fear that the lawlessness will come to an end. Because lawlessness only serves those who are breaking the law. And those who like the lawlessness will target those who draw attention to it.

To those who interfere with my keyboard, you define the word violator.

You are a traitor to everything that is good and wholesome, and if you continue, I curse you a thousand fold. In so much as you have interfered with my freedom to speak, so too, your mouth will be shut at a time that is most uncomfortable and undesirable to you. And you will remember that the law of karma is in effect, as ever.
vern

Brattleboro, VT

#22 Jul 2, 2014
Having said that, we have an agreement. If you disagree, then tell me why you think it is proper for you to interfere with my free speech.
vern

Brattleboro, VT

#23 Jul 2, 2014
It's settled then. Since you continue to mess with my keyboard, you are hereby cursed a thousand fold. And you are still a violator in the worst of ways.
vern

Brattleboro, VT

#24 Jul 2, 2014
The fact that my keyboard is giving me nothing but trouble because of someone on the outside is a good thing. It demonstrates just how desperate some are that they will inadvertently reveal truth through their foolish actions.
vern

Brattleboro, VT

#25 Jul 2, 2014
So, for the record, the police are not our owners. The more they try to be, the more their ignorance will come to light. They need to stop the scam, and stop it now. Enough already! If you are a police officer you ought to know the difference between a law and a statute. And you ought to know that not a single "person" is obligated to be responsible for statutory violations.

If I ask a police officer whether or not he or she is a person and they say yes, that's fine. But if I ask which person, and you play dumb, you forfeit your authority on the spot. Because you are either dishonest, or, you don't know the difference between laws and statutes.

The statute defines a person as either a human being, or, a corporation. A corporation is defined as an artificial person, a fiction, an idea. But in spite of the fact that a person can be a human being under the statute, the statute does not define a human being.

The statute does not afford someone the opportunity to present as a human being because a human being is not defined under the statute. Only the corporation is defined and as such the human being is reduced to a fictional entity who inadvertently waives human rights in exchange for the benefits of the corporation.

An example of a benefit afforded to a person under the statute is getting thrown into a cage for refusing to wear a seatbelt. The fact is, is that human beings have the right to deny being provided the service of safety by someone else.
Joe Shlabotnik

White River Junction, VT

#26 Jul 25, 2014
Mulligan lives on ....he has been reincarnated as "Vern".
StopTheCrime dot Net

Newton Center, MA

#27 Jul 27, 2014
she seems a bit paranoid (they're messing with her keyboard, uh-huh) but nonetheless is way more truthful and articulate than mikey could ever be
//
Man seeks video of 1995 Oklahoma City* bombing
AP news
http://news.yahoo.com/man-seeks-video-1995-ok...
//
*-also an inside job like 9/11
'A NOBLE LIE'- THE BOMBING OF OKLAHOMA CITY
excellent 2 hr documentary

/
Vern will appreciate this...
Its an Illusion - A lecture in law by John Harris
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
/
The secrets of legalese
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
vern

Brattleboro, VT

#28 Jul 28, 2014
Joe Shlabotnik wrote:
Mulligan lives on ....he has been reincarnated as "Vern".
Definitely not mulligan. What do you think about what's been said? Is there something you disagree with?
vern

Brattleboro, VT

#29 Jul 28, 2014
StopTheCrime dot Net wrote:
she seems a bit paranoid (they're messing with her keyboard, uh-huh) but nonetheless is way more truthful and articulate than mikey could ever be
//
Man seeks video of 1995 Oklahoma City* bombing
AP news
http://news.yahoo.com/man-seeks-video-1995-ok...
//
*-also an inside job like 9/11
'A NOBLE LIE'- THE BOMBING OF OKLAHOMA CITY
excellent 2 hr documentary
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =DV4uuzgl5igXX
/
Vern will appreciate this...
Its an Illusion - A lecture in law by John Harris
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
/
The secrets of legalese
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
I could be wrong about my keyboard being messed with, for sure. Truth be told though, I've never had a problem with my keyboard. Only on topix do I have to struggle, and I know the things that I write are troubling to some. Also, I know that someone's keyboard can be hijacked from the outside. So, as far as being paranoid, I don't think so. My conclusion is not unreasonable, is it? If it's not unreasonable, then it's not paranoia. It just means that I'm wrong. Can you imagine if you were simply wrong about something and you were labeled paranoid? But I did rant about it, didn't I?

Thanks for the links, very helpful.
Joe Shlabotnik

White River Junction, VT

#30 Jul 29, 2014
vern wrote:
<quoted text>Definitely not mulligan. What do you think about what's been said? Is there something you disagree with?
Your legal theory is quite novel.
vern

Brattleboro, VT

#31 Jul 29, 2014
Joe Shlabotnik wrote:
<quoted text>
Your legal theory is quite novel.
Novel means that it's new, so to speak. It's not novel to me. Is it novel to you? Are you a person?
vern

Brattleboro, VT

#32 Jul 29, 2014
Joe Shlabotnik wrote:
<quoted text>
Your legal theory is quite novel.
If you are a person, please define person and site your source.
vern

Brattleboro, VT

#33 Jul 29, 2014
Joe Shlabotnik wrote:
<quoted text>
Your legal theory is quite novel.
Just to be clear, it's not my theory, but I do happen to agree with it. I have no choice at all but to agree with it because I've been looking at the evidence for years now. The evidence that I have, anyone can get for themselves. This "theory" is so simple, that even a five year old can grasp it. But that's probably because the five year old does not have to discard decades of conditioning. So, the fact that you don't understand it is not entirely your fault. First exposure to this sort of info will cause you to recoil and dismiss it out of hand.
vern

Brattleboro, VT

#34 Jul 29, 2014
I too dismissed it initially. It was months before I just happened to come across it again. Oh, here goes my keyboard again.
vern

Brattleboro, VT

#35 Jul 29, 2014
If anyone at all cares to define the word person and post up your source, that would be great.
Sovereign

Newton Center, MA

#36 Jul 29, 2014
vern wrote:
If anyone at all cares to define the word person and post up your source, that would be great.
understanding the definition of a word like person is first about understanding the who's using it in what application and where etc., as in simple conversation or a court or legalese/papers.
The sheeple don't get that they make themselves a legal fiction and a corporate personhood by paying taxes to the G-d IRS with their all-capped corporate 'name'( nom de guerre)
in correspondence with that non-federal collection agency the IRS for the non-federal Federal Reserve which is effectively owned and controlled by the Banksters
That's who we owe the 'Dept' to, and it's WELL over 17 trillion and unpayable and therefore we are considered their slave property on their planet
Libraries sometimes have copies of Black's Law Dictionary or Ballantine's, anyone who seriously wants to know legalspeak and be able to use it right has an Old copy of Black's
Sovereign

Newton Center, MA

#37 Jul 29, 2014
vern wrote:
<quoted text>Truth be told though, I've never had a problem with my keyboard. Only on topix do I have to struggle,.
a newbie here wouldn't know to save whatever you type B4 posting cuz it'll either not go thru if you take too long and revert to the main Bratt page, or just for whatever it'll screwup, or if you post certain links that Topix has on their sh'tlist for whatever reason the post will Seem to go thru but check the same thread link via a proxy and you might find that it was auto-deleted, so always save your post in a file especially if long and/or with links
The G-d Masons must have biatched enough to get FreeMasonryWatch dot org banned from being hotlinked here cuz I noticed its one of many that'll get a thread auto-deleted
(or this Turdpix thing is Run by a Mason(s)!)
vern

Brattleboro, VT

#38 Jul 29, 2014
Sovereign wrote:
<quoted text>
a newbie here wouldn't know to save whatever you type B4 posting cuz it'll either not go thru if you take too long and revert to the main Bratt page, or just for whatever it'll screwup, or if you post certain links that Topix has on their sh'tlist for whatever reason the post will Seem to go thru but check the same thread link via a proxy and you might find that it was auto-deleted, so always save your post in a file especially if long and/or with links
The G-d Masons must have biatched enough to get FreeMasonryWatch dot org banned from being hotlinked here cuz I noticed its one of many that'll get a thread auto-deleted
(or this Turdpix thing is Run by a Mason(s)!)
Thanks. Nice to know there are people out there who understand and read topix.
vern

Brattleboro, VT

#39 Jul 29, 2014
Sovereign wrote:
<quoted text>
understanding the definition of a word like person is first about understanding the who's using it in what application and where etc., as in simple conversation or a court or legalese/papers.
The sheeple don't get that they make themselves a legal fiction and a corporate personhood by paying taxes to the G-d IRS with their all-capped corporate 'name'( nom de guerre)
in correspondence with that non-federal collection agency the IRS for the non-federal Federal Reserve which is effectively owned and controlled by the Banksters
That's who we owe the 'Dept' to, and it's WELL over 17 trillion and unpayable and therefore we are considered their slave property on their planet
Libraries sometimes have copies of Black's Law Dictionary or Ballantine's, anyone who seriously wants to know legalspeak and be able to use it right has an Old copy of Black's
I think the all caps name is also referred to as capitas diminutia maxima. Not sure about the spelling though. That's from Black's Law. It defines a mans maximum loss of status.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

West Dummerston Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Stand With Rand - Pillory Hillary (Jun '15) Thu Bill Hicks 14
Get on the bandwagon while there is still time! Jan 29 Reginald 1
News Police Log (Jan '09) Jan 26 Dorest Manchester... 90
News Man accuses judge of extortion, theft (Apr '09) Jan 19 Anonymous two 31
Top 10 Lies In Obama's SOTU/ Clinton's Crimes/ ... Jan 13 Hillary For Priso... 1
Obama's Top Ten Lies Last Night/ Clinton's Crim... Jan 13 Hillary For Priso... 1
Strontium-90 detected in fish near VT Yankee (Aug '11) Jan 7 Alex- Infowars Do... 141
More from around the web

Personal Finance

West Dummerston Mortgages