Did you say...You must learn out to count<quoted text>
You must learn out to count, sir. If you already received 50% of your money, you last posted that the alleged receiver would be providing another 52%. Therefore you WOULD BE GETTING MORE!! than a 100% back. Besides, WHY DIDN'T YOU TELL these BLOG READERS the REAL!! REASONS - why you/or/the Receiver is trying to GET CCG- to yet! CASH those CHECKS!! that CCG Constituents were not TRICKED to have Cashed.
As FACTS ARE, the Receiver-Beattie B. Ashmore-knows! his PARTNER in CRIME, "CHIEF" Federal Judge Margaret B. Seymour is FINALLY! NO! LONGER! "CHIEF" Federal Judge. That's now "Chief" Judge Terry L. Wooten - since! the DATE 1-16-2013.
WHEREAS, the Receiver-Ashmore is aware that NOW! just! Federal Judge Margaret B. Seymour DON'T HAVE THE POWER she thought! she had. Nor does the alleged Receiver- NEVER! had ANY Legal! MONIES of CCG's. Therefore he can not give you back something that the Receiver! nor! Federal Judge M.B. Seymour NEVER!!! HAD.
Therefore, it appears that NO! further! CCG Constituents wants your, nor federal judge M.B. SEYMOUR's STOLEN! Monies...; When they can actually - get ALL their MONIES BACK! plus! the Bank Interests for ALL these years, and for Damages for the said INTENTIONAL THEFT not! by the CCG/3-Hebrew Boys' agents. Since! the MONIES as YOU! ALWAYS knew! was ALWAYS within the possession! of the BANKS, involving!! the said RECEIVER-B.B. Ashmore and Federal Judge M.B. SEYMOUR.(As to WHY! Judge M.B. Seymour was VACATED/DELETED/or TERMINATED!! as being the said "CHIEF" Presiding Judge - for LIFE- JUST as the pass Honorable Judge Perry.
As you are aware that, some of CCG's Constituents - indeed!! RECEIVED - 100% of their MONIES BACK TO THEM. When they PARTICIPATED with the Legal Researcher's findings - when they contacted the ACTUAL BANKS. Which the Legal Researcher actually provided COPIES of the actual 100% RETURN CHECKS and Letters from BANK OF AMERICA who returned hundreds'of CCG's Constituents 100% MONIES. But, now! they are taking the Banks to Court, for their REQUIRED MONEY INTEREST and DAMAGES entitled to CCG's Constituents.
If you, got 50% of your alleged money back. WHO! did you GET IT FROM??
OMG you are so over the top dumb. When I said 52% we are talking about 52% return. You do not add 52% plus 50%. I guess I have to break it down for your dumb a--. Let's say they owed me $10,000 and I got back $5,000. That would make my 1st return a 50% return. Let's say on my 2nd check they gave me $2,500. That would now make my total return a 75% return. You do not add the pct you dumb a--.
The people who received 100% return were the investors at the top of the ponzi scam. I know Cedrick Brunson, Joes brother was able to pay off his house. I have a question for you ebonics boy. A very simple question and you will look so dumb if you do not have the answer, because any person defending a group this much would be equipped with the knowledge of how the money was invested. I will wait for your answer. Can't wait!!
In their pitch, the men told investors they had been through the flames of crushing debt and survived, thanks to their secret investments and the power of God.
But there was no rescue Tuesday as they stood before U.S. District Judge Margaret Seymour and took a scathing rebuke for using money given to them to buy luxury items such as a nearly $1 million motor home and a private jet.
"Were they called to buy a Gulfstream jet?" Seymour asked. "Were they called to buy luxury cars and condos?"
How was the money invested to recoup a return?